Do you support Human Rights or sharia?

Klevius wonders whether BBC/UK government count Islamic State muslims who can't be directly tied to atrocities, as "peaceful muslims"?

Klevius wonders why semitic attacks on Jews are called "antisemitism"?

WARNING about "Five Eyes" and BBC, and their "close ally", the hate, terror and war crimes producing islamofascist "custodian of islam", the Saudi dictator family!
If you prefer peace, democratic non-fake information and positive development - ask your politicians to avoid US/UK's war mongering militarism and the world's biggest state propaganda tool BBC, which constitutes the most serious threat to free information. UK government is pushing for neo-British imperialist militarist meddling and intervention around the world - and making its propaganda tool BBC "the custodian of fact checks", i.e. a wolf among sheep.

Theresa May wants to leave EU. That should include UK militarist meddling within EU as well. Leave means leave! Don't let UK and its "close ally" the islamofascist Saudi dictator family contaminate EU citizens lives. Don't let the insidious spy organization Five Eyes spy on EU citizens and their leaders and parliamentarians. Don't let BBC's or islam's glossy surface (i.e. normal news/info and non-sharia muslims respectively) lure you to not see the evil core. Klevius is the opposite. WYSIWYG. No hidden evil core, just defense of your (whoever you are) basic Human Rights that islam wants to deny you.

UK government wants to force EU to put a border on Ireland - so it can blame EU for something UK-Brexit caused. Brexiters want to eat the cake while still having it. Unconstitutional UK has become a cancer that hopes to survive by creating metastases in line with old fashioned British imperialism.

Klevius islam logic: If I is SI and SI is not HR then I is not HR.
For those who don't understand formal logic: If islam is sharia islam and sharia islam violates Human Rights, then islam violates Human Rights.

Theresa May & Co defend sharia by saying "it's just a a contract". This is utter lie because any meaningful islam demands sharia and stepping out of the "contract" is the worst sin you can commit as a muslim (s.c. apostasy). Theresa May's and others deception is built on the mass of secular muslims, i.e. not true muslims. And these "secular muslims" get away with it as long as there's not enough true muslims to demand sharia all over the pitch - as yet. Moreover, Saudi led sharia finance demands sharia compliance - as does Saudi based and steered OIC, all muslims world organization.

Klevius supports "secular muslims" - Theresa May supports sharia muslims.

Theresa May & Co and state media BBC play with race cards

Theresa May  & Co and state media BBC play with race cards

Driverless unstable Brexit

Driverless unstable Brexit

UK is drowning in sharia islamofascism while BBC is silent

UK is drowning in sharia islamofascism while BBC is silent

US/UK is a security risk - not China. Tell your EU politician!

US/UK is a security risk - not China. Tell your EU politician!

Klevius "islamophobic" heroine Nawal El Saadawi from Egypt

Klevius "islamophobic" heroine Nawal El Saadawi from Egypt

Politicians in the worst interest of the people

Politicians in the worst interest of the people

Anti Human Rights muslim or not?

When Klevius writes 'islamofascist' it should always be understood as islamic default tenets (e.g. OIC's world sharia) that are gravely opposite UN's anti-fascist 1948 Universal Human Rights declaration. So Klevius suggests every muslim to openly declare if they oppose the most basic Human Rights or not. This is particularly important when it comes to media people and politicians who say they are muslims but hesitate on this most crucial issue.
Klevius supports no border on Ireland. Follow the will of the people, i.e. let England leave and let Scotland and Northern Ireland stay. UK is an unconstitutional mess which now wants to leave EU without controlling its border to EU. A proper constitution would have demanded qualified majority in two consecutive elections/votes about such a crucial matter as Brexit - and being aware what the vote is about. The root of the problem is England's mad man Henry 8's colonialization of Ireland and lack of constitution. The preposterous "British" Brexit parody is then spiced with the government's and BBC's use of religious hate mongering etc. In summary UK is an anomaly of countries trying to be a state in a world of federal states united as countries.

Britisharia Human Rightsphobia

Calling criticism of islam "islamophobia" is pure racism and also supports islamic racism and sexism

Calling critics of islam "islamophobes" is pure racism and also supports islamic racism and sexism

Calling critics of islam "islamophobes" is pure racism and also supports islamic racism and sexism
BBC isn't much interested in anti-semitism, homophobia etc. but uses them as an excuse for its Saudi/OIC supported "islamophobia" smear campaign against Human Rights.

Is BBC's Pakistan rooted and Saudi raised muslim(?) presenter Mishal Husain an "islamophobe" against evil* islam, or an apostate supporting toothless** "islam"? She doesn't fast during Ramadan but rather drinks some alcohol, and doesn't veil herself and says she doesn't feel any threats to her way of life (Klevius: thanks to Human Rights - not sharia islam), well knowing how muslim and non-muslim women suffer in muslim sharia countries like Pakistan and Saudi Arabia without Human Rights. What would she say to a muslim terrorist asking her if she's a muslim? Isn't it about time to stop this bigoted and hypocritical indirect support of islamofascism that this Saudi/OIC initiated "islamophobia" smear camopaign against Human Rights*** is all about?

* Human Rights equality violating sharia islam
** in line with the anti-fascist, anti-racist and anti-sexist U.N.'s 1948 Universal Human Rights declaration.
*** Socialists have an ideological problem with individual Human Rights, and are therefore vulnerable for islamism (see Klevius 1994).

British militarist neo-colonialism

British militarist neo-colonialism

UK sells weapons to Saudis - and smears peaceful China who can do better weapons themselves.

UK sells weapons to Saudis - and smears peaceful China who can do better weapons themselves.

Why is Theresa May excused for her secret ties with islamofascism?!

Why is Theresa May excused for her secret ties with islamofascism?!

Saudi induced muslim attack on UK Parliament. How many elsewhere? And what about Saudi/OIC's sharia

Saudi induced muslim attack on UK Parliament. How many elsewhere? And what about Saudi/OIC's sharia

A "close ally" of the islamofascist Saudi dictator family mixes OIC sharia with Human Rights

A "close ally" of the islamofascist Saudi dictator family mixes OIC sharia with Human Rights

Is UK turning into a militaristic unconstitutional islamofascist rogue state?

First UK people voted to join and share borders with EU. Then England voted to leave while Scotland and Northern Ireland voted to stay. And now UK politicians want to leave while keeping the Irish EU border open. UK lacks a modern constitution according to which a constitutional issue has to pass at least two majority votes.

Rabbi Sacks: "BBC runs Britain." Klevius: Pro-sharia BBC meddles worldwide.

Rabbi Sacks: "BBC runs Britain." Klevius: Pro-sharia BBC meddles worldwide.

The islamofascist Saudi dictator family criminalizes Human Rights and calls them "islamophobia".

Are you or your representative(s) for or against basic universal Human Rights equality?

Peter Klevius global morality can only be challenged by violating the most basic of Human Rights.

Everything Peter Klevius writes (or has written) is guided by the anti-sexist. anti-racist, and anti-fascist Universal* Human Rights declaration of 1948. In other words, what is declared immoral and evil is so done as measured against the most basic of Human Rights (the so called "negative" rights - i.e. the rights of the individual not to be unnecessarily targeted with restrictions and impositions). Unlike the 1948 Universal Human Rights (UHR) declaration, islam denies Human Rights equality to women and non-muslims. And violation of such basic Human Rights can't be tolerated just by referring to "freedom of religion".

* This means accepting everyone - without exception due to e.g. sex, religion, lack of religion, "security" etc. - as equal in Human Rights. The individual is protected by negative Human Rights, but of course not against substantiated legal accusations - as long as these are not produced as a means that violates the basic Human Rights (compare "not necessary in a free, democratic country"). The legislator may not produce laws that seek to undermine some individuals rights. This also includes e.g. "freedom of religion", i.e. that this freedom doesn't give the right to unfree others, or cause others to be in an inferior rights position. If by islam you mean something that fully adheres to basic Human Rights equality, then you aren't targeted by Peter Klevius islam criticism. However, if you mean islam accepts violations of the most basic of Human Rights, then you may also call Peter Klevius an "islamophobe" - and he will be proud of it. And when it comes to "security" it can't mean "offending" opponents to basic Human Rights.

This is why any effort to twist or accuse the writings of Peter Klevius as "islamophobia" etc. can only be made from a standpoint against these basic Human Rights. As a consequence, no body of authority can therefore accuse, hinder etc. Peter Klevius without simultaneously revealing its own disrespect for these Human Rights. Conversely, Peter Klevius can not accuse anyone who agrees on these rights - i.e. this leaves e.g. "islamophobia" etc. accusations against Peter Klevius without merit.

Every effort against these basic Human Rights is treason against a country calling itself free and democratic.

Saudi terror, war crimes, sharia - and "islamophobia" smear campaign against Human Rights.

Racist UK Government and BBC

Racist UK Government and BBC

The world's most dangerous war criminal is the guardian of islam's holy places and OIC

The world's most dangerous war criminal is the  guardian of islam's holy places and OIC

UK's sharia ties to Saudi islamofascism threaten EU (and UK) security

UK's sharia ties to Saudi islamofascism threaten EU (and UK) security

Warning for BBC's faked "news" and support for Human Rights violating Saudi/OIC islamofascism

Warning for BBC's faked "news" and support for Human Rights violating Saudi/OIC islamofascism

Peter Klevius "islamophobia"/Human Rightsphobia test for you and your politicians

Saudi war criminal "prince" "reforms" islam to fit Saudi islamofascism against Human Rights

Saudi war criminal "prince" "reforms" islam to fit Saudi islamofascism against Human Rights

Saudi "ally" responsible for chemical attacks (Jaysh al-Islam)

Warning for a muslim robot!

Sharia and weaponry keeps Brexit-UK in EU - with leaking borders and against the will of the people

Sharia and weaponry keeps Brexit-UK in EU - with leaking borders and against the will of the people

EU closes internal borders - and opens its external ones.

EU closes internal borders - and opens its external ones.

Welcoming UK's main security threat - and committing treason against the will of the people

Welcoming UK's main security threat - and committing treason against the will of the people

What's left for UK when finance is fully AI? Profiting from conflicts and wars.

What's left for UK when finance is fully AI? Profiting from conflicts and wars.

The ultimate treason against people in England, Ireland and Scotland

The ultimate treason against people in England, Ireland and Scotland

True Brits for the islamofascist Saudi dictator family and against Human Rights

Klevius: Face it, Wikipedia/BBC etc. fake media - Finland was first in the world with full suffrage

Jacob Rees-Mogg, UK's top far right religious extremist, hates Human Rights and laughs at Germans

UK PM candidate Rees-Mogg: Germans needed Human Rights - we don't. Klevius: I really think you do.

Definition of Negative Human Rights - i.e. the very foundation of the freedom part of the anti-fascist Universal Human Rights declaration of 1948.

Most people today are A(mono)theists, i.e. not "believing" in an impossible "one god"*. Such a "collective god" would mean equally many personal "gods" as there are believers/interpretors. "Monotheisms" are for racist/sexist movements - not for individuals. Human Rights are for individuals living among individuals with same rights.

Religion always means a total or partial reduction of some people's (e.g. women''s) Human Rights equality.

Being against A(mono)theism must be categorized as contempt of basic Human Rights equality because "monotheists" have doctrines which can't comply with basic Human Rights equality.
Klevius moral formula is a bedrock you can't beat:

1 There's no absolute and fixed moral in a dynamic society.

2 Therefor we have to repeatedly agree on a minimum moral and equality for all.

3 In doing so we are logically forced to approve of negative Human Rights, i.e. not to impose restrictions other than necessary in a democracy based on as much freedom as possible for all individuals - no matter of sex, race etc. And, for the truly dumb ones, do note that this definition excludes the freedom to restrict freedom.

* Though some people keep calling their own racist/sexist "interpretation" as "god's/allah's will").

"Brits" who are racist against EU citizens but dare not criticize muslims - here's your passport.

"Brits" who are racist against EU citizens but dare not criticize muslims - here's your passport.

Klevius 1979: Human Rights rather than religion

Klevius 1979: Human Rights rather than religion

BBC (imp)lies that 84% of the world is "monotheist" although most people are A(mono)theists

BBC (imp)lies that 84% of the world is "monotheist" although most people are A(mono)theists

Klevius can no longer distinguish between the techniques of BBC and Nazi propaganda - can you!

By squeezing in Atheist ideologies/philosophies as well as polytheisms under the super set BBC calls "religion", and by narrowing 'Atheism' to what it's not (Atheism is what it says on the tin - no god) they produced the extremely faked proposition that 84% of the world's population is "religious". Moreover, BBC also proudly claimed that the 84% figure is rising even more. Well, that's only by relying on those poor women in Pakistan, Bangladesh, English muslim ghettos (where most so called "British" women don't even speak English) etc., who still produce many more children than the average in the world. But Klevius doesn't think this abuse of girls/women is anything to cheer.

Klevius CV

Some basic facts to consider about Klevius* (except that he is both "extremely normal" and extremely intelligent - which fact, of course, would not put you off if you're really interested in these questions):

* The son of one of Sweden's best chess-players and an even more intelligent Finnish mother. He was mentored by G. H. von Wright, Wittgensteins's successor at Cambridge. However, G H v Wright sadly didn't fully realize back then (1991) the true power of the last chapter, Khoi, San and Bantu, in Klevius book. Today, if still alive, he would surely see it.

1 Klevius' analysis of consciousness is the only one that fits what we know - after having eliminated our "pride" bias of being humans (which non-human would we impress, anyway?). Its starting point is described and exemplified in a commentary to Jurgen Habermas in Klevius book Demand for Resources (1992:30-33, ISBN 9173288411, based on an article by Klevius from 1981), and is further explained in a commentary to Francis Crick's book The Astonishing Hypothesis under the title The Even More Astonishing Hypothesis (EMAH), which can be found in Stalk's archive and which has been on line since 2003 for anyone to access/assess.

2 Klevius out of island/mainland fluctuating Southeast Asia Denisovans up to big skulled Siberians as the birth of much more intelligent modern humans who then spread all over the world, is the only analysis that fits both genetic reality as well as tool and art sophistication seen in e.g. the Denisova cave (no dude, Blombos etc. don’t come even close).

3 Klevius criticism of Human Rights violating sharia islamofascism (e.g. OIC) which is called "islamophobia" by islamofascists and their supporters who don't care about the most basic of Human Rights (e.g. re. women). Klevius' "islamophobia" has two roots: 1) UN's 1948 Universal Human Rights declaration, which, contrary to any form of muslim sharia, doesn't, for example, allow sex to be an excuse for robbing females of their full Human Rights equality, and 2) the history of the origin of islam ( e.g. Hugh Kennedy, Robert G. Hoyland, K. S. Lal etc.) which reveals a murderous, pillaging, robbing, enslaving and raping racist/sexist supremacist ideology that exactly follows precisely those basic islamic tenets which are now called "unislamic" but still survive today (as sharia approved sex slavery, sharia approved "liberation” jihad, academic jihad etc.) behind the sharia cover which is made even more impenetrable via the spread of islamic finance, mainly steered from the islamofascist Saudi dictator family.

4 Klevius analysis of sex segregation/apartheid (now deceptively called “gender segregation”) and heterosexual attraction - see e.g. Demand for Resources (1981/1992), Daughters of the Social State (1993), Angels of Antichrist (1996), Pathological Symbiosis (2003), or Klevius PhD research on heterosexual attraction/sex segregation and opposition to female footballers (published in book form soon).

Racist Theresa May robs EU citizens of their Human Rights

This (via Saudi steered sharia finance) is the biggest threat to your Human Rights

This (via Saudi steered sharia finance) is the biggest threat to your Human Rights

UK's security pact with the Devil himself

UK's security pact with the Devil himself

The islamofascist Saudi dictator family spreading its hate and losses over you

The islamofascist Saudi dictator family spreading its hate and losses over you

Is Mrs Theresa May digging a racist "British" sharia "empire" under the Brexit cliff?

BBC, the world's biggest fake/selective news site - with an evil agenda

BBC, the world's biggest fake/selective news site - with an evil agenda

BBC's compulsory fee funded propaganda for Saudi sharia islam

Tuesday, November 21, 2017
Today England's parliament vote between islamofascist sharia and Human Rights - without even mentioning sharia. Shame on you England, to even have to vote about it!

While Theresa May tries to pave the way for islamofascist Saudi friendly sharia by trashing Human Rights, BBC fills its news with the suffering of Rohyngia muslims - without a word about the Saudi backed muslim terrorist attacks against Buddhists that preceded it.

Support Klevius' Atheist anti-fascism against islamofascism

This is what BBC's muslim sharia presenter Mishal Husain "forgot" to report. Mishal grew up in the very same theocratic medieval dictatorship which now harbors and rules all muslims world organization OIC and its Human Rights violating sharia. While also spreading islamic hatred over the world through a variety of channels.

Klevius to dumb (or just evil) alt-left "antifa" people who support the worst of Human Rights violating evil:

True anti-fascism in its purest form is laid down in the Universal Human Rights declaration of 1948. Islam (OIC) has in UN decided to abandon the most basic of these rights (the so called negative Human Rights).

Fascism is, according to Google's top hit, "a political philosophy, movement, or regime that exalts nation and often race above the individual and that stands for a centralized autocratic government headed by a dictatorial leader, severe economic and social regimentation*, and forcible suppression of opposition." 23 Aug 2017

So let's face islam with this definition.

A political philosophy, movement, or regime (islam) that exalts nation (Umma) and often race (muslims) above the individual and that stands for a centralized autocratic government (Koran text/Mohammad's example) headed by a dictatorial leader (the caliph - e.g. the Saudi based OIC's Saudi leader), severe economic and social regimentation* (sharia), and forcible suppression of opposition (apostasy ban against muslims wanting to leave islam, and demonizing defenders of Human Rights by calling them "islamophobes").

And islamofascism gets away with it by calling itself a religion and thereby being protected by those very Human Rights it opposes.

* According to Cambridge dictionary, "extreme organization and control of people".

Theresa May's sharia = >23,000 jihadi - before Brexit. How many after?

Theresa May's sharia = >23,000 jihadi - before Brexit. How many after?

The earliest truly modern human skull was found in Liujiang/China.

The Viking phenomenon started with bilingual Finns raiding/trading sex slaves to Abbasid (ca 750)

UK DID NOT vote Brexit. EU residents weren't allowed to vote while non-EU residents were.

The islamofascist Saudi dictator family is the root of most islam induced suffering

While Klevius is forcing islam into a Human Rights corner, Obama continues supporting islamofascism

The "Birmingham Koran" hoax - and a sonless "prophet" invented after it!

Homo Naledi - and a late "West" hating lawyer relative. A judge for May?

BBC lies and fake news

Lego won't sponsor the defense for Human Rights equality - but islamofascism and sharia is ok

Apostate (?) Obama's bio- and adoptive dads were both muslims

Choudary and May both want more sharia and less Human Rights - so what about Brits?

Islam is the hide-away for racist/sexist supremacists

Nazi-muslim cooperation: Audi then built by Jewish slaves - today dangerous quality problems

Japan 10 yrs ahead of Europe ln hybrid/fuelcell cars, space tech etc

God is bad semantics - Science is good math

Origin of Goths and Vikings

The world's oldest real portrait ever found (Central Europe). Carvings dated to 26-29,000 bp.

From tropical island SE-Asia to cold and protein/fat rich Northern Eurasia - and over the world

Origin of islam: Sharia slave finance and sex apartheid

Muslims and Hillary against Human Rights

We're all born unequal - that's why we need Human Rights, not islam!

"Allah" is man made racist/sexist interpretation against Human Rights

Muzzammil Hassan (the man on the pic who receives award from the influential islamofascist US organization CAIR-PA's Chairman Iftekhar Hussain and CAIR National's Chairman Parvez Ahmed) founded Bridges TV "to correct misconceptions about islam in America". He then stabbed his divorcing wife nine times and decapitated her in accordance with islamic Sharia tradition in the premises of Bridges TV. Being a believing muslim he was leniently sentenced only for second degree murder for this gruesome islamic honor killing.

Contrast these scumbags against those (incl. Klevius) who relentlessly volunteer for spreading knowledge about Human Rights and are called "islamophobes" simply because islam doesn't submit to Human Rights (this is why the islamofascist organization OIC has openly abandoned Human Rights and replaced them with islamofascist Sharia).

Klevius is probably now the world's foremost expert on sex segregation (sad, isn't it) and islam (the worst hate cime ever) is the most evil expression of sex segregation. By 'islam' Klevius means Sharia as described by Bill Warner and as adopted by OIC in their Human Rights violating Saudi initiated Cairo declaration (Sharia) from 1990 which replaces Universal Human Rights for women and non-muslims with sexism and racism! Why? Because it's the very soul and origin of islam which wouldn't survive if applied to full Human Rights!

The islamic extermination of the Jews

Burn OIC's islamic anti-Human Rights declaration!

Samantha Lewthwaite, Mishal Husain and Michael Adebolajo have sharia islam in common

The distinct art tracks of the first truly modern humans

Iceage refuges were rooted in Eurasiatic - IE came much later

Klevius altruistic virtual volunteering in defense of Universal Human Rights

Ferrari is a poor quality but expensive Fiat

Ferrari is a poor quality but expensive Fiat

Monday, February 18, 2019

Arrogant Brits attacking Finland, and thratening Japan and China

Year 1854 British HMS Arrogant meddled, harassed, threatened and attacked peaceful Finland-Swedes in the southwest of Finland. Year 2019 some Brits think they can do the same with Japan and China.

HMS Arrogant bombing Ekenäs in Finland 1854.

British (whatever it is) has a long tradition of meddling, threatening and attacking around the world.

Industrialization started in England - and ended in England due to poor quality e.g. Jaguar (below average despite calling itself a "luxury brand") and Land Rover (constantly been among the worst in quality surveys).

So England continued its imperial ambitions by what was left from the empire namely the money hub called London.

Today England's closest ally is the worst "country" in the world, namely the islamofascist, murders and war crimes committing Sunni islamic terrorism supporting Saudi dictator family. And London is the hub for Saudi islamofascist sharia finance and money laundering.

Klevius to Brits: Stop cheating and learn to behave!

Klevius wonders, as many others also do, if it isn't time to leave evil Britishness and grow up and enter a friendlier world instead of trying to make money on evilness, militarism and destabilization?

Thursday, February 14, 2019

How does BBC pick their non sense "researchers" to be presented fpr the compusory licence fee paying people in England?

Not only is BBC a faking state propaganda media with a worldwide "British" imperial ambition to become the only true god of news/information, BBC is also a notoriously unreliable source of science news/info.

Today's examples includes Paul Davies who thinks information is separate from matter, and an other who thinks chimps/bonobos don't understand "complex" information.

These "researchers" would have gained tremendously if they had read Klevius theory/analysis of consciousness and the brain.

As already Wittgenstein pointed out, one has to distinguish between "things" and operations. And as Klevius has pointed out (published 1981, 1992, 2004):

The basis of existence is change (motion), and causality constitutes a complex of evolution and devolution. Evolution may be seen as the consequence of causality's variables in time where complexity in existing structures are reinforced. This stands in opposition to thermodynamics which theoretically leads to maximal entropy (i.e. energy equilibrium) where time/change finally ends. Someone might then say that the products of evolution are just temporary components in causality's road towards uniformity (Klevius 1981, 1992:23).

Sorry about the poor translation from Swedish.

Information is hence reduction of uncertainty, i.e. awareness/consciousness. In other words, information is your adaptation to your environment. As is the abstraction of what's going on in a black hole.

And when it comes to "complex understanding", it's just a stupid and nearsighted human effort to glorify her/himself in a completely meaningless way.

This reminds me of Peter Gärdenfors, "one of Sweden's most notable philosophers" (Wikipedia),  who thought chimps/bonobos can't think about the future. These kind of statements reveal an ignorance beyond comprehension when considering this man got a professorship and awards for his philosophical incompetence.

Btw, the only "reward" Klevius has ever been awarded was 500 Finnish Marks back in 1981 when his first article about Demand for Resourdes was published. However, not even that would have been possible without George Henrik von Wright's (Wittgenstein's successor at Cambridge) good word to the editor.

Doesn't this Klevius' cry for attention also contain something good for a general usage? What do you think.

Klevius 1992 book Demand for Resources which is based on the 1981 article - which was written already in 1979 - will be translated in English on these blogs in the near future. Then you can evaluate Klevius - and perhaps read his much later analysis as well.

Friday, February 08, 2019

Fake media (like BBC) uses the deliberately misleading term "anti-semitism" for the purpose of protecting the most evil country on the planet.

Was this white non-Jew the greatest Holocaust hero? And was his non-Jewishness the reason Hollywood refused to make a film about him?

 Witold Pilecki (13 May 1901 – 25 May 1948).

He describes his own entrance to Ausch­witz in 1940, when it was a camp for Poles, as the moment when he “bade farewell to everything I had hitherto known on this earth and entered something seemingly no longer of it.” Between 1939 and 1945, nearly some 3 million non-Jewish Poles died were murdered by the Nazis. Jews came to Auschwitz beginning in 1942. Pilecki escaped in 1943 and delivered a full report about the atrocities he had already told the world about in 1941.

Volunteering for Ausch­witz and ­remaining there for almost three years was perhaps one of the most courageous things anyone has ever done. He was then betrayed by his own government who sent him to death through a show trial to please the USSR.

1940 Witold Pilecki deliberately walked into a German roundup in Warsaw for the purpose of being sent to Auschwitz. He did it to check out whether the rumors were true about what happened there.

While in the camp, he organized a resistance movement and informed the Western Allies of Nazi Germany's Auschwitz atrocities as early as 1941. He escaped from the camp in 1943 after nearly 2½ years of imprisonment. He took part as a combatant in the Warsaw Uprising[6] in August–October 1944. He remained loyal to the London-based Polish government-in-exile after the Communist takeover of Poland, and he was arrested for espionage in 1947 by the Stalinist secret police (Urząd Bezpieczeństwa) on charges of working for "foreign imperialism", a euphemism for British Intelligence.

In 1941 he was one of the first (the first?) to tell the world about Holocaust - but few were interested.

In December 1942, the US and UK governments were (officially) aware of the scale of the Holocaust where some 6-14 million non-Jews and 5.9 million Jews were killed. However, they
kept it for themselves. Allied commanders who liberated camps at the end of the war seem to have been totally unaware of this information and what had been going on in the camps.

According to the Holocaust remembrance memorial in Israel, information regarding mass murders of Jews (sic - what about non-Jews?) began to reach the free world in late June 1941, and the volume of such reports increased with time.

Biography of Pilecki is actually a ready screenplay for a film. Why, in your opinion, American Hollywood filmmakers did not make such a film? Why did they prefer to depict the story entitled "Resistance" about the imaginary heroic exploits of the Jewish partisan unit of Tewii Bielski?

Adam Cyra, a specialist in World War II history of Central Europe: The (planned Hollywood-) film you spoke about was extremely biased and false. However, I remember that two or three years ago a representative of Hollywood appeared in the museum, who wanted to make a film about Pilecki. They already had a script written, translated into Polish. They absolutely wanted me to give my opinion and make a positive statement. I read the script and my hair stood on end. There were various strange, sensational and fictional threads.

Did you ask filmmakers from Hollywood why they wanted to color the captain's biography in such a way?

Adam Cyra: No, apparently the real one seemed too unattractive to them. Anyway, when it comes to disseminating Pilecki's biography, it is possible that another delicate issue played a role here. On the cover of Garlinski's book, which I mentioned earlier, translated into English and French, is the information that Pilecki was of Jewish origin. It was not true, he was not. It just happened that he did not have any Jewish roots, but if he did, then Hollywood filmmakers might be interested in him more. Garlinski himself said that when he went to the United States and the Jews there they saw a prison number on his arm, they said he must be a Jew. When he denied and added that he was Polish, they were surprised because, in their opinion, there were no Poles in Auschwitz at all. This is the image in the West. And yet it was a camp founded for the Polish intelligentsia.

BBC (and some other fake media) keep spitting out the oxymoron "anti-semitism" well knowing that most Jew haters are semitic (Arabic) speaking muslims. Why?

Klevius has the right answer - again: It's all about protecting the murderous war crimes and terrorism committing islamofascist Sunni Arab Saudi dictator family - and to label Persian speaking Shia muslim Iran "anti-semitic", i.e. against both Jews and Arabic speaking muslims.

The islamofascist custodians of islam, the Saudi dictator family and Israel are "allies", and therefore tied to the US (and its tiny cousin England). Add to this the dollar, the OPEC, and the OIC, and you see why islam creates so many victims today.

Read Klevius if you want the facts right - and always avoid state propagandist BBC and its insidiously faked mis-"info".

Judaism and islam have historically always been intertwined in a schizophrenic relationship that continuous today.

It started with Jewish-Christians creating islam and with Mohammad's first deed being to slaughter all the Jews in Medina. However, when the muslims started their pillaging, raping and enslaving "conquest" it was encouraged and aided by Jews already in place in e.g. the Sassanid civilization as well as in the Visigothic civilization and Carolingian Empire.

However, this didn't hinder muslims from persecuting Jews. Just ask Maimonides (the Jew that most Jews celebrate the most) who had to hide his Jewishness despite living at a time now described by PC historians as "islamic tolerance".

Klevius wrote:

Wednesday, August 5, 2015

The Jewish origin of islam

Islam is a sect grown out of Judaism via Christianity.

According to Human Rights there are no "chosen people". Meaning that you may believe whatever you like as long as you follow legislation guided by the principle of Universal equality.

 Here's an approximate map of Judaism just before the origin of islam.

And below an approximate map of the violent muslim colonization in the foot steps of the Jewish slave trade routes.

 The above maps could be almost identical if produced with same techniques. This is no coincident but due to the "mysterious" code (the Jews) that made Arab imperialism possible and historical analysis impossible ("mysterious") if not included.  

Except for Khazaria, Jews were more business orientated than eager to waive swords compared to their copycats the Arab Bedouins. However, without wealthy and influential Jews leading the bloodthirsty and illiterate Bedouins (compare Ibn-Khaldun's description) and paving the way for the Arab looters (compare how the Jews used Turkic people in Khazaria in pretty much the same manner) the "Arab conquest" would have quickly dried out in the Arabian sand.

Dear reader. When reading Klevius analysis of the origin of islam, do always keep in mind the following important facts:

1 There was no Koran - only some Jewish/Christian text manipulations.

2  There was no Muhammad - only the old Jewish Messias (the rescuer/saver/leader) myth. Muhammad as described by muslims is a later invention snd doesn't appear in any official documents whatsoever before Malik.

3  Conventional "descriptions" of the "Arab conquest" are impossible and leave historians "amazed". Instead looting, booty, and sex slaves were the main incentives for the Bedouins. What was new was a more tight racist system of "we-and-the-other" which hindered (for a time) hindered internal divisions. On top of this was the Dhimmitude taxation system under the sword.

4 Understanding these point is also understanding that islam originated as a parasite and therefore never functioned as inspiration in itself for innovations etc. This is why every islamic colony has ended in bachwardness. Africa is an example of how a parasitic ideology was able to drain a whole continent.

Tuesday, January 29, 2019

You moron (or deliberately evil), who shouts "islamophobia" and "hater" to Human Rights. The real "back stop" is about the border against Saudi islamofascism.

Klevius welcomes refugees and immigrants - as long as they aren't sharia muslims against Human Rights. UK government seems to think the very opposite.

The only asylum/migration problem is the flood of sharia muslims who violate our most basic Human Rights. And the only reason we have this problem is the Saudi "custodian of islam" who uses all its oil money influence to enforce islamofascist sharia and declaring Human Rights defenders "islamophobes".The islamofascist Saudi dictator family hence keeps the world's muslims hostage, well knowing that a true muslim has to submit to sharia, i.e. to drop Human Rights.

Saudi Arabia is the core of the cancer of fascism in the world of today. And everyone knows it - take that! Almost everyone (except sharia muslims who are against basic Human Rights) on UK streets thinks the Saudi dictator state is evil. And most people know that it's the islamofascist Saudi dictator family that has been behind most terrorist attacks in UK.

So how come that this evil state is UK's "best ally"?

The only reason that UK has sharia courts is because London wants to be the world's sharia finance hub, and for that purpose they need to do as the biggest (the Saudis) in sharia finance say.

It's a historical irony that England, who shaped the islamofascist Saudi monster and Zionism in the first place, voted to leave the EU precisely because of fear of an invasion of Sunni sharia muslims via Turkey and EU to UK, and that these Brexit voters are now represented by Saudi paid traitors.

If a muslim married woman carries a veil, burqa etc. chances are considerable that she doesn't (or isn't allowed to) approve of Human Rights equality.

Sharia supporting Sajid Javid (right) is now UK Home Secretary and therefore can personally decide over EU citizens right to stay or be deported.

Monday, January 28, 2019

Klevius warns EU not to blink or trust UK's Saudi islamofascism supporting militaristic government and state media BBC's faked propaganda.

This Saudi lover is BBC's and foreign minister Jeremy Hunt's China "expert".

Parag Khanna is an Indian American who has been named one of the "Most Over-Rated Thinkers" of the year, and his book a "self-congratulatory anthology of clichés and platitudes". A review of Hybrid Reality, described Khanna as an "intellectual impostor" possessed of "contempt for democracy and human rights", and criticized his admiration of authoritarian governments.

BBC state propaganda media uses all its power trying to stifle competing (and much more people friendly) media. Remember this when you hear BBC News broadcasting heartening but cherry picked stories to boost agendas not necessarily at all in the interest of the people.

Klevius wrote:

Sunday, January 27, 2019

BBC's fake news radio 4 completely neglected Naomi Osaka who won the Australian Open tennis tournament.

BBC is the world's most dangerous fake media right now - when will its compulsory fee payers realize it?

 If it's not Serena Williams who wins, then BBC turn ultra sexist - it's already by default ultra nationalistic (compare e.g. BBC's divisive use of "British nationals" in the face of EU-nationals in UK).

This is quite the opposite to BBC Radio 4's usual endless reporting about Serena Williams.

Klevius warns for the world's worst fake media, i.e. state controlled BBC which does everything to smear and get rid of its new rivals.

Not only is BBC a state propaganda machine of the worst kind, its hate mongering and meddling around the worlds (smearing and boosting in truly Goebbelian Nazi style) also poses a real threat to world peace.

BBC's cherry picking is almost Kafkaic when you really listen to it.

BBC stays safely as far away from any journalistic ethic possible.

BBC's explanation: There's no truth.

Klevius explanation: The truth is that BBC uses its global media monopoly for spreading divisive misinfo for the purpose of pushing through certain agendas (quite often militaristic ones) by people within or near the UK government and Saudi Arabia/UAE.

Klevius warns Poles and others not to trust UK militarism. It's all about annoying Russia and China and to keep a militaristic foothold within EU after Brexit. UK government and BBC used to spit on Polish people in England, remember.

 Not only watching but meddling - dangerously and probably not in accordance with the will of the people.

England  has a problem adapting to a new world order. A cornered mouse who spits while hoping for the big rat relative to assist.

Sunday, January 27, 2019

Klevius thinks we ought to pay equal attention to the non-Jewish majority who died in the s.c.* Holocaust.

* Holocaust is Greek and means 'whole offering'.

The Forgotten Suffering (Klevius 1992)

 Demand for Resources (Klevius 1992, ISBN 9173288411).

The civilized wo/man walks
back in her/his foot steps,
strikes a light and lets her/himself be enlightened
and glorified
Only the forgotten suffering,
and the shadow behind her/him,
hovering over the future,
are greater

Some 17 Million (est. varies between 12-20) died in the s.c. Holocaust.
According to Wikipedia between half and three quarters of the victims were non-Jews.

Wkipedia's definition etc.:

Most Holocaust historians define the Holocaust as the German state policy, enacted between 1941 and 1945, to exterminate the European Jews.[c] In Teaching the Holocaust (2015), Michael Gray offers three definitions:

    the persecution and murder of Jews by the Nazis and their collaborators between 1933 and 1945; this definition views the events of Kristallnacht in Germany in 1938 as an early phase of the Holocaust;[2]
    the systematic mass murder of Jews by the Nazis and their collaborators between 1941 and 1945; this acknowledges the shift in German policy in 1941 toward the extermination of the Jewish people;[2]
    the persecution and murder of several groups by the Nazis and their collaborators between 1933 and 1945; this includes all the Nazis' victims.[2]

The third definition fails, Gray writes, to acknowledge that only the Jewish people were singled out for annihilation.
Klevius comment: What an insult to non-Jewish Holocaust victims. Singled out but not classified. Most of the world's victims have always been unclassified. This is why they're only recognized if belonging to a certain, often arbitrarily or deliberately, pointed group. And most often just hidden as not belonging to an accepted group. We all do know about the Unknown Soldier. However, the Unknown Sufferer is kept in the shadow of groups.

Klevius defends the individual against group labeling no matter if s/he's a Jew, a muslim, Atheist, Christian, Buddhist, communist, capitalist, feminist or whatever.

And why so low profile and silent about non-Jewish Holocaust victims? BBC's religious Sunday program by BBC's islam loving Ed Stourton about Holocaust allegedly didn't even mention non-Jews. Why?

However, the worst ideological genocide ever was made by islam against s.c. "infidels" who were singled out for slavery/rape and annihilation during 1,400 years. Even the lowest estmates are staggering. And for a start, do read what Lal and other historians have dug out about islamic horror in the past. Christians, communists, National-socialists etc. don't come even close. Or take a look at what Islamic State and other Mohammad and Koran inspired jihad organizations have done in present time.

Klevius repeats the same advise he has been giving since his teenage: Negative Human Rights freedom for the individual against religious or political fascism. Just read the original anti-fascist Human Rights declaration from 1948.

And do note very carefully that islam today via Saudi based and steered all muslims world organization OIC approves of a sharia that violates the most basic of real Human Rights.

Klevius 1979: Human Rights rather than religion.

A Google search today on 'victims of islam estimates' produces these strange results:


Tuesday, January 22, 2019

U.S. Race Card Race 2020

Klevius: Playing the race card is the first step of fascism. So why do BBC and politicians use it so often?

Klevius answer: Racial segregation groups individuals in political "communities.

This is exactly the opposite to the anti-fascist 1948 Universal Human Rights Declaration.

Klevius cure? Call it what it is: Racist hate speech.

The web's first web museum was proudly presented more than a decade ago. That doesn't mean Human Rights for the individual should be stored in a museum as well, does it. started 2003 as an anti-sexist, anti-racist, and anti-fascist web site defending the most basic of the individual's (negative) Human Rights - no matter who you are or whatever sex you think you belong to, if any.

In 2008 was set to rest as a web museum. However, Klevius has since his teens fought this campaign against ignorance and evilness, and continues to do so.

Why don't you join Klevius instead of promoting racism and sexism?