Who benefits most from recent attacks against Russia (and Corbyn's anti-semitism)? The islamofascist Saudi dictator family and its new Hitler.

Klevius analysis: Russia is the main obstacle for the islamofascist Saudi dictator family's take over of the whole of Mideast. And the war drums are on for the Saudi Hitler. 

How did UN and the West end up in the darkest of caves against those very Human Rights UN and the West had agreed on after the last Hitler?

Dear non-politician readers, how many of you think it's ok to go in bed with our main enemy? An enemy that has countless of times attacked us. An enemy that criminalizes the values we hold as our dearest. An enemy that ticks every box on evilness.


Klevius is utterly ashamed of being a "Westerner" today...

Jews feel safer in Poland than in Sweden and England

Jews in Sweden feel least safe were there are most muslims.

Klevius comment: There's something peculiar with monotheisms. Canaanites, Jews in Medina, Catholic inquisition etc.

.

Why doesn't an ordinary 14 year old "brit" know that Russia is a constitutional (unlike UK) democracy?

Who is responsible for this educational meltdown? Teachers, parents, Theresa May? How far has the "british" propaganda and brainwashing of its youth already reached?

An English boy thinks Putin has made himself president for life.

Criticism of how democracy is practiced is one thing, but shouldn't be conflated with constitutionally deliberately non-democratic countries.

Klevius suggests he reads Wikipedia (in this case*) instead of listening to propagandists. Be critical!:

* Wikipedia is arguably more anti-Russia than it is anti-UK/US. When Russia is accused of destabilizing other countries it may well be so. However, it can hardly be more than US/UK have done. US tools (shared with lilliput UK) have been so much more powerful. Russia is now not a main threat but rather a main excuse for selling influence, weapons etc. And always remember that the worst "country" on Earth, the islamofascist Saudi dictator family with its criminalization of Human Rights and its active support of islamic hate around the world, war crimes in Yemen etc., is a "close ally" to US/UK.

 

Russian Federation

Main articles: History of Russia (1992–present), Russia and the United Nations, and 1993 Constitution of Russia

See also: Commonwealth of Independent States, War of Laws, and 1993 Russian constitutional crisis

Moscow International Business Center

In June 1991, Boris Yeltsin became the first directly elected President in Russian history when he was elected President of the Russian Soviet Federative Socialist Republic, which became the independent Russian Federation in December of that year. During and after the disintegration of the Soviet Union, wide-ranging reforms including privatization and market and trade liberalization were undertaken,^[96] including radical changes along the lines of "shock therapy" as recommended by the United States and the International Monetary Fund.^[97] All this resulted in a major economic crisis, characterized by a 50% decline in both GDP and industrial output between 1990 and 1995.^[96][98]
The privatization largely shifted control of enterprises from state agencies to individuals with inside connections in the government. Many of the newly rich moved billions in cash and assets outside of the country in an enormous capital flight.^[99] The depression of the economy led to the collapse of social services; the birth rate plummeted while the death rate skyrocketed.^[100] Millions plunged into poverty, from a level of 1.5% in the late Soviet era to 39–49% by mid-1993.^[101] The 1990s saw extreme corruption and lawlessness, the rise of criminal gangs and violent crime.^[102]
The 1990s were plagued by armed conflicts in the North Caucasus, both local ethnic skirmishes and separatist Islamist insurrections. From the time Chechen separatists declared independence in the early 1990s, an intermittent guerrilla war has been fought between the rebel groups and the Russian military. Terrorist attacks against civilians carried out by separatists, most notably the Moscow theater hostage crisis and Beslan school siege, caused hundreds of deaths and drew worldwide attention.
Russia took up the responsibility for settling the USSR's external debts, even though its population made up just half of the population of the USSR at the time of its dissolution.^[103] High budget deficits caused the 1998 Russian financial crisis^[104] and resulted in a further GDP decline.^[96]

From left: Patriarch Alexy II, Vladimir Putin, Boris Yeltsin

On December 31, 1999, President Yeltsin unexpectedly resigned, handing the post to the recently appointed Prime Minister, Vladimir Putin, who then won the 2000 presidential election. Putin suppressed the Chechen insurgency although sporadic violence still occurs throughout the Northern Caucasus. High oil prices and the initially weak currency followed by increasing domestic demand, consumption, and investments has helped the economy grow for nine straight years, improving the standard of living and increasing Russia's influence on the world stage.^[105] However, since the World economic crisis of 2008 and a subsequent drop in oil prices, Russia's economy has stagnated and poverty has again started to rise.^[106] While many reforms made during the Putin presidency have been generally criticized by Western nations as undemocratic,^[107] Putin's leadership over the return of order, stability, and progress has won him widespread admiration in Russia.^[108]

Governance

President
Vladimir Putin

Prime Minister
Dmitry Medvedev

According to the Constitution of Russia, the country is a federation and semi-presidential republic, wherein the President is the head of state^[121] and the Prime Minister is the head of government. The Russian Federation is fundamentally structured as a multi-party representative democracy, with the federal government composed of three branches:

• Legislative: The bicameral Federal Assembly of Russia, made up of the 450-member State Duma and the 166-member Federation Council, adopts federal law, declares war, approves treaties, has the power of the purse and the power of impeachment of the President.
• Executive: The President is the Supreme Commander-in-Chief of the Armed Forces, can veto legislative bills before they become law, and appoints the Government of Russia (Cabinet) and other officers, who administer and enforce federal laws and policies.
• Judiciary: The Constitutional Court, Supreme Court and lower federal courts, whose judges are appointed by the Federation Council on the recommendation of the President, interpret laws and can overturn laws they deem unconstitutional.

The president is elected by popular vote for a six-year term (eligible for a second term, but not for a third consecutive term).^[122] Ministries of the government are composed of the Premier and his deputies, ministers, and selected other individuals; all are appointed by the President on the recommendation of the Prime Minister (whereas the appointment of the latter requires the consent of the State Duma). Leading political parties in Russia include United Russia, the Communist Party, the Liberal Democratic Party, and A Just Russia.  

UK government puts its own citizens* at risk during Worldcup 2018 by instigating hatred in Russia - a country which, unlike Saudi Arabia, hasn't been ever proven attacking UK.

 * In this case 'citizens' is the right word. However, when the UK government and BBC talk about people in UK they deliberately appeal to racist and nationalistic "brits" by using worlds like "british citizens", "british people", "brits" etc. for the racist purpose - and in a demonstrative and rude manner - to exclude e.g. EU citizens living in UK. Can EU citizens really trust such a "country's" leaders?

Why is this muslim Saudi Hitler war criminal supported by BBC and Theresa May while Russia is demonized beyond anything?

Here Theresa May escapes a Saudi (her close "ally") instigated muslim attack outside UK Parliament. Just one of uncoutable muslim terrorist attacks - most of them instigated by the islamofascist Saudi dictator family - not by Russia.

UK Brexit government and its hateful and divisive propaganda spreading machine BBC constitute an apparent risk for people not only in UK but all over the world.

Do note that BBC was born as an imperial propaganda machine. BBC World Service began in 1932 as the BBC Empire Service. 

Was BBC (Brexit Broadcasting Caliphate) behind the Facebook plot? And the plot to shut down RT?

BBC, the biggest fake info propaganda agitator in the world, today says "Facebook is too big" (BBC Today Radio 4).



The same BBC gathers information about its listeners and iPlayer users etc. For what purpose? Do note that BBC is a strange creature with dirty tentacles in places most of its listeners wouldn't think possible.

No matter what you think about RT, at least it isn't BBC.

Why we’re asking you to sign in

You now need to sign in to watch and listen to things on BBC iPlayer and iPlayer Radio. And the same goes for some other parts of the BBC. This is so we can make the BBC more relevant and personal to you.

Klevius: Really!

Other thoughts on media's appeasement of the new Saudi Hitler

Mehdi Hasan: Move over Tom Friedman and David Ignatius — in O’Donnell, the Saudis seem to have found a new cheerleader within the U.S. press corps. Forget the Saudi bombardment and siege of Yemen, described by United Nations agencies as “the worst humanitarian crisis in the world,” which received a mere two minutes of coverage over the course of a 30-minute segment. Forget the horrific Saudi record of beheadings and stonings, which received zero coverage from the “60 Minutes” team in Riyadh. Instead, we were treated to O’Donnell oohing and aahing over the crown prince’s youthfulness, workaholism, and — lest we forget — support for women drivers.

The interview itself consisted of one softball question after another. (Example: “What’s been the big challenge?” Another example: “What did you learn from your father?”)

So, in a spirit of constructive criticism, and in an attempt to try and push back against the U.S. media’s bizarre love affair with MBS ahead of his D.C. visit …
Here are 10 much tougher, more relevant questions that “60 Minutes“ could and should have asked

1) You helped launch the war in Yemen in 2015 and continue to accuse Houthi rebels of causing all the violence and suffering there, yet the United Nations has blamed airstrikes by the Saudi-led coalition for the majority of Yemeni civilian deaths while Amnesty International has documented “34 air strikes … by the Saudi Arabia-led coalition that appear to have violated international humanitarian law” including “attacks that appear to have deliberately targeted civilians and civilian objects such as hospitals, schools, markets and mosques.” How do you square “reform” at home with war crimes abroad?

2) You have said in this interview that the Houthi rebels in Yemen “block humanitarian aid in order to create famine and a humanitarian crisis,” but what about your own role in causing that crisis? A U.N. panel of experts “found that Saudi Arabia is purposefully obstructing the delivery of humanitarian aid into Yemen.” Is it not a moral outrage for one of the richest countries in the Middle East to be starving the poorest country in the Middle East?

3) Congratulations on lifting the Saudi ban on women drivers, but when will you be abolishing the death penalty for blasphemy, sorcery, adultery, and homosexuality? Isn’t it true that more people have been beheaded by your government than by the Islamic State?

4) You have compared Ayatollah Khamenei, Iran’s unelected and self-styled “supreme leader,” to Adolf Hitler, but what about your own autocratic style of rule? You have cracked down on dissent by rounding up clerics, intellectuals, and activists and have detained and allegedly tortured your fellow princes — is it any wonder that the prominent Saudi journalist and former adviser to the royal family, Jamal Khashoggi, has compared you to Vladimir Putin and called you Saudi Arabia’s very own “supreme leader”?

5) You say these princes had to be arrested as part of an anti-corruption drive, but how are Saudi citizens supposed to know whether or not you’re corrupt, too? After all, you’re the prince who spotted a Russian-owned luxury yacht while on holiday in the south of France and then bought it on the spot for $550 million — where did that money come from?

6) Shouldn’t you also be wary of invoking Hitler given Saudi Arabia’s history of brazen anti-Semitism? In fact, as part of your “reform” efforts, would you be willing to apologize for the Saudi-based Arab Radio and Television Network’s production of a TV series based on the notorious “Protocols of the Elders of Zion”; or for the imam of the Grand Mosque in Mecca calling Jews “rats of the world” and “the scum of the earth”;  or for your own father, King Salman, attributing the 9/11 attacks to a Mossad “plot”?

7) You have suggested in this interview that Iran is working with Al Qaeda. Yet Bob Graham, the former chair of the Senate Intelligence Committee, has said that 28 declassified pages of the 2002 Congressional Joint Inquiry suggest “a strong linkage between [the 9/11] terrorists and the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, Saudi charities, and other Saudi stakeholders.” Isn’t it time the government of Saudi Arabia admitted to its extensive and long-standing role in funding, arming, and inciting “jihadi” terrorism?

8) Isn’t it the case that the Saudi education system fans the flames of intolerance and extremism? How else do you explain the fact that when ISIS “needed textbooks to distribute to schoolchildren in Raqqa, it printed out copies of Saudi state textbooks found online”?

9) You have said in this interview that the Iranians “want to expand” in the region. But was it the Islamic Republic of Iran or the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, under your leadership, that detained not one, but two, elected heads of Arab governments — the president of Yemen and the prime minister of Lebanon — against their will?

10) You and your ministers have dubbed your changes and reforms a “revolution.” So why not stand for election yourself and allow the citizens of Saudi Arabia to choose their own leader? After all, how can it be called a “revolution” if the absolute monarch is still in absolute control of the country at the end of it?

Finland-Swedish Peter Klevius celebrates the Finland-Swedish Minna Canth's day - you should too, especially if you're a woman.

Finland-Swedish Minna Canth (who paved the way for Finland being first in the world with full suffrage) would have been horrified by today's extremely dumb - or just deliberate - appeasement of the Human Rights violating islamic sharia worm.

Quotes by Minna Canth (1844-1897):


Freedom, equality, love - will they ever be true in this worm stung world.
 
Women's area of work in the future will be vast and important. 
Long live all intelligent men - the dumb ones (i.e. against women's rights) may succumb.


Klevius wrote:

Sunday, March 19, 2017

Finland-Swedish Peter Klevius proudly (again) presents and honors the Finland-Swedish Minna Canth who paved the way for Finland becoming the world's first country to give women full voting/electing rights.

Every girl in the world should be educated about today being Minna Canth's Day - and why/how Finland became the first country* in the world with full suffrage for women. And why the Finnish language doesn't sex segregate.

* No dude, it wasn't New Zeeland (not full rights for all women), Wyoming (a state, not a country), Australia (not full rights) or anything else - it was Finland!

However, instead Klevius fears girls are fed with even more religious sexism and misogyny at school.

Minna Canth, born Ulrika Wilhelmina Johnsson, 19 March 1844 – 12 May 1897) was a Finland-Swedish (i.e. mother tongue Swedish) author and social activist*.

* Minna Canth was neither a "leftist" nor a feminist. The word 'feminist' wasn't even invented in modern meaning before just some years before her death - and meant quite the opposite to what Minna Canth stood for.

She began to write when she became a widow. Her work addresses issues of women's rights, particularly in the context of a prevailing sex segregated culture she considered antithetical to permitting expression and realization of women's aspirations. She therefore became a controversial figure, due to the asynchrony between her ideas and those of her time, and in part due to her strong advocacy for her point of view.

Minna Canth is the first woman to receive her own flag day in Finland, starting on 19 March 2007. It is also the day of social equality in Finland.

Religion was Minna Canth's main enemy. In 1885 a bishop argued that God's order required that women were not emancipated*. The writer Gustaf af Geijerstam then argued that men could only aspire to one day having the purity of women because they were fundamentally different and this was the reason for prostitution and other immorality. Canth objected strongly to this argument as it meant that men could defend their poor morals by reference to their implicit shortcomings, whereas any women involved in prostitution would lack the same defence.

* However, always remember young Otto Weininger's words in 1903: 'The main obstacle to women's emancipation is the Woman.' Indeed, there would be no islam without women suppressing other girls/women under sharia sex segregation/apartheid, hence robbing them from their basic Human Rights equality.

In Minna Canth's play The Worker's Wife from 1885, the main character Johanna is married to Risto, an alcoholic who wastes all his wife's money. Johanna cannot prevent him – her money is legally his, not hers. The play's premiere of course caused a scandal, but the fact that only a few months later, parliament enacted a new law about separation of property, shows that these thoughts were already high on the political agenda in Finland - at a time when Freud was just about to start his misogynist psychoanalysis fantasies as a reaction to Mill's work about women which enraged the simple minded but elegantly writing and talking Sigmund (see Peter Klevius' Psychosocial Freud Timeline to get a better grip on this line of thoughts).

The play Anna Liisa from 1895 describes a probably authentic tragedy about a fifteen-year-old girl who gets pregnant without being married – she manages to hide her pregnancy, and when the child is born, she suffocates it in a fit of panic. Her boyfriend Mikko's mother helps her – she buries the baby in the woods, but a few years later, when Anna Liisa wants to marry her fiancé Johannes, she is blackmailed by Mikko and his mother. They threaten her to reveal her dark secret if she does not agree to marry Mikko, but Anna Liisa refuses. In the end, she decides to confess and is taken to prison.

Minna Canth was followed by an other female giant, Europe's foremost modernist poet of her time, the Finland-Swedish Edith Södergran, about whom Klevius has written lengthy and deep probing posts (now sadly collapsed with the collapse of Geocities).

So why has the tiny Finland-Swedish community produced more per capita progressive thoughts than anywhere else in the world? Well, Klevius has in different ways already for a long time explained the reasons for this. Briefly it's abou Finland-Swedes being a remnant from the fault line between Uralic and Indoeuropean - and spiced with some northern (Sami, Siberian etc.) brain power left-over genes from the IQ explosion in Altai some 50,000bp (compare Vikings, Goths, etc. "phenomenon" of big brute lads - mostly average dumb but some with exceptional brains. And then jumping to modern times the "translation movement" that the Finland-Swedes started after being cut off from Sweden 1809 resulted in not only educating the illiterate Finns but even (many, not all) changing their names to Finnish ones.


Klevius wrote:

Tuesday, March 19, 2013

Klevius on Minna Canth's Day: Paving the way for women's rights against religion

Minna Canth was a Finland-Swede just like Klevius

The bedrock of "monotheist" religions is sex apartheid - and worst of them is islam

Did you know that the word 'God' comes from the Finnish word for home ('koti') which is far older than any of the Mideastern "monotheisms"?

The ancient Persian (which is extremely young compared to Uralic) word for god 'khoda' connects to the even more ancient Finnish 'koti' and Finno-Ugric/Uralic 'kota' (=home/house/seed vessel - see Klevius definition of religion and the Vagina gate), Saami 'goahti'. German Gott (god) and Swedish gott (good) as well as Gotland (pronounced Gottland), the island in the Baltic sea that constituted a (the?) main Viking* hub in their slave trade with Jews and muslims. This very same Gotland belonged before the Viking age to Kvenland under the half mythic (but less so than the entirely mythic Mohammed) Finnish King Fornjotr.

* see also The oldest textual use of the word 'Viking'

Linguistic sex apartheid

As Klevius has pointed out for decades, in Finnish (as in most other languages) there is no sex segregation. A person is 'hän' regardless of sex, not the stupid he/she apartheid Europe has inherited from sexist Mideastern "monotheisms".

Is this why Finland became the most progressive country in Europe more than a century ago? And do note that full (i.e. also electable etc) voting rights for women in Finland was the result of non-socialists. Partly social-democratic Sweden had to wait 14 years to achieve the same.

       
The bilingual Minna Canth street sign in Helsinki reflects not only 600 years as part of Sweden but, according to Klevius, perhaps even more so the time before, namely as Kvenland (Queenland) the home of the Goths and the Vikings.

Minna Canth, born Ulrika Wilhelmina Johnsson, 19 March 1844, Tampere/Finland - 12 May 1897, Kuopio/Finland) was a Finnish-Swedish writer (i.e. mother tongue Swedish*) and social activist who wrote her most important works against religion and the treatment of women in Finnish. She inspired the proposal 1997 in the Finnish Parliament (actually same year as she died).

 * in Finland both Swedish and Finnish are official languages since long ago (also see Kvenland/Kvinnoland/Queenland) 

Drawing (1979) and photo (2012) by Peter Klevius.

Saudi Hitler* is the problem and Iran the solution

* However, unlike Hitler, the Saudi dictator has political cowards traitors "allies" all over the world. And these "politicians" are almost never supported by the majority of the people on this particular bug in democracy.

Arabic language, "the holy places", OIC's anti-Human Rights sharia, and the threat from Palestine/Iran, constitute the components of the problem - and solution.

If the text seems too graphic and "offensive" for you, do remind yourself that Klevius is here talking about a muslim theocracy dictatorship "country" where Human Rights and Atheism (i.e. not to believe in a 'god" made up for defending racism and sexism) are heavily criminalized. And then take a look in your mirror!

Of course, the basic problem is with islam itself and its incompatibility with Human Rights (compare Saudi based and steered OIC's sharia declaration against Human Rights - deceptively called "islamic human rights") due to islam's "prophetic" ties to its evil past (the world's worst slave rader/traider ever).

However, islam is nothing if not connected to its context. And the irrefutable fact is that the combination of 1) oil wealth 2) custodianship of islam 3) custodianship of OIC (the muslim world sharia Umma/nation*) 4) islam as a language imperialist Arabic "religion", puts the islamofascist oil rich Saudi dictator family** in the center of islam's evilness today. With disastrous consequences not only in Yemen and Syria but all over the world through Saudi induced Sunni/Salafist islamic hate mongering. Even Theresa May had to escape one of those Saudi steered street attacks.

* Muslims can never be classified as "a minority" because their Umma doesn't accept any borders, hence making muslims the biggest nationalist supremacist party.

** Have you noticed that the muslim islamofascist members of the Saudi dictator family are rarely called what they are by BBC -  namely just 'muslims'. Is it "offensive" against muslims

The islamofascist Saudi dictator family fully utilizes the situation that the "islamophobia" campaign they themselves have sponsored, now offers them, i.e. to spread their evil influence and power hunger all over the Arab world and beyond. Hitler used the German language as his excuse...

The solution

Stop immediately the support of the islamofascist Saudi dictator family, and treat them at least equally hostile as you treat Russia, Iran etc. And although Iran is always a lesser islamic evil and threat due to it not being an Arabic majority country, the majority of its people are just longing for getting rid of islam and returning to its Persian roots. Roots that the Saudis lack completely. The only roots (except the evil islamic ones) the Saudis have are the ones they got from the "British" gardener less than 100 years ago. And as most people do well without sticking to some evil roots, Klevius thinks the young Saudis could do as well if they were allowed to.

A treaty with Iran that is combined with the stopping of the Saudi war mongering (and oppression of Shia muslims) against Iran, and which includes a safety guarantee for Israel, would be the best solution for not only Mideast but for the world. And the Iranian people would surely take care of their Ayatollahs - and without replacing them with Saudi steered substitutes.

The islamofascist muslim war criminal and Saudi dictator "prince", Mohammad Salman's desecration of the Queen, ordered by Theresa May against the will of the people.

Some voices about Saudi war crimes from the web:

Jeremy Corbyn has accused the government of colluding in war crimes committed by Saudi forces in Yemen in an intervention which prompted a furious response from Downing Street.

As Mohammed bin Salman, the Saudi crown prince, began a three-day visit to the UK, the Labour leader used prime minister’s questions to attack Theresa May for co-operating with the regime, claiming British forces personnel were “directing” the conflict in Yemen. Downing Street reacted angrily, saying Mr Corbyn’s allegation was “simply not true”.






End the US Enabling of Saudi War Crimes in Yemen

Zaid Jilani reports that the U.S. military has no idea what missions are carried out in Yemen by the coalition planes that they refuel:

In a surprising admission on Tuesday, the head of U.S. Central Command – which oversees U.S. forces in the Middle East and Central Asia – admitted that the Pentagon doesn’t know a whole lot about the Saudi airstrikes in Yemen that the United States is supporting through intelligence, munitions, and refueling.

U.S. CENTCOM Cmdr. Gen. Joseph Votel made the admission in response to questions from Sen. Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass., during a hearing of the Senate Armed Services Committee.

“General Votel, does CENTCOM track the purpose of the missions it is refueling? In other words, where a U.S.-refueled aircraft is going, what targets it strikes, and the result of the mission?” Warren asked.

“Senator, we do not,” Votel replied.

If the U.S. military doesn’t track what the coalition planes do after they are refueled, it can’t honestly claim that it isn’t aiding and abetting coalition violations of international law. They don’t know what the coalition planes they refuel do later on, and perhaps they don’t want to know. If the U.S. isn’t tracking how our assistance is used, it isn’t credible to say that our government is using that assistance to change the coalition’s conduct of the war for the better. The U.S. is blindly enabling indiscriminate coalition bombing without making any effort to understand the effects of our support.

Gen. Votel also stated that the U.S. is not a party to the conflict. This is the lie that U.S. officials have been hiding behind for the last three years. When our military refuels planes that go on to bomb targets in another country, our military has joined that war on the side of the governments it is aiding. That should be an uncontroversial statement of fact, but supporters of U.S. involvement in the war are desperate to deny it. If the U.S. weren’t a party to the conflict, there would be no need to debate the extensive assistance that the U.S. provides to the governments wrecking and starving Yemen for the last three years.

U.S. support has been essential to the Saudi-led war, and it would be much harder for the Saudis and their allies to continue waging that war without our military assistance. That is why those in favor of continuing the war don’t want to cut off that support. They wish to keep the war going, but they want to dodge the responsibility our government has for aiding and abetting the coalition’s crimes. Americans that want to end U.S. involvement and help bring an end to the war on Yemen should urge their senators to vote for S.J.Res. 54.






The Senate is expected to debate a war powers resolution next week that calls for the United States to end its involvement in the Yemen conflict, but a top Senate Republican leader signaled Thursday GOP leaders would prefer to put off a final vote on the divisive issue until after it can be more closely studied in committee.
"I think it would be better for the committee to consider it and make a recommendation after having a hearing so everybody understands exactly what the consequences are," said Sen. John Cornyn of Texas, the No. 2 GOP leader in the chamber, referring to the Senate Foreign Relations Committee.
The US has provided military support -- including intelligence sharing, logistical support, and mid-flight refueling -- to a coalition led by Saudi Arabia against Iranian-backed Houthis in Yemen. The conflict, which is considered, in part, a proxy war between Saudi Arabia and Iran as they struggle for dominance in the region, has created a dire humanitarian crisis in Yemen.

Three senators -- Mike Lee, a Republican from Utah, Bernie Sanders, an independent from Vermont, and Chris Murphy, a Democrat from Connecticut -- authored the privileged resolution and are working to force a vote on it. They believe the refueling and other actions by the US armed forces are akin to "boots on the ground" and that Congress needs to authorize it.
They described their bill as the "first-ever vote in the Senate to withdraw US armed forces from an unauthorized war."

She's only 12, but her father is already planning her wedding

"For too long, and under both parties, Congress has abdicated it responsibility to provide authorization for the use of military force," the three senators wrote recently in a letter to bipartisan Senate leaders. "Regardless of what one thinks of our involvement in Yemen, as we enter a fourth year of helping the Saudis prosecute this war it is important that Congress either provides express authorization for our involvement in the conflict or calls on the president to cease operations."
"I hope the Congress and the Senate vote next week to get the United States out of aiding Saudi Arabia in this very terrible war and works on a humanitarian solution and works to bring peace to a very volatile region," Sanders told reporters Wednesday as he departed a classified briefing on Yemen for all senators by Trump administration officials.
Pentagon leaders oppose the resolution and have argued refueling and the other limited assistance they are providing don't constitute "hostilities" that need congressional approval.

Russia vetoes UN resolution linking Iran with terror activities in Yemen

Sen. Bob Corker, a Tennessee Republican who chairs Foreign Relations, said he agrees.
"We do so much of that with our allies around the world and don't consider that to be involved in hostilities but simply helping our allies in what they're doing," Corker said. "I think if we use the War Powers Act to call these kinds of activities hostilities, we could go down a really slippery slope."

Senators and aides involved in the issue say they are unsure where the votes are and predict it could be close. GOP leaders may try to redirect the measure on procedural motion, for which a majority vote is needed to succeed.

Such a move could diffuse the issue, which will take place the same week Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman visits Washington.









A study shows weapons imports to the Middle East and Asia have soared over the past five years, with Saudi Arabia leading the steep rise amid its bloody war on Yemen.  

According to the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI), arms imports to the Middle East between 2013 and 2017 jumped by 103 percent compared with the previous five-year period.

Saudi Arabia is now the world’s second largest importer of arms after India. The kingdom registered a 225-percent rise in military purchases - almost all from the US and Europe - during the period, the study released on Monday said.

American weapons constitute 61 percent of arms imports to Saudi Arabia and British weapons 23 percent. During the period, the Saudis received 78 combat aircraft, 72 combat helicopters, 328 tanks and 4,000 vehicles, the SIPRI noted.

The same period, it said, saw Israel increasing its arms exports by 55 percent.

“The US and European states remain the main arms exporters to the region and supplied over 98 percent of weapons imported by Saudi Arabia,” it said.

On Friday, Saudi Arabia signed a preliminary deal to buy 48 Typhoon jets worth as much as $10 billion. 

Saudi Arabia already operates more than 70 Typhoon jets. They have been used extensively in the Yemen war, and the deal is likely to spark outrage among rights groups and campaigners.

Arms remain the main component of UK-Saudi trade and the UK government has approved the export of $6.4 billion in weapons since the start of the war in Yemen, despite allegations that Saudi-led forces have committed war crimes.

The United Kingdom has increased its weapons sales by around 500 percent since March 2015, The Independent reported last November.
PressTV-Saudi, UK to finalize hefty warplane deal amid protests
Britain and Saudi Arabia agree to finalize a warplane deal despite protests against Riyadh's deadly war on Yemen.

Last May, US President Donald Trump visited Saudi Arabia in his first foreign visit, signing a $110-billion deal to sell weapons to the kingdom.

“Widespread violent conflict in the Middle East and concerns about human rights have led to political debate in Western Europe and North America about restricting arms sales,” said senior SIPRI researcher Pieter Wezeman.

“Yet the US and European states remain the main arms exporters to the region and supplied over 98 percent of weapons imported by Saudi Arabia.”

More than 13,600 people have died since the Saudi-led invasion began, and Yemen has turned into the scene of the world's worst humanitarian crisis.

Comments (17)
[Hasan Hakim]
Hasan Hakim3 days ago 15:48
The Talmudic-Crpyto saudi mafia is an Insult to Islam, I Am 63-Yrs-Old, I Pray ALLAH-(SWT) Lets me live to see the Day When The Proud Yemeni People March into Arabia & free the Kabba from these Edomites.........In Iran [Che Guevara] Pictured Below Is Studied May ALLAH-(SWT) Have Mercy On His Soul.....
Reply
+0
-0
[Joseph Lieberman]
Joseph Lieberman3 days ago 10:59
Wherever they are located, let all Saudi weapon stockpiles be destroyed.
Im sure even saudi citizens are ready to do this deed, for the sake of justice.
Reply
+0
-0
[Pakistan Is Moving Away From US What is Saudi Doing?]
Pakistan Is Moving Away From US What is Saudi Doing?3 days ago 09:30
While you are in Pakistan Dear Zarif ask the Pakistani Government a sensitive question that they don't like to answer if possible about Saudi Arabia Terrorist Activities & servile attitudes to Terrorist states like UK, US and Israel that has not only killed hundreds & thousands of innocent Muslims Sunni or Shia but also Non Muslims raping women and children supporting IS, ISIS, Daesh, Takfari, Al-Qaeda and other rotten groups of Zionism and surly that DOES NOT serve the interest of "Islam" and the "Main Stream Unity of Islam" on the whole as "Creator" has intended and how the fight against this UK-US-Israel-Saudi TERRORISM should end...
Reply
+0
-0
[(We?) Unknown Higher Order Entity Since 2011...]
(We?) Unknown Higher Order Entity Since 2011...3 days ago 09:02
The very puppet regime of Saudi Arabai is 100% "HARAM" and a GREAT insult to "Islam" & "Main Stream Unity of Islam" and a abominable act against "Creator"...
Reply
+1
+1
-0
[David Kuperman]
David Kuperman3 days ago 08:18
Weapons can not save Saudi Monarchy.
Reply
+0
-0
[FREE PALESTINE]
FREE PALESTINE3 days ago 07:48
BAD SICK RACIST ZIONIST ARAB LEADERS - OF USA UK FRANCE ISRAEL WILL LEAVE THE ARAB WORLD - NO MORE ZIONISTS IN THE ARAB WORLD. THEY KILL CIVILIANS ONLY BY CIA MOSSAD MI6 TERROR--ISIS TERROR--WE WILL NEVER FORGET--WE WILL NEVER FORGIVE.... NEVER- NEVER- NEVER.
Reply
+0
-0
[methos]
methos3 days ago 06:48
The Saudi Regime is a cash cow for the west, as they do nothing but stockpiling armament operated by unmotivated foreign mercenary
Reply
+0
-0
[Ap]
Ap3 days ago 03:33
This brainless Saudi idiot only make people laugh but nothing else but that day is not so far when they will face irreversible consequences which must lead their complete destruction.
Reply
+0
-0
[john]
john3 days ago 03:19
another war against iran by arabs is highly likely. islamic republic got many enemies both inside middle east and outside it.this is how stupids diplomacy works creating more enemy for a bankrupt country with no agriculture no industry no future no hope.
Reply
+0
-0
[Ali]
Ali3 days ago 03:13
These Arms are useless to the people who have no ability to fight - THE REAL REASON behind buying these arms is the theft of ARABIAN RESOURCES - The Crypto Jews ruling Arabian peninsula are funding British and US aggression in Middle east. Britain and US (the greatest Debtor) cannot sustain their hostile policy without the Oil dollars they cunningly steal from Muslim lands. In the past the Arab rulers would lose trillions in Casino (as covert gift to US and Britain)
Reply
+0
-0
[J.J._Knows_the_I.D.F._R_Cowards]
J.J._Knows_the_I.D.F._R_Cowards3 days ago 03:10
It doesn't take a long time after opening a History Book to realize that
when a Country is arming like K.S.A. is, they're intending to use those
arms in aggressive wars against their neighbors.
Any nations that K.S.A.has shown any type of aggression towards
need to arm themselves now for defense.
Reply
+1
+1
-0
[Assad]
Assad3 days ago 02:10
Brainless idiots/imbeciles are appointed at the head of Saudi government by international gangsters
Reply
+1
+1
-0
[Gharib]
Gharib3 days ago 02:09
Why then Saudi's cannot win the war in Yemmen?

For fairness, Yemen should be granted the 'Nobel Prize for resistance'.
Reply
+1
+1
-0
[Assad]
Assad3 days ago 02:06
Saudi Arabia with its huge oil revenues is used by Zionist gangsters as a marionnette and serves as a venue for flooding the Middle East with arms for terrorist activities. Arms paid for by Saudi money. Gangsters steal oil and the money
Reply
+1
+1
-0
[Hasan Hakim]
Hasan Hakim> Assad3 days ago 15:50
1000% Correct-!!!!
Reply
+0
-0
[Lion od Haqq]
Lion od Haqq3 days ago 01:24
The ruling Gulf Arab puppets are not Muslims. They kill and persecute elderly, women, children, all on behalf of USrael. Shame on them.
Reply
+3
+3
-0
[Hasan Hakim]
Hasan Hakim> Lion od Haqq3 days ago 15:56
Cowards Have No Shame
When Ali Ibn Abi Talib-(A.S.)
Was On The Battlefield, the Cowards Pulled Down There Pants & Ex-posed Themselves to the Great Imam-(A.S.) The Imam-(A.S.) Let Them Be & Looked Away For A Worthy-Opponent............

UK Brexit desperation and support of Saudi islamofascists and their war crimes behind poison hypocrisy

Preparing for war actions in Syria etc. before the poison question is investigated properly and while the lynching mentality UK government itself induced is still working?

Listen to this BBC Radio 4 interview where the only one daring to be slightly critical (John Humphrys - age 74) clearly points to Boris Johnson's utter nonsense talk about Russia and and the poisoning affair. Klevius warns, you might vomit because of the graphic hypocrisy in Johnson's words.

Why is it that the UK government as well as most of the parliament (except Corbyn) are so keen on protecting Saudi islamofascists and demonizing Russia?

England (aka UK) now constitutes the worst security threat to EU (and to itself) because of Brexit. England wants to stir as much tensions as possibly for the purpose of keeping within EU when it comes to weapon trade and "security". England also wants to combine this with influence and arms contracts with Saudi islamofascists and other muslim countries. And in doing this England's politicians want to utilize average muslims as a means to protect the islamofascist "guardians of islam". 

Dear reader, Klevius has never been to Russia and has never had any Russian friends or contacts whatsoever despite the fact that Klevius has lived much of his life not far from the Russian border.  Moreover, Klevius has never been a Communist nor does he approve of many things Russia stands for, such as e.g. being "islam's best friend", violating Human Rights when it comes to sex segregation etc. (just as so many other countries also do). See e.g. what Klevius wrote about the Pussy Riots.

Klevius wrote:

Thursday, August 09, 2012

OIC, the real force behind the ideological rape of the Pussy Riot

Klevius: Dear reader! You're a true idiot or, alternatively, a truly disgusting personality if you call this analysis "islamophobia"!

And you! Please educate yourself about Negative Human Rights and islamic Sharia slave finance during 1400 years!

To understand sex apartheid, please read What's sex segregation?!

Politicians and religians in UN, UK. US, Russia etc. sell out your Human Rights through cooperation with islamofascist Saudi based muslim OIC (all muslims Sharia steered world organization)!

OIC has some 1.4 Billion muslims (most of whom have not a clue of what's going on). Some 30-40% (only 500 Millions, but still) of these muslims want Sharia. However, OIC wants to impose Sharia on EVERY MUSLIM!

 

What is OIC's islamofascist Sharia declaration?

The Cairo Declaration on Human Rights in Islam (CDHRI) is a declaration of the member states of the Organisation of the Islamic Conference adopted in Cairo in 1990, which affirms islamic Sharia as its sole source. CDHRI declares its purpose to be "general guidance for Member States [of the OIC] in the Field of human rights". 

Predominantly Muslim countries, such as Sudan, Iran, and Saudi Arabia, frequently criticized the Universal Declaration of Human Rights for its perceived failure to take into account the cultural and religious context of non-Western countries.

Though using a universalist language akin to the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, it clearly expresses an islamic particularity. The preamble is mostly religious rhetoric, and the particulars of the CDHRI contain numerous references to the Quran, sharia and aspects of islam that appear on no other similar international list. The CDHRI concludes in article 24 and 25 that all rights and freedoms mentioned are subject to the islamic Sharia, which is the declaration's sole source. The CDHRI declares "true religion", i.e. islam, to be the "guarantee for enhancing such dignity along the path to human integrity". It also places the responsibility for defending those rights upon the entire Ummah, i.e. ON EVERY MUSLIM.

The CDHRI has also been criticized by others than Klevius and Littman, for being implemented by a set of states with widely disparate religious policies and practices who had "a shared interest in disarming international criticism of their domestic human rights record."

Article 24 of the declaration states: "All the rights and freedoms stipulated in this Declaration are subject to the Islamic Sharia." Article 19 also says: "There shall be no crime or punishment except as provided for in the Sharia."

The CDHRI has been criticised for failing to guarantee freedom of religion as a "fundamental and nonderogable right".

In a joint written statement submitted by the International Humanist and Ethical Union (IHEU), a non-governmental organization in special consultative status, the Association for World Education (AWE) and the Association of World Citizens (AWC): a number of concerns were raised, that the CDHRI limits Human Rights, Religious Freedom and Freedom of Expression. It concludes: "The Cairo Declaration of Human Rights in Islam is clearly an attempt to limit the rights enshrined in the UDHR and the International Covenants. It can in no sense be seen as complementary to the Universal Declaration."

The Centre for Inquiry in September 2008 in an article to the United Nations writes that the CDHRI: "undermines equality of persons and freedom of expression and religion by imposing restrictions on nearly every human right based on Islamic Sharia law."

Rhona Smith writes that because the CDHRI's reference to Shariah implies an inherent degree of superiority of men.

Adama Dieng, a member of the International Commission of Jurists, criticised the CDHRI. He argued that the declaration gravely threatens the inter-cultural consensus on which the international human rights instruments are based; that it introduces intolerable discrimination against non-Muslims and women. He further argued that the CDHRI reveals a deliberately restrictive character in regard to certain fundamental rights and freedoms, to the point that certain essential provisions are below the legal standards in effect in a number of Muslim countries; it uses the cover of the "Islamic Shari'a (Law)" to justify the legitimacy of practices, such corporal punishment, which attack the integrity and dignity of the human being.

Pussy Riot, Suffragettes of our time

In March 2012, during an improvised and unauthorized concert in Moscow's Cathedral of Christ the Saviour, the three women from the band were arrested and charged with hooliganism and their trial began in late July. The band members have gained sympathy both within Russia and internationally due to allegations of harsh treatment while in custody and a risk of a possible seven-year jail sentence, but have also been criticized in Russia as well for offending the feelings of religious people.

Pussy Riot's lawyers have said the circumstances of the case have revived the Soviet-era tradition of the show trial. However, a more important connection may be cold political power diplomacy, esåecially via islam, although often camouflaged with0"defense of other religions .

Religious diplomacy can be described as a state activity consisting of the use of a religious factor in foreign policy; that is, the whole set of mechanisms for state cooperation with religious associations in the pursuit of pragmatically defined national interest, use of the international activity of religious institutions, ideas and religious symbols (appropriately interpreted to comply with current political aims) and so on. It is important to emphasise pragmatism of architects of religious diplomacy for it does not depend solely on the—professed— religiosity of political elites.

Nor is religious diplomacy exclusive to theocratic states. Religious institutions (actors) and religious ideas, symbols etc. are treated in this context foremost as assets, which can be used in order to achieve political goals. However, it is not easy to draw a clear-cut line between personal convictions of an individual and his political decisions and it is practically impossible to determine if a particular act was a result of a sheer political calculation or stems—at least partly—from religious motives.

Although decisionmakers usually have at least a sentimental relationship to the given belief, this does not necessarily have to be the case—the religious factor can be used in foreign policy regardless of a decision-maker’s attitude to faith.

Klevius: All religions, but specifically islam, constitute defamation of Human Rights! 

For you who have problem with this extremely simple and crystal clear logic, let me explain in plain language:

1) Weird religious/super-natural, astrological, creationist etc individual thoughts have no bearing on this topic. On the contrary, Human Rights give you the right to have whatever thoughts as long as you don't harm others.

2) All religions are collective racism and/or sexism. Some, like islam, are even totalitarian. However, whereas totalitarian islam restrticts the rights of women and other non-muslims, "totalitarian" Human Rights do the exact opposite namely defend those rights. This is why islam (OIC) could never accept Human Rights without destroying itself! And this fact together with the fact that islamic ideology has been behind the worst collective historical crime throughout 1400 years explains why islam (OIC) now is so eager to criminalize any discussion about it! 

The muslim scimitar against the Western "infidel". Or today, Saudi islamofascism (OIC sharia) against Human Rights

The scimitar on Finland's and Karelia's coat of arms symbolizes the evil of islam - not Russia (although Ivan was terrible, he wasn't an ideology).

Before the appearance of the scimitar trampling lion on the coat of arms of Finland muslim Tatar warriors carrying scimitars* repeatedly attacked and pillaged the coast of Finland with devastating effect on the locals.

* Tatars used by Russia (Muscovites) carried Cossack style sabers, not scimitars.

Finland's coat of arms (top right) is first known from the 1580s (on Gustav Vasa's tomb in Uppsala cathedral), while the Karelian coat of arms (below Finland's) was seen already in 1562.

Uppsala cathedral, built after the Viking age on top of Sweden's original sacred non-Christian site. Uppsala was the natural and closest connection from Finland via the archipelago (see Klevius Finland-Swedish history lesson on Kvenland).

The symbol of the lion is derived from the arms of the Folkung family, which are included in the royal arms of Sweden. The beginning of the Folkung family can be mythologically traced to Fornjotr, the King of Kvenland and Gotland (ca 160-240 AD).

Finland-Swedish Leif Tengström made a desperate 1,000 page long effort in Muschoviten-- Turcken icke olijk": Ryssattribut, och deras motbilder, i svensk heraldik från Gustav Vasa till freden i Stolbova (1997 - ("The Muscowite, not unlike the Turk" : Russian attributes in Swedish heraldry from Gustavus Vasa [1523] to the peace-treaty of Stolbova [1617]. Diss. -- Jyväskylä University) - trying to disprove a better Finland-Swedish historian, Matti Klinge, who already 1981 established the scimitar on the weapon as representing muslims. Tengström vehemently opposed this view but after a decade long research he had to admit his failure but covered it up in a charlatanic excuse, i.e. that the scimitar just represented a general "western" xenophobia against both Russia and islam. In fact, Tatar warriors were all over the place, even fighting for the Muscovites, but they can't possibly have been the prototype for the muslim scimitar on the coat of arms.

Tatar muslim warriors were sent to Arabia to learn how to hate "infidels" - and then utilized by a Polish King (Sigismund II Augustus) who said he "liked the muslim way of keeping with old customs".

Klevius: Reminds me of how the islamofascist Saudi dictator family still today uses the old islamic method of "teaching" hate against the "infidels" (compare Rohyngia jihadis, Sri Lankan jihadis - or just any Sunni jihadi all over the world.

How many acid, knife, car, bomb, rape etc. attacks against people in England have been induced by the islamofascist Saudi dictator family's spread of islamic hate? Klevius think they are far more than anything induced by Russia.

Klevius wrote:

Sunday, January 24, 2016

Putin didn't murder Litvinenko and Politkovskaja - islam did!

 But Putin - and Cameron - may be seen as accomplices due to their close "friendship" with islam

Klevius wrote a long time ago: 

Saturday, October 07, 2006

Did Islam in Chechnya kill Anna Politkovskaya because of her planned trip there?

Putin: "Russia is the most reliable partner of the Islamic world and most faithful defender of its interests"! Klevius comment: Chechnya is now ruled by expansionist Islamists notorious for kidnapping (even outside its own borders, e.g. in Ingushetia) torture, murder etc. and the young PM Ramzan Kadyrov is planning an "arena-sized" mosque etc in the war torn state. Allegedly Anna Politkovskaya was about to publish an article with witness evidence of torture in Chechnya by Ramzan Kadyrov himself.

Thursday, November 23, 2006

Klevius Friday analysis: Did Islam kill Politkovskaya & Litvinenko? And is it really wise to have an islamist heading IAEA?

An original feature of Islam (see Origin of Islam) is its creeping via dirty routes such as slave and drug trails. "Infidels" can be abused and it´s just good for Islam to profit on poisoning them.

Like in Iraq, Sudan, Somalia etc. the bloodshed in Chechnya (after Jeltsin) has essentially been caused by Islamists rather than liberators. However, when Putin got enough of naive and extremely onesided Western media criticism - one that didn't (and still doesn't) even see "the worst crime ever against humanity" - he made a deal with Islam which now aids Islamic expansion in the region and a horrifying Taliban-Chechnya-Europe drug/mafia etc trafficking trail occupied by almost everything from Al-Qaeda to KGB agents/mafiosos, but all connected by Islamic expansion. Politkovskaya reluctantly started opening her eyes (see Oct 7 posting) whereas Litvinenko was probably even more naive - he also claimed Putin was behind terror bombings etc in Moscow (sic) - when faced with a reality that didn't fit the prevalent media hypocrisy of "it's not Islam" but Bush or Putin.

Klevius comment: According to Litvinenko, Mario Scaramella (Napoli) gave him (Nov 1, 06) data on Politkovskaya's proposed killers, doubtful, however, if he really read the four pages. In 2001 the Russian Federal Security Service allegedly claimed a Chechen trace in 9/11 was found among Chechen Islamists led by "Abdurakhman the Little": a blueprint-CD of a Boeing 737; a manual for pilots; explosive device, weapons, munitions and Saudi Islam (Wahhabi) literature. It was also said that some 300 Chechen Islamists guarded Bin-Laden in Afghanistan and a special Chechen battalion fought for Saddam Hussein against the US led liberation campaign.


Did the Polonium (extremely easy to carry and smuggle) come from Iran and the murderer fron Arabia?

One probable source of Polonium (Po-210) is Iran which long since has experimented with this stuff for the purpose of blasting their upcoming nukes!

In her last interview Politkovskaya accused the Islamist Chechen leader Kadyrov ("Stalin of our times" as she described him) and his militia: "Right now I have two photographs on my desk. I am conducting an investigation about torture today in Kadyrov's prisons. These are people who were abducted by Kadyrovsty for completely inexplicable reasons and who died. These are bodies absolutely disfigured by torture." Then she was murdered, most probably by Islam!
Kadyrov has recently been warmly welcomed by Saudi Islamofascist leadership.


Is it really clever to let an islamist, soft on Iran, head IAEA?!

Iran has, according to several anonymous sources, brought huge amounts of beryllium from different countries. Interestingly beryllium can be combined with polonium-210 to blast a nuclear bomb. It has also been alleged that IAEA (part of UN) chief Mohamed El Baradei, an Egyptian islamist, did know abt it but didn't tell the IAEA board of governors!

Klevius comment: How come that the very same UN that was created to protect the world from fascism now is heavily infested with and influenced by islamofascism (incl. Sudan, Saudi Arabia, Iran etc)?!

.

Klevius question: Isn't sexism "multicultural" and "diverse" more than "white"?

Feminist asks: How important should we allow it to be for men to to have the "right" to get sex? Klevius answers: Not important at all. Because of heterosexual attraction ("male gaze"*) women with informed and free consent should always decide - incl. within marriage (women should not be doomed to whoring**).

The folk use of "feminism" fits Klevius. However, real feminists using "feminist theory" is quite a different horse. A horse that runs backwards towards the beginning of feminism itself where feminists opposed the vote, denied women playing football etc.

* The reason Klevius isn't a feminist but instead suggests Human Rights no matter of sex (as expressly noted in the 1948 Human Rights declaration - which islam vehemently opposes) is that feminist theories exclude women's role in their own oppression - as well as excluding women who want to leave the "feminine" without cutting or drugging themselves. Although feminist theorists talk about "women's own experience", they always exclude women who transgress feminists' beloved sex segregation border between "masculine" and "feminine". This is also why Klevius had a problem using feminist "research" in his PhD thesis. The most important of women's experience are excluded. So Klevius had to do in depth interviews with such women - and with remarkable result.

Not only extremist feminists but also mainstream feminists function as "guardians" of the cultural borders of sex segregation, i.e. the pressure on girls/women to look/behave in an ever changing (both locally and temporally) confused "feminine" way.

** This of course also means that women have no automatic right to sex from men either.
Btw, Klevius, the world's foremost expert on sex segregation (sad isn't it) thinks he's is qualified for talking about sex and sexual harassment. Why? Well, firstly, Klevius has way more sex hormones than feminists. In fact so much so no woman has seen him failing sexually. Secondly, no woman has been pushed, or even "seduced" to sex by Klevius. Thirdly, Klevius has a history of several marriages (with equally many daughters and sons plus grandchildren) and other longterm  and shortterm relationships incl. five years as a quite popular bachelor between going steady. Fourthly, Klevius still feels as a horny but non-sexist teenager. 

So why is Klevius talking in this ridiculous way? Well, just to show that there has been enough possibilities for Klevius to be sexist - but he hasn't. And because Klevius doesn't think he's a superman, the inevitable conclusion is that most other men can perform similarly if released from sex segregation. And to be "released from sex segregation" simply means "loosing" one's "manhood" - as Klevius did when he was 17 and the cutest girl on the disco he had managed to get interested told him later on that "it felt so relaxing when you didn't try to get me in bed all the time". 

And of course Klevius understands that less cute girls/women might fall into the trap of using their asses as confirmation that they are attractive. In fact, many of Klevius early girlfriends begged for sex, not because they were necessarily so horny but because they wanted to tell their friends about it.
 
And finally, although Klevius is so much more sexually potent than any feminist out there, he has never felt any need for sex gadgets of any sort. Nor has he ever thrown white pepper just for getting a sneezing "orgasm". And to be honest, Klevius doubts that they can develop a female sex robot that could interest him. Wonder why? Cyber sex, yes, but not a robot. The human consent is what turns Klevius on.

RFSU is a Swedish state sponsored organization for sex education. Klevius thought RFSU's pic looked strange so he added a more normal view. However, feminists theorists would have condemned both pics as "objectification", i.e. what Klevius calls heterosexual attraction.

Klevius wrote about Linda and her friend 14 years ago. Nothing has changed since.

Scandinavian new paper Aftonbladet uses a picture of a half fat white man with Viagra pills to illustrate sexual harassment etc. Klevius isn't fat nor has he ever needed Viagra. However, to make the pic more "multicultural" Klevius added some skin tones from Oprah Winfrey's cheek. Sorry about that Oprah...

We aren't supposed to "stereotype" sharia muslims  as racist and sexist Human Rights violators because "not all muslims are". Despite the fact that sharia - e.g. Saudi based and steered OIC via UN - overrides and even criminalizes the most basic of Human Rights

However, Klevius is all the time associated with "white men" in negative context, although Klevius in every aspect is outside that realm. If Klevius would try to be better than the offered caricatures of "white men" he would end up as a god. And nothing could be more offensive for a true Atheist as Klevius.


Klevius wrote (do note that www.klevius.info is a web museum not touched upon for more than a decade):

Sunday, December 05, 2004

Tarik Ramadan's Islamic hypocrisy

Tarik Ramadan (the ultimate sexist - see From Klevius without love): "I think that God blesses -- and should bless -- all the countries and all the way."

Klevius' translation: "I think that the Islamic Allah should bless the whole world in all ways"! Klevius comment: This is, per definition, pure totalitarianism as far as possible from the Holy 1948 (negative) Human Rights Declaration (explained on Klevius' definition of negative human rights)!

www.klevius.info

Saturday, December 04, 2004

When Islamic fundamentalists and "their" women move West

Women risk lives criticizing Muslim extremists
In Somalia, says Allas, "If you are a girl, you always are in fear of your parents, your older brothers, your male neighbors. It is always the man ... It is always fear and fear and fear.

"When I came to Holland, for me it was, Whew! What freedom! What a country! It was love, immediately," she recalls.

"But Holland is not the same."


Award for anti-fascist work and death threat from Islam

Tuesday, November 30, 2004

Feminism and Islam both share sex segregation

Klevius' comments to an Islamist's view on women.

According to:

Muslim Response to Feminism: Holistic Approach

" Holistic approach does not isolate woman from absolute society , they see womans rights and position within the whole structure of the society and avoid the segragation of society in terms for feminism or masculinism or any sort of monocentric approach as opposed to feminism."

Klevius' comment: On the contrary, "women's rights and position within the whole" is segregation in precisely the same way as feminism!

"According to holistic approach, society as a whole including men and women are addressed to their individual and social responsibility without any monosex inclination. The feminist perspective is monosexim perspective, neglecting the valueable place of men and woman side-by-side as a unifying force in family and in society. Holitsic approach looks at one comprehensive position of woman and man in public, private, in society and in politics."

Klevius' comment: "individual and social responsibility" (for men and women respectively) again is segregation! And the idea that feminism is a monosexism is ridicilous having in mind that the ultimate political aim of most feminisms is to underline the difference between men and women! See Why do you call yourself a feminist, Judith Butler?

"One of the distinguished scholars who offered the holistic approach was Shaheed Mutahhari. He explained the reason and the necesaty of different treatment of woman in Islam according to biological and pychological differences between man and woman. while the apologists try to reread the Holy text in line with change - changed codition of the current society."

Klevius' comment: This non-problem (i.e. the lunatic idea that a man can't handle his attraction towards women without burkas etc - in fact real rapists, no matter if they rape because of Islamic "infidel" contempt or some other bad cultural reasoning, aren't biologically but culturally determined to do so) is out-lined and "solved" on From Klevius without love (+ additional links offered on the page). The pages also explain why feminists contrary to Islamists deny HSA (heterosexual attraction).

Peter Klevius
www.klevius.info




Klevius wrote:

Saturday, December 31, 2005

Swedish sex segregation 2005 - In memory of Linda 13, sex slave* & abused to death by "a gang" in her school

Background: Strange Swedish attitudes in the public debate! Swedish white collar fascists /former defender of Pol Pot etc?) now want to stop external criticism against totalitarian Islam (i.e. against an ideology that forbids internal criticism)! Also see Klevius' Definition of Religion (usually top-rated on MSN)!

Also note that According to British YouGov's survey 2005 one in four (abt half a million) British Muslims sympathises with motives of Islamic terrorists- more than 100.000 British Muslims are ready to actually support Islamic terrorists- about 16,000 British Muslims declare themselves willing, possibly even eager, to embrace Islamic violence (For the worldwide spreading of Islam, and to conquer the non-Islamic world?!).

Official Sweden talks child abuse at home while kids are abused to death at schools (Swedish readers may compare this with the analyses presented in Ekot om incest )!
* Linda said she felt like a slave (compare the girls in Darfur raped by Islamic paramilitaries) on the school's toilet when she had to give sex services to the boy with "many dangerous relatives" (also see Nov 30 posting below abt Gangs of Arabs & dogs terrorizing Sweden). This is in line with e.g. "street Islam" (see Brief history of true Islam) which states (compare Koran's "infidel" and marriage/rape practices) that "white" girls/women are whores and should be abused and intimidated! Which is exactly what is taught in many Muslim (or Islam influenced) homes, before the kids show up as evil gangs in schools and on the streets! This racism is the real power of Islam, from Mohammed to the irresponsible parents of the kids chasing Linda. And equally irresponsible Swedish political correctness! Compare the Swedish chancellor of justice, Göran Lambertz, who isn't at all interested in the Swedish Radio Islam's continuing denial of Holocaust and extreme hatred propaganda against Jews! Today Islam is the world's most powerful violent ideology. Is that why not only Saudi-Arabic oil-billionaires but also the Swedish state and Swedish white collar fascists so eagerly support and defend it?! Also see the horryfying WMD-link Sweden-Iran!
and Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad: "Islam must prepare to rule the world".

Also compare the Rissne gang rape case where the boys were fiercly defended against the Swedsh whore (age 14) etc. by a huge gang of parents and relatives. Their ultimate "penalty" then was to visit an Islamist imam (sic)! I.e. the representative for what actually might have boosted their and their parents' racist/sexist attitudes! "The informal censorship in stories related to immigration in Sweden. Similar incidents are reported with shocking frequency, to the point where some observers fear that law and order is completely breaking down in the country."

True Islam has a bad influence on both Muslim and non-Muslim cultures

Islam is an evil ideology of rapetivism, exploitation & conquest ultimately based on pure racism - not to be confused with cultural ethnicity of the people that have happened to live under this evil ideology! One might even say that most of the disadvantages may be traced to how Islam has affected people's behavior, not to the people! No matter which changes are made to it, true Islam (i.e. attraction of Islam) is based on infidel racism and sex segregation. Islam's jihad-"paramilitaries" in the West are youngsters brainwashed by parents and Koranic agitation at home, in youth organizations, mosques, on the street etc) If this attraction is removed, Islam becomes an empty eunuch just like Chistianity. And that's OK to me. In the long run both racism and sex segregation are doomed anyway - just like true Islam!

Islam at work today: 20,000 Egyptian riot police kill at least 25 unarmed Sudanese refugees in Cairo outside UN!!!

But Sweden now praises and rewards misled and brainwashed children who at school write naive and glorifying nonsense abt Islam (uncritically gathered from Islamist sources). These writings and Linda's death represent the two extremes of the Swedish hypocrisy (also see Hypocritical Swedish misogynist imam Leif Karlsson).

For a background see From Klevius without love - freedom from sex segregation
Klevius' definition of religion
Klevius' definition of (the holy) negative human rights

"We feel every effort is made to silence the real circumstances abt Linda's death" (i.e. political correctness of the social state may not be disturbed? Also note that Sweden has a compulsory school, unlike in other Nordic countries were it's only the fulfilling of a child's education that is compulsory - not the attendance in one of the world's worst school system!).

Linda, 13, was a Swedish girl who, together with her best friend, used not to follow the stereotypical, stupid ("sexy") girlish style (often incl. being sex servants to certain boys) so common now in Sweden (see the Swedish girl problem and Angels of Antichrist and Sex segregation in LVU). She was sporty, climbing etc "Tomboy".
But a certain "gang" (plus, of course, the ordinary confused Swedish school attitude: glorifying Islam, pro-sex segregation, pro-child sex, etc) forced her (after severe bullying) to wear make up etc. Then she was sexually abused on the school's toilet while 6-7 of his friends were outside (like many other helpless Swedish girls). The day she eventually hung herself by using her sister's jump rope, she had been called a whore and other namings by a boy who also physically abused her and threatened to send his relatives on her.

Status among girls is based on "drinking, smoking, giving boys sex services, and using lots of make up and sexy clothes." Sounds pretty pathetic to me. According to Linda's friend "they" who have power control the school - including the pathetic Swedish teachers (compare P. Klevius' Echo of Incest, an analysis of the strange fact that while Western bio-parents are the least likely to commit sexual abuse. they are the most targeted, and vice versa, while sexual abuse committed by other kids in a heavily depending/pressuring environments at school etc, are the most common, they are the least addressed!).

Also compare the weird psychoanalytic idea abt the necessity of sex etc stupidities (From Freud to bin Laden). And it seems the younger the better. Compare the Swedish state funded institute that sexually abused 6 year old children by forcing them to listen to stories abt oral sex etc (see e g Swedish state pedophilia rewarded) !

Linda was described as secure and happy at home and outside the school.



IS TOTALITARIAN RACIST/SEXIST PAN-ARABIC ISLAM THE WORST CRIME EVER AGAINST HUMANITY?

Nature Shinto meets the raping fields of monolitheist** Islam - i.e. the world's oldest family religion with the world's best high tech vs. the world's youngest state "religion" with brainwashing Koran schools, physical & cultural desertation & low-tech totalitarianism
** Klevius' naming

Klevius' sites & blogs so far the only ones clearly addressing the horrors, abuse and confinement of sex segregation!

Update: Georgetown’s Capitulation to Radical Islam

Rape stats: 44% of women who were date raped have considered suicide!




Klevius wrote:

Saturday, June 10, 2006

A dedication to Edith Södergran from Peter Klevius without love

Link to Klevius love letter to Edith Södergran

The foremost Nordic modernist poet, Edith Södergran, was a Finland-Swedish like Peter Klevius (meaning she belonged to a small Swedish language/cultural tradition in Finland). This minority group has lived in a special niche between the east and the west (compare e.g. Johannes Salminen). Although this may have contributed to some disturbed creativity (see Inside Klevius' mind) the main point here is a formula for analyzing sex segregation in regard to human existence.

Also see how Edith Södergran was abandoned by her sex

Edith Södergran symbolizes the modern human being trapped between loneliness in search for salvation (see Was Jesus Religious and Angels of Antichrist and World Values Survey) and fascist gang belonging (compare Islamofascism)


IS 1400 YEARS OF ISLAMIC SLAVERY/GENOCIDE/RAPETIVISM THE WORST CRIME EVER AGAINST HUMANITY? (see Origin of Islam)

To destroy Islamofascism you need to destroy Islam, i.e. its connection to Koran (as hinted by the pope and others)! And yes, Islamofascism may continue even after this, BUT, without the indirect support of "moderate" Islamists and their supporters, the pure evilness will be more easily recognized and hence less attractive for sexist lunatics!

It's not only that Islam (according to Koran) clearly supports slavery (and Koran is the final word of god according to Islam), but that the whole concept of Islam is based on slavery and rapetivism. It's the main idea and Islam is the manual for organizing it! Islam is the refined system of sponging on slavery/rapetivism, and this "ideology" was born pragmatically in the already existing slave trade routes through Mecca etc. (pilgrimage was originally simply a slave merchant's trip to the slave market in Mecca - see e.g. M. Gordon: Slavery in the Arab World) . This is also the reason why the racist contempt expressed under the title "infidels" is so essential in Islam. However, unlike Gordon (1987) above, Klevius offers an updated analysis of slavery and sex segregated rapetivism in historical Islam.

What is essential here is to understand that this feature of Islam cannot be eliminated without changing the whole concept. And this is impossible precisely because those violent etc. lunatics who represent Islam in accordance with its original message (Pope: "Islam's stuck with Koran" - see posting below) will always claim and benefit from every "dialogue" or "support" of Islam per se (i.e. Islam disguised as some "ethnicity" or "private faith" which it is clearly not)! This is how/why(?) "moderate" Islamists support evilness. This is also why Islam is giving incentives for trafficking in girls on night clubs in Sweden, and why Islam gives incentives for raping "infidels" and to sterilize them if they can't be converted to Islam (Girls, don't drink from glasses in public places!). And finally, this is perfectly in line with Islam's incentives for making money on the selling of drugs to the "infidels" while at the same time destroying these "infidels'" lives. Islamoterror in different forms is going on at schools, on streets etc. often boosted by Islamic contempt learnt from parents etc. Surprisingly little has changed during 1400 years when it comes to Islam!

update

Finland and Sweden are the only ones using the term "Foster-land" to describe their nationality. There lies a huge irony/tragedy in this very fact
Klevius page Fosterlandet Sverige tops Google before the Swedish PM Göran Persson




.

Posted by Peter Klevius at 7:39 AM