A miserable xmas break in the British parliament - and a new low mark in British history
Islam is naked said the little child peer representing more than half of the views of non-muslim (incl. so called "cultural muslim") Brits!
One brave peer, Lord Pearson, dared to reveal his "islamophobia" in full
just before the Yule break. He said what couldn't be said because it's
"blasphemy" according to sharia: "Islam is the problem"!
Result? Everyone either jumped on him or kept silent!
Lord Pearson: “Where there is contradiction in the
Qur’an, its later, more violent verses outweigh its admirably peaceful
early texts.”
Lord Ahmad (the muslim who killed a person while allegedly SMSing while
driving and who was sentenced to some 12 days while a non-muslim got 12
years today for similar carelessness in traffic ):
“Together with some Qur’anic scholars I have written a short summary of
Islam which I will send to him and we are asking the Guardian (sic)
newspaper
to hold an open debate as to its accuracy.
Klevius: This sharia muslim who threatened England with ten thousand
street jihadis if an islam critic was allowed to enter Britain is
writing something about islam for non-muslim Brits! No wonder it will be
short - the Koran stripped from its racist/sexist content can't cover
many pages.
Lord Pearson: “Given the seriousness
of our domestic situation couldn’t the Government itself sponsor a
council of our Muslim leaders in which they could clarify the modern
meaning of their religion and cast the extremists out of Islam?”
Lord
Ahmad (: “I look forward to receiving the
noble Lord’s summary of the great religion of Islam Perhaps in his reflection he would have also noted that with the
exception of one verse in the Holy Qur’an, every verse in the holy
Qur’an starts with the words ‘In the name of God, the gracious most
merciful’, which underlines the true sentiments and principle of that
religion.”
Klevius: The oldest parts of the Koran are all Jewish-Christian! The true original sentiments and principle of that
so called religion called islam is pure racism. In accordance with this basic tenet "the gracious most
merciful" in islam simply means those muslims who are approved of by whom happens to be the approver.
Lord Lamont: "A council of Muslim leaders is totally inappropriate”.
Klevius: Indeed! Just like ten thousand jihadis. The whole idea of islam
is as a suitable tool for "conquest" (jihad) and parasitism in whatever
location or circumstance that happens to be at hands.
Baroness Mobarik: “Such a debate as he advocates could be
divisive and further exacerbate the current rise in Islamophobia.
Klevius: Such a "debate" as she advocates has long since proved
divisive and further exacerbate the current rise in islamofascist radicalization.
Baroness Mobarik: “I,
like the vast majority of the 1.6 billion Muslims around the world, was
taught that peace, compassion and obeying the law of the land are
fundamental. To me, that’s the nature of Islam.”
Klevius: "The vast majority of the 1.6 billion muslims" (incl. not
practising "muslims") are kept in deep ignorance about Human Rights -
and the rest are openly racist and sexist islamofascist supporters!
Here's Wikipedia's description of this disgusting* sharia muslim whom Tony Blair appointed a peer.
* What here qualifies as 'disgusting' includes Human Rights violating sharia plus the list below.
In December 2001, Ahmed claimed that his phone had been tapped by the
government because of his opposition to its intervention in Afghanistan.
He claimed he had a heated conversation with Foreign Office minister
Denis MacShane, during which MacShane claimed to have transcripts of
Ahmed's private conversations. The government denied that Ahmed was
under surveillance, and MacShane said that his remarks had been
misinterpreted.[28]
In 2002, Ahmed was accused by campaign group Baby Milk Action of
changing his position on Nestlé's sale of baby milk in Pakistan at a
time when he was negotiating a paid advisory role with the company.[29]
He subsequently did become a consultant.[30]
On 25 July 2005, Ahmed, while interviewing with Robert Siegel on
National Public Radio, said that the suicide bombers of 7/7 had an
"identity crisis" and that "unfortunately, our imams and mosques have
not been able to communicate the true message of Islam in the language
that these young people can understand."[31] Christopher Orlet of The
American Spectator did not agree with Ahmed's "identity crisis". He
said, "That's not an identity crisis, Lord Ahmed, that's religious
psychopathy. That's a bloodthirstiness that makes Dracula look like a
teetotaler."[32] Ahmed did acknowledge, "the community leaders and
religious leaders, who have kept very close contacts with South Asia and
the Middle East rather than keeping a good contact with the British
society where we live."[31]
On 30 November 2006, the New Statesman reported a claim by fellow Muslim
and Labour parliamentarian Shahid Malik that Ahmed had campaigned
against him during the Dewsbury election in 2005. He alleged that Ahmed
instead backed Sayeeda Warsi, vice-chair of the Conservative Party, the
daughter of a personal friend. According to the New Statesman's report,
Warsi "welcomed Lord Ahmed's support". The New Statesman also printed
Ahmed's refutation, saying "I never told any constituent of Dewsbury to
vote for the Tories"[33]
On 3 February 2009, Melanie Phillips, a newspaper columnist, claimed
that Ahmed had threatened to mobilise 10,000 Muslims to prevent
anti-Islamist Dutch MP Geert Wilders from entering the House of Lords to
speak at a screening of the film Fitna. Wilders had been invited by a
peer to debate issues of social inclusion.[34] This claim was later
denied by Ahmed, but the House of Lords authorities had determined to
provide adequate security, if necessary. In the event, the film Fitna
was broadcast as planned, but Wilders was denied entry to the UK, thus
leading many commentators to deplore the action by the Home Secretary
Jacqui Smith as appeasement.[35][36]
Fatal road crash and subsequent jail sentence
On 25 December 2007, Ahmed was involved in a crash on the M1 motorway
near Rotherham in which Martin Gombar, 28, was killed. Gombar's car had
been involved in a crash and he had left it in the outer lane.
Apparently trying to return to his vehicle from the hard shoulder he was
hit by Ahmed, who was driving his Jaguar X-Type. Ahmed's wife and
mother, who were passengers in the car, also received minor
injuries.[37]
On 1 December 2008, Ahmed appeared at Sheffield Magistrates' Court in
connection with a charge of dangerous driving. Ahmed admitted sending
and receiving five text messages on his phone while driving two minutes
before the crash, and pleaded guilty to the charge before him. He was
banned from driving until his sentencing. On 22 December, Sheffield
Magistrates' Court referred the case for sentencing at the Crown Court
on 19 January due to its "aggravating features".[38] This was later put
back until 25 February.[39] Ahmed was sentenced to 12 weeks in prison by
the presiding judge, Mr Justice Wilkie, which meant he would serve six
actual weeks in jail, and he was disqualified from driving for 12
months.[40][41]
On 12 March 2009 Ahmed was freed by the Court of Appeal. Lady Justice
Hallett said it was important to state that Ahmed's offence was one of
dangerous driving, not of causing death by dangerous driving. Hallett
said that there was "little or nothing" Ahmed could have done to avoid
the collision and that after being knocked unconscious, he had come to
and "risked his life trying to flag down other vehicles to stop them
colliding with the Audi or his car". She said that while his prison
sentence had been justified, the court had been persuaded it could now
take an "exceptional" course and suspend the sentence for 12 months.[42]
He was freed just 16 days into his sentence.[43]
In subsequent interviews, Ahmed has incorrectly stated that he has no
criminal record and that his sentence was overturned.[44][45]
Bounty allegation
A Pakistani newspaper, The Express Tribune, alleged that Ahmed said "If
the US can announce a reward of $10 million for the captor of Hafiz
Saeed, I can announce a bounty of ₤10 million on President Obama and his
predecessor George Bush", at a business meeting in Haripur, Pakistan,
on 15 April 2012.[46] On learning of these allegations, the Labour Party
immediately suspended Ahmed pending a formal investigation.[47] He
later responded by stating "I'm shocked and horrified that this whole
story could be just made up of lies...." Ahmed went on to say that he
was not issuing a bounty but rather calls for the prosecution of George
W. Bush and Tony Blair due to the "war crimes committed in Iraq and
Afghanistan" in what he considers to be "illegal wars".[48]
Video footage of the meeting, released on 18 April, showed that Ahmed
had been misquoted and instead had said, "Even if I have to beg I am
willing to raise and offer £10 million so that George W Bush and Tony
Blair can be brought to the International Court of Justice on war crimes
charges."[49] The same day, The Express Tribune offered a
"clarification" that it had "erroneously reported" Ahmed's statement and
that their reporter had incorrectly cited the name of Obama. The
article stated that the newspaper "deeply regretted" its mistake.[50]
His suspension was later revoked on 25 June 2012.[51]
Malala accusation
In November 2012 Ahmed claimed that the attempted assassination of
Malala Yousafzai might have been carried out by unnamed official
elements in Pakistan as part of an effort to discredit the Taliban. He
subsequently accepted that he gave the speech whilst having "no idea
what happened" and that this was not the case.[52]
Jewish conspiracy comments
On 14 March 2013, The Times newspaper in London revealed that Ahmed had
blamed a Jewish conspiracy for his driving conviction. In an interview
given in Urdu, broadcast on a Pakistani television channel in April
2012, the peer claimed that he was jailed because of pressure on the
courts by Jewish owned media: "My case became more critical because I
went to Gaza to support Palestinians. My Jewish friends who own
newspapers and TV channels opposed this." He also alluded to further
Jewish involvement regarding the judge, claiming that Mr Justice Wilkie
was specifically selected to judge his case having previously been
appointed to the high court after helping a "Jewish colleague" of former
Labour prime minister Tony Blair during an important case. The Times
pointed out that neither of these claims about the judge were factually
correct.[53][54]
Reactions were negative. Katie Wheatley, a criminal law expert, said
that if Ahmed had made such claims in Britain he could have faced
prosecution for a hate crime.[53] The Labour party immediately suspended
him, saying it "deplores and does not tolerate any sort of racism or
anti-Semitism." Jewish organisations condemned the comments, with the
Board of Deputies of British Jews, saying, "We are appalled by Lord
Ahmed's alleged comments which recall the worst Jewish conspiracy
theories."[54] In contrast, the chairman of the UK-based Kashmir Watch
International was reported by The Nation, an English-language Pakistani
paper, as saying, "Lord Ahmed has, in fact, been made the target of a
deep-rooted vendetta by the rivals – mostly the Jews lobby for his
"crime" of exposing the increased anti-Muslim approach and policies of
the Jews including their backed British media."[55]
Ahmed's initial response was that he had no recollection of making the
comments and that he would have to examine the transcripts with his
solicitors.[53] On 18 March he resigned from the Joseph Interfaith
Foundation as a result of the allegations.[27] At about the same time,
he ceased to be a member of the International Expert Team of the
Institute Research of Genocide, Canada.[56]
Among the pieces written in the immediate aftermath of the revelation
was one by Mehdi Hasan in The Huffington Post which claimed that
antisemitism within some otherwise well-integrated sections of the
British Muslim community was commonplace.[57] In the 28 March interview
with Ahmed resulting from this article, Ahmed apologised, describing his
comments as "completely unacceptable" and the product of a "twisted
mind". He could not explain why he had made the comments.[58]
His appearance before Labour's National Executive Committee to determine
whether his suspension should be lifted or whether he should be
expelled was due to take place on 15 May.[59] On 9 May it was reported
that he was considering preempting the hearing by leaving the Labour
party[60] and on 13 May he resigned from the Labour party.[25] In his
letter of resignation he again stated that he has no recollection of the
interview, that The Times had failed to provide the footage in order
for it to be forensically examined and, consequently, that he was unable
to get a fair hearing. He alleged that the video was deliberately
doctored, perhaps by "elements in Pakistan who bears [sic] grudge
against me".[26]
Family life
Ahmed lives in Rotherham where some of UK's worst muslim child sex scandals surfaced.
Klevius wrote:
From Magna Carta in 1215 to Human Rights in 1948
Magna Carta Libertatum is the first rudimentary effort in a long
struggle towards the final 1948 Human Rights declaration which PM David
Cameron now again seems to betray by giving in for Human Rights
violating sharia.
Back in 1215 Magna Carta (the first predecessor to Human Rights) was
produced to stifle traitor King John's effort to islamize Britian.
Compare this to the British PM Cameron's attacks on Human Rights while
seemingly proposing Britain as the center of islamofascism outside
Mideast (beginning with London sharia finance).
King John the Traitor, PM David
Cameron and the islamofascist "king" Abdullah who pretended to be
"reformist" while steering the country in an even more intolerant
direction by new sharia inspired laws by early 2014 (e.g. equalizing
Human Rights, Secularism and Atheism with "terrorism" and due penalties - compare
Raif Badawi and others).
King John in the early 13th century sent envoys to Mohammed al-Nâsir
asking for his help. In return King John offered to convert to Islam and
turn England into a muslim state. The muslim jihadist Mohammed al-Nâsir's view on King John: "I never read
or heard that any king possessing such a prosperous kingdom subject and
obedient to him, would voluntarily ... make tributary a country that is
free, by giving to a stranger that which is his own ... conquered, as
it were, without a wound. I have rather read and heard from many that
they would procure liberty for themselves at the expense of streams of
blood, which is a praiseworthy action; but now I hear that your wretched
lord, a sloth and a coward, who is even worse than nothing, wishes from
a free man to become a slave, who is the most miserable of all human
beings." Mohammed al-Nâsir concluded by wondering aloud why the English
allowed such a man to lord over them — they must, he said, be very
servile and soft.
It's the original evilness* of islam that makes it so vulnerable for
criticism that it needs to be protected by sharia compliant so called
blasphemy laws (in the West called "hate speech" laws).
* For a starter islam's incompatibility with Human Rights as proved by OIC's sharia declaration in UN.
So what about muslim friends?
Immediately face your muslim friend with the question whether s/he
supports Human Rights violating sharia or Human Rights equality? Or do
you fear hearing the truth?
Klevius proposes that every muslim is invited to carefully be taught
about Magna Carta and Human Rights and how sharia violates the most
basic of Human Rights, i.e. the universal equality principle that makes
sexism and racism (and due hate) redundant (Klevius 1992). This should
then be followed up with the simple question: Do you want equality or
Human Rights violating sharia? And those who choose sharia instead of
Human Rights (i.e. the real muslims) ought to train themselves in
looking at this picture without bursting into violence etc.
The war between muslims and Jews started when Muhammad slaughtered all
the Jews in Medina. However, what made this war special was muslims'
claim to be the only true branch of Judaism.
Albert
Einstein: "For me the unaltered Jewish religion like all other religions
is an incarnation of the most primitive superstitions.
Although the
majority of the world's population is Atheist, religious dogma leading
to racism, sexism and hatred is still allowed to be exempted from Human
Rights equality logic.
Klevius wrote:
In Klevius series muslims chasing muslims:
UK's first muslim peer Nazir Ahmed offers bounty for the capture of Obama
Nazir Ahmed, equalizes muslim born Mr X
"president" with the muslim terrorist leader Hafiz Saeed who was behind
the islamic mass murdering in Mumbai where 166 died.
Nazir
Ahmed from Pakistan but now appointed muslim peer in UK (down to the
right behind the JIHAD text on Klevius' classic Mr X pic) has allegedly
offered a 10 million Pound bounty for the capture of the muslim born Mr X
"president". Ahmed, who killed a person while SMSing in his car and who
uses to threaten Bris with tens of thousands of jihadists if he doesn't
get what he wants, is a good friend of an other muslim, UK PM's right
hand Sayeeda Warsi, also from Pakistan, who uses to call other muslims
"idiots" (down to the right below Nazir Ahmed on the Mr X pic). She has
been admired among muslims and others for calling the truth about
islamic atrocities "islamophobia".
Muslim Nazir Ahmed reportedly said: “'If the USA can announce a reward
of US$ 10 million for the (capture) of Hafiz Saeed, I can announce a
bounty of 10 million Pound (for the capture of) President Obama...”
.
This is Nazir Ahmed's friend in the British House of Lords. An other PC appointed muslim.
and here
Klevius question: When should the black racist troll "Ms Lucy Black" be
arrested? She who wrote the postings below when the two girls on the
pic (Samantha Sykes and Kim Frank) were probably jihad-murdered, i.e.
islamic/muslim hate crimes. But nothing happens but silence and cover
up. Instead the whole islamofascist propaganda apparatus is full of a
Norwegian lone lunatic who did what the Black Panthers and other racist
terrorist groups have done for years.
.
