Peter Klevius to Chinese people: I'm not a racist like many in the UK parliament - although I certainly look like one.
UK origin of Sinophobia: The 19th century Opium Wars were triggered by UK's
imposition of the opium trade upon China. Lord Palmerston regarded the
Chinese as uncivilized and suggested that the British must attack China
to show up their superiority as well as to demonstrate what a
"civilized" nation could do. The resulting concession of Hong Kong
compromised China's territorial sovereignty. There's also the background
to South China Sea.
Behind the Huawei etc. Sinophobia: The Pact between the US freeloader and the Saudi Devil.
UK
created a devil's kingdom in Arabia, and US made a devil's oil pact
with the Saudi custodians of islam - hence infecting the world with
petrodollar and anti-Human Rights sharia islam (Saudi based and steered
OIC).
The US made up a grand conspiracy about China and
Chinese. No country in the world has been equally targeted by unfounded
US aggression as China - yet China is called the "assertive aggressor"
by US and its puppets.
What "core values" does UK share with
US? Extra-judicial killings, militarism, support of the Saudi dictator
family's murders, war crimes, and spread of terror, OIC's anti-Human
Rights sharia etc.?!
Chinese civilization vs. US freeloading rouge nation.
US
has a long history of freeloading on the world. Why would you be stupid
to believe anything of it? And when you use US' Google company to
google'US aggression' the return is Chinese aggression.
The
Belt and Road Initiative is based on ordinary and previously accepted
and established norms. What US has, and still does, is the very
opposite.
On 15 August 1971, the United States unilaterally
terminated convertibility of the US dollar to gold, effectively bringing
the Bretton Woods system to an end and rendering the dollar a global
counterfeit currency which sucked currency etc. financial profit
unfairly from the world and into US. The term monetary hegemony appeared
in Michael Hudson's Super Imperialism, describing not only an
asymmetrical relationship that the US dollar has to the global economy,
but the structures of this hegemonic edifice that Hudson felt supported
it, namely the International Monetary Fund and the World Bank.
US
tries to push US jurisdiction globally through arbitrary trade wars and
sanctions. US even tries to colonize the space outside the Earth for
itself and its militarism.
However, China shows a possible way
out of this US made trap - but that freedom would mean US falling down
to its right place. This is why US demonizes China with unfounded
accusations. In fact, China's position has made it something of a dream
state when it comes to global spread of technology, wealth and health.
But US hates to face itself in the mirror of reality.
UK
has for 20 years used Huawei without the slightest problem, but when US
lost the tech race then suddenly Huawei became a "threat".
So
when US and its puppets in the cyberspace attacking and spying Five
Eyes organization try to meddle and destabilize in China, then Chinese
defence against these cyber attacks and spying is called a "threat" and
turned into a reason for accusing China. And every allegation against
China's Covid-19 handling has been proven false, yet constantly repeated
by BBC and in the parliament etc.. And when Hong Kong was turned into a
terror chaos by external meddling and support, then China had to
implement similar security laws which are accepted in US and UK but
strangle not in China.
While BBC showers the Brits with constant
war nostalgia (war mongering?) UK continues selling weapons to the
islamofascist Saudi dictator family's war crimes in Yemen etc. And the
right wing anti-EU Brexiters have turned into a militant anti-China
campaign organization in Westminster.
Peter Klevius used to
admire the Greenham Common women against nukes - presumably Theresa May
didn't participate because she wouldn't hesitate to use nukes against
civilians - so where are the peace voices in UK today?!
When will Westminster Abbey be turned into a Saudi/OIC supported Salafist shariamosque?
BBC
and its right wing China haters in Westminster are complicit not only
to Saudi atrocities and Human Rights violations induced by Saudi based
and steered OIC, but also to crimes committed by IS and other islamist
groups used by US and its NATO puppets, as well as all the islamic jihad
inspired crimes around the world - and no dudue, you can't get away
with it by lying "it's not islam".BBC's hateful and gravely misleading
propaganda machine is a threat to peace, development and prosperity.
Peter Klevius asks for an independent international inquiry on BBC's
racist Sinophobia, its deliberately misleading propaganda combined with
neglecting truthfulness, and its support of sharia islamism - incl. how
many victims and suffering it has caused because of its worldwide
propaganda influence combined with its denial or blinking of islamic
atrcities. Peter Klevius thinks it's a shame that
Should
BBC and some politicians be put on a Nurenberg trial for draconian
crimes against humanity* after this relentless and demonizing Sinophobia
campaign and deliberate lies, support of Saudi islamofascism, etc.?
* Meaning they are complicit not only to Saudi atrocities and Human
Rights violations induced by Saudi based and steered OIC, but also to
crimes committed by IS and other islamist groups used by US and its NATO
puppets, as well as all the islamic jihad inspired crimes around the
world - and no dudue, you can't get away with it by lying "it's not
islam".BBC's hateful and gravely misleading propaganda machine is a threat to peace, development and prosperity. Peter Klevius asks for an independent international inquiry on BBC's
racist Sinophobia, its deliberately misleading propaganda combined with
neglecting truthfulness, and its support of sharia islamism - incl. how
many victims and suffering it has caused because of its worldwide
propaganda influence combined with its denial or blinking of islamic
atrcities.
BBC's
extremely bigoted and hypocritical Sinophobic Saudi raised muslim
presenter Mishal Husain says the Chinese demand for Uyghur women to
follow the same law as other Chinese women as something worse than the
islamofascist Saudi dictator family's atrocities - incl. murders, war
crimes, terrorism, and persecution of Shia muslims etc..
2013 in a
terrorist suicide attack by Uyghur muslims (Usmen Hasan, his wife
Gulkiz Gini, and his mother, Kuwanhan Reyim) five people died and 38
injured.
The East Turkestan Islamic Movement, or Turkistan Islamic Party, claimed responsibility and threatened with future attacks.
Chinese police asked for information about two people from Xinjiang describing a vehicle and four Xinjiang number plates.
Three suspects, identified as Huseyin Guxur, Yusup Wherniyas and Yusup Ehmet, were convicted of masterminding the attack.
Chinese
security official Meng Jianzhu said the East Turkestan Islamic Movement
(ETIM) was behind the attacks, but Uighur exile groups and some Western
observers disputed the claim although on 24 November 2013, the
Turkistan Islamic Party, i.e. ETIM, declared it was responsible for the
attack.
The United States State declined to call it a terrorist
attack and and instead reiterated support for Uighur "human rights"
despite the fact that Turkistan Islamic Party has been designated as a
terrorist organization by the European Union, China, and the United
States.
US is rottening fast and should therefore go for peace and cooperation
instead of its shameless behavior around the world and against its own
citizens and residents!
Despite using $-freeloading, sanctions, breaking
treaties, murdering officials and politicians in other countries during
state visits etc., hindering the use of tech previously used to
monopolize US companies globally etc., US now wants to destroy Huawei
and other Chinese companies, not for security but because US is
inevitably losing the tech race. And no, it isn't the Chinese state
support any more than US uses state support for force-feeding Apple,
Google etc. and backed up by US state militaristic interventions,
spying, interference, threats etc. globally. And China was the first to
recognize the danger of Covid-19 - not "delaying" anything" but quite
the contrary (see below)!
In the early 1990's US
accused Japan of selling superior cars in US without buying crappy cars
from US. And a congress woman warned for tech theft if selling US planes
to Japan - but was told that those planes wouldn't even fly without
Japanese high tech. At the same time EU was created to build a trade
wall against Japanese products. However, Japan is more than ten times
smaller than China - and isn't at the hotbed of different coronaviruses
in SE Asia.
Peter Klevius EMAH theory (1992) on "consciousness" - the only one that fits empirical evidence.
US' behavior is completely unacceptable in a free world!
$-freeloader* US provoking China with war ships while simultaneously
"leaking" "classified" rumours. Why?! Its Sinophobia is all about trying
to stop China's success as the foremost spreader of wealth and high
tech both in China and the world. It's not the leadership but China's
success that US can't stand.
*
US itself violated (a common US behavior) the Bretton Woods treaty it
itself initiated - resulting in a free floating dollar that equals
counterfeit currency, i.e. can be printed at will, and in the case of
dollar, used globally for the benefit of US. And this was then connected
to the islamofascist Saudi dictator family, the s.c. petrodollar..
SINOPHOBIA RACISM. US tries to pull you away from Chinese high tech
superiority so US can keep feeding you with its outdated tech and
influence - just as it used to do with cars and wars. Your pick: US
militarism with Saudi led islamofascism - or highspeed Chinatech towards
Chinese democracy and global wealth. China is the very opposite to Cuba
- and already, in practise, almost identical to Western governments.
Excluding China only prolongs the democratic process - and even speeds
up China's high tech inside its 1.4 billion market.
BBC sides with whoever Sinophobes -
and would probably even have used Goebbels against China if he was still
around. UK universities etc. are littered with dangerous Saudi (OIC)
anti-Human Rights sharia jihad propaganda (incl. supprt of IS Utghur
jihadi) - yet China has always been aggressively smeared all the way
since UK's opium war attacks on China when it was declared "inferior"
and "uncivilized". Today the problem seems to be that China is too
superior and too civilized - but thankfully they have a "communist"
party to blame, although the leadership has behaved better than most in
the West. And when BBC talks about the "West" against China it actually
means US spy organization Five Eyes (with the puppet states Australia,
UK, Canada and NZ) and whoever other Sinophobes it can find elsewhere -
like the Israel supporting and anti-muslim right wing Axel Springer,
Europe's largest media (practically a monpoly) which is accused of e.g.
censorship and interference in other countries (just like state media
BBC).
Should China sue BBC and UK (not to mention US) and the
far-right, anti-China and anti-muslim UK "think tank" the Jackson
Society (with associated Sinophobic MPs and lords) - whose Sinophobia
(disguised as "against communism" etc.) complements leftist and
pro-sharia jihad muslims BBC which now so eagerly gives it a platform,
as well as the closely connected US spy organization Five Eyes which has
demonized China for years long before Huawei or Covid-19? The lies
about China they have spread are indistinguishable from those of Pompeo
and Trump. Is this baseless (compared to US/UK) hate mongering really
conducive to the welfare of UK? And when China reacts to this massive
Sinophobia campaign then BBC calls it "aggressive Chinese propaganda".
US "warns" about China "stealing" vaccine info because US knows that China now produces much better research than US.
And
shame on everyone who blinks Saudi (US/UK's close ally) based and
steered OIC's anti-Human Rights sharia for all the world's muslims while
spitting on China!
BBC News' deliberately misleading and
dangerous anti-China rant 20200706: "China ought to be our enemy! We
can't do any business with China because of Hong Kong, and the
sterilization of Uyghur muslims which some people (BBC and its cherry
picked guests?!) think amounts to genocide". Peter Kleius: That Chinese
muslims should follow the same laws as other Chinese, and that China
uses similar deradicalization programmes proposed in the West, BBC
thinks is "suppression". And volontary sterilization in the West BBC
calls "genocide" in China. And Hong Kong's security law is similar to
those in the West - and not as bad as US - and are definitely neccessary
to keep "one nation" together under the immense pressure from US and
its puppet regimes.
2020 4th of July: Peter Klevius wonders when
US women will get the same rights as Chinese women - ERA is still
lacking from US constitution? Article 2, Chinese constitution: Women
shall enjoy equal rights with men in all aspects of political, economic,
cultural, social and family life. Peter Klevius also wonders why
aggressive and assertive US attacks peaceful China (every schism has US
fingerprints) while siding with the war crimes committing murdeous
islamofascist Saudi dictator family whose OIC sharia clearly denies
eqaulity for women?! China is doing more good to more people than any
other country today. Is this the reason?!
20200701: BBC News asks
for war against China but complains "we have only two aircraft
carriers". Peter Klevius wonders how sick BBC has become?!
20200616:
When China discovers Covid-19 with a European DNA profile on a cutting
board for Norwegian salmon, the BBC thinks it's the communist party.
Why
is BBC so quiet about Churchill's secret (until 2018) pact with Stalin
in 1939 which would have divided Scandinavia between Russia and UK?! And
US' NATO puppet Jens Stoltenberg repeats like a parrot his master's
voice against China - while a civil war is going on inside NATO between
Greece and Turkey.
African Pygmy lives matter! Why aren't they included in BLM - and why are those who enslaved them included?!
Colonized, raped and enslaved for more than 3,500 years by the Eurasian intruders we now call Bantu etc. Africans.
It's
a senseless irony that "Africans" (Bantus etc. newcomers) who enslaved
and mixed with original Africans (Khoisan and especially Pygmies from
whom they got their phenotype) and later were enslaved by muslim Arabs
and their "African" collaborators, now get a brain drop at the West
African ports where islam exported slaves to America etc.. Any old
African genes come from Khoisan and Pygmies - and ultimately out of Asia
- not Africa. "Out-of-Africa" and BLM are created by white racist
idiots and only feed supremacism and greedy black politicians etc. who
see segregation as a power tool. Read "out-of-Africa" more dangerous
than the Piltdown hoax.
Peter Klevius 20200604: What if Floyd had
been white or Chinese?! And the officers members of Nation of Islam?
And how do we even know that any racism was involved? And what about a
fair trial? All human lives matter!
20200603: UK's Sinophobic right wing anti-EU migration Brexiters now want to import 3 million Chinese from Hong Kong!?
20200529:
In its everyday Sinophobia rant BBC today managed in one sentence to
accuse Chinese, China and Xi separately - and even missing the stock
smear, i.e. the "communist party". However in a very near future China
will develop and export a world leading ecosystem of non-US software,
hardware, fintech, social media, telecom infrastructure etc. that
everyone will long for. Stubborn and dumb stiff lipped Sinophobes will
become Neanderthals in no time. Sadly few politicians understand how
powerful Chinese tech development is. Japan did the same but wasn't
hampered by Maoist communism and was ten times smaller. High IQ and an
Atheist culture they both have in common.
The pro-Saudi and
anti-China "party-within" UK's governing party is committing long term
criminal harm to UK. China is the future and US is rottening with
accelerating speed (the desperate sanctions against China tell it all).
Only tech cooperation with China will benefit Brits and Americans. So
why are UK politicians and BBC so eager to shoot their own PM and the
Brits in the foot by being dictated by Pompeo, Trump and the Saudi
dictator family, and boosted by a general Sinophobia racism? The
"communist" scare mongering has no relevance because in practice China
behaves in no way different than US - but is under constant smear and
subversion attacks. And China's surveillance has actually developed less
fast than that of US. US is a rogue state state state state that
murders and surveils in other countries (e.g. murdered top politician in
Iran and surveilled Merkel - and you). And who likes ISIS and al-Qaeda
etc. Uyghur jihadi terrorists anyway? Pompeo, Erdogan and Saudi steered
islamofascists.
20200522: BBC and some right wing MPs call it a
"draconian move" when China wants to stop foreign interference and
people using Molotov cocktails. Really! So what about in UK?!
20200518:
BBC again repeated the anti-China lie about "a silenced doctor" by
inviting the former right wing and pro-Saudi (anti-)EU Research Group -
now (anti-)China Research Group. How bad a journalist isn't Sarah
Montague then when she didn't even try to question it - or is she
muffled?! Eye dr. Li Wenliang wrongly spread out it could be SARS. It
wasn't and just one hour later - and long before any police etc. had
contacted him - he corrected his mistake (see fact check below).
BBC
anti-China fake 20200506: "Hundreds if not thousands of people were
likely to have been infected in Wuhan, at a time when Chinese officials
said there were only a few dozen cases." Peter Klevius fact check: BBC
deliberately conflates real time confirmed knowledge with calculations
in retrospect.
US has made all the mistakes it accuses China for.
Here's one from the top of the iceberg: Whistleblower Dr. Rick Bright,
the director of the Biomedical Advanced Research and Development
Authority, pressed for urgent access to funding, personnel and clinical
specimens, including viruses, which he emphasized were all critically
necessary to begin development of lifesaving medicines needed in the
likely event that the virus spread outside of SE Asia. He was then cut
out of critical meetings for raising early alarm about the virus and
ousted from his position.
Chinese 5G much more reliable than US'
Five Eyes, the world's most dangerous misinfo and conspiracy spreading
US spy and smear organization (together with its puppet states UK,
Canada, Australia and New Zealand) which "leaked" a 15-page dossier
alleging "probing the possibility" the virus came from the Wuhan
Institute of Virology. As Peter Klevius has said before, it didn't come
from bats to humans but from some other host animal. Fake news and
anti-China propaganda videos are making false and unfounded claims about
"delays" and "late" human to human transmission report. Again, it was
only in retrospect anyone could have known the nature of early cases.
Many weren't even connectded to the wet market and many weren't affected
at all despite intimate contact. Moreover, the wrong early SARS
diagnosis was corrected the very same day but spread by a
"whistleblower" eye doctor (see fact check below). And despite being
first affected China acted better than US etc. countries. 5eyes equals
Nazi Goebbels in propaganda misinfo. Every single accusation so far has
built on deliberate distortion of facts. And possble improvements in
retrospect would have been exactly the same in even the best of Western
countroes.
"God", "Allah", or whichever "monotheistic" idol
is a pathetic fallacy and "monotheism" is a ridiculous and dangerous
self-delusion because your "god" is used to defend the undefendable.
There are equally many "gods" as there are individuals - and the
collective "god" only functions as cherry picked confirmation of the
individual's "god". However, the collective "god" may combine individual
evil - never individual good, because that can only be achieved by
(negative) Human Rights. After all, as Peter Klevius always has said,
the only way of being fully human is to allow others full humanhood
(what else could possibly unite all humans) - without religious
impositions/exclusions.
Pentagon, islam - and China?!
Also
check out Peter Klevius theory (1992) on "consciousness"/Thalamus - the
only one that fits empirical evidence. And don't miss Anthropologist
Peter Klevius vs. Afropologist John Hawks - and how the British Piltdown
hoax moved to Africa.
Sinophobic BBC working hard for a Coup d'état together with Saudi loving and China hating MPs against PM Boris Johnson.
Peter
Klevius wonders why Sinophobic state media BBC (with Tom Tugendhat
etc.) goes against the state (PM, MI6 etc.) in being so extremely
worried about unfounded claims about China while having no problem with
the threats posed by the worst of the worst, the islamofascist Saudi
dictator family's influence over UK - and BBC?!
20200417: BBC's
Sinophobic muslim Razia Iqbal together with Tom Tugendhat arrange a
pathetic propaganda theatre of BBC's 22:00 news hour for the most
senseless and even childish smearing of China. And how can this clown
(just listen to his laughter etc.!) be a leader of UK's foreign affairs
committee?! Moreover, Razia Iqbal even uses Trump as an expert!
Desperate...!
20200416: State media BBC's Sinophobic Uganda
rooted muslim Razia Iqbal lies about Chinese "racism" against Ugandans
without telling that it was a local matter that was caused by some
Africans linked to a cluster of cases in the Nigerian community in
Guangzhou at a time when China had already curbed Covid-19. At least
eight people diagnosed with the illness had spent time in the city's
Yuexiu district, known as "Little Africa". Five were Nigerian nationals
who faced widespread anger - not for being Africans but because of
reports that they had broken a mandatory quarantine and been to eight
restaurants and other public places instead of staying home. As a
result, nearly 2,000 people they came into contact with had to be tested
for Covid-19 or undergo quarantine. Guangzhou had confirmed 114
imported coronavirus cases – 16 of which were Africans. The rest were
returning Chinese nationals.
20200407a.m.: UK's best PM, Boris
Johnson, is much shorter (same as Einstein and Klevius dad) than Trump -
but also much more intelligent. It's OK to say so when Trump is white -
and loves to play on height, right?
20200412: The reason the
Chinese government wanted extra control of DNA results was the previous
failed report (see below) which wrongly indicated SARS. However, British
media (BBC etc.) blatantly lie about it and first accused Shi Zhengli's
lab for spreading infected bats, while some weeks later making her a
hero and accusing the government. And no, it didn't spread from bats -
but possibly from civet cats. Suspected animals are now forbidden from
the market.
Dear reader, if you think Peter Klevius has a problem
with self-assertion you're very wrong. Apart from it being connected to
Peter Klevius criticism of citation cartels (see Demand for Resources,
1992:40-44) Peter Klevius main problem is your self-assertion.
Anthropologist
Peter Klevius vs. Afropologist John Hawks - and how the British
Piltdown hoax moved to Africa. And why would antelopes evolve in the
very opposite direction to humans - at the same time?!
Covid-19 propaganda against China
UK/Matt
Hancock (20200402): "We will work (against Covid19) with our friends
and allies." Peter Klevius: That excludes the best, i.e. China, which
you, on order from US, have declared an "unfriendly enemy"!
Peter
Klevius fact check: "COVID-19 has a natural origin and there is no
evidence that the virus was made in a laboratory or otherwise
engineered" (Nature). China swiftly sequenced and shared the genome
worldwide. China's remarkable response on all stages was praised by WHO
(but not BBC) and is in line with its superior tech advances (Mao's
China would never have made it). There isn't a trace of an alleged (by
BBC etc. fakes) Chinese Covid19 reporting "delay" that wouldn't have
been bigger in the West. And the reason is that
for China good
reputation is all that matters - now when it has already won the tech
competition. China's defense against West's smear campaign is called
"propaganda" in the West. Dear US, it's time to behave! You lost the
tech war to little Japan long ago. Now you've lost it against big China.
Get over it. So Peter Klevius advises: Do as Wall Street, shake hands
instead of producing unfounded Sinophobic smear propaganda!
Covid19 timeline
17 November 2019: A retrospectively confirmed case.
1
December 2019: The first known patient started experiencing symptoms
but had not been to the Huanan Seafood Wholesale Market. No
epidemiological link could be found between this case and later cases.
8–18
December 2019: Seven cases later diagnosed as COVID19 were documented;
only two of them were linked with the Huanan Seafood Wholesale Market.
18-29
December 2019: Bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BAL) that will eventually
be used for viral genome sequencing is collected from patients.
25 December 2019: Wuhan Fifth Hospital gastroenterology director Lu Xiaohong reported suspected infection by hospital staff.
26 December 2019: Zhang Jixian identified a CT scan that showed a different pattern from other viral pneumonia.
27
December 2019: She reported to Jianghan district CCDC with four cases.
During the following two days, the hospital received three similar
cases, who all came from Huanan Seafood Wholesale Market. The hospital
reported to the provincial and city CDC directly which initiated a field
investigation with a retrospective search for pneumonia patients
potentially linked to the market. They found additional such patients
and on 30 December, health authorities from Hubei Province reported this
cluster to CCDC who immediately sent experts to Wuhan to support the
investigation. Samples from these patients were obtained for laboratory
analyses.
30 December 2019: Wuhan Municipal Health Committee informed
WHO, Weibo etc. about an "urgent notice on the treatment of pneumonia
of unknown cause". There had been "a successive series of patients with
unexplained pneumonia recently." However, a DNA report inaccurately
indicated SARS on one patient. Late same day (17:43) ophthalmologist Li
Wenliang WeChatted "There were 7 confirmed cases of SARS at Huanan
Seafood Market." He included a patient's CT scan. At 18:42, he admitted
that it wasn't proven SARS.
31 December 2019: US Centers for Disease
Control and Prevention were alerted by China of an unexplained "cluster
of 27 cases of pneumonia” in Wuhan.
US worst nightmare is a
democratic China - which wouldn't change China but make it even more
like one-party "democracies" in the West - because that would mean
losing US only argument. US deliberately seeks Sinophobic
confrontational aggression against China - which hampers the development
and peace of the world.
US island puppets against China and EU.
US, who used to treat Japan as it now treats China, is now parasitizing
on former enemy Japan in an (in vane) effort to keep China high tech
down, and on the much tinier UK ally to trouble EU.
Something
sinister is behind when Sinophobic far right extremist politicians so
desperately risk future development in UK with false accusations of
"possible risks in the future", skewed presentations, and unfounded
demonization of Chinese high tech. And while Klevius is posting this,
all in his machine is spied on and sent to US. And why is BBC constantly
only hosting Sinophobic guests who also happen to be supporters of the
islamofascist Saudi dictator family and happy to allow US spying on you
via US companies? The only risk Huawei poses is that the Chinese state
gets fed up and makes it illegal to sell Chinese top tech to UK. China
is the future of high tech, so stepping off the bus means retardation.
Btw, the two main accusations against China could easily be made against
US/UK as well. China wants to trade and therefore doesn't want to risk
reputation. US doesn't bother about its reputation. And when it comes to
clean up muslim "communities" from islamofascist extremists there's
really no other difference than in numbers. Moreover, NATO/Turkey uses
extremist Uyghurs against civilians in e.g. Idlib - and hypocritically
accuse China when these jihadi return.
Klevius to women: NATO
makes a deal with the Taliban to continue sharia oppression of women,
and NATO+IS=true because NATO is the main culprit behind the suffering
in Idlib. Without the support from NATO the worst muslim terrorist group
would never have survived. Like IS, NATO ally Hayat Tahrir al-Sham
wants to create an islamic state. Turkey/NATO backs SNA well knowing
that it's together with HTS. I.e. a NATO member state invades its
neighbor, sides with terrorists and gets full support from NATO when its
soldiers get killed while helping the terrorists. And what about
Yemen?!
Peter Klevius to climatists: Sinophobia is a threat
to the environment, because China has the slowest population growth and
is the the least per capita polluter of main economies (see table below)
and the main producer of alternative and conventional super high tech!
Moreover, China lacks the same proportion of natural resources as e.g.
Sweden, Norway etc. (e.g. hydropower) but instead has to deal with the
dust smog blowing from the Gobi desert and the extreme cold from the
north. And China bears the manufacturing pollution for products other
countries then consume and profit on.
NATO (Turkey supported by
US/UK) is siding with the worst muslim terrorist organization Hayat
Tahrir al-Sham (some 10,000 IS jihadi) against the people of Idlib while
BBC News spreads misinfo propaganda against Syria, Russia and Iran -
and nothing about the Saudi dictator family.
BBC (20200217) wants to
stop Chinese tech because China opposes islamofascist Uyghurs. Klevius
suggests the world should stop dealing with US/UK because of involvement
in war crimes and genoscides against Shia muslims.
Why is
Wikipedia allowed to spread polemical, tendentious and deliberately
misleading info about islam? And not a word about islam's original
supremacist enslavement, booty and humiliation ideology?! This misinfo
is the most harmful of all!
From a true (negative) Human Rights,
as well as from a historical perspective, original islam may rather be
seen as original fascism. The oldest Koranic texts and the historically
verified beginning of islam both emphasize supremacism as the main tenet
(blamed/excused on "Allah"). Islam conserves racism, sexism and
supremacism as pointed out by true muslims (aka "fundamentalists")
reinforced through sharia (e.g. by Saudi based and steered OIC's world
sharia which is heavily criticized both by Klevius and the Council of
Europe etc.). Islamic (and therefore muslim) supremacism is easily
distinguished as it doesn't approve of Human Rights equality.
And why does Wikipedia deliberately conflate the history of islam with the fairy tales of believers in islam?!
Sinophobia
is racism but "islamophobia" is criticism of an ideology.
"Islamophobia" shouters are directly responsible for islamic hate crimes
based on Koranic texts and hitting children of "infidels".
The Saudi-US-UK axis of evil
Chinese
eyes less intrusive than Five Eyes (US and its puppets) - because China
prioritizes trade and reputation while US prioritizes global spying,
meddling and military control. The Saudi loving US puppets Duncan Smith,
Davis, Paterson, Green, Ellwood and Seely etc. produce baseless
"security" arguments for Sinophobic MPs.
U.S. flu this season
Feb. 2020: 19 million illnesses, 180,000 hospitalizations, and over
10,000 deaths (China has a third less common flu than US). 2019-nCoV, 6
Feb. 2020 (estim. total death rate 0.1-0.2%, i.e. same as common flu):
28,018 cases (not illnesses) and 563 deaths. Did the eye doctors SARS
rant on social media delay response in China? It wasn't SARS but much
closer to common flu - but without vaccine. Instead of assisting,
US/UK/BBC did the utmost to smear China with it!
Klevius warning
to Finland (and the rest of the world): Don't be useful idiots in US'
export of militarism! It will create tension and pull fire on you in a
conflict. Four balancing power blocs is safer than one or two. Moreover,
China will become the world's first true democracy thanks to AI. Don't
let Sinophobia blind you. US is going down unless it starts cooperating
instead of trying to rule the world. Non 5G iPhone sells well - in US -
where there's no true 5G.
BBC's bigoted and hypocritical Pakistan
rooted, Saudi raised and Cambridge schooled "muslim" (no veil, no
Ramadan fasting, but yes to alcohol etc.) presenter Mishal Husain, like
many Saudi/OIC supporters, represents the "security risk" between
islam's "core" (OIC sharia) and "periphery" (e.g. "Euro-islam",
"cultural islam" etc.).
Peter Klevius suggests cooperation instead of unfounded incl. religious) hate!
Klevius
is ashamed over hateful, racist Western Sinophobia - and support of
hateful sharia jihad. BBC's sharia supporting (?) muslim Mishal Husain
now eagerly sides with Sinophobic extreme right wing politicians who
support Saudi islamofascism but demonize China and Chinese (except if
critcical of China). Sinophobes would treat China exactly the same if it
copied US "democracy".
BBC today (20200129) forgot to tell about
China already having isolated the virus for vaccine (and helped
Australians to do so). However, BBC repeatedly lied that the death rate
is 20%. Common flu and the new corona virus deaths (~2%) are extremely
rare outside very vulnerable groups - who don't travel much.
BBC,
who otherwise don't hesitate to spit on Trump, has no problem using his
advisor when it comes to racist Sinophobia against Huawei. US is
blackmailing UK so to hinder China's tech success and the "security
issue" is actually US itself.
Niklas Arnberg, Swedish professor
in virology: "Considerably higher mortality than ordinary flu." BBC:
"Death toll rises as disease spreads from China."
Peter Klevius: Both
are faking! Arnberg used overall death numbers although most (all?!) of
these deaths have been people who could have died from ordinary flu as
well. And do you really think BBC would ever have written similarly
about the deadly camel flu from Saudi Arabia?!
Why is BBC spending so much more time on a 2019 flu from China than on the much deadlier 2019 camel flu from Saudi Arabia?!
Why
is BBC only talking about Jewish victims - and why is BBC silent about
the fact that most "anti-semites" (i.e. anti-Jews) are muslims?
Holocaust: 6 million Jews and 11 million "others" were murdered by the
German government for various discriminatory practices due to their
ethnicity, Atheism, or LGBT+.
Hitler: "All character training must be
derived from faith." Himmler: ""We believe in a God Almighty who stands
above us; he has created the earth, the Fatherland, and he has sent us
the Führer. Any human being who does not believe in God should be
considered arrogant, megalomaniacal, and stupid." Klevius (the Atheist
"other"): That's a description of me by most Americans and muslims. Btw,
why are muslim sex predators (compare Koran and sex slaves) from
Pakistan called "Asians"?! And why have they been protected while
Klevius has been muffled?!
Islam trumps LGBT rights in
English schools - and hateful sexist and racist muslim supremacism
defending BBC is silent as usual (e.g. about Parkfield Community School
2020).
Klevius: Do you really support US/UK/BBC's disgusting
racist Sinophobia madness - and their support and use of anti-Human
Rights muslim islamism?! Wikipedia: In the Xinjiang riots Turkic
speaking Uyghur muslims shouted/posted "kill the Han (Chinese) and Hui
(Chinese speaking muslims)"!
Why is BBC so silent about Iran Air
Flight 655 that was recklessly shot down by US over Iran territory
killing 290 incl. 66 children?! Is it the new US puppet empire agenda?
Did US aggression also cause the latest plane crash?
When BBC
announces "the threats of 2020" the murders, terrorism and war crimes
committing Saudi dictator family isn't included. As isn't US/UK
militaristic meddling and proxy wars in Syria, Yemen, Iraq etc. However,
China's peaceful trade and high tech manufacturing is!?
Saudi
based and steered Human Rights violator OIC is the main legal guidance
for the world's sharia muslims. BBC eagerly supports it by neglecting to
criticize it while spitting on those who do. OIC's Cairo Declaration on
"Human Rights" in Islam (CDHRI) is against freedom of religion - but
abuses real Human Rights for the promotion of anti-Human Rights sharia
islam. The CDHRI concludes in Articles 24 and 25 that all rights and
freedoms mentioned are subject to the Islamic sharia, which is the
declaration's sole source. OIC hence keeps the gate open for continued
islamofascism in the "muslim world" - and as a convenient tool for
meddling in "hostile states".
BBC calls critics in Russia and
terrorists in Hong Kong "opponents" but similar people "security risk"
if in UK. And has no problem with a real freedom fighter like Assagne to
rotten in a UK jail and to be extradited to possibly 175 years in
prison in the US. You believer in "islamophobia"! Doesn't it scare you
that if Peter Klevius is right about islam but wouldn't say anything,
then who would when you're doomed on the market if you do? If Marx had
been called a "messenger" then Marxism would have been protected by
freedom of religion, and critics called "Marxophobes". All "monotheist"
religions make excuses not to fully accept Human Rights equality, but
islam is by far the worst - not the least due to its origin and the fact
that it's protected, unlike other threats to Human Rights. Whereas
totalitarian Marxism used to be the enemy of the West, today US is on
the totalitarian islamofascist side using it for Saudi gains against
declared "enemies". It's truly a grim irony when BBC protects
islamofascist terrorist groups by telling you that the suffering in
Syria is due to the Syrian government and Russia. US could stop the
muslim terrorist groups at any time - but doesn't because it wants the
war and suffering to continue.
Peter Klevius fact/fake check: Why
does Google (and BBC) lie and fake straight up your face about China?!
When searching for 'world's biggest per capita polluters' China comes up
with extra big letters despite being one of the least polluting of
major economies (47th on a reliable polluters list). Moreover, China is
not only the world leader for alternative technologies, but its
pollution number also includes the biggest production of products
exported and consumed all over the world outside China. Source: EDGAR
and incl. all human activities leading to climate relevant emissions,
except biomass/biofuel combustion (short-cycle carbon).
Peter
Klevius Christmas greeting to BBC and Tesco: Ever thought about the
possibility that muslim islamists don't like making Christmas cards but
are encouraged by US/UK/BBC etc. to smear China. "We are foreign
prisoners (muslims?) in Shanghai Qingpu prison China. Forced to work
against our will (islamic Christophobia?). Please help us and notify
human rights (ultimate bigotry if sharia muslims ask for HR)
organisation (Saudi based and steered OIC?!)."
US/UK (NATO) don't accept muslims like Uighur islamists (other than as proxy soldiers) - but demand China to accept them.
NATO's
Sinophobia is a threat to world peace, environment and prosperity. NATO
is all about US monopolizing space for its own militarism and to block
China's success? In 1990s Russia was proposed as a member of NATO but is
now demonized by US/UK (and BBC) as the "main enemy" together with "the
challenge from China" (sic). But NATO members are guilty of offensive
wars, occupations, annexations, use of chemical weapons, use of islamist
terrorists, foreign interventions, extrajudicial murderings in other
countries - and use of similar muslim "re-education" camps as China (why
not just criminalize original evil islam?!). NATO (US) threatens the
free flow of tech and wealth, and provokes hate and defensive attitudes
among Chinese - hence forcing China (world leader in tech) using its
financial muscles more for defense (China can't be starved like USSR in
1980s) than environment. Btw, Chinese per capita GDP is 1/3 of US, and
total GDP much bigger than US - and faster growing. A fraction of the
effort given to demonize "islamophobic" islam criticim, would do wonders
to reduce Sinophobic racism against Chinese. And stop using the
"Communist threat". China is now a capitalist country similar to Western
powers - except technologically much better (and the West copies
everything China does in surveillance). Do you really think much would
change if China would be fully democratic - except chaos caused by NATO?
NATO (US/UK) would be equally Sinophobic. In fact, what is called
"democracy" in the West functions quite similarly as the leadership in
China. Media propaganda, lying politicians and empty promises combined
with silencing the real issues (compare BBC's fake "news") - and
therefore a truly democratic vote. Moreover, the only reason capitalist
China has a non-democratic leadership for the moment is precisely its
justified fear for leaving it vulnerable for what happened in the past
when UK and US meddled and attacked with great suffering for the Chinese
people. NATO should turn against the real evil, the islamofascist Saudi
dictator family.
England voted (for the second time) against Merkel’s islam import from Turkey.
Can
islam be rehabilitated from its evil origin and deeds - and can
unrehabilitated islam be allowed in public and private spheres?
Why
is Saudi based and steered OIC's Islamic State of Gambia accusing Aung
San Suu Kyi for the consequences of islamofascism OIC's sharia protects -
and why isn't the murderous islamofascist war criminal and genocide
committing Saudi dictator "prince" accused of anything? And why is BBC's
leading muslim extremist propaganda presenter Mishal Husain allowed to
"present" an absolutely one-sided pro islamist picture for BBC's
compulsory fee paying listeners?
"British" nationalist hypocrisy: Get back control - and meddle, influence, intervene, spy and control all over the world.
More
than half of muslims in UK are "islamophobes" (against sharia) - just
like Peter Klevius, Council of Europe etc. - but opposite to BBC and
many UK politicians (source: A survey of UK’s muslim communities by
Martyn Frampton, David Goodhart and Khalid Mahmood MP).
BBC
awards a white man who plays an odd sport few are interested in the
title of "sports personality of the year 2019". Why?! Because cricket is
a "british" colonial sports and also fits BBC's special interest in
"asians" - but couldn't find a "british asian" good enough.
Is BBC killing UK democracy and paving the way for islamofascism?
DEMOCRACY DENIED: WARNING TO UK VOTERS ABOUT BBC's HUMANRIGHTSPHOBIA! WHO's RIGHT ON ISLAM - BBC OR THE COUNCIL OF EUROPE?
BBC
undermines your most basic Human Rights. BBC's "islamophobia"
propaganda machine (incl. Sayeeda Warsi) boosts OIC islam while
neglecting Council of Europe's sharp ("islamophobic") criticism of OIC's
world sharia (Cairo declaration). SO HOW COME THAT BBC IS ALLOWED TO
MEDDLE IN THE VOTING PROCESS BY ATTACKING AND SMEARING THOSE CANDIDATES
WHO SHARE THE VIEW OF THE COUNCIL OF EUROPE - not to mention the
anti-fascist Universal Human Rights declaration of 1948?! And how come
that racism against e.g. Polish and other EU people in UK is of no
interest for BBC while the "problem" of "islamophobia" fills all BBC
"news"?
How Merkel paved the way for Brexit (Erdogan deal) and
aided jihad in EU. NATO (US) with former fascist state Germany now sides
with islamofascism - especially Erdogan's Ottoman aspirations - and
supports Uyghur jihadism in hope of placing NATO (i.e. US) nukes between
Russia and China. Peter Klevius wonders whether this ill-directed jihad
propaganda will promote peace and safety?
The world bully U.S.
thinks it owns and rules the world after having colonized it via dollar
manipulation, infiltration, spying, meddling, sanctions and the
unscrupulous use of militants and militarism.
Thanks to the global
dollar scam, Americans have been freeloaders on the rest of the world,
the biggest per capita polluters and the U.S. by far the biggest threat
to world peace via weapons built with money it stole from the world.
Said by Peter Klevius who has been an anti-socialist all his life. Btw.
the world's industrial revolution didn's start in England but in Sweden
already in the late 17th century by inventor Christopher Polhem and
capitalist Gabriel Stierncrona. Without Polhem's automation to get the
rich Swedish iron ore from the mains, England had no chance to start
real industrial production.
A nun's gear doesn't sign other women as "whores". However, what about a woman in an islamic "chastity" gear?
K.S.
Lal (a giant among historians): Mahmud of Ghazni had marched into
Hindustan again and again to wage jihad and spread the Muhammadan
religion, to lay hold of its wealth, to destroy its temples, to enslave
its people, sell them abroad and thereby earn profit, and to add to
muslim numbers by converting the captives.
Is BBC 100% steered by
muslims? Not only can you ever hear anything critical about islam and
muslims - but all main channels are also occupied by sharia (OIC)
supporting (i.e. against basic Human Rights equality) muslims. Nazir
Afzal ('Moral maze', news, culture etc.), Mishal Husain (news, culture
etc.), Samira Ahmed (news, culture etc.), Razia Iqbal (news, culture
etc.). And they all keep cheating the public about it and instead
pointing finger to "dumb and hateful xenophobes". Not a word about e.g.
Council of Europe's harsh critcism (see below) of muslims biggest sharia
organization, the Saudi based and steered OIC. Foreigners isn't the
peoblem - sharia islam is!
BBC's muslims and their PC supporters
also meddle in UK election by demonizing "islamophobia", i.e. trying to
stop critcs of islamofascism.
Muslim child/youth fascism induced by an islam interpretation from family and strengthened by PC media, politicians etc.
Peter
Klevius: Everyone - incl. every muslim who respects Human Rights -
ought to make sure to vote for an "islamophobe"! BBC and Sayeeda Warsi
will make their utmost to stop critics of islamofascism in the election.
Don't be robbed of your democratic right. And of course you know that
the only real problem with migration is islamofascism.
BBC's "man
in Hong Kong" asked street terror leader Joshua Wong if they could
possibly escalate violence. And they could. One day later they put a
Chinese on fire in a murder attempt.
BBC dosn't want to save
4,000 steel-workers' jobs because "it's a Chinese buyer and because of
the leadership". However, BBC doesn't complain about the murderous and
islamofascist Saudi leadership and more than 200 UK/Saudi joint ventures
between UK and Saudi companies, and some 100,000 Saudi nationals in UK
(equivalent to 14 Million Chinese).
BBC, in an interview about
Corbyn, also desperately tries to agitate for more militarism and use of
nukes - although fact being that a UK with nukes and war meddling
globally may draw more attention and due risk for the Brits than
without.
Peter Klevius: The Saudi Aramco sale is the biggest
ripoff in the world. If there's any future in oil and you don't care
about environment, then why buy what's at its peak when Venezuela's
PDVSA is bigger and as low it can get?!
Are you an "islamophobe"
if you don't like islamist Human Rights violations? Islam has (via OIC's
sharia declaration) abandoned the most basic anti-fascist Human Rights
from 1948. Islam is hence the only religion in doing so - not even the
Catholics have needed to replace Human Rights with "Catholic human
rights".
The seed for world fascism is dormant in Saudi based and
steered OIC's world sharia - opposed by ECHR and Peter Klevius, but
supported by Sayeeda Warsi.
Sayeeda Warsi, UK's biggest "islamophobia" shouting mouth against Human Rights, is for OIC sharia
While US/UK aim for militarism and war China aims for health and wealth.
How
could the Brexit party possibly avoid the Parliament. Breakit instead
of Brexit because what's the point of leaving one EU while still staying
in an other called UK? England voted leave.
However,
unfortunately BBC demonizes China on behalf of UK's relying on
militarist meddling, weapons sales and islamofascist sharia finance. So
you see the solution: Cut off sharia etc. islamofascist ties and open up
for prospering with China - not the over-selfish game of spying and
dying of US.
BBC boosts stupid nationalist "Britishness" with
peculiar "sports" like cricket and rugby because the world has already
"colonized" football and the English language is a global property.
1
Nov 2019 BBC's Sinophobic muslim presenter Razia Iqbal spent most of
World Tonight ("in depth news reporting and intelligent analysis from a
global perspective") to defend muslim connected street terror in Hong
Kong while smearing China. However, nothing about muslims in UK
attacking journalists and non-muslims celebrating the Diwali which is
globally seen as 'a day of light and hope'. The rest of the time Razia
Iqbal boosted rugby. Intelligent? No. Propagandistic, tendentious,
bigoted, hypocritical and misinforming while neglecting - yes.
Nigel
Farage is like BBC against "islamophobia" and pro-Saudi - but Boris
Johnson doesn't like letter boxes and was criticized by Theresa May for
being critical against the Saudis while serving as her foreign minister.
China
(laws against sharia islamofascism) and EU (Human Rights against sharia
islamofascism) are now the only ones protecting basic (negative*) Human
Rights.
* Religious people and socialists don't like negative Human
Rights simply because they prefer collectives ("communities") rather
than individuals. That's why the web is full of misinfo about these
rights. Read Peter Klevius definition instead if you want a deep view -
or listen to Lauren Chen starting from 7:11 if you want it light
The
Saudi "custodian of islam" has some 1.5 billion "citizens" in the muslim
world Ummah nation - and demands the world to bow them no matter what
(as long they aren't Shia or so, of course). China, on the other hand,
keeps its citizens and laws within its own borders. IS islam IS fascism
and islam (even the archbishop agrees). So why is sharia fascism not
separated from an "islam" that submits to basic Human Rights? As it
stands now Saudi based and steered OIC's sharia (the 1990 Cairo
declaration) still stands as the basic Human Rights violation via sharia
muslims all over the world. And whereas China actively tries to erase
sharia islamofascism, EU keeps promoting import of it while judicially
telling us it's not right, yet doing nothing to stop it.
Unlike the
West, China hasn't aggressively meddled militaristically in other
countries around the world, but rather being the world's foremost
spreader of new technology and wealth. And whereas the West has eagerly
supported Mohammed's totalitarian aims, China has, in practise,
implemented in law most of the Human Rights advices that The Council of
Europe has directed against OIC. Against this background West's Saudi
backing and China smearing is deeply bigoted and hypocritical.
John
le Carré: I'm depressed and ashamed of British nationalism. Nationalism
needs enemies but today we really have no identifiable enemies except
among ourselves.
North Atlantic (sic) Treaty Organization invades
a country in Mideast and attacks (with chemical weapons) a people
without a country
UK's Brexit business model: Sharia finance,
weapons sale and militaristic meddling?UK Secretary of State for Foreign
and Commonwealth Affairs (sic) and Global Neo-Imperialist and
Militarist Meddling, Jeremy Hunt, 15 Oct. 2019: It's wrong to accuse
Donald Trump - it's Americans isolationism because American taxpayers
don't want to pay between 1/2 and 2/3 of the defense of Europe. And
Turkey is very skilled at finding wedges and gaps between allies. UK
should be EU's bridge to US.
Peter Klevius: No, EU should take care
of its own defense - against whom? The Saudi dictator family who is the
world's no 1 spender on weapons and islamic terror incitement and who
hates EU's anti-sharia legislation? And UK taxpayers should not have to
pay more for dangerous militarism. Militaristic meddling is a bad and
dangerous business idea.
Read K.S. Lal (free online) on islam's evil spread!
A
Google (i.e. U.S. web monopoly) search (20191006) reports 'islamists
Hong Kong' "missing". Really! No islamists in Hong Kong? Peter Klevius
also wonders if EU citizens in UK are UKongers and can peacefully demand
the same rights as Joshua Wong violently demands (and eagerly
broadcasted by BBC) for Hong Kongers?
Are EU citizens in UK included in Tom Tugenhadt's "British people"?
Sinophobe
Tom Tugendhat, chair of UK's Foreign Affairs Committee (who has studied
islam and Arabic in Mideast) suggests that English speaking
universities should consider banning Chinese students because "they
might be used as leverage like Huawei". Peter Klevius wonders if one
could be any more racist than this, and if he doesn't see any
islamofascist sharia supremacist "leverage" at all? Btw, there are more
than 50,000 Chinese muslims in Hong Kong. Peter Klevius wonders how many
of them are "radical" ones and participate in BBC's lengthy anti-China
propaganda "news" - while the world doesn't suffer from Chinese but from
muslim violence and Human Rights violations?
BBC's Mark Mardell
couldn't get a visa to China because of his extreme and hateful
Sinophobia - but that didn't stop him/BBC from producing a fake
anti-China program series while pretending to be there. Is Sinophobia
really better than cooperation?
US/UK destroyed the lives of
millions of Chinese during some hundred years of evil militaristic
meddling. BBC is now busy smearing China all the time while supporting
Saudi islamofascism and violent Hong Kong demonstrators - but neglecting
the mass of peaceful pro-China demonstrators. BBC also "worries" about
Chinese "surveillance state" while the truth is China's technological
superiority. US is much more insidious in its surveillance policies but
lacks the techno - can't even produce a working 5G so far. US/UK follow
exactly China but utilize the meantime to smear it. And who is really
behind the Hong Kong riots? Someone who can't take China's success? But
the Syria tactics won't work. US (and its UK puppet) wants to be able to
meddle militarily near China - therefore its interest in Taiwan, Hong
Kong, Korea, Tibet, Myanmar, Uyghur extremist muslims etc.
As
Greta Thunberg is allegedly reported to the Swedish social authorities,
Peter Klevius suggests that her parents read his thesis Pathological
Symbiosis in LVU, Relevance, and Sex Segregated Emergence. Keeping in
mind that Peter Klevius daughter was only 15 when she entered university
and at 16 made her graduate paper about women in ancient times, it
shouldn't be considered too sensitive for Greta either. Also read the
attached email correspondence which clearly shows how democracy is
manipulated. And why not consider Angels of Antichrist, the Social State
vs the People (P. Klevius 1996). And last but not least, Peter Klevius
1981/1992 Demand for Resources (original titel Resursbegär).
Peter
Klevius congratulates Savid Javid for abandoning the islamofascist
"islamophobia" smear. BBC’s bigoted hypocrite Mishal Husain and others
ought to follow!
Peter Klevius and the Council of Europe share exactly the same "islamophobia".
Council
of Europe. Resolution 2253 (2019), Sharia, Saudi based and steered
OIC's Cairo Declaration and the European Convention on Human Rights:
Human Rights protect the right to freedom of thought, conscience and
religion as enshrined in Article 9 of the European Convention on Human
Rights. The right to manifest one’s religion, however, is a qualified
right whose exercise, under Article 17 of the Convention, may not aim at
the destruction of other Convention rights or freedoms.
People
in UK-land (especially women) will loose their Human Rights after Brexit
- while sharia prevails in UK, and UK citizens in EU are protected by
the European Court of Human Rights.
Brexit was meant to protect UK
from muslim invasion via Turkey's proposed visa free deal with Merkel.
Even the possibility of temporary membership in ECHR (in case of a deal)
isn't enough - especially considering UK will be out of reach of the
European Court of Justice.
US loosing the tech war - and starting a real one?
Do Americans share the Saudi hate against Shia muslims?
BBC supports muslim persecution of Christians etc.
In
the 8 October 2016 Sana'a (Yemen) funeral bombing by Saudi Arabia 155
people were killed and at least 525 more wounded when two airstrikes,
about three to eight minutes apart, hit the packed Al Kubra hall. US and
UK happy with the Saudis investigating it.
This muslim wants to criminalize Peter Klevius islamophobia. Really!
West's
indulgence of islamofascism (sharia) has made its boasting against
China about "democratic values" empty. The risk of you being stabbed,
raped etc. by a hateful jihadi is created by your political leaders, BBC
etc. - who also have arranged so it's not even called a hate crime.
BBC
squeezes in Eng-land cricket in every news report - while UK-land plays
borderless Brexit - and football is divided in four UK-lands, Welsh,
English, Irish and Scottish players, and two top leagues with whatever
players!? Confusing? Not even close to the "British" measuring
decaphobia. English isn't "British", it belongs to the world. British
stands for imperialism, colonialism, slavery and cooperation with
islamofascists.
Peter Klevius stands for these "stops" and due
huge implications - all shame on him if you can prove him wrong (click
links if you need to educate yourself before saying something stupid):
Stop using the misleading 'gender' instead of sex (sociology)! Stop
islam's abuse of Human Rights (jurisprudence)! Stop saying humans came
"out of Africa" (anthropology)! Stop talking about "consciousness" when
you don't know what you're talking about (philosophy/ai).
Islam is the problem - China is the solution.
If
China today became a full democracy (and even accepting full Human
Rights*) - nothing would change, because it's not the rulers but the
high tech industry in China that outperforms the West. And unlike islam,
China doesn't have tenets against Human Rights. However, islam is tied
to its supremacist and sexist sharia tenets (OIC) which deny women full
Human Rights - just the opposite to what is said in the anti-fascist
Universal Human Rights declaration from 1948. If islam would accept full
Human Rights it would not be islam anymore. China's economic expansion
has been a non-aggressive big contributor to wealth around the world,
but when China reached out its Belt and Road hand, then the West bit it
and supported extremist muslim terrorists. Islam induced hate crimes and
terror are based on a shared evil ideology (a global muslim collective
rather than as nationals, which inspire and hail each other) - but
because most are committed by lonely or gang muslims, and because police
and media are told muslim "ethnicity" ought not to be revealed, then
the public are kept unaware of most muslim hate crimes. How come that
evilness is protected? The answer is in the question. To hide its
original evilness. And how come that BBC and UK politicians dare to
support islamofascism in Kashmir? Freedom from sharia for women in
Kashmir!
* UK PM Theresa May opposed Human Rights.
Peter
Klevius: BBC supports the islamofascist Saudi dictator family's
strategic use of supremacist islam which has spred muslim hate all over
the world's streets, institutions etc. (and usually not correctly, if at
all, reported by BBC which instead doesn't hesitate to give long
coverage of "alternative news" that better suits its propaganda) - while
muslim terrorist organizations keep it within muslim territories. So if
true Salafists became the "gurdians of islam's holy places" then that
would mean less muslim terror elsewhere. And less to cover up for BBC.
How big a contributor to the suffering of islamic supremacist hate
crimes has BBC's fake (and lack of) info been? Will we in the future see
BBC in an international court accused of crimes against humanity? As it
stands now the spill over effect of BBC's cynical support of proxy evil
is stained in blood and rape etc. over innocent people. And if true
Salafists took over in muslim countries, they would quickly become
non-muslim countries. A better option than today's prolonged suffering
caused by the hopeless effort to "adapt" a medieval slavery ideology to a
modern world based on everyone's Human Rights equality. And if it's so
important to keep islam in name only - then islam would loose all of its
racist and sexist "we and the other" appeal anyway.
Why is West and BBC aiding islamofascism?
Statues of football player Nilla Fischer and Caroline Seger vandalized in Sweden
Why didn't islam go to the Moon?!
Sex segregation/apartheid (aided by religion and poverty) means over-population.
Islam (represented in UN by Saudi based and steered OIC and its sharia called “islamic human rights”) is against Human Rights!
Sweden’s
Supreme Court has found a man guilty of rape for having sex without
explicit consent from a "teenage woman" who had been passive and gave no
clear expression that she wanted to participate in the sexual acts.
Lack of a partner’s spoken agreement or any other clear approval can
hence be considered rape. However, islamic sharia gives a muslim man the
"right" to have sex with wives and and concubines his "right hand
possesses" (e.g. "infidel" girls/women). The neo-islamist rational
(original openly supremacist islam didn't need one) is that "it
satisfies the sexual desire of the female". Peter Klevius wonders if
Swedish Courts will accept this reasoning - perhaps only for muslims?!
Peter
Klevius also wonders whether BBC's leading presenter, the alcohol
drinking and not Ramadan fasting, Pakistan rooted and Saudi raised
muslim, Mishal Husain, approves of sharia?
UK introduced face
recognition after for many years accusing Chinese for having it. Peter
Klevius wonders how this fits UK's face covered muslims and others who
utilize it?
So how do you vote for someone critical of islam's
Human Rights violations if parties don't allow "islamophobia"? Is it
democracy?
What do BBC and Jeremy Hunt have in common? Both support the islamofascist murderer and war criminal Mohammad bin Salman.
Peter Klevius: Girls' emancipation needs more football and less cricket, netball etc.
BBC's
cricket propaganda is a slap in the face of young girls who need
equally much moving around and spatial skills as young boys. However,
there's a huge sex segregation in females motivation and access to
football - not only the world's by far most popular physical sport, but
also the only one that doesn't use tools or hands to handle the ball,
and which makes all participants moving most of the time even without
the ball. Moreover, the very nature of the sport forces participants to a
never ending series of spatial and strategic challenges - with or
without the ball and even while playing alone. So why is BBC so hostile
to the Queen of sports (the "beautiful game") that is perfect for the
physical and spatial development of girls - and in the face of the
football loving majority who has to pay compulsory fees (and paying
extra for football channels) to this faking regime propaganda media that
uses stiff and lifeless colonial cricket for neo-colonial purpose?!
England banned football for girls/women already 1921 and suggested
cricket, land hockey and netball instead - almost like today except it's
not called a ban. And what about the laughable notion of a "world cup"
in cricket?! When is the "world cup" in caber tossing between Gotland
and Scotland?
The murderous war criminal Saudi muslim "custodian
of islam" (and OIC) "prince" MBS is OK but Human Rights defender Peter
Klevius isn't. Why?! Because the former isn't an "islamophobe", dude!
West's indulgence of islamofascism (sharia) has made its boasting against China empty
Peter
Klevius serious questions to you "out of Africa" believer! Ask
yourself: How come that the oldest primates came from outside Africa;
that the oldest great ape divergence happened outside Africa; that the
oldest bi-pedals are from outside Africa; that the only
australopithecines with a Homo skull lived as far from Africa you can
get; that the oldest truly modern looking skull is from eastern China;
that the oldest Africans are mongoloid; that the latest genetic mix that
shaped the modern human happened in Siberia and is traced to SE Asia;
that the earliest sophisticated art is found from Iberia to Sulawesi -
but not in Africa; that the oldest round skulled Homo sapiens in
sub-Saharan Africa are much younger than similar skulls in Eurasia; that
we lack ancient enough DNA from Africa, etc. etc.? Peter Klevius theory
answers all these questions - and more.
Peter Klevius evolution formula: From production (isolation) to end consumption (diversity).
Stop
US global bullying! What moral right does US have trying to dominate
Earth and space? "God"?! Or the Saudi murderer and mass murderer
"prince"?! Hasn't US sucked out enough already from the rest of the
world? A global dollar manipulation favoring US and paid by the rest. A
US marked global license and patent imperialism - and Android. Is
Internet next?
26 June 2019: BBC's leading presenter, the alcohol
drinking and not ramadan fasting Pakistan rooted muslim, Mishal Husain
(brought up in Saudi Arabia), worried about Boris Johnson not having
cricket as his hobby.
25 June 2019: BBC's leading presenter, the
alcohol drinking and not ramadan fasting muslim, Mishal Husain (brought
up in Saudi Arabia), sounds desperate when trying to smear Johnson. Is
it because Boris 2016 was critical against the Saudis while foreign
minister and 2018 critical of muslim women packed in burqas etc.?
BBC thinks the militaristic Saudiphil Jeremy Hunt "is a safer option" as UK PM. What about you?
BBC News 8:00 AM 23 June 2019: Johnson financially unfit because he spilled wine on a couch.
Is the Saudi "custodian of islam" a muslim - and is the very question "islamophobic", "muslimophobic" or "Saudiphobic"?
Why
is BBC comparing Saudi with China?! China's leader isn't a murderer,
war criminal, and spreader of terror on the streets! "If we drop the
Saudis then we can't deal with China either." Really?! BTW, 'Diversity'
means different/conflicting whereas its antonym stands for
similar/friendly.
Blinked by BBC's fake "news" which instead
boost militaristic confrontation and the smearing of China: The Saudi
war criminal "custodian of islam" who murdered Khashoggi is now the
world's new Hitler. However, unlike Hitler's Germanic language
imperialism, bin Salman's Arabic language imperialism is added by a
totalitarian imperialism due to the fact that he is a muslim and as such
represents the totality of islam (inc. the Saudi based and steered all
muslims world organization O.I.C.'s sharia declaration against Human
Rights). Peter Klevius has for long pointed out that we need to
distinguish between Human Rights obeying "muslims" and "extremist"
muslims, but for some reason they are all bundled as 'muslims'.
US puppet empire UK's Jeremy Hunt wants to double spending on militaristic meddling for US
Chinese high tech is met with Sinophobia, bans (tariffs) and militarism by US/UK/EU.
China's emissions incl. export products made in China
When
muslim terrorists mass murder more than 100 in Mali, BBC gives it less
time (2 min.) than an item on animal cruelty, Russian journalist arrest
etc. in a 45 min "news" program!
Read this: The "out of
Africa" hoax is worse than the Piltdown hoax - and much bigger and more
worrisome. When will “out of Africaphobia” be criminalized?
Nothing in Primate/Haplorhini evolution came out of Africa - not even Africa (it was disconnected due to tectonics).
scientist - people like Klevius
researcher
- if the scientist is an architect in global architecture the
researcher is the builder in a building team in one of many construction
companies.
A “definition” of “islamophobia” ought to be balanced with a definition of muslim Human Rightsphobia.
"Diversity" without basic (negative) Human Rights is like having a car without steering - dangerous.
In
its senseless and continuous "islamophobia" ranting BBC says to be
'muslim' is the same as to be 'English'. Klevius thinks not. A 'muslim'
is one who wittingly or unwittingly adheres to what historical records
show being the most evil enslaving ideology ever around (from a Human
Rights perspective). And Klevius doesn't count as real muslims those who
call themselves "cultural muslims" for the purpose of benefiting from a
certain "ethnicity", or those who against their will are trapped in
muslimhood because of the evil apostasy tenet in islam. And islamic
"modesty" attires is a protected way of calling other women "whores".
Klevius
suggests the UK baby should be named Muhammad. After all, according to
BBC, the Queen is related to him and all politicians love islam. And
several hadiths describe him as white (one even proposing the killing of
anyone who says he was black). Only problem being that he then may be
described as a white supremacist. Luckily the baby, according to BBC, is
“mix-race”.
Klevius to EU voters: If you respect Human Rights -
don’t vote for anyone who supports the islamofascist Saudi dictator
family who spreads Human Rightsphobia via the Saudi based and steered
OIC’s world sharia!
And if you respect your Earthly home – don’t
support a hate ideology that encourages over-population and sex
apartheid. We don’t need more workers because the most profitable
sectors have the least jobs – a trend that AI accelerates.
No true muslim can be fully human.
Why?
Because islam's dividing the world in muslims and (not fully human)
"infidels" makes it impossible. Only by fully accepting the basic (s.c.
'negative') Universal Human Rights equality - which islam can't accept
(see e.g. Saudi based and steered all muslims world Ummah sharia
organization OIC) without committing ideological suicide - can we meet
every human as basically equal, in the same way as we can give every
road-user a basic equality in traffic, i.e. we have traffic sense. So
Klevius asks muslims whether they have "traffic sense"? And for all the
rest of you - to be 'human' in a global sense can only be achieved by
giving every human you meet basic equality - no matter how alien that
human might feel to you. Because every human has the right to be "alien"
and there can't even be any alternative to this as long as we don't
accept brainwashed totalitarianism (see e.g. Klevius 1996 paper Angels
of Antichrist). This is the only way to meaningfully talk about
'humankind'. And to alien hunters Klevius says you probably meet them
every day already.
So when BBC and other fake media talk about
xenophobia against muslims, they actually contribute to spread
xenophobia themselves.
Peter Klevius to Greta Thunberg: Saudi
salafist oil funded supremacist islam or Chinese Taoist (kindness) high
tech - which one do you think is the real threat to the people and
environmment in EU and the world?
Ultimate bigotry and hypocrisy – militant spying and war mongering 5 Eyes instead of true 5G?
Saudi
hate spreading antennas (Salafi/Wahhabi mosques etc.) or Chinese world
leading 5G tech? No one knows the amount of street etc. victims of Saudi
hate because when the haters are muslims their attacks are not recorded
as hate crimes. If a Chinese would attack shouting 'Tao' it would most
certainly be classified as a hate crime. However, chances are slim that
it ever occurs compared to hate attacks made by muslims.
Arabic
(not "white" etc.) islam has been the by far biggest enslaver throughout
1,400 years. Islamic language imperialism via the Koran. And all races
have been complicit in the muslim Koranic slave trade. So how do you
distinguish between descendants of slaves or slave traders? Will
Cambridge check today's "Caribbeans", "Africans" etc. about it? Klevius
warns there might be unwelcomed surprises, e.g. that many of those who
come to Europe are actually descendants of slave trading black Africans
on whose wealth lineage top they are better privileged than those from
slave lineages. And what about "whites" like Klevius who were cut off
from any lineages? Should the skin color Klevius was born with be used
against him because of the privileges of others with the same skin
color? Same question may be asked about sexism. Klevius doesn’t see it
fair to blame him for male sexism just because he happens tp be male, do
you!
The real threat is the US led Saudi supporting spy
organization 5 Eyes, which 1) tries to block superior tech, and 2) uses
China as a scapegoat for US/UK privacy breaches. It's not China but US
that wants to control you! So "securing 5G from Chinese influence"
actually means giving US/UK a technical space for spying/influencing
etc. In short, trying to hinder US/UK customers from accessing the best
technology while spying on them.
Muslim terrorists get legal
aid to stay in UK - EU nationals don't! p { margin-bottom: 0.25cm; line-height: 115%; }
The
crystal clear connection between the surge in knife, rape etc. attacks
and islam - and its custodian, the islamofascist Saudi dictator family -
is desperately silenced by BBC and politicians (BBC now tries to cover
this up by airing long programs about "conventional" knife crimes
instead). This means they are directly complicit, doesn't it. Klevius
suggests boycotting BBC and Saudi bribed politicians. They constitute
the worst security threat.
BBC collected a UKIP hating mob to shout "islamophobia" against islam criticism.
However,
the very same BBC also willfully misleads people about islam so that
most people in UK are completely unaware of that Saudi based and steered
OIC and its extreme Human Rightsphobia is a world guide for (sharia)
muslims. Moreover, BBC's top presenter (Mishal Husain) who seems to be
muslim in name only (drinking alcohol, not fasting on Ramadan, no muslim
attire, no Haji, no sharia, etc) so to dupe the public about islam.
The
1948 Human Rights declaration was created to protect against fascism.
Accepting islam without a clear border against sharia that violates the
most basic Human Rights, allows space for islamofascism (i.e. original
supremacist islam).
However, the new fascist mob is shouting
"islamophobia" because islam can't comply with it (compare Saudi based
and steered OIC's sharia declaration against Human Rights). This smear
is then "enhanced" by connecting it to murderers, Nazis, right wing
extremists etc. Islam's sharia sexism and racist supremacism is the
problem - so why is addressing it "bad"?!
BBC is also keen on silencing the only truly free media, i.e. bloggers etc. social media.
The best explanation to the surge in knife crimes since 2015 is the Islamic State's exhortation to street jihad.
However,
the police don't record hate crimes as muslim - other than if directed
against muslims. And do consider that IS and the Saudi dictator family
both rest on the same Salafi islam that most young true muslims in the
West follow. Following Salafism (etc. true muslimhood) involves
distinguishing muslims from others, to show that one only belongs to
islam and that true muslims ought to be strangers to the "infidels".
When Klevius sees a muslim woman in burqa, veil etc. he thinks that's a
supremacist and rapist attitude towards other women. And certainly
contempt of Human Rights.
UK/BBC's extreme double standard re. the
islamofascist Saudi dictator family and China. Klevius: How come that
islamofascist tech poor Saudi property-, media-, infra structure- etc.
'vulnerable' investments and supremacist hate spreading mosques, is
considered no threat to UK but instead an 'important ally' while China,
which doesn't tick any danger boxes, is deliberately painted by BBC
propaganda as the worst threat? And how come that China's peaceful Belt
and Road spreading of wealth and high tech is considered worse than UK's
continuing militaristic and (un)security meddling within an EU that UK
decided to leave for the purpose of EU not meddling within UK?!
UK
continues even after Brexit to use EU citizens as bargaining chips by
placing their rights in an unsafe statutory instrument instead of in the
law.
Stop security cooperation with UK whose close connection to
the the suspected murderer, war criminal and islamic terror spreading
islamofascist Saudi custodian of islam, Mohammad bin Salman, constitutes
the by far worst threat against the security of people in EU! Moreover,
sharia islam (the only real islam for real muslims) which is a racist
and sexist supremacist ideology that violates Human Rights, is supported
by UK.
Don't let haters and Human Rightsphobes get away with it by calling themselves 'believers'!
Either
religion is (grades of) supremacist hate and sexism and you better
become an Atheist (and therefore universal human) - or you keep your
"beliefs" for yourself. In traffic you can think what you want about
other people, but you can't drive over them!
You muslim should be ashamed of calling Human Rights defenders "islamophobes"
-
and take responsibility for your own supremacist sharia, represented by
Saudi based and steered all muslims world organization OIC, which
violates the most basic Human Rights! And do note the difference between
universal impositions and universal freedom! Full respect of the other
rests on accepting her/his freedom. This is the only way of being
universally human.
Islam is an evil* supremacist and divisive ideology - why isn’t this told by BBC, schools etc.?
*
weighed against the anti-fascist, anti-supremacist, anti-racist and
anti-sexist Universal Human Rights declaration of 1948 that all
civilized people are supposed to build on. Islam doesn't fit these
goals, so OIC (the legal world Umma steered from and by the Saudi
dictator family) decided to replace them with medieval racist, sexist
and supremacist sharia.
Article 24 of the Saudi based and steered
OIC's sharia declaration (CDHRI) states: "All the rights and freedoms
stipulated in this Declaration are subject to the Islamic Sharia."
Article 19 says: "There shall be no crime or punishment except as
provided for in the Sharia." CDHRI also fails to guarantee freedom of
religion, in particular the right of each and every individual to
abandon their religion, as a "fundamental and non-derogable right".
Article
10 of the Declaration states: "Islam is the religion of unspoiled
nature. It is prohibited to exercise any form of compulsion on man or to
exploit his poverty or ignorance in order to convert him to another
religion or to Atheism." Since in Islamic society all reasons for
conversion away from Islam are considered to be essentially either
compulsion or ignorance, this effectively forbids conversion away from
Islam.
CDHRI denies women equality with men by imposing "own
rights" and "duties to perform". p { margin-bottom: 0.25cm; line-height:
115%; }
A global world is only possible under the guidance of
(negative – i.e. individual freedom from racist/sexist impositions)
Human Rights - as outlined in the original anti-fascist Universal Human
Rights declaration of 1948. It excludes any religious or other
supremacist tenets or impositions on the individual.
Due to the
above and due to the West (politicians and media) having locked itself
in with the islamofascist Saudi dictator family (the custodians of
islam) we now have a deficit of (negative) Human Rights education – but
massively more religious propaganda (e.g. Saudi spread “islamophobia”
smear) against these rights. Against this background it's utmost
hypocrisy to point against wealth spreading China while supporting
islamic hate, terror and war crimes spreading hegemonic Saudi dictator
family.
The world's biggest fake news producer, UK state media
BBC, 20190221 gave the Japanese asteroid landing just a few seconds but
managed to squeeze in the fake "info" that "it is the first attempt to
take samples back to Earth" (Cathy/PM 17:00) when the previous Japanese
sond already 2010 brought back samples from an other asteroid. No one
else has managed to do this except the Japanese. This is in line with
BBC's usual racist attitude against Japan and China.
WARNING
about "Five Eyes" and BBC, and their "close ally", the hate, terror and
war crimes producing islamofascist "custodian of islam", the Saudi
dictator family!
If you prefer peace, democratic non-fake information
and positive development - ask your politicians to avoid US/UK's war
mongering militarism and the world's biggest state propaganda tool BBC,
which constitutes the most serious threat to free information. UK
government is pushing for neo-British imperialist militarist meddling
and intervention around the world - and making its propaganda tool BBC
"the custodian of fact checks", i.e. a wolf among sheep.
Theresa
May wants to leave EU. That should include UK militarist meddling within
EU as well. Leave means leave! Don't let UK and its "close ally" the
islamofascist Saudi dictator family contaminate EU citizens lives. Don't
let the insidious spy organization Five Eyes spy on EU citizens and
their leaders and parliamentarians.
Don't let BBC's or islam's
glossy surface (i.e. normal news/info and non-sharia muslims
respectively) lure you to not see the evil core. Klevius is the
opposite. WYSIWYG. No hidden evil core, just defense of your (whoever
you are) basic Human Rights that islam wants to deny you.
UK government wants to force EU to put a border on Ireland - so it can blame EU for something UK-Brexit caused.
Klevius
supports no border on Ireland. Follow the will of the people, i.e. let
England leave and let Scotland and Northern Ireland stay. UK is an
unconstitutional mess which now wants to leave EU without controlling
its border to EU. A proper constitution would have demanded qualified
majority in two consecutive elections/votes about such a crucial matter
as Brexit - and being aware what the vote is about. The root of the
problem is England's mad man Henry 8's colonialization of Ireland and
lack of constitution. The preposterous "British" Brexit parody is then
spiced with the government's and BBC's use of religious hate mongering
etc. In summary UK is an anomaly of countries trying to be a state in a
world of federal states united as countries.
Calling criticism of islam "islamophobia" is pure racism and also supports islamic racism and sexism
This Viking tells you a lesson you really need.
Modern humans evolved in tropical SE Asia and cold Siberia.
Peter
Klevius was the first to connect the big Jinniushan woman with small
mongoloid Khoisan (1992) and SE-Asia with the new brain setup due to
island dwarfing (2004).
"Out of Africa" is no longer terminally
ill - it's equally dead as Monty Python's parrot. So why do media and
some anthropologists keep babbling when faced with overwhelming evidence
to the contrary. Not even all tricks in the book (like e.g. the
spurious stretching of what counts as "anatomically modern human" - i.e.
incl. long skulled species) can save OoA. But the simplest way of
understanding human evolution is to place it where all primates
originally came from, i.e. SE Asia and its volatile tropical archipelago
which could do evolutionary tricks the African continent couldn't. The
oldest "Africans" are the mongoloid Khoisan. However, no one can become
mongoloid (i.e. cold adapted) in Africa. This means they must originally
have come from northern Eurasia - just as their look-alikes, e.g.
Shompen and South American natives. Khoisan population is extremely
small and, except for Pygmies, most "Africans" entered the continent
within the last 10,000 years. Khoisan are mongoloid together with e.g.
Shompen in SE Asia, and tribes in South America.
Klevius 1992-2010: From tropical SE-Asia to cold and protein/fat rich North Eurasia to global human
Theresa May & Co and state media BBC play with race cards
Klevius "islamophobic" heroine Nawal El Saadawi from Egypt
The
world's biggest fake news producer, UK state media BBC, 20190221 gave
the Japanese asteroid landing just a few seconds but managed to squeeze
in the fake "info" that "it is the first attempt to bring back samples
to Earth" (Cathy/PM 17:00) when the previous Japanese sond already 2010
brought back samples from an other asteroid. No one else has managed to
do this except the Japanese. This is in line with BBC's usual racist
attitude against Japan and China.
BBC isn't much interested in
anti-semitism, homophobia etc. but uses them as an excuse for its
Saudi/OIC supported "islamophobia" smear campaign against Human Rights.
Is
BBC's Pakistan rooted and Saudi raised muslim(?) presenter Mishal
Husain an "islamophobe" against evil* islam, or an apostate supporting
toothless** "islam"? She doesn't fast during Ramadan but rather drinks
some alcohol, and doesn't veil herself and says she doesn't feel any
threats to her way of life (Klevius: thanks to Human Rights - not sharia
islam), well knowing how muslim and non-muslim women suffer in muslim
sharia countries like Pakistan and Saudi Arabia without Human Rights.
What would she say to a muslim terrorist asking her if she's a muslim?
Isn't it about time to stop this bigoted and hypocritical indirect
support of islamofascism that this Saudi/OIC initiated "islamophobia"
smear camopaign against Human Rights*** is all about?
* Human Rights equality violating sharia islam
** in line with the anti-fascist, anti-racist and anti-sexist U.N.'s 1948 Universal Human Rights declaration.
***
Socialists have an ideological problem with individual Human Rights,
and are therefore vulnerable for islamism (see Klevius 1994).
Politicians against people
Is UK turning into a militaristic unconstitutional islamofascist rogue state?
First
UK people voted to join and share borders with EU. Then England voted
to leave while Scotland and Northern Ireland voted to stay. And now UK
politicians want to leave while keeping the Irish EU border open. UK
lacks a modern constitution according to which a constitutional issue
has to pass at least two majority votes.
Are you or your representative(s) for or against basic Human Rights equality?
Peter Klevius global morality can only be challenged by violating the most basic of Human Rights.
Everything
Peter Klevius writes (or has written) is guided by the anti-sexist.
anti-racist, and anti-fascist Universal* Human Rights declaration of
1948. In other words, what is declared immoral and evil is so done as
measured against the most basic of Human Rights (the so called
"negative" rights - i.e. the rights of the individual not to be
unnecessarily targeted with restrictions and impositions). Unlike the
1948 Universal Human Rights (UHR) declaration, islam denies Human Rights
equality to women and non-muslims. And violation of such basic Human
Rights can't be tolerated just by referring to "freedom of religion".
*
This means accepting everyone - without exception due to e.g. sex,
religion, lack of religion, "security" etc. - as equal in Human Rights.
The individual is protected by negative Human Rights, but of course not
against substantiated legal accusations - as long as these are not
produced as a means that violates the basic Human Rights (compare "not
necessary in a free, democratic country"). The legislator may not
produce laws that seek to undermine some individuals rights. This also
includes e.g. "freedom of religion", i.e. that this freedom doesn't give
the right to unfree others, or cause others to be in an inferior rights
position. If by islam you mean something that fully adheres to basic
Human Rights equality, then you aren't targeted by Peter Klevius islam
criticism. However, if you mean islam accepts violations of the most
basic of Human Rights, then you may also call Peter Klevius an
"islamophobe" - and he will be proud of it. And when it comes to
"security" it can't mean "offending" opponents to basic Human Rights.
This
is why any effort to twist or accuse the writings of Peter Klevius as
"islamophobia" etc. can only be made from a standpoint against these
basic Human Rights. As a consequence, no body of authority can therefore
accuse, hinder etc. Peter Klevius without simultaneously revealing its
own disrespect for these Human Rights. Conversely, Peter Klevius can not
accuse anyone who agrees on these rights - i.e. this leaves e.g.
"islamophobia" etc. accusations against Peter Klevius without merit.
Every effort against these basic Human Rights is treason against a country calling itself free and democratic.
Some
basic facts to consider about Klevius* (except that he is super
intelligent - which fact, of course, would not put you off if you're
really interested in these questions):
* The son of one of
Sweden's best chess-players and an even more intelligent Finnish mother.
He was mentored by G. H. von Wright, Wittgensteins's successor at
Cambridge. However, G H v Wright sadly didn't fully realize back then
(1991) the true power of the last chapter, Khoi, San and Bantu, in
Klevius book. Today, if still alive, he would surely see it.
1
Klevius' analysis of consciousness is the only one that fits what we
know - after having eliminated our "pride" bias of being humans (which
non-human would we impress, anyway?). Its starting point is described
and exemplified in a commentary to Jurgen Habermas in Klevius book
Demand for Resources (1992:30-33, ISBN 9173288411, based on an article
by Klevius from 1981), and is further explained in a commentary to
Francis Crick's book The Astonishing Hypothesis under the title The Even
More Astonishing Hypothesis (EMAH), which can be found in Stalk's
archive and which has been on line since 2003 for anyone to
access/assess.
2 Klevius out of island/mainland fluctuating
Southeast Asia Denisovans up to big skulled Siberians as the birth of
much more intelligent modern humans who then spread all over the world,
is the only analysis that fits both genetic reality as well as tool and
art sophistication seen in e.g. the Denisova cave (no dude, Blombos etc.
don’t come even close).
3 Klevius criticism of Human Rights
violating sharia islamofascism (e.g. OIC) which is called "islamophobia"
by islamofascists and their supporters who don't care about the most
basic of Human Rights (e.g. re. women). Klevius' "islamophobia" has two
roots: 1) UN's 1948 Universal Human Rights declaration, which, contrary
to any form of muslim sharia, doesn't, for example, allow sex to be an
excuse for robbing females of their full Human Rights equality, and 2)
the history of the origin of islam ( e.g. Hugh Kennedy, Robert G.
Hoyland, K. S. Lal etc.) which reveals a murderous, pillaging, robbing,
enslaving and raping racist/sexist supremacist ideology that exactly
follows precisely those basic islamic tenets which are now called
"unislamic" but still survive today (as sharia approved sex slavery,
sharia approved "liberation” jihad, academic jihad etc.) behind the
sharia cover which is made even more impenetrable via the spread of
islamic finance, mainly steered from the islamofascist Saudi dictator
family.
4 Klevius analysis of sex segregation/apartheid (now
deceptively called “gender segregation”) and heterosexual attraction -
see e.g. Demand for Resources (1981/1992), Daughters of the Social State
(1993), Angels of Antichrist (1996), Pathological Symbiosis (2003), or
Klevius PhD research on heterosexual attraction/sex segregation and
opposition to female footballers (published in book form soon).
Forerunners of the next iceage?
Peter Klevius "islamophobia"/Human Rightsphobia test for you and your politicians
Warning for a muslim robot!
BBC means global faked/filtered "news"/"info" - and propaganda for Human Rights violating sharia.
Klevius: Face it, Wikipedia, BBC etc. fake media - Finland was first in the world with full suffrag
There's no true islam without Human Rights violating sharia (compare OIC)
PM candidate Rees-Mogg: Germans needed Human Rights, we don't. Klevius: I really think you do.
Peter Klevius 1986 zero budget experimental refugee video
