US evil metastases from its original 1971 tumor is now reaching the maximum the world can take. However, the pro-Zionist and the anti-Chinese evil already started in US in the 19th Century - and in the 20th Century Chinese super-physicist Chien-Shiung Wu got to personally feel it.
The world's top physicist Chien-Shiung Wu was "asked" (i.e. coerced*) by the Oppenheimer team to make the atom bomb working, which she did - but was remarkably absent in the Oppenheimer movie.
* Men from the Manhattan project came to her dormatory room, confiscated and classified her typewritten paper which she had made ready for publication in the Physical Review, and ordered her to solve the crucial problem that hindered them from making the atom bomb. The world's first nuclear reactor, a breed reactor, was purposefully built for enriching plutonium. However, because of a theoretical flaw, it shut itself off before reaching the level of producing the right amount of plutonium.
Chien-Shiung Wu then in 1949* proved quantum entanglement and that Einstein was wrong, and in 1956 proved that the universe was in imbalance with anti-matter, and set the first experimental basis for the Standard Model - but was the most downtrodden, belittled and persecuted physicist ever. Why? Because of her ethnicity. Considering that Marie Curie had already got two Nobel prizes for much less, one might conclude that it wasn't Chien-Shiung Wu's sex but the fact that she was Chinese.
* The polarization of pairs of gamma-ray photons produced by electron–positron annihilation was made by Chien-Shiung Wu in 1949, thereby demonstrating that entangled particle pairs considered by Einstein–Podolsky–Rosen as a paradox. Chien-Shiung Wu was the first 1949 to conclusively verify photon entanglement. Her experiment was done only 15 years after Albert Einstein, Boris Podolsky, and Nathan Rosen first brought the concept of quantum entanglement to light in what’s known as the EPR paper.
The width and extent of Chien-Shiung Wu's scientific genius and achievements top all. Chien-Shiung Wu not only mastered theory and the math but also the technology needed for empirical experiments - to an extent that she made the most crucial parts herself on top of the world's by then cutting edge equipment. If she had been Jewish her intelligence and talent would have been celebrated but because she was Chinese it twas "explained" only as her "hard work".
Chien-Shiung Wu: 'I wonder whether the tiny atoms and nuclei, or the mathematical symbols, or the DNA molecules have any preference for either masculine or feminine treatment.'*
* In 1936, Chien-Shiung Wu was accepted by the University of Michigan, but she was shocked when facing extreme sex segregation on the campus and the fact that women had to use a separate sex segregated entrance. She therefore decided to study at the more liberal Berkley in California. Wu was a popular student and the most talented.
Chien-Shiung Wu was extremely close to her father (compare Peter Klevius original research on how fathers, brothers etc. males not affected by heterosexual attraction made it possible for girls/women to transgress sex segregation), who was an engineer. He created an environment for girls that encouraged curiosity, questioning and research from an early age. Wu's mother was a school teacher who also valued sex equality.
Chien-Shiung Wu received her primary education at a school for girls that was founded by her father. At home, she was surrounded by books, magazines and newspapers. Her hand writing was considered outstanding by others as she was praised for her Chinese calligraphy.
As a high school student, Chien-Shiung Wu (much like Einstein) struggled in the subject of mathematics. Her father bought self study guides to trigonometry, algebra and geometry one summer to help. That experience created a life long habit of self learning and gave Wu sufficient confidence.
Wu emerged from an environment that blended traditional Chinese culture and modernism. Wu Zhong-yi, her engineer/businessman father, and Fan Fu-hua, her teacher mother, were progressives from well-to-do scholarly families who opened the Ming De School for girls in Liuhe, emphasising not only the Analects of Confucius and Chinese poetry but also maths and sciences. Crucially, the couple, who also had two sons, recognised their daughter’s remarkable intellectual qualities.
Her father started reading articles in scientific journals to Wu before she learned to read, and allowed her to play with the quartz radios he constructed. He was not just a scholar, he was also a revolutionary who embraced boldness and took part in China’s 1911 revolution. He included “shiung”, the Chinese character for “hero”, in her name, and held up the Ming dynasty explorer-diplomat Zheng He, whose legendary seven voyages set sail from their hometown, as a “bang yang”, or life example.
After finishing in the top 10 among more than 10,000 applicants, Wu, aged 11, attended the prestigious Suzhou Girls High School, where her preference for hard sciences solidified. Graduating top of her class in 1929, she headed to the National Central University (NCU), in Nanjing, China’s then capital. NCU housed an impressive physics faculty that included Shi Shiyuan, who had worked with Nobel laureate Marie Curie, Wu’s idol.
Wu Chien-shiung’s father takes young Wu to the Temple of Mazu to learn of Zheng He. Illustration: Samuel Porteous
Wu Chien-shiung’s father takes young Wu to the Temple of Mazu to learn of Zheng He. Illustration: Samuel Porteous
In Nanjing, Wu remained laser-focused on her studies and gained the lab experience she craved. But, ever her father’s daughter, in December 1932, she agreed to lead a protest against Japanese aggressions plaguing the country. Hundreds of students followed Wu to the Presidential Palace, where, as evening fell and temperatures dropped, Chiang emerged. He promised Wu and the crowd to do better, and Wu returned to her lab, little suspecting she and Chiang would meet again, under quite different circumstances, some 30 years later.
Wu is especially cheered for not pushing her name in science - i.e. the very opposite to Peter Klevius who has been forced to do so*.
Without Peter Klevius pushing his name, his scientific contributions to the world would be wasted - and he would have to live with a bad conscience for not even trying to offer the world something he thinks is beneficial for all people.
While supporting religious extremism, West bans what it needs the most, i.e. Confucianism* and Chinese talent, the main keys to Chinese tech superiority.
Chien-Shiung Wu was (and still is) belittled as an "experimental" physicist. However, whereas a theoretical physicist doesn't need to be able to do experiments, an experimental physicist need to know everything about both theory and tech.
Chien-Shiung Wu's plan to return to China was interrupted by Mao's cultural revolution and ban on Confucianism*. However, little did she know that US would repeat the same ban after her death.
* Most intellectuals, political reformers and revolutionaries in the 20th century opposed China’s traditions – with Confucianism at their core – blaming them for China’s temporary backwardness and poverty, which was in fact caused by Western and Japanese attacks. This culminated in an anti-Confucian Maoism. But since the early 1990s, there has been a huge revival of the Confucian tradition, not just for political reasons but also because of economic reasons – not just China, but other countries with a Confucian heritage like South Korea and Japan have modernized in a relatively peaceful and harmonious way. And it turned out that Confucian values that had been blamed for China’s (Western+Japan caused) problems were actually the key for modernization. The gravely misled and violent protesters 1989 wrongly believed that Western style "democracy" would be better for China. However, today in retrospective China's development on the anti-Maoism track proves them fundamentally wrong.
Peter Klevius wrote:
Media's US led depiction of the 1989 Tiananmen "democracy"* riots in China is as far you can get from the truth.
* Even if some of the violent rioters really believed that "democracy" would be better for China, history now tells them how wrong they were. Moreover, just consider dollar embezzler (1971-) US reaction if China had become even stronger technologically, economically, politically and morally (if the latter is even possible for a 1.4 billion country)? That wouldn't have extended US stolen hegemony, right.
$-freeloader US extreme anti-China cognitive, financial, militaristic warfare is made possible with US 1971 stolen world dollar hegemony and is a crime against humanity and most people are too busy/ignorant to understand the danger of the cornered US - but instead fear China which offers best consumer goods, infrastructure etc, without imposing its system as US does!
Sadly, many haven't understood the enormity of US financial fraud 1971. And US economists - and some stupid US puppets called "allies" - just "explain" away how US as the only country in the world can prosper and militarize the rest of the world despite constant trade deficit. "We're just so good" is Bloomberg's and others answer!
When US 1971 stole* the world dollar it could manipulate it as it wanted and have the world pay for its trade deficit. However, China is now back and challenges it with superior tech which makes consumers happy. China's capitalist reform got severely hit 1988-89 because of US Feds chock rate increase. That caused havoc in a still extremely vulnerable China on its path out from Maoism.
* 1944 Bretton Woods "agreement" pegged the world dollar to US dollar which was then pegged to gold under US Feds custodianship. 1971 US was bankrupt and arbitrarily violated the gold connection but kept the custody over the world dollar. Although it hit poor countries the most, China was especially vulnerable because it was in an intensive opening-up trade development following Deng Xiaoping's capitalist reform policy.
Peter Klevius analysis of the US controlled media massacre of the truth about the Tiananmen square incident by neglecting cause and effect while producing anti-China* smear.
* No, it's not just CCP! Undemocratic Christian theocracy US uses Sinophobia as synonymous with "democracy", well knowing that the absolute majority of Chinese people don't share the US view on "democracy", although young Chinese in the late 1980s realized the difference in living standard between US and China after Deng Xiaoping opened up the China that Mao had closed. So when US again manipulated the world dollar it hit hard (up to 19% 1989 inflation from 7% 1987) on China's economy.
Peter Klevius agrees with Klaus Schwab (WEF) who said "I respect China's tremendous achievements … over the last forty years. China could act as a role model for many countries, but in the end, each country should be left to make its own decision regarding the system it wants to adopt. We should be very careful in imposing systems but the Chinese model is certainly a very attractive model for quite a number of countries." Peter Klevius: Especially for US!
Wu'er Kaixi (aka Örkesh Dölet) Of Uyghur heritage from Xinjiang had a leading role during the 1989 protests.
Peter Klevius: What did he think about the old Uyghur jihad battle cry "kill the Han and the Hui"?
Summary of Peter Klevius Tiananmen analysis: There were two distinct and mutually exclusive groups of protesters who were not distinguishable by their appearance.
Much of the rioters brutality was the result of Beijing’s decision on June 2 to send in unarmed soldiers to clear the Square. The unarmed soldiers were set upon immediately by rioters around the Square waiting for the chance to attack the soldiers. Beijing’s armed battalions were sent in later.
US Embassy daily reports of what was happening at the time.
The US Embassy report for June 4 notes:
“the beating to death of a PLA soldier, who was in the first APC to enter Tiananmen Square, in full view of the other waiting PLA soldiers, appeared to have sparked the shooting that followed.”
So it was the rs, not the government soldiers, that started the bloody confrontation.
State Department chroniclers continue their unbiased summary of events:
“.. the initial moves against the students suggested to many that the Chinese leadership was still, as of the morning of June 3, committed to a relatively peaceful resolution to the crisis.”
From there we go to:
“fascinating eyewitness accounts of the disorganized and confused retreat of PLA soldiers from the center of Beijing after their advance on Tiananmen Square was halted by crowds of demonstrators on the morning of June 3.’ ..the soldiers were ridiculed by Chinese citizens and scolded by elderly women who called them “bad boys” and “a disgrace to the PLA.”
On the day after, on June 4, however: “thousands of civilians (rioters - not peaceful protesters) stood their ground or swarmed around military vehicles. APCs were set on fire, and demonstrators besieged troops with rocks, bottles, and Molotov cocktails.”
Media reports confirmed this rioters violence.
According to the Wall Street Journal of June 4:
“As columns of tanks and tens of thousands soldiers approached Tiananmen many troops were set on by angry mobs … [D]ozens of soldiers were pulled from trucks, severely beaten and left for dead. At an intersection west of the square, the body of a young soldier, who had been beaten to death, was stripped naked and hung from the side of a bus. Another soldier’s corpse was strung at an intersection east of the square.”
Even ABC, later to one-sidedly dramatize cruelties by government forces, describes how in front of the Australian embassy a PLA solder was beaten to death, disembowelled and left with his penis stuck in his mouth.
But those who condemn government violence at Tiananmen need to explain the seeming hatred of the government among protesters that triggered Tiananmen events .
Chai Ling, like many other Tianamen rioters became Christian and welcomed in US. Listen to her video to measure her bloodthirstiness - and cowardice.
The "tank man" hoax*
Cui Guozheng, was an unarmed cook in the 348th Regiment of the 116th Division. He was murdered by rioters because he did not stay close enough with the other troops.
Read how Peter Klevius solved "the biggest mystery in science".
Read Peter Klevius in-depth research on The Psychosocial Freud Timeline.
Read Peter Klevius Origin of the Vikings from 2005 - now again available after Google deleted it 2014 and again in February 2024.
Peter Klevius (1981, 1992): The ultimate question ought to be: What is it like to be a stone? There's no difference between human consciousness polished through living, and the "consciousness" of a stone that has been smoothly shaped in streaming water against other rocks, stones etc. It started its "life" as a rugged piece of rock in a mountain and adapted to its life in streaming water down hill, or perhaps as a piece of rock falling on a beach and polished by waves.
.