Why hasn't BBC's blood thirsty islamofascist* muslim Sharia presenter
Mishal Husain told the Brits about how islam/Koran approves of slavery
and rape?
* I.e. against the most basic Human
Rights (see below about OIC - all muslims world Sharia) and ask yourself
why you weren't properly informed about what was going on in UN behind
your back!
Aftonbladet and Jan Hjärpe reveal total ignorance about islam - or bottomless hypocrisy!
Scandinavia's biggest news paper Aftonbladet together with an old and
confused (?!) professor emeritus in "islamology" (sic), Jan Hjärpe, try
to dismiss a less educated islam critic belonging to Sweden's only islam
critical party Sverigedemokraterna, by stating that there is 'nothing
in the Koran that says rape can be used as a penalty' against women.
Klevius comment:
Of course not, but that doesn't change the fact that islam/Koran
clearly approves of rape - and slavery! Do whatever you llike
with what your right hands possess (sex slaves).
Linus Bylund allegedly said that it's written in the Koran that rape can be used as a penalty against women.
Jan Hjärpe: It's a myth.
Peter Klevius to Jan Hjärpe, Aftonbladet and BBC: You're not only
pathetic but also endangering the lives of millions and prolonging the
suffering caused by the worst racist/sexist ideology ever!
No wonder so many are misled about islam!
Two young British girls got acid thrown in their face because of islam. But no one, except the muslims who caused it, say so!
Klevius: Yes, it's perfectly normal. What a pity no one has told
you before. Islam is the very essence of ultimate racism! This is why
muslims are so sensitive about criticism against islam while showing
extreme contempt and insensitivity against non-muslims and "wrong-muslims". And this is also why
OIC (all muslims world organization) not only has abandoned and even
criminalized Human Rights (via UN) but also made it a crime to criticize
islam (the worst ideological crime history knows about).
Rape in the Koran
Klevius acknowledgement: Before
reading about rape in the Koran, do keep in mind that there was no
Mohammed before he was inserted in the islamic/Koranic fairy tale.
The evilness of islam explained in simple English
There are no Human Rights in islam - only islamic "human rights" (Sharia)
Because islamofascists and their supporters lack any credible argument
in favor of islam, but 1,400 years of historical evidence* for the very
opposite, they have to use the lowest of means to blur the picture of
the evil medieval slave Leviathan. So, for example, are those who dare
to criticize this pure evilness
* Not to mention the extremely obscure
origin of islam. According to Britain's (and the world's - after
Klevius) foremost islam researcher when it comes to its extremely
violent early stages, Hugh Kennedy, "Before Abd al-Malik (caliph
685-705) Mohammed (allegedly dead 632) is never mentioned on any official document whatsoever".
The main reason that Klevius considers
himself the world's foremost expert on the origin of islam is that he
(sadly) still happens to be the world's foremost expert on sex
segregation/apartheid, i.e. what constitutes the basis for rapetivism
and islam's survival (and which is the main reason OIC abandoned Human
Rights in UN and replaced them with islamofascist Sharia).
Only truly pious (so called "extremist") muslims are truly evil.
However, all non-extremist (secularized) "muslims" aren't necessarily
good either if they knowingly use the evilness of islam for their own
satisfaction. Only ignorant "muslims" can be excused.
There is no equivalent term for ‘rape’ in the Koran. However,
neither is there a single verse in the Koran which even remotely discourages forced sex. In contrast, there are several verses in the Koran which give the green light to rape and other sexual crimes against women.
One has also to remember that although islam/the Koran sees all women as
inferior to men, non-muslim women are even worse off. That's why so
many non-muslim women convert if they are stupid enough to fall in love
with a muslim man. Stupid if they do it while knowing they have to give
up their most basic Human Rights!
Surah an-Nisa discusses lawful and forbidden women for pious muslims.
Before we delve into the particular verse, it should be noted that it is
not easy to understand what is being suggested using the verse alone.
Therefore, relying on authoritative Tafsirs (Koran interpretations) and
Sahih (authentic) Hadiths associated with it, are necessary to get the
exact picture.
Koran verse 4:24: Also (forbidden are) women already married,
except those whom your right hands possess.
Thus has Allah ordained for you. All others are lawful, provided you
seek them from your property, desiring chastity, not fornication. So
with those among them whom you have enjoyed, give them their required
due, but if you agree mutually after the requirement (has been
determined), there is no sin on you. Surely, Allah is Ever All-Knowing,
All-Wise. Koran 4:24
What we see in the beginning of this verse as “forbidden” refers to
sexual intercourse. The Koran dictates, women already married are
forbidden for muslims
except those whom their right hands possess (sex slaves).
It is important to know the context of this verse, as it sheds light
onto the nature of allowance. If we go through a Sahih Hadith in Sunan
Abu Dawud:
Abu Said al-Khudri said: "The apostle of Allah sent a military
expedition to Awtas on the occasion of the battle of Hunain. They met
their enemy and fought with them. They defeated them and took them
captives. Some of the Companions of the apostle of Allah were reluctant
to have intercourse with the female captives in the presence of their
husbands who were unbelievers. So Allah, the Exalted, sent down the
Koranic verse, "And all married women (are forbidden) unto you save
those (captives) whom your right hands possess". That is to say, they
are lawful for them when they complete their waiting period." [The Koran
verse is 4:24]
Abu Dawud 2:2150
Here in the above hadith, we are told why verse 4:24 was revealed to Muhammad. It was
to
encourage his muslim fighters, who were reluctant, to have sexual
contacts with female captives even while their husbands were alive as prisoners of war. This is made clear when we read:
"Some of the Companions of the apostle of Allah were reluctant to
have intercourse with the female captives in the presence of their
husbands who were unbelievers."
The Abu Dawud hadith is confirmed by the two Sahih collections, namely Sahih Bukhari and Sahih muslim.
In Sahih Bukhari we read:
Narrated Ibn Muhairiz: I entered the Mosque and saw Abu Said Al-Khudri
and sat beside him and asked him about Al-Azl (i.e. coitus interruptus).
Abu Said said, "We went out with Allah's Apostle for the Ghazwa of Banu
Al-Mustaliq and we received captives from among the Arab captives and
we
desired women and celibacy became hard on us and we loved to do coitus
interruptus. So when we intended to do coitus interrupt us, we said,
'How can we do coitus interruptus before asking Allah's Apostle who is
present among us?" We asked (him) about it and he said, 'It is better
for you not to do so, for if any soul (till the Day of Resurrection) is
predestined to exist, it will exist."
Sahih Bukhari 5:59:459
Similarly in Sahih muslim:
Abu Sa'id al-Khudri reported that at the Battle of Hunain Allah's
Messenger sent an army to Autas and encountered the enemy and fought
with them. Having overcome them and taken them captives, the Companions
of Allah's Messenger seemed to refrain from having intercourse with
captive women because of their husbands being polytheists. Then Allah,
Most High, sent down regarding that:" And women already married,
except those whom your right hands possess (Koran 4:. 24)" (i. e. they were lawful for them when their 'Idda period came to an end).
Sahih Muslim 8:3432
There is an entire chapter devoted to this in the Sahih Muslim
collection. The title of the chapter speaks in volumes as we read:
Sahih Muslim. Chapter 29: Title: It is permissible to have sexual
intercourse with a captive woman after she is purified of menses or
delivery. In case she has a husband, her marriage is abrogated after she
becomes captive.
Ibn Kathir, the most prominent of all Koran interpreters, had this to say in regards to verse 4:24:
The Ayah (verses) means Also (forbidden are) women already married,
except those whom your right hands possess.), you are prohibited from
marrying women who are already married, except those whom your right
hands possess) except those whom you acquire through war, for you are
allowed such women after making sure they are not pregnant. Imam Ahmad
recorded that Abu Sa`id Al-Khudri said, "We captured some women from the
area of Awtas who were already married, and we disliked having sexual
relations with them because they already had husbands. So, we asked the
Prophet about this matter, and this Ayah (verse) was revealed, Also
(forbidden are) women already married, except those whom your right
hands possess). Accordingly, we had sexual relations with these women."
(Alternate translation can be: as a result of these verses, their
(Infidels) wives have become lawful for us) This is the wording
collected by At-Tirmidhi An-Nasa'i, Ibn Jarir and Muslim in his Sahih.
Forbidding Women Already Married, Except for Female Slaves
Tafsir Ibn Kathir
Similarly in Tafsir al-Jalalayn (Koran interpretation by two Jalals namely: Jalaluddin Mahalli and Jalaluddin Suyuti):
And, forbidden to you are, wedded women, those with spouses, that you
should marry them before they have left their spouses, be they muslim
free women or not;
save what your right hands own, of captured [slave] girls,
whom you may have sexual intercourse with, even if they should have
spouses among the enemy camp, but only after they have been absolved of
the possibility of pregnancy [after the completion of one menstrual
cycle]; this is what God has prescribed for you.
Koran 4:24
Tafsir al-Jalalayn
The tafsir attributed to Ibn Abbas, Muhammad's paternal cousin, further confirms:
And all married women (are forbidden unto you save those (captives) whom
your right hands possess) of captives, even if they have husbands in
the Abode of War, after ascertaining that they are not pregnant, by
waiting for the lapse of one period of menstruation. (It is a decree of
Allah for you) that which I have mentioned to you is unlawful in Allah's
Book.
Koran 4:24
Tafsir 'Ibn Abbas
Further Verses
Verses 23:1-6
There are other verses in the Koran similar to verse 4:24. For example,
Surah al-Mumenoon makes mention of successful muslims and their
characteristics:
Successful indeed are the believers, who are humble in their prayers and
who keep aloof from what is vain and who are givers of poor-rate and
who guard their private parts, except before their mates or those whom
their right hands possess, for they surely are not blamable.
Koran 23:1-6
Guarding private parts is denotative of abstaining from sexual
activities. The Qur'an points out successful believers are those who are
indulging in sexual activities only with their wives and sex-slaves.
Verses 70:29-30
This is confirmed again in Surah al-Maarij:
And those who guard their private parts, except in the case of their
wives or those whom their right hands possess-- for these surely are not
to be blamed,
Koran 70:29-30
Muhammad
This practice of raping war captives was practiced by islam’s very own
prophet Muhammad, in his life. On two occasions, he married (for the
sake of sexual gratification only) war captives and raped them. Those
victims were namely Safiyah and Juwairiyah.
Safiyah
Safiyah the daughter of Huayy was the wife of a Jewish Rabbi named
Kinana. When Muhammad conquered the Jewish village of Khaibar, he
tortured and killed the Rabbi and took captive his wife. Sahih Hadith in
Bukhari testify to this fact:
Narrated 'Abdul 'Aziz: Anas said, 'When Allah's Apostle invaded Khaibar,
we offered the Fajr prayer there yearly in the morning) when it was
still dark. The Prophet rode and Abu Talha rode too and I was riding
behind Abu Talha. The Prophet passed through the lane of Khaibar quickly
and my knee was touching the thigh of the Prophet . He uncovered his
thigh and I saw the whiteness of the thigh of the Prophet. When he
entered the town, he said, 'Allahu Akbar! Khaibar is ruined. Whenever we
approach near a (hostile) nation (to fight) then evil will be the
morning of those who have been warned.' He repeated this thrice. The
people came out for their jobs and some of them said, 'Muhammad (has
come).' (Some of our companions added, "With his army.") We conquered
Khaibar, took the captives, and the booty was collected. Dihya came and
said, 'O Allah's Prophet! Give me a slave girl from the captives.' The
Prophet said, 'Go and take any slave girl.' He took Safiya bint Huyai. A
man came to the Prophet and said, 'O Allah's Apostles! You gave Safiya
bint Huyai to Dihya and she is the chief mistress of the tribes of
Quraiza and An-Nadir and she befits none but you.' So the Prophet said,
'Bring him along with her.' So Dihya came with her and when the Prophet
saw her, he said to Dihya, 'Take any slave girl other than her from the
captives.' Anas added: The Prophet then manumitted her and married her."
Thabit asked Anas, "O Abu Hamza! What did the Prophet pay her (as
Mahr)?" He said, "Her self was her Mahr for he manumitted her and then
married her." Anas added, "While on the way, Um Sulaim dressed her for
marriage (ceremony) and at night she sent her as a bride to the Prophet .
So the Prophet was a bridegroom and he said, 'Whoever has anything
(food) should bring it.' He spread out a leather sheet (for the food)
and some brought dates and others cooking butter. (I think he (Anas)
mentioned As-SawTq). So they prepared a dish of Hais (a kind of meal).
And that was Walima (the marriage banquet) of Allah's Apostle ."
Sahih Bukhari 1:8:367
Juwairiyah
The following hadith from Sunan Abu Dawud bears out how Muhammad
obtained Juwairiyah, a beautiful woman of a tribe called Banu Mustaliq.
Muhammad was attacking the tribe without warning and conquering them:
Narrated Aisha, Ummul Mu'minin: Juwayriyyah, daughter of al-Harith ibn
al-Mustaliq, fell to the lot of Thabit ibn Qays ibn Shammas, or to her
cousin. She entered into an agreement to purchase her freedom. She was a
very beautiful woman, most attractive to the eye. Aisha said: She then
came to the Apostle of Allah (peace be upon him) asking him for the
purchase of her freedom. When she was standing at the door, I looked at
her with disapproval. I realised that the Apostle of Allah (peace be
upon him) would look at her in the same way that I had looked. She said:
Apostle of Allah, I am Juwayriyyah, daughter of al-Harith, and
something has happened to me, which is not hidden from you. I have
fallen to the lot of Thabit ibn Qays ibn Shammas, and I have entered
into an agreement to purchase of my freedom. I have come to you to seek
assistance for the purchase of my freedom. The Apostle of Allah (peace
be upon him) said: Are you inclined to that which is better? She asked:
What is that, Apostle of Allah? He replied: I shall pay the price of
your freedom on your behalf, and I shall marry you. She said: I shall do
this. She (Aisha) said: The people then heard that the Apostle of Allah
(peace be upon him) had married Juwayriyyah. They released the captives
in their possession and set them free, and said: They are the relatives
of the Apostle of Allah (peace be upon him) by marriage. We did not see
any woman greater than Juwayriyyah who brought blessings to her people.
One hundred families of Banu al-Mustaliq were set free on account of
her.
Abu Dawud 29:3920
The following hadith from Sahih Bukhari is evidentiary to the above:
Narrated Ibn Aun: I wrote a letter to Nafi and Nafi wrote in reply to my
letter that the Prophet had suddenly attacked Bani Mustaliq without
warning while they were heedless and their cattle were being watered at
the places of water. Their fighting men were killed and their women and
children were taken as captives; the Prophet got Juwairiya on that day.
Nafi said that Ibn 'Umar had told him the above narration and that Ibn
'Umar was in that army.
Sahih Bukhari 3:46:717
Muslim Apologetics
Claims about verse 24:33
Muslims will frequently quote the following when confronted with the passages provided in this article and others like it:
Let those who find not the wherewithal for marriage keep themselves
chaste, until Allah gives them means out of His grace. And if any of
your slaves ask for a deed in writing (to enable them to earn their
freedom for a certain sum), give them such a deed if ye know any good in
them: yea, give them something yourselves out of the means which Allah
has given to you. But force not your maids to prostitution when they
desire chastity, in order that ye may make a gain in the goods of this
life. But if anyone compels them, yet, after such compulsion, is Allah,
Oft-Forgiving, Most Merciful (to them),Koran 24:33
The first part of the verse is telling unmarried people to keep
themselves chaste. Now, the important thing to remember is that the
Islamic definition of chaste is different than the commonly agreed upon
definitions of the word. According to Koran 23:6, Qur'an 33:50, Qur'an
33:52, and Qur'an 70:30 a muslim man is considered "chaste" so long as
he only has sex with his wives (of whom he may have up to four) and his
right-hand possessions (female captives/slaves). An unmarried muslim man
who has sex with his slave girl is still considered to be "chaste" by
islamic standards.
The second sentence speaks about slaves who ask for a way to pay for
their freedom (like indentured servants) as long as the master knows of
"any good in them". It would be interesting to discover how female
slaves could earn any money at all if they had been kidnapped from their
families and forced into slavery and did not have money-making skills.
And if a female slave was to earn her freedom, where then could she go
if her family had been massacred? How could she support herself and keep
herself safe from rape, prostitution, etc.? Practicalities aside, this
verse only tells muslims to let their slaves purchase their freedom (but
puts in a convenient disclaimer of "if ye know any good in them").
Muhammad did stipulate that the masters should give their slaves
something but conveniently left out what and how much.
The third sentence is what pertains to the muslim claim that rape is
forbidden. However, the word used is not simply sexual intercourse but
is more specifically "prostitution" or "whoredom". Prostitution is not
simply about sex, but sex for a price. This is why it is often referred
to as one of the oldest professions. What this verse speaks of is a
master forcing his maid to be a prostitute thereby making money by
allowing other men to have sex with her. This verse says nothing about a
master forcing himself upon his slave-girl who is considered "halal"
for him according to Islamic law. The fourth sentence says that if a
girl is indeed forced into prostitution, then Allah will forgive her for
committing zina. What this verse does not say is what the punishment
should be for a man who forces his maid into prostitution. All it says
is that he should not do it. And what it definitely does not say is that
a muslim man cannot force himself on his own slave-girl. Hint hint, for
BBC and others wondering what "caused" muslim atrocities of all kinds!
From 4:24, it can be rightly assumed, that the Koran does not see any
wrong-doing in muslims having sex with captive women even if these women
are married and their husbands are still alive.
This clearly
indicates that the Koran allows rape, as captive women, even in the
unlikely case of agreeing to sexual intercourse, would still be having
that intercourse under duress, i.e. rapetivism.
References
Gaines, Larry; Miller, LeRoy (2006). Criminal Justice In Action: The Core. Thomson/Wadsworth. ISBN 0-495-00305-0.
1st Class Investigations Glossary
Ruling on having intercourse with a slave woman when one has a wife - Islam Q&A, Fatwa No. 10382, November 24, 2005
There can be no doubt that islam has been the worst slave ideology ever.
Not only does islam approve of slavery, the scale of islamic slavery
early on was such that no other interpretation is even possible!
Islam originated in the bloody enslavement campaign by Abu Bakr who
became the first muslim caliph over the firtst islamic caliphate. As
seen on the map below its Northern part followed almost exactly the
campaign by its modern successor, the Saudi fueled al-Qaeda branch
called the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria and led by Abu Bakr Baghdadi
(sic) aka Ibrahim Awwad Ibrahim Ali al-Badri al-Samarrai.
Islam's mosques, already more than 1,000 years ago, constituted the
center for the worst slave finance the world had ever experienced - and
it got worse!
Klevius comment: Do note that
already more than thousand years ago in what is now Iraq, some 500,000
African Zanj slaves started a rebellion against their muslim masters! It
gives a hint of the scale of muslim Sharia slave finance based on "infidel" racism - which is clearly
also sanctioned in the Koran. In fact, it's the very root of islam!
The Zanj Rebellion or the Negro Rebellion took place near the city of
Basra, located in present-day southern Iraq, over a period of fifteen
years (869−883 AD). The insurrection is believed to have involved
enslaved Black Africans (Zanj) that had originally been captured from
the African Great Lakes region and areas further south in East Africa.
It grew to involve over 500,000 slaves who were imported from across the
muslim empire and claimed over "tens of thousands of lives in lower
Iraq" - i.e. actually smaller numbers than today's islamic campaign in
Iraq.
Islam today
Viktor Titov (July, 2013): The objective of Saudi Arabia in this game is
crystal clear – to attain the uncontested control over the Arab world.
For this reason Libya is lying in ruins today, for this reason Egypt
found itself on the brink of collapse, for this reason Yemen obeys any
order he gets from “Bandar Bush”, for this reason the regimes in Qatar
and Kuwait are being suppressed, for which Iraq fails to attain
stability, for which the war in Syria rages on. And when everything went
just great for the Saudi “Godfather”, Assad managed to crack the
resistance of the rebels. Which meant that all these intrigues and
innocent human lives were a waste – since Saudi Arabia can’t get to its
only rival in the region – Iran without breaking Syria’s back. Back in
2011 Henry Kissinger, a close friend of “Bandar Bush” said on a closed
press-conference that “they” need to conquer seven more Middle Eastern
countries in order to get their recourses. Syria was the sixth country
in this list, and Iran was the last to go down.
Klevius comment: Saudi supported Sunni muslims linked to Al Qaeda
have gained control of territory in western Iraq's Anbar province in
two of Anbar's main cities, Falluja and Ramadi, that were the sites of
crucial battles during the Iraq war. On Friday, militants waving the Al
Qaeda flag blew up key government buildings in Falluja. More than 8,000
Iraqis died in the fighting last year, according to United Nations,
making it the bloodiest year since 2008, when Saudi islam bowing muslim
born (apostate?!) Mr X Barry Barakeh Husain Obama Dunham Soetoro (or
whatever) via a media coup d'etat mainly based on racist prejudice
became an unconstitutional* "president" of the US.
* You can't possibly approve of
islamic Sharia, which is distinctly (OIC/UN) against the US Constitution
and US obligations to Human Rights, while being a US president.
Across the border in Syria, Saudi (and other Sunni steered Arab states)
sponsored Sunni muslim militant groups are playing an increasingly large
role in the insurgency against President Bashar Assad. Among the most
prominent militant groups on both sides of the border is the
Islamic State of Iraq and Syria.
The group has roots in Iraq, but the civil war in Syria, initiated and
supported by Saudi Arabia, has provided fresh supplies of money and
weapons from the Saudis & Co, and fighters from the Koran. Under the
leadership of Abu Bakr Baghdadi, it seeks to create an islamic
caliphate including the territory of both Syria and Iraq, in other words
a huge buffer zone for the Saudis against Iran.
The Saudi supported muslim jihadists of course have heavier weapons than Iraqi government forces.
Ryan Crocker, U.S. ambassador to Iraq from 2007 to '09: "It was
bad enough when this contagion was just inside Syria, but now it's
spreading, and that's a whole lot worse," said . Nothing could be more
worrisome, he said, than the militant groups' plan to expand their grip
on territory, giving them a base from which they could plot long-range
operations.
The leader Abu Bakr Baghdadi, seeks to create an islamic caliphate including the territory of both Syria and Iraq.
While ISIS militants were fighting government forces in western Iraq,
other muslims were battling other Syrian muslim groups (a common pattern
in islam) trying to limit their reach near Aleppo, in western Syria.
The Pentagon last month sent 75 Hellfire missiles to Iraq to be used on
propeller planes in the fight against the militants, and the U.S. plans
to send ScanEagles, a small surveillance drone with limited tactical
range.
Klevius comment:
Do the muslim test by asking them if they are against Human Rights.
If they are not they are no real muslims, according to OIC and every
possible form of Sharia!
In other words, a true muslim is then per definition always a
supremacist racist and sexist individual through the tie to islam and
Sharia. And there is no real islam without Sharia! Got it dude? And
stop cheating yourself and others with that "moderate islam" crap, will
you!
Sayeeda Warsi is Cameron's "minister of
faith islam"
and UK's representative in OIC, the islamofascist Sharia organization
which in the UN has abandoned Human Rights and now wants Britain to
implement Sharia compliance and making London a Sharia capital. And
making national laws criminalizing anything critical of islam or
muslims! All to satisfy islamofascists Arabs etc.
The Abu Qatada noise was deliberately used to make Brits hostile to
Human Rights (which don't allow torture) so to pave the way for
islamofascist Sharia money to London.
