Humanrightsphobia

We need a European Spring against fascist islam - so not to repeat what happened some 70 years ago!

Nothing can be more fascist than islam! A totalitarian racist/sexist ideology that cannot accept basic Human Rights and which makes it extremely hard for muslims to leave the "faith" because of its apostasy ban and fascist organization (e.g. Saudi and Sharia based OIC which now more or less rules the UN that was created to stop it).

And our worst enemies are some of our own politicians and their connections with the worst scumbugs you can imagine.

Ha Ha "islamophobia"

Patrick Condell is an English writer, political commentator, comedian and atheist. internet personality. He performed alternative comedy shows during the 1980s and 1990s in the United Kingdom, and won a Time Out Comedy Award in 1991. He was also a regular panelist on BBC Radio 1′s “Loose Talk”. As of March 2013, Pat Condell’s YouTube channel has over 177,902 subscribers and 44 million video views.

Sayeeda Warsi is probably now the worst threat to the Brits' Human Rights

Douglas Murray: According to the Home Office if you are a non-Muslim and you make the following statement your presence will be deemed ‘not conducive to the public good’ and you will be barred from entering the United Kingdom:

    ‘It [Islam] is a religion and a belief system that mandates warfare against unbelievers for the purpose for establishing a societal model that is absolutely incompatible with Western society. Because of media and general government unwillingness to face the sources of Islamic terrorism these things remain largely unknown.’

If, on the other hand, you are a Muslim and you say the following then the UK government has no problem with you, and you can come in to the UK to do a speaking tour:

    ‘Devotion to Jihad for the sake of Allah, and the desire to shed blood, to smash skulls and to sever limbs for the sake of Allah and in defense of His religion, is, undoubtedly, an honor for the believer.’

In welcoming the decision to ban the first speaker, rather than the second, Keith Vaz, chairman of the Home Affairs Select Committee, has said:

    ‘The UK should never become a stage for inflammatory speakers who promote hate.’

Too late, Keith.  Too late.



Some comments on this:


Avatar
chan chan • 2 days ago

Cameron and his dhimmi government once again enforcing shari'ah law.
60
•
Reply
•
Share ›

Avatar
Julieann Carter • 2 days ago

Gosh! This is terrible! Why? Why? Why? There's no good reason! How utterly disturbing and sinister is this malicious and cowardly 'affirmative action'. Stand alone Muslims in government appear to be more powerful and influential than the rest of parliament combined. That what it seems like. Bloody creepy. You really have to question the motivation of Keith Vaz in wishing to bar those who would speak out
truthfully against violent Islam (as opposed to 'peaceful Islam')? I thought we were all supposed to be on the same side here?
57
•
Reply
•
Share ›

Avatar
Marky_D • 2 days ago

Wasn't that long ago I was hoping Theresa May would oust Cameron. Are there absolutely no free speech loving conservatives in the Conservative party any more?
Presumably Theresa May would ban those who came back from Nurembourg with scaremongering stories about that nice Mr Hitler and his National Socialist party...
55
•
Reply
•
Share ›

Avatar
retundario • 2 days ago

This is the most outrageous decision, and I will not vote for LibLabCon as a matter of principal because of it. Not only is it grossly unfair, it is also just stupidly dangerous, in the sense that many people are so disgusted and fed up with the UK political class's blatantly far (far, far, far) stronger repression of British people's right to express things from our ethnic point-of-view, as compared to the ultra-liberalism that applies to ethnic hatred against us and claims to Britishness from non-whites.
80 1
•
Reply
•
Share ›

Avatar
Old Fox • a day ago

The double standard to which you refer has been in place for many years. It arises from the "anti-racist" establishment's commitment to anti-white racism. Under the term's of this belief, all whites are collectively guilty for the alleged crimes of white Europe across recorded time. This of course is a form of collective guilt, one of the pillars of antisemitism. It also ignores inconvenient facts such as the Islamic slave trade, the involvement of black African chiefs in the Atlantic slave trade and the enslavement of more than a million white Europeans by the Ottoman Sultan. As a result of this belief only whites or those friendly to "white" values and society, such as Ayaan Hirsi Ali, are considered guilty of "hate-speech" or worse, because the rest of the world is merely giving vent to the just rage of the "oppressed". Why do you think the sexual exploitation of white girls by Pakistani perverts in northern England is greeted with such bland sang-froid? Why do you think our so-called "liberals" are so reluctant to highlight Islamic persecution of Christians and others across the middle east and so eager to prattle about "Islamophobia" in the west? Why do you think they have been so happy to flood Europe's heartlands with hostile newcomers - often from Islamic countries? Our ruling elite is in the grip of a morbid, self-hating attitude which heralds the persecution and perhaps the holocaust of European peoples. Unless we can overthrow these criminally treacherous scum we are heading for an unimaginable catastrophe.

The pic below illustrates at least two things: 1) How fascism hides behind gas, and 2) how islam and sex segregation (apartheid) are synonyms.

And sadly, Peter Klevius still seems to be the web's by far best informed (and intelligent enough) auctority on sex segregation. He feels quite alone though* so please come up with some competition. However, keep in mind that he has already long since eaten and burped both Judith Butler and Pierre Bourdieu. And he is a proud Atheist and therefore not vulnerable for "monotheistic" sexism.

* except, of course, that he is supported by the whole world in its inevitable march towards de-sex segregation. Compare his Demand for Resources (1981, and in book format 1992), Daughters of the Social State (1994), Angels of Antichrist (1996), Warning for Feminism (1998), and http://klevius.info/pathologicalsymbiosis.html (2004). Just to name a few.

Qatar is a main hub (together with Saudi Arabia and some other muslim states)  for the spreading of islamic hatred and Humanrightsphobia

How many have muslim fascists murdered, raped and tortured in Libya, Syria and elsewhere?

Having anything to do with them can only be excused with ignorance!

Is UN's schizophrenia incurable?

History repeats itself

While UN is taken over by islamofascists archbishop Justin Welby in his pathetic medieval speech for the Queen’s coronation 60th anniversary had the nerve to state “We live in a hierarchy of liberty under authority that ascends to God. Here is the model of liberty and authority. Liberty is only real when it exists under authority. Liberty under authority  begins with our duty to God"

Klevius: However, as an atheist I'm less interested in God than in the humans staying on the steps just below God. Dear Justin, you've got it all wrong! The very idea of basic Human Rights is to defend our all freedom against authorities. We are our own authority and the system is called democracy. Or maybe you've already abandoned Human Rights because of your "inter-faith" duties!

Read about Negative Human Rights and cure your ignorance!


Turkish OIC Fuhrer Ekmeleddin Ihsanoglu, who is proposed by Saudi Arabia to be UN's next secretary general (sic), asks the West to bomb Syria.

The fascist symbol of German National-socialism (aka "Nazism") was actually less totalitarian than OIC's islamofascist world embracing Umma nation symbol.

OIC's islamofascist Sharia declaration concealed as "islamic human rights" within UN

By 1) using the the concept 'islamic human rights' (sic) instead of Sharia, and 2) by creating a Sharia zone within the UN, OIC has managed


We now live with a schizophrenic UN thatis based on Human Rights yet harbors its very opposite!

OIC, consisting of 57 more or less muslim member states, created the Cairo Declaration of Human Rights in islam (Sharia). Article 24 states that "[a]ll the rights and freedoms stipulated in this Declaration are subject to the islamic Sharia" and Article 25 follows with "[t]he islamic Sharia is the only source of reference for the explanation or clarification of any of the articles of this Declaration." Attempts to have it adopted by the United Nations Human Rights Council have met increasing criticism, because of its contradiction of the UDHR.

Critics of the CDHR state bluntly that it is “manipulation and hypocrisy,” “designed to dilute, if not altogether eliminate, civil and political rights protected by international law” and attempts to “circumvent these principles [of freedom and equality].”

According to Human Rights Watch OIC has “fought doggedly” and successfully within the United Nations Human Rights Council to shield states from criticism, except when it comes to criticism of Israel. For example, when independent experts reported violations of human rights in the 2006 Lebanon War, “state after state from the OIC took the floor to denounce the experts for daring to discuss Hezbollah as well.” OIC demands that the council “should work cooperatively with abusive governments rather than condemn them.” HRW responds that this works only with those who are willing to cooperate; others exploit the passivity.

The OIC has also been criticised for failing to discuss the treatment of ethnic minorities within member countries.

Along with the revisions of the OIC’s charter in 2008, the member states created the Independent Permanent Human Rights Commission (IPHRC).

The IPHRC has the power to monitor "human rights" (i.e. OIC's Sharia) within the member states and facilitates the integration of "human rights" (i.e. OIC's Sharia) into all OIC mandates. The IPHRC also "aids" in the promotion of political, civil, and economic rights in all member states.

LGBT rights are rejected by OIC as "licentious behaviour ... against the fundamental teachings of various religions, including islam".

Violent islamic jihad terrorism is, according to OIC, not terrorism

 OIC's definition of terrorism in article 1 describes “any act or threat of violence carried out with the aim of, among other things, imperiling people’s honour, occupying or seizing public or private property, or threatening the stability, territorial integrity, political unity or sovereignty of a state.” This is vague, ill-defined and including much that is outside the generally accepted understandings of the concept of terrorism. It is subjective and ambiguous and opens up for abusive use of terrorist prosecutions against political opponents and others. It also labels, or could easily be used to label, as terrorist actions, acts of peaceful expression, association, and assembly. Not to mention criticism against islam or its islamofascist leaders.

OIC doesn't recognise as terrorism acts that serve causes endorsed by their member states.

Not surprisingly contradictions between OIC's and other UN members' understanding of terrorism has stymied efforts at the UN to produce a comprehensive convention on international terrorism.

OIC also rejects any description of muslims attacking Israel as terrorism.

However, OIC calls non-violent defense of Human Rights "islamophobia" and "the worst form of terrorism" 

At the 34th Islamic Conference of Foreign Ministers (ICFM), an OIC section, in May 2007, the foreign ministers termed islamophobia the worst form of terrorism.

How many murderous, racist and sexist Allahs do muslims have?!

Some 100,000 humans, mostly muslims, have now been killed in the islamic religious "monotheist" sectarian violence in Syria that is backed by the Saudi, Qatar, Turkey etc islamofascist leaders.

When muslims dislike other muslims they call them takfiri, i.e. an apostate who is not a true muslim, i.e. who believes in the wrong Allah.

And to make it impossible to decide whose Allah is the "right" one, islam has made Allah redundant in its praxis.

So the only function left to these Allahs is as a reference to why one commits what would be classified as atrocities etc. under Human Rights.

There are no "right" or "wrong" humans in Human Rights!

Because of islam's inherent incompatibility with Human Rights the Saudi based Sharia organization OIC with 57 member states introduced islamofascist Sharia via UN as an excuse for violating Human Rights.

According to Turkish PM and OIC's world Sharia, Human Rights constitute "a crime against humanity"

Elected islamofascist dictatorship

Turkey's PM is attacking his citizens. Time for the West to support islamist intervention - or Human Rights?

Amnesty International: The lack of freedom of speech in Turkey is one of the country's "most entrenched human rights problems.

Klevius: This "Human Rights problem" stems from islam and its Sharia which is against Human Rights and which Turkey is prescribing for, mainly via its PM Erdogan and OIC's Fuhrer Ihsanoglu.

The Human Rights declaration is the ultimate "islamophobia"

It's not Klevius but the original anti-fascist 1948 Human Rights Declaration that constitutes the worst "crime" against islam today!


Qur'an:8:39 — "So fight them until there is no more Fitnah (disbelief) and all submit to the religion of Allah alone [in the world]."

Muslims WorldWide: There are no churches allowed in Turkey and the number one cause of death for women is assault. Like all Muslim societies Turkey constantly pretends to be striving for democracy to appease the EU while none of this is true. Democracy, equality, freedom and so on, taken for granted in the West are completely against Islamic doctrines and violates Sharia law. Like Egypt’s president Morsi, the Turkish PM Recep Erdogan has been caught numerous times contradicting his open lies to the EU. While Mustafa Kemal Atatürk recognized the dangers of Islam he banned minarets, the Koran and the spread of Islam in his country to try and avert it from a totalitarian rule, PM Erdogan is a deep admirer of the Ottoman empire and cannot wait to be a stepping stone for it to reappear in our modern age.

The Muslim world is eagerly waiting for Turkey to open borders with Europe, which many Brussel lunatics support, so the country can serve as a bridge between the Middle East and Europe, allowing enormous mass immigration of the kind that created the Palestinian people and the endless effort to gain control over Israel. Turkey’s EU membership and open borders with this Islamic state allows the Muslim world to infiltrate and speed up the new Caliphate order that Muslims dream of. Islam intends to ‘rule the world’ no matter how absurd it sounds. And they have no intentions to let go of that dream. It is being done through mass immigration, mass baby production, exploitation of human rights laws, abuse and pressure on political policies, lawfare, crime, and economic exploitation (massive welfare exploitation, common in Muslim communities all across Europe).