Spencer Wells, the genetist who helped pointing out that modern Europeans didn't arrive via Mideast but from Siberia where they emerged together with mongoloid Asians, has now written a new book where he basically repeats Klevius criticism of civilizations in Demand for Resources - on the right to be poor (1992). The original idea is from 1980, and first published in a brief article 1981 after some discussions with the Finnish philosopher Georg Henrik von Wright (Ludwig Wittgenstein's possibly best friend).
The map is from Well's The Journey of Man, and further developed by Klevius. It definitely proves that what we may arguably consider as humans did not develop in Africa. What came out of Africa was a small Chimp/Homo hybrid which ought not to be confused with more human-like Homos already in existence both in Eurasia and Africa (these Homos later became mixed with the down-moving modern "Aurignacian" humans from the North).
This is Denisova in Siberia where the mtDNA of a finger of a 40,000 year non-human reveals hybridization with Neanderthals and relationship with Melanesians (Floresiensis, the apeman who, with a tiny brain, was equally intelligent as Homo erectus with more than double the brain, was from the same place). Note that this finger both in time and place fits eerily well in Klevius' theory.
This extremely complicated to manufacture stone bracelet was made in Siberia 40,000 years ago by utilizing a drilling technology, comparable to modern machines, according to the researchers who found it. It was found nearby by the non-human Denisovan.
Peter Klevius was the first (1992-94) to solve consciousness, and the first (1992) to point out the mongoloid (cold adaptation) link between the Jinniushan fossil in China and Khoisan people in Africa.
Pages
▼
Tuesday, May 25, 2010
Monday, April 05, 2010
After 19 yrs Klevius Thalamus hypothesis on consciousness (EMAH) still rules alone!
If you know anything abt your Thalamus (the most important part of YOU) & if you possess enough IQ power, then read EMAH (the Even More Astonishing Hypothesis). Then you'll also realize how out of touch academic neuroscience is! No, this isn't a Langham story (the guy with an IQ of 195) but something far more advanced - & simple!
To understand human evolution as theorized in Out of Africa as pygmies & back as global mongoloids, you really need EMAH because it not only defines language but also the very interface of being human!
In 1992, in Demand for Recources, Klevius established the foundation for a completely new understanding of observation, namely that both are the same, i.e. that there is no difference between understanding a phenomenon, sensation etc. or "observing" it! Just the opposite to e.g. Habermas' view, Klevius states that whatever we might think we "observe", it's already understood. Yes, it's easy to confuse our retroactive historical corrections as being "understandings" as opposed to "observations" (read more on EMAH abt how your Thalamus works).
In 1994 (or 5) Klevius sent a letter with a floppy disk containing an outline of EMAH to Francis Crick at Salk (should be archived there) because of Crick's book An Astonishing Hypothesis. The only response was a polite secretatry letter. I'm not sure Crick ever read EMAH.
In 2004 EMAH was transferred to a web page in the same form you can still see here. Judge for yourself!
To understand human evolution as theorized in Out of Africa as pygmies & back as global mongoloids, you really need EMAH because it not only defines language but also the very interface of being human!
In 1992, in Demand for Recources, Klevius established the foundation for a completely new understanding of observation, namely that both are the same, i.e. that there is no difference between understanding a phenomenon, sensation etc. or "observing" it! Just the opposite to e.g. Habermas' view, Klevius states that whatever we might think we "observe", it's already understood. Yes, it's easy to confuse our retroactive historical corrections as being "understandings" as opposed to "observations" (read more on EMAH abt how your Thalamus works).
In 1994 (or 5) Klevius sent a letter with a floppy disk containing an outline of EMAH to Francis Crick at Salk (should be archived there) because of Crick's book An Astonishing Hypothesis. The only response was a polite secretatry letter. I'm not sure Crick ever read EMAH.
In 2004 EMAH was transferred to a web page in the same form you can still see here. Judge for yourself!
Thursday, February 04, 2010
Terri Schindler Schiavo wasn't in a "vegetative state" - she was starved, left without water & slowly killed!
See the torture of Terri Schindler Schiavo as described by Klevius in 2004 & 2005!