Monkey see - monkey do! How US led media screwed you about NATO expansion aggression that led to an inevitable* war.

 * Putin knew that without intervention, Ukraine would join NATO with US nukes on the Russian border - i.e. violating its 1990s promise to be nuke free.

 The hungry and desperate $-embezzling (1971-) and war crimes committing US wolf guarding Russophobic and Sinophobic sheep.

Peter Klevius: China R&D causes $ to rotten from inside - just like US manufacturing etc., i.e. US anti-China hate speech and miltary aggression are not conducive to the best interest of most of the people in the world.
 

US expansion of NATO nukes started as an aspiration for a world domination scheme in after the fall of Soviet. However, in the 2010s China's rapid development becam a threat to US stolen $-hegemony.

 How monkey was Alexander Stubb when he said about Finland's peaceful and prosperous Russia relation called "Finlandization" by the US led West: I would never wish another country to have such a cramped position where the bigger player decides on the most important things.

Peter Klevius: This is the man who has not only happily welcomed the end of Finland's neutrality, but also welcomed the United States of War and its nukes on Finnish soil!
 

Peter Klevius translation: American (sic) magazine reported about Finland getting U.S. nukes - Aaltola and Stubb snarled: 'Humbug' (this was in regard of Newsweek's article - which isn't "American" but a U.S. magazine). 

 

 

    

Russia had everything to win on peaceful trade with Germany/EU, but nothing to gain from war - other than stopping US/NATO nukes in Ukraine, i.e. an existencial threat. 

 

Listen to this video to understand how screwed you are! 

 

An alternative and better England 

 England/UK needs to cut off its evil past as well as its evil "special relationship" with dangerous loser and war criminal $-freeloader US (since 1971).

 

Peter Klevius wrote:

Sunday, November 29, 2020

Although many countries have a shameful past, only UK thinks it's a good idea to continue its tradition of appalling behavior

 

British Sinophobia hate rests on megalomania delusion and functions as a Potemkin fasade against UK's own historical guilt and debt to the world.

 It wasn't only in Asia and Africa the Brits behaved like scumbags:

 1854 British HMS Arrogant meddled, harassed, threatened and attacked peaceful Finland-Swedes in the southwest of Finland. Today the Brexit brits are equally arrogant and planning to live on weapons trade, militarism, anti-Human Rights sharia finance and money laundering etc financial cheating outside EU.

In other words UK, which already has made a fool of itself because of its bad behavior (not keeping its word in treaties, excusing terror and murder abroad by British military, spying and meddling second only to US etc. etc.), will again become a threat (as a US puppet) to world peace and itself. 

UK attacking civilians in Finland 1854 with HMS Arrogant.

HMS Arrogant (sic) bombing Ekenäs in Finland 1854.

British (whatever it is) has a long tradition of aggression, meddling, threatening and attacking around the world.

Industrialization started in England - and ended in England due to poor quality e.g. Jaguar (below average despite calling itself a "luxury brand") and Land Rover (constantly been among the worst in quality surveys).

So England continued its imperial ambitions by what was left from the empire namely the money hub called London.

Today England's closest ally (except for its master US) is the worst "country" in the world, namely the islamofascist, murders and war crimes committing Sunni islamic terrorism supporting Saudi dictator family. And London is the hub for Saudi islamofascist sharia finance and money laundering.

Klevius to Brits: Stop cheating and learn to behave!

Klevius wonders, as many others also do, if it isn't time to leave evil Britishness and grow up and enter a friendlier world instead of trying to make money on evilness, militarism and destabilization? 

 

 

How Peter Klevius evolution formula (1981) explains why existencecentrism (P. Klevius 1992) is essential to understand the human mind*.

*  'Mind' is here to be understood as the latest state of the individual's (or humankind's) adaptation to sensory input imprinted via the thalamus in a way that makes any new input pattern obliged to hit (roughly/dynamically) the same original association pattern. For this process to work no "qualia" is possible other than as obscure concepts in language. In fact, to understand the mind one has to separate it from language. Or more precisely, one has to understand language as sensory input in general - compare Peter Klevius stone example (1992) - but realize its capability of irrational illusions. There's no table in the brain to support a toddler learning to walk - s/he is just adapted to it as part of her/his surroundings. Same with a sunset etc. The neuronal circuit is just a chaotic "film" emulsion where different association patterns have become familiar to the individual. And scanning the brain shows just that, i.e. a chaotic pattern unlike anyone else's, except for more general structures due to similar biology.

The main point of Peter Klevius concept 'existencecentrism' (1992) is that the only reality is the one inside the mind, and that it's impossible to even talk/think about something "outside" the mind because any such speculation is 100% determined/understood by what is inside the mind.

A pile of house building material has the potential for a variety of different houses. However, the more the house is built the less possibility for variation. Same applies to the mind, according to Peter Klevius (1981, 1992, 1994, 2004). This means that the more the brain (mind) adapts to its limited (existencecentrism) surrounding, the less room for other views. First threshold for the growing young human (fetus, baby etc.) is the limit of the senses. The second is the ackumulation of synaptic adaptations which makes the individual naturally (walking etc.) and socially (talking etc.) fluent, but further also limits access to alternative understanding because of the mind “going native”*.

* "Going native" is a concept in social anthropology when a researcher “becomes” one with the culture under study.

Peter Klevius evolution formula from 1981 applied to the mind.

 This article appeared as a s.c. "under-liner" (under strecket) on the editorial page and was back then paid Fmk 500 to the author. 

The understanding of what the senses bring is limited to what they have brought before (P. Klevius 1992). This is in line with Peter Klevius evolution formula (published 1981) where the basic element of existence is motion, and the causality of events constitutes a complex of evolution and devolution (synaptic pruning). Evolution can be said to be the consequence of the variables of causality in where the complexity of older structures is reinforced (compare s.c. counterfactual relation). This development stays in an apparent opposition to thermodynamics which theoretically leads to what is called "maximum entropy", i.e. the state where no additional pruning is needed (compare e.g. walking and talking in general). Thus, one could fatalistically say that evolution in fact only constitutes components of causality on its way to uniformity, where the end point of evolution is determined by its external frame of reference, and can be summed up in the words of the philosopher Hegel: 'Pure being and nothingness are identical' (P. Kotilainen* 1981). 

* Kotilainen (mother's maiden name) was the last of three names labelled on Peter while still a child - the others being Lundberg (married to the mother) and Lindroos (who kept the kidnapped child in secret for many years). Ironically, the proper name Kinnmark (the bio father who admitted fathering the child and promised to marry the mother but never did) was never applied.