Peter Klevius was the first (1992-94) to solve consciousness, and the first (1992) to point out the mongoloid (cold adaptation) link between the Jinniushan fossil in China and Khoisan people in Africa.
Is Oxford University and AstraZeneca cheating with its Covid-19 vaccine?
UK has a poor reputation when it comes to drugs and the handling of diseases. Here's just one example:
Oxford University and AstraZeneca's Covid-19 vaccine trial again got casualties.
Peter
Klevius has already earler warned about the risks with tampering with
RNA code instead of doing as the Chinese Sinovac, i.e. using safe dead
virus. And the risks are even higher when the company itself has
questionable records (see below).
In short, Peter Klevius points to the fact that there's no way Oxford University/AstraZeneca can claim it was just placebo.
Brazilian
newspaper Globo and international news agency Bloomberg said he was in
the control group and had received a placebo rather than the test
vaccine, citing sources close to the trials.
“Following
careful assessment of this case in Brazil, there have been no concerns
about safety of the clinical trial, and the independent review in
addition to the Brazilian regulator have recommended that the trial
should continue,” Oxford said in a statement.
AstraZeneca
said medical confidentiality meant it could not give details on any
individual volunteer, but that independent review had “not led to any
concerns about continuation of the ongoing study”.
Brazil’s national health regulator, Anvisa, confirmed it had been notified of the case on October 19.
The
D’Or Teaching and Research Institute (IDOR), which is helping organise
the tests in Brazil, said the independent review had “raised no doubts
about the safety of the study, and recommended it continue”.
Oxford
and AstraZeneca previously had to suspend testing of the vaccine in
September when a volunteer in Britain developed an unexplained illness.
Trials resumed after British regulators and an "independent" review concluded the illness was not a side effect of the vaccine.
Half
the volunteers in the final-stage clinical trial – a double-blind,
randomised, controlled study – receive a placebo, IDOR said. Around
8,000 volunteers have been vaccinated so far in Brazil, and more than
20,000 worldwide, it said.
Study participants must be doctors, nurses or other health sector workers who come into regular contact with the virus.
The
deceased volunteer was a young doctor who had been treating Covid-19
patients since March in the emergency rooms and intensive care units at
two hospitals in Rio de Janeiro, Globo said. He graduated from medical
school last year, and was in good health before contracting the disease,
family and friends told the newspaper.
In July 2020 Peter Klevius wrote:
Chinese
Sinovac's COVID-19 vaccine is the by far most promising and now starts
late-stage trials among thousands of healthworkers in Brazil and
Bangladesh - yet BBC doesn't even mention it but rather push for the
lousy Swedish-UK (AstraZeneca*) one because it happens to cooperate with
Oxford university. However, whereas the Chinese vaccine also protects
against infection, AstraZenecas' vaccine doesn't.
*
After the successful Swedish Astra merged with UK's Zeneca everything
started going downwards. This faulty vaccine is just one more disaster
in waiting.
Peter Klevius wrote:1
Monday, July 20, 2020
Why is BBC lying about economies and vaccines?
The world's best vaccine against SARS-CoV2/Covid-19 comes from the world's by far largest economy.
France and UK practically share 10th place.
Chinese
Sinovac's COVID-19 vaccine is the by far most promising and now starts
late-stage trials among thousands of healthworkers in Brazil and
Bangladesh - yet BBC doesn't even mention it but rather push for the
lousy Swedish-UK (AstraZeneca*) one because it happens to cooperate with
Oxford university. However, whereas the Chinese vaccine also protects
against infection, AstraZenecas' vaccine doesn't.
*
After the successful Swedish Astra merged with UK's Zeneca everything
started going downwards. This faulty vaccine is just one more disaster
in waiting.
Behind
the Sinophobic smear campaign against China re. Hong Kong, Uighurs, etc.
lays US' desperate effort to stop China's success. Unfortunately US
evil game is supported by common Sinophobia - much like how the Nazis
were supported in Germany and beyond.
Btw, talking about e.g. extradition, Human Rights, fair trial etc., what about Assange, Snowden etc.?!
Peter Klevius to Chinese people: I'm not a racist like many in the UK parliament - although I certainly look like one.
UK origin of Sinophobia: The 19th century Opium Wars were triggered by UK's
imposition of the opium trade upon China. Lord Palmerston regarded the
Chinese as uncivilized and suggested that the British must attack China
to show up their superiority as well as to demonstrate what a
"civilized" nation could do. The resulting concession of Hong Kong
compromised China's territorial sovereignty. There's also the background
to South China Sea.
Behind the Huawei etc. Sinophobia: The Pact between the US freeloader and the Saudi Devil.
UK
created a devil's kingdom in Arabia, and US made a devil's oil pact
with the Saudi custodians of islam - hence infecting the world with
petrodollar and anti-Human Rights sharia islam (Saudi based and steered
OIC).
The US made up a grand conspiracy about China and
Chinese. No country in the world has been equally targeted by unfounded
US aggression as China - yet China is called the "assertive aggressor"
by US and its puppets.
What "core values" does UK share with
US? Extra-judicial killings, militarism, support of the Saudi dictator
family's murders, war crimes, and spread of terror, OIC's anti-Human
Rights sharia etc.?!
Chinese civilization vs. US freeloading rouge nation.
US
has a long history of freeloading on the world. Why would you be stupid
to believe anything of it? And when you use US' Google company to
google'US aggression' the return is Chinese aggression.
The
Belt and Road Initiative is based on ordinary and previously accepted
and established norms. What US has, and still does, is the very
opposite.
On 15 August 1971, the United States unilaterally
terminated convertibility of the US dollar to gold, effectively bringing
the Bretton Woods system to an end and rendering the dollar a global
counterfeit currency which sucked currency etc. financial profit
unfairly from the world and into US. The term monetary hegemony appeared
in Michael Hudson's Super Imperialism, describing not only an
asymmetrical relationship that the US dollar has to the global economy,
but the structures of this hegemonic edifice that Hudson felt supported
it, namely the International Monetary Fund and the World Bank.
US
tries to push US jurisdiction globally through arbitrary trade wars and
sanctions. US even tries to colonize the space outside the Earth for
itself and its militarism.
However, China shows a possible way
out of this US made trap - but that freedom would mean US falling down
to its right place. This is why US demonizes China with unfounded
accusations. In fact, China's position has made it something of a dream
state when it comes to global spread of technology, wealth and health.
But US hates to face itself in the mirror of reality.
UK
has for 20 years used Huawei without the slightest problem, but when US
lost the tech race then suddenly Huawei became a "threat".
So
when US and its puppets in the cyberspace attacking and spying Five
Eyes organization try to meddle and destabilize in China, then Chinese
defence against these cyber attacks and spying is called a "threat" and
turned into a reason for accusing China. And every allegation against
China's Covid-19 handling has been proven false, yet constantly repeated
by BBC and in the parliament etc.. And when Hong Kong was turned into a
terror chaos by external meddling and support, then China had to
implement similar security laws which are accepted in US and UK but
strangle not in China.
While BBC showers the Brits with constant
war nostalgia (war mongering?) UK continues selling weapons to the
islamofascist Saudi dictator family's war crimes in Yemen etc. And the
right wing anti-EU Brexiters have turned into a militant anti-China
campaign organization in Westminster.
Peter Klevius used to
admire the Greenham Common women against nukes - presumably Theresa May
didn't participate because she wouldn't hesitate to use nukes against
civilians - so where are the peace voices in UK today?!
When will Westminster Abbey be turned into a Saudi/OIC supported Salafist shariamosque?
BBC
and its right wing China haters in Westminster are complicit not only
to Saudi atrocities and Human Rights violations induced by Saudi based
and steered OIC, but also to crimes committed by IS and other islamist
groups used by US and its NATO puppets, as well as all the islamic jihad
inspired crimes around the world - and no dudue, you can't get away
with it by lying "it's not islam".BBC's hateful and gravely misleading
propaganda machine is a threat to peace, development and prosperity.
Peter Klevius asks for an independent international inquiry on BBC's
racist Sinophobia, its deliberately misleading propaganda combined with
neglecting truthfulness, and its support of sharia islamism - incl. how
many victims and suffering it has caused because of its worldwide
propaganda influence combined with its denial or blinking of islamic
atrcities. Peter Klevius thinks it's a shame that
Should
BBC and some politicians be put on a Nurenberg trial for draconian
crimes against humanity* after this relentless and demonizing Sinophobia
campaign and deliberate lies, support of Saudi islamofascism, etc.?
* Meaning they are complicit not only to Saudi atrocities and Human
Rights violations induced by Saudi based and steered OIC, but also to
crimes committed by IS and other islamist groups used by US and its NATO
puppets, as well as all the islamic jihad inspired crimes around the
world - and no dudue, you can't get away with it by lying "it's not
islam".BBC's hateful and gravely misleading propaganda machine is a threat to peace, development and prosperity. Peter Klevius asks for an independent international inquiry on BBC's
racist Sinophobia, its deliberately misleading propaganda combined with
neglecting truthfulness, and its support of sharia islamism - incl. how
many victims and suffering it has caused because of its worldwide
propaganda influence combined with its denial or blinking of islamic
atrcities.
BBC's
extremely bigoted and hypocritical Sinophobic Saudi raised muslim
presenter Mishal Husain says the Chinese demand for Uyghur women to
follow the same law as other Chinese women as something worse than the
islamofascist Saudi dictator family's atrocities - incl. murders, war
crimes, terrorism, and persecution of Shia muslims etc..
2013 in a
terrorist suicide attack by Uyghur muslims (Usmen Hasan, his wife
Gulkiz Gini, and his mother, Kuwanhan Reyim) five people died and 38
injured. The East Turkestan Islamic Movement, or Turkistan Islamic Party, claimed responsibility and threatened with future attacks. Chinese police asked for information about two people from Xinjiang describing a vehicle and four Xinjiang number plates. Three suspects, identified as Huseyin Guxur, Yusup Wherniyas and Yusup Ehmet, were convicted of masterminding the attack. Chinese
security official Meng Jianzhu said the East Turkestan Islamic Movement
(ETIM) was behind the attacks, but Uighur exile groups and some Western
observers disputed the claim although on 24 November 2013, the
Turkistan Islamic Party, i.e. ETIM, declared it was responsible for the
attack. The United States State declined to call it a terrorist
attack and and instead reiterated support for Uighur "human rights"
despite the fact that Turkistan Islamic Party has been designated as a
terrorist organization by the European Union, China, and the United
States.
* Facebook redistributed the hateful muslim parents' hate that triggered the murder
And why doesn't BBC's bigoted* top muslim hypocrite* Mishal Husain take a stand from her ivory tower stand - so to eliminate any connection with evil anti-Human Rights sharia islam?!
* * What else would you suggest for someone who, raised in Saudi Arabia, calls herself a muslim but doesn't fast during Ramadan and who drinks alcohol - yet brags - in the face of all the women suppressed by islam - about how she can lead her "Westernized muslim" life as a "muslim" in a non-muslim country?
Ask Mishal Husain (and other muslims paid by the compulsory fees and taxes that BBC feeds on) about the fact that 1Saudi based and steered OIC in 1990 decided to abandon all nbasic Human Rights and replace them with islamist sharia. Calling oneself a muslim without declaring one's stance in this the most important question is just either pure cowardness - or pure islamism.
Peter Klevius to those imams etc. muslims who condemn the muslim idiot who murdered a teacher i
Do muslim islamists ask for the reintroduction of the guillotine?
Aren't the muslim parents 100% guilty when supporting this kind of islamic hate?
Just making fun of islamism isn't enoughMake all forms of islamism a crime and defend Human rights equality!
Klevius wrote:
ednesday, June 8, 2016
Will BBC's bigoted* and hypocritical* muslim sharia presenter, Mishal Husain, drink alcohol during Ramadan - and how many lashes would she get in "moderate" Malaysia?
* What else would you suggest for someone who, raised in Saudi Arabia, calls herself a muslim but doesn't fast during Ramadan and who drinks alcohol - yet brags - in the face of all the women suppressed by islam - about how she can lead her "Westernized muslim" life as a "muslim" in a non-muslim country?
With muslim Turkey inside EU, islam will in one blow become part of the muslim Mideast. And true orginal islam has only one direction - backwards.
* With visa free travel for Turks to EU Turkey will in practice already be a EU country.
Singaporean Kartika Sari Dewi Shukarno was fined 5,000 ringgit ($U.S. 1,412) and sentenced to six strokes of the cane after pleading guilty to consuming alcohol at a local nightclub, July 20, 2009. Now a proposal in Malaysia's Parliament by Abdul Hadi Awang, the president of the Pan-Malaysian Islamic Party, wants to introduce the strict Islamic penal code known as hudud law. It will be debated in October and, if passed, will replace current provisions in the country's Sharia courts -- with even harsher hudud punishments. Hudud law allows for penalties such as amputation of limbs and stoning.
How many destroyed lives has BBC's ongoing islamization campaign contributed to?
BBC religion chief Aaqil Ahmed (sic) admits: Islam inspires IS jihadis. However, he himself is for sharia and against the most basic of Human Rights.
BBC’s muslim head of "religion" (read 'islam'), sharia* muslim Aaqil Ahmed, says station is ‘too Christian’, could broadcast muslim prayers. He also says Islamic State is inspired by islam.
* He accepts Saudi based and steered OIC's Human Rights violating sharia declaration in UN. If not, he ought to publicly distance himself from sharia islam - which in effect would make him a non-muslim when it comes to real islam.
The myth about "Euro-islam" vs real evil medieval original islam
Researchers behind a recent European study defined islamic fundamentalism as a belief in returning to the origin of islam, coupled with an adherence to a strict interpretation of the Koran. Fundamentalists also believe values espoused in the Koran take precedence over norms and laws of European countries.
Only 4 percent of Christians in Europe can be described as fundamentalist Christians and very few propagate violence. Among Atheists fundamentalism doesn't exist simply because they lack any fundament other than universal Human Rights equality (please, don't mix Atheism with communism/socialism).
57 percent of muslims reject homosexuals as friends, 45 percent said they don’t trust the Jews and 54 percent think of the West as an enemy of islam.
Among fundamentalist muslims, 72 percent of respondents said they would use violence to defend islam. Among regular muslims, that number amounted to 35 percent.
An incredibly large number of muslims want Sharia law to dominate over local laws. For instance, 72 percent of muslims in France and 69 percent in UK want to see Sharia as the main or only source of law in the country.
But in Germany, the number of muslims who want Sharia supremacy is only 13 percent. Others German (Turkish?) muslims, at 44 percent, think Sharia is a good moral guide (sic). However, a majority of Germans, 60 percent, think that islam does not belong in Germany.
Radko Hokovský, executive director of European Values, said islamic fundamentalists are determined to apply their religion in a way that could potentially destroy personal freedom.
Integration of muslim migrants is one of the central issues facing the EU today. Problems stemming from a flood of mainly muslim migrants into various European countries have threatened the EU’s continued existence.
Bringing in more muslim migrants, regardless of consequences such as a staggering increase in Human Rights violations, is anti-democratic.
Just one more example in an endless row of hate crimes
Migrants (muslims?) BURN 5 British teenagers with ACID, leaving one ‘BLINDED IN ONE EYE’ and 4 others horrifically injured as they waited for a train at Ockendon station, Essex.
It was confirmed this afternoon that two of them suffered injuries described as ‘potentially life changing’.
One 17-year-old suffered burns to his eyes whilst another, also 17, was left with burns to his mouth and tongue.
He approached the five victims who were waiting on the platform where he held one of his hands behind his back. After a brief dialog with them, he removed his hand from behind his back exposing a bottle. He then squirted an unknown liquid over the victims.
The man re-joined his group of roughly nine friends on the 11.44pm Southend to Barking service.
Investigating officer Detective Sergeant Gail McKemmie said: ‘This was a particularly vicious and alarming assault which has left some of the victims with potentially life changing injuries.
The attacker is alleged to have been part of a group that squirted corrosive liquid over the boys before jumping on a train and making his getaway.
The man is described as black, with dark hair and wearing a jet black North Face gilet.
Peter Klevius: A 3D map of Universe is impossible and a 4D map only theoretical - try it on yourself and you'll see the light!
You have no experience of your own "big bang" and the resulting baby has no resemblance whatsoever with your personhood now.
A 3D map of your life is the equivalent of a 3D map of Universe and equally impossible.
A
4D map of your life is also only theoretical. And for it to be
'theoretical' you need to understand the parts of it that build up your
"theory" about yourself.
Peter Klevius wrote:
Thursday, April 25, 2019
Peter Klevius concept of 'existence-centrism' (1992)
If you consider/evaluate Peter Klevius as a selfish attention seeker,
then you're certainly wrong about 'selfish' because according to Klevius
there is no 'self'* only an origo. And if you just consider him as an
"attention seeking blogger" then at least Klevius texts may work as a
border, above which you can put your heroines and heroes above it.
* see Klevius web museum (which hasn't been touched upon for more than a decade).
Peter
Klevius is a split personality (as we all are, albeit most perhaps to a
more moderate extent) ancored on the bedrock of existence-centric
uncertainty Klevius wrote about in his forst published article on the
subject human demand for resources in 1981.
In the 1980s, while
Klevius worked as a radio reporter, he met a talented sound engineer
with whom he "quarrelled" about sound properties etc. It ended up with
Klevius, without any musical background or training, stupidly tried to
do a couple of songs - and deliberately not asking any real musician,
book etc. The whole point was to try to explore, or at least try to
understand the problems re. sound elements that certain real music/hits
were made of.
So why upload such a video. Well, you can always
read the lyrics, and for musicians, when they have stopped laughing, it
might give an extra thought to the wellknown but unanswered question of
what makes good music. To know the ocean you also need to dive.
Klevius wrote about existence-centrism:
Friday, May 19, 2017
This Jew sucks
Sir Lord Rabbi Jew (or whatever) Jonathan Sacks: Atheism has failed;
only religion can defeat the new barbarians. Sir Atheist "islamophobe"
and Human Rights defender Klevius: Atheist terrorism a bigger problem?
Islamic Human Rights (sharia)?!
BBC's news hour was today reportedly today much less targeted on
smearing President Trump now that he is heading for their beloved
islamofascist Saudi dictator family.
After pressure from the islamofascist Saudi dictator family (via OIC,
OPEC, etc. organizations, lobbyists and politicians such as e.g. McCain,
etc.) Mr. Trump (that's what BBC calls the US President) now not only
boosts the Saudis but as a consequence turns Americans against Russia
(because of Iran being the Saudi's main target). Moreover, as China has
surpassed the US economically (and all indicators accelerate this trend)
military pressure (and due military production) combined with the US
fonzi scheme ("printing money" under the cover of $ still being a world
currency) that has replaced much real production, seems to be the
options President Trump has bowed down to - and thereby also charged the
world's third most dangerous country (after Pakistan) to a dangerous
point. US aggressions against China won't help to get China's help to
calm down Korea tensions, will it.
According to Jonathan Sacks, Peter Klevius has ended up us a "marvelous
creation" in the Universe, i.e. that he is mentally extremely fit
(almost as fit as he is physically). However, the "creation" called
Klevius is "marvelous" only from a human point of view - a fact that Sir
Lord Rabbi Jew (or whatever) Jonathan Sacks seems to completely have
missed.
Is Sir Lord Rabbi Jew (or whatever) Jonathan Sacks mentally retarded? If
so, pay no relevance to what Klevius says below. However, if he has
close to average intelligence, then his idolatry of himself as an
"intellectual" while spewing out the most reprehensive non sense, must
be challenged.
Jonathan Sachs (a Jewish lord, rabbi etc. in England frequently used in
BBC's propaganda for "monotheisms" - especially islam, which has managed
to cause more suffering than any of the other "monotheisms"): Where do
we come from?
Sir Atheist "islamophobe" and Human Rights defender Klevius answer to this poorly (mis)informed Jew:
Jonathan Sachs (a Jewish lord, rabbi etc. in England frequently used in
BBC's propaganda for "monotheisms" - especially islam, which has managed
to cause more suffering than any of the other "monotheisms"): There's a
delicate balance built in where humans can be.
Sir Atheist "islamophobe" and Human Rights defender Klevius answer to
this poorly (mis)informed Jew: No, there's no "delicate balance" other
than your words.
Sir Atheist "islamophobe" and Human Rights defender Klevius intellectual
help to this poorly (mis)informed Jew who obviously lacks average
intelligence (most people are Atheists): Read Sir Atheist "islamophobe"
and Human Rights defender Klevius book Demand for Resources (1992 ISBN
9173288411) to get a better and more humble view on yourself and your
pompostrous "the god chosen people" ideology. It's in original English,
i.e. Swedish, but if you don't master Swedish you can ask someone to
read for you - or, you can donate to
Klevius so he can arrange for a good translation worldwide.
Lord rabbi Jonathan Sacks: Antisemitism is not ancient. The "Scapegoats” (i.e. muslims) are not indigenous to it.
Although the sonless "prophet" Mohammad fable was made by Malik some
half a century after his alleged death, what is important is that islam
considers the hadith about the slaughtering of all the Jews in Medina as
an essential and even proud part of itself as the "religion of
conquest" under which everyone has to surrender, and first in line the
Jews who "falsely pretend to have the original Abrahamic faith".
Sir Atheist "islamophobe" and Human Rights defender Klevius suggestion
to Sir Lord Rabbi Jew (or whatever) Jonathan Sacks: Don't do politics
with your Judaism. And if you need some Kabbala "spirituality" I'm
certain there are some books, programs, clubs etc. for you to enjoy
without having to contribute to islamofascism and other forms of
religious hatred, racism and sexism.
Sir Lord Rabbi Jew (or whatever) Jonathan Sacks: When ("monotheist")
religion dies and consumerism takes its place, people are left with a
culture that encourages them to buy things they don’t need with money
they don’t have for a happiness that won’t last.
Sir Atheist "islamophobe" and Human Rights defender Peter Klevius: Japan
is just one example of why every word in this crackpot sentence sucks.
The test of faiths is whether they can make space for difference as
described in the 1948 Universal Human Rights Declaration against all
sorts of fascisms. And with this measures they all fail. Some less and
some more, but from a Human Rights universal equality point of view only
Atheism fills the measure. And dude, don't you ever conflate Atheism
with Communism/socialism - you don't conflate apples and pears either,
do you.
Sir Lord Rabbi Jew (or whatever) Jonathan Sacks: The greatest Jewish
rabbi, Maimonedes got everything from the wonderful muslims of Andalus.
Sir Atheist "islamophobe" and Human Rights defender Klevius: Including
the muslim attires he had to cover himself in so not to be killed by
muslims, or the "great" Maimonides manner of pretending to be a muslim.
Not to mention that if Maimonedes is considered a "great" Jew then the
standard must be pretty low.
Not even muslims are safe among muslims.
Sir Atheist "islamophobe" and Human Rights defender Klevius wise words
for an ignorant (hopefully, cause the alternative is worse):
Klevius sex segregation point: Never let
heterosexual attraction shade personhood. Here both men and women often
miss the point. Men see women as the "heterosexual other", sometimes
even "inferior other", and women often contribute to this view by
confusing their heterosexual attraction with their personhood. The
"body" sociology didn't help either to get out of this unfortunate catch
22 that Klevius has pointed at since his teens*.
* As a teenager Klevius was forced out
of his country alone, without money, and with no previous ties.
However, although Klevius managed the language and fixed a decent job,
he didn't manage the local, and quite different dialect, which caused
problems communicating with prejudicial teen girls at noisy discotheques
etc. However, in his job environment he happened to meet a very nice
girl whose pictures he had used to drool over in a "men's magazine", and
who told him she had never had sex. Klevius also met many young
university teens who offered "posing" (sometimes Klevius got it even for
free) in the main news paper and who had their "offices" just behind
Klevius workplace in the most central part of the capital city. Those
girls made a very distinct line (no copulation) between themselves and
what they called the "whores". Times have changed but the entanglement
of heterosexual attraction and female personhood in sex segregation is
still equally unsolved for most girls/women. But with a (negative) Human
Rights approach based on the 1948 Universal Human Rights Declaration no
woman should have to suffer of sex segregational prejudices about sex -
no matter how sexy men might think she looks like, and no matter if she
doesn't want to have to do with heterosex or sex at all, icl. if she
doesn't want to have children. Yes, Klevius knows. These kind of
thoughts make him an evil "islamophobe". But that's sadly the fate
nowadays for anyone defending everyone's Human Rights - even women's.
Drawing from 1979 by Peter Klevius.
John Searle seems to have a quite different approach to heterosexual attraction and consciousness than Klevius.
In a lawsuit Joanna Ong, 24, is seeking damages for sexual harassment
and assault as well as for wrongful termination and creation of a
hostile work environment.
“As a philosopher, Searle should be familiar with the concept of
coercion. Instead, he and the university have “used their power and
platform to abuse others.”
The lawsuit, which lists Searle and the Regents of the University of
California as defendants, claims Searle groped Ong in his office after
he told her “they were going to be lovers.” He also said he had an
“emotional commitment to making her a public intellectual,” the
complaint states, and that he was “going to love her for a long time.”
Ong turned Searle down and reported him to other UC Berkeley employees,
but they did nothing, the complaint states. Instead, Searle cut Ong’s
salary and she was eventually fired, according to the complaint, which
also claims Searle watched pornography at work and made sexist comments.
Searle, 84, is famous for his work in the philosophy of language and the
philosophy of mind and has taught at UC Berkeley since 1959.
Artificial intelligence (AI), consciousness - and EMAH
Wikipedia: Artificial intelligence (AI) is intelligence exhibited by
machines. In computer science, the field of AI research defines itself
as the study of "intelligent agents": any device that perceives its
environment and takes actions that maximize its chance of success at
some goal
Peter Klevius: A shock absorber fulfills every bit of this
definition - and can be digitally translated, i.e. e.g. "shock absorbed
by wire", either partially or fully!
Wikipedia: As machines become increasingly capable, mental facilities
once thought to require intelligence are removed from the definition.
For instance, optical character recognition is no longer perceived as an
example of "artificial intelligence", having become a routine
technology.
Are there limits to how intelligent machines – or human-machine hybrids –
can be? A superintelligence, hyperintelligence, or superhuman
intelligence is a hypothetical agent that would possess intelligence far
surpassing that of the brightest and most gifted human mind.
‘’Superintelligence’’ may also refer to the form or degree of
intelligence possessed by such an agent.
The philosophical position that John Searle has named "strong AI"
states: "The appropriately programmed computer with the right inputs and
outputs would thereby have a mind in exactly the same sense human
beings have minds." Searle counters this assertion with his Chinese room
argument, which asks us to look inside the computer and try to find
where the "mind" might be.
Searle's thought experiment begins with this hypothetical premise:
suppose that artificial intelligence research has succeeded in
constructing a computer that behaves as if it understands Chinese. It
takes Chinese characters as input and, by following the instructions of a
computer program, produces other Chinese characters, which it presents
as output.
Suppose, says Searle, that this computer performs its task so
convincingly that it comfortably passes the Turing test: it convinces a
human Chinese speaker that the program is itself a live Chinese speaker.
To all of the questions that the person asks, it makes appropriate
responses, such that any Chinese speaker would be convinced that they
are talking to another Chinese-speaking human being.
Searle then supposes that he is in a closed room and has a book with an
English version of the computer program, along with sufficient paper,
pencils, erasers, and filing cabinets. Searle could receive Chinese
characters through a slot in the door, process them according to the
program's instructions, and produce Chinese characters as output. If the
computer had passed the Turing test this way, it follows, says Searle,
that he would do so as well, simply by running the program manually.
Searle asserts that there is no essential difference between the roles
of the computer and himself in the experiment. Each simply follows a
program, step-by-step, producing a behavior which is then interpreted as
demonstrating intelligent conversation. However, Searle would not be
able to understand the conversation. ("I don't speak a word of
Chinese",he points out.) Therefore, he argues, it follows that the
computer would not be able to understand the conversation either.
Searle argues that, without "understanding" (or "intentionality"), we
cannot describe what the machine is doing as "thinking" and, since it
does not think, it does not have a "mind" in anything like the normal
sense of the word. Therefore, he concludes that "strong AI" is false.
Peter Klevius: Nonsense! 'Intentionality' is an illusion. There's
no "gap" between input and output where 'intentionality' could be
squeezed in. Moreover, if Searle believes in 'intentionality' he can't
refute 'the free will' either. The machine could also be understood by
the Chinese speakers without "understanding" - only fulfilling the
Turing criterion. There is no 'understanding' or consciousness', other
than the usage of these terms.
Wikipedia: No one would think of saying, for example, "Having a hand is
just being disposed to certain sorts of behavior such as grasping"
(manual behaviorism), or "Hands can be defined entirely in terms of
their causes and effects" (manual functionalism), or "For a system to
have a hand is just for it to be in a certain computer state with the
right sorts of inputs and outputs" (manual Turing machine
functionalism), or "Saying that a system has hands is just adopting a
certain stance toward it" (the manual stance). (p. 263)
Searle argues that philosophy has been trapped by a false dichotomy:
that, on the one hand, the world consists of nothing but objective
particles in fields of force, but that yet, on the other hand,
consciousness is clearly a subjective first-person experience.
Searle says simply that both are true: consciousness is a real
subjective experience, caused by the physical processes of the brain. (A
view which he suggests might be called biological naturalism.)
Ontological subjectivity
Searle has argued[48] that critics like Daniel Dennett, who (he claims)
insist that discussing subjectivity is unscientific because science
presupposes objectivity, are making a category error. Perhaps the goal
of science is to establish and validate statements which are
epistemically objective, (i.e., whose truth can be discovered and
evaluated by any interested party), but are not necessarily
ontologically objective.
Searle calls any value judgment epistemically subjective. Thus,
"McKinley is prettier than Everest" is "epistemically subjective",
whereas "McKinley is higher than Everest" is "epistemically objective."
In other words, the latter statement is evaluable (in fact, falsifiable)
by an understood ('background') criterion for mountain height, like
'the summit is so many meters above sea level'. No such criteria exist
for prettiness.
Beyond this distinction, Searle thinks there are certain phenomena
(including all conscious experiences) that are ontologically subjective,
i.e. can only exist as subjective experience. For example, although it
might be subjective or objective in the epistemic sense, a doctor's note
that a patient suffers from back pain is an ontologically objective
claim: it counts as a medical diagnosis only because the existence of
back pain is "an objective fact of medical science".[49] But the pain
itself is ontologically subjective: it is only experienced by the person
having it.
Searle goes on to affirm that "where consciousness is concerned, the
existence of the appearance is the reality".[50] His view that the
epistemic and ontological senses of objective/subjective are cleanly
separable is crucial to his self-proclaimed biological naturalism.
Klevius: All of this is more or less non sense due to a balancing
act (deliberate or just out of ignorance) to satisfy certain needs and
wishes. To understand this you need to read Klevius and contrast it with
the above:
1 Existence-centrism (Klevius 1992:21-23, ISBN 9173288411), i.e. the
simple fact that there's no difference between 'reality' and 'conscious
experiences'.
2 Klevius EMAH - the Even More Astonishing Hypothesis
which eliminates prejudices about the mind, as well as the naive idea
about "a thoughtful and subjective brain", and therefore opens up for a
human brain that fits the nature it belongs to and from which it
emerged. Moreover, Klevius analysis also opens up for a more truly human
approach to other humans, i.e. that that's what we have in common - and
only we can see it, not a non-human (Klevius 1992:36-39), which fact
doesn't eliminate that we should try to cope with non-humans in a
"humane" way.
The preposterous thought that "we are special" stands on two contradicting pillars:
1 We, out of our existence-centrism (read Klevius' book, Jonathan!),
define what's "outside" - i.e. the foundation for making (usually just
some of) us "special".
A ten billion year old supernova has been discovered. It means it died ten billion years ago, i.e. 5.5 billion years before our Sun was born.
The black area on the pic above corresponds to the white area on Klevius' Origin of Universe pic.
The nearest star, Proxima Centauri, is 4.2 light years from the
Earth. Light travels at a speed corresponding to 7.5 laps around the
Earth in one second.
The light from the farthest objects detectable by Hubble and other
cameras (incl. radio waves etc), i.e. more than 13 billion years ago, marks the end of our capabilities, not
the end of Universe. Because there is no "end" or "beginning". These
terms are oxymorons and semantically absurd.
So next time you take a look at the stars do consider what you don't see.
In my book Demand for Resources (Resursbegär1992:21-22) I pointed
out not only the dangers of such a senseless "model" as "Big Bang" but
also how this "model" is trapped in a "monotheistic" view demanding
"creation", i.e. a "starting point". Not only is such a "starting point"
conceptually impossible (apart from its very obvious other limitations,
e.g. how do you "bang" in "nothing") but it also fatally misdirects
research focus because it assumes "a universe" or "the universe" where
there's only universe.
A time trip back towards the "Big Bang" would only reveal a continuing
growth of neighboring "universes". The space/time continuum and warping
would make the "Big Bang" model laughable.
To my surprise I've noticed how many decently minded people seem to have
great difficulties understanding how the great distances and the great
limitations caused by the speed of light constant, warps every effort to
take even quite small thought steps, say for example only within our
own tiny galaxy.
Cameras never lie - pictures do!
All space cameras, from our own eyes to the Hubble space telescope and
its follow-ups, have in common that they don't take pictures of space
but of themselves, i.e. photo reactions on the retina, CCD etc. These
reactions are then interpreted by our knowledge. However, to describe
such reactions as a picture of space is extremely misleading.
Due to our human shortcomings we tend to entangle us with stupid
concepts which then get a life of their own. These include not only e.g.
irrational numbers but also such peculiarities as 'beginning',
'creation', 'existence', 'god' etc.
There can't be 'the', 'a', 'one' or 'many' in front of universe.
To understand this simple fact you just need to expore it by pinpointing
the histories of light perceptions hitting "your world". Such light
phenomenons may represent a "distance"* of everything from light
traveling at 300,000 km/sec some fractions of a second to Billions of
years. Moreover, some of them may be just side by side and with equal
relative luminance. With this in mind then start it all over again, i.e.
your theoretical mapping of "the Universe".
* If the source has moved or vanished when you perceive its light, then there i no real "distance" to be measured.
to be continued...
Some conventional views later to be commented by Klevius:
In astronomy and cosmology, dark matter is matter that is inferred to
exist from gravitational effects on visible matter and gravitational
lensing of background radiation, but that neither emits nor scatters
light or other electromagnetic radiation (and so cannot be directly
detected via optical or radio astronomy).[1] Its existence was
hypothesized to account for discrepancies between calculations of the
mass of galaxies, clusters of galaxies and the entire universe made
through dynamical and general relativistic means, and calculations based
on the mass of the visible "luminous" matter these objects contain:
stars and the gas and dust of the interstellar and intergalactic medium.
According to observations of structures larger than solar systems, as
well as Big Bang cosmology interpreted under the Friedmann equations and
the FLRW metric, dark matter accounts for 23% of the mass-energy
density of the observable universe. In comparison, ordinary matter
accounts for only 4.6% of the mass-energy density of the observable
universe, with the remainder being attributable to dark energy.[2][3]
From these figures, dark matter constitutes 83%, (23/(23+4.6)), of the
matter in the universe, whereas ordinary matter makes up only 17%.
Dark matter was postulated by Fritz Zwicky in 1934 to account for
evidence of "missing mass" in the orbital velocities of galaxies in
clusters. Subsequently, other observations have indicated the presence
of dark matter in the universe; these observations include the
rotational speeds of galaxies, gravitational lensing of background
objects by galaxy clusters such as the Bullet Cluster, and the
temperature distribution of hot gas in galaxies and clusters of
galaxies.
Dark matter plays a central role in state-of-the-art modeling of
structure formation and galaxy evolution, and has measurable effects on
the anisotropies observed in the cosmic microwave background. All these
lines of evidence suggest that galaxies, clusters of galaxies, and the
universe as a whole contain far more matter than that which interacts
with electromagnetic radiation. The largest part of dark matter, which
does not interact with electromagnetic radiation, is not only "dark" but
also, by definition, utterly transparent.[4]
As important as dark matter is believed to be in the cosmos, direct
evidence of its existence and a concrete understanding of its nature
have remained elusive. Though the theory of dark matter remains the most
widely accepted theory to explain the anomalies in observed galactic
rotation, some alternative theoretical approaches have been developed
which broadly fall into the categories of modified gravitational laws,
and quantum gravitational laws
Peter Klevius: A raised tower on top of a submarine fits the shape of the hole on M/S Estonia and has the power (>500 tons) to cause it.
Top pic is a reconstruction of the placement of the hole seen low right.
Several
people heard a bang from the side of the ship. Carl Eric Laantee
Reintamm, who survived 1994 and is today working as a diplomat, run out
from his cabin and saw water flooding on the car deck. When he came up
and out on the seventh floor he saw something moving in the water by the
side of the ship. It was light and several meters times several meters.
The
M/S Estonia September 1994 sinking, in the Baltic Sea between Sweden,
Åland, Finland and Estland (Estonia), was one of the worst maritime
disasters of the 20th century. It is the second-deadliest peacetime
sinking of a European ship, after the RMS Titanic, and the deadliest
peacetime shipwreck to have occurred in European waters, with 852 lives
lost.
M/S Estonia, was a ferry built in 1979/80 which sailed as
Viking Sally 1980–1990 between Finland and Sweden, was capable of moving
some 2,000 passengers and some 500 cars.
A former disaster
investigator, Margus Kurm, claims that a Swedish submarine had struck
the ferry, and the ensuing hole allowed seawater to rapidly enter the
lower decks and lead to the Estonia's demise.
Peter Klevius
comment: The M/S Estonia catastrophe occurred on the first day of a
10-day NATO naval exercise called Cooperative Venture 94. Although,
Sweden doesn't belong to NATO officially, inofficially it does.
M/S
Estonia's bog visor (55 tons) broke loose during the catastrophe and
has, together with stormy weather, been the official explanation.
However, Peter Klevius thinks the impact in the side may have caused the
locks to get slightly loose and then due to the repeated diving into
four meter or more waves, the locks eventually cracked. This may also
explain why the rear of the ship sunk first.
This
timeline shows the speed of the sinking as well as the fact that the
rear of the ship went down first, contrary to what one would have
expected if it was only the bow visor. A simulation suggests the disaster started already 01:00.
This
type of fin was activated and out on the left side but not on the right
side of the ship - meaning its function was already destroyed when
activated.
Peter Klevius to Chinese people: I'm not a racist Sinophobe - although I certainly look like one.It's
an irony that China now seems to offer the only defense of those very
Human Rights it's accused of not following - while the West supports
islamism that violates those Human Rights (compare Saudi based and
steered OIC's global sharia declaration against Human Rights).
Moreover, apostasy (i.e. leaving islam, which is the worst crime in
islam) and the fact that the muslim man determines the faith for the
children no matter who is the mother, together have to be added to any
estimation of muslim population growth.
US has turned into a dangerous state terrorist which now threatens the peace, wealth and stability of the world.
Why do Sinophobic BBC and UK parliament call it "deradicalization" in UK, US and Saudi Arabia, but "genocide" in China?! And
why wasn't one-child policy against Atheist Han Chinese called
"genocide" while Uighur muslims were allowed to have many children?!
Btw, e.g. Sweden abducts many more children than China does in Xinjiang -
and for extremely questionable reasons (read Peter Klevius' thesis
Pathological Symbiosis and ask yourself why Sweden gets away with its
Human Rights violations). Answer: It's all about U.S. being a lousy
loser and therefore behaving appalingly badly with smear, threats,
illegal sanctions, militaristic aggression etc! Btw, China is already
number one in economy and most technology - and accelerating compared to
US. So you stupid US puppets - take note!
Shame
on everyone who blinks Saudi based and steered OIC's anti-human rights
sharia for all the world's muslims while spitting on China!
Should
BBC and some politicians be put on a Nurenberg trial after this
relentless and demonizing Sinophobia campaign and deliberate lies?
US is rottening fast and should therefore go for peace and cooperation!
Despite using $-freeloading, sanctions, breaking treaties, murdering
officials and politicians in other countries during state visits etc.,
hindering the use of tech previously used to monopolize US companies
globally etc., US now wants to destroy Huawei and other Chinese
companies, not for security but because US is inevitably losing the tech
race. And no, it isn't the Chinese state support any more than US uses
state support for force-feeding Apple, Google etc. and backed up by US
state militaristic interventions, spying, interference, threats etc.
globally. And China was the first to recognize the danger of Covid-19 -
not "delaying" anything" but quite the contrary (see below)! BBC News' deliberately misleading and dangerous anti-China rant 20200706: "China
ought to be our enemy! We can't do any business with China because of
Hong Kong, and the sterilization of Uyghur muslims which some people
(BBC and its cherry picked guests?!) think amounts to genocide". Peter
Kleius: That Chinese muslims should follow the same laws as other
Chinese, and that China uses similar deradicalization programmes
proposed in the West, BBC thinks is "suppression". And volontary
sterilization in the West BBC calls "genocide" in China. And Hong Kong's
security law is similar to those in the West - and not as bad as US -
and are definitely neccessary to keep "one nation" together under the
immense pressure from US and its puppet regimes.
2020 4th of July: Peter Klevius wonders when US women will get the same rights as Chinese women
- ERA is still lacking from US constitution? Article 2, Chinese
constitution: Women shall enjoy equal rights with men in all aspects of
political, economic, cultural, social and family life. Peter Klevius
also wonders why aggressive and assertive US attacks peaceful China
(every schism has US fingerprints) while siding with the war crimes
committing murdeous islamofascist Saudi dictator family whose OIC sharia
clearly denies eqaulity for women?! China is doing more good to more
people than any other country today. Is this the reason?!
20200701: BBC News asks for war against China but complains "we have only two aircraft carriers". Peter Klevius wonders how sick BBC has become?!
20200618:
Why is the most cemtral witness, Inge Morelius (later aka Mårelius) in
the Swedish PM Palme's murder case, deleted by Google's search engine
from Peter Klevius revealing murder analysis?!
20200616:
When China discovers Covid-19 with a European DNA profile on a cutting
board for Norwegian salmon, the BBC thinks it's the communist party.
Why is BBC so quiet about Churchill's secret (until 2018) pact with Stalin
in 1939 which would have divided Scandinavia between Russia and UK?!
And US' NATO puppet Jens Stoltenberg repeats like a parrot his master's
voice against China - while a civil war is going on inside NATO between
Greece and Turkey.
