Klevius: Yes, it's perfectly normal. What a pity no one has told you before. Islam is the very essence of ultimate racism! This is why muslims are so sensitive about criticism against islam while showing extreme contempt and insensitivity against others. And this is also why OIC (all muslims world organization) not only have abandoned and even criminalized Human Rights (via UN) but also made it a crime to criticize islam (the worst ideological crime history knows about).
Why have these London girls never been honestly taught and warned about the evils of islam - back then and now?! And how many more victims of islam do we really need?
Katie Gee and friend Kirstie Trup, both 18, had the corrosive substance thrown in their faces by two men on a moped as they strolled through Stone Town, in the capital of the island, around 8pm last night. One of the British teenagers attacked with acid in Zanzibar was assaulted in the street just weeks earlier for "singing during Ramadan".
Who is responsible for these girls ignorance about evil islam?They visited Stone Town in Zanzibar - one of the most horrifying memories of islamic/muslim atrocities - and still full of muslim jihadists who want to defend this evilness to whatever price. Because not doing so would immediately lead to acceptance of what islam really stands for.
The monument in the middle is where the girls were attacked.
Is it David Cameron and his OIC messenger Sayeeda Warsi, who, apart from Human Rights violating OIC, also has close (albeit complicated) ties to islamofascist terror organization Hizb ut-Tahrir?
Here she meets with the world's most dangerous man, Ekmeleddin Ihsanoglu, the Fuhrer of OIC, the muslim world organization which has declared that Sharia shall overthrow Human Rights and that failure to do so should be criminalized (i.e. what is also called "islamophobia" - an islamofascist synonym to Human Rights defense).
Sayeeda Warsi's close Hizb ut-Tahrir friend
Theamericanmuslim.orghttp://theamericanmuslim.org/tam.php/features/articles/robert-spencer-discovers-that-hizb-ut-tahrir-are-extremists/0019926 makes fun over Mr. Spencer's warnings about Hizb-ut-Tahrir, and on their website refer to their own warnings: 'Hizb-ut-Tahrir, part of the Muslim lunatic fringe', in a series of articles. In other words they share Mr. Spencer's view on Hizb-ut-Tahrir. However, this same Mr. Spencer's warnings were so offending to Cameron/May/Warsi so he was banned from even visiting UK.
According to Tories, Hizb-ut-Tahrir aims for the "the violent overthrow of our society". Klevius comment: And what about a "non-violent" overthrow of the very Human Rights Britain has rested on? At least, this is what OIC and her beloved islamofascist OIC clearly aims for.
Jason Lewis: Mr Dugher (Labour party) said, “Yet again, there seems to be a blurring of the lines between what constitutes proper official business and what is, in fact, party political activity with private associates. What the baroness was doing with someone who has admitted his involvement with the extremist Islamist group Hizb ut-Tahrir also calls into question her judgment.”
Hizb ut-Tahrir has been accused of promoting racism and anti-Semitism, praising suicide bombers and urging Muslims to kill Jews.
Before coming to power, Mr Cameron pledged to ban it but the plan was shelved after a Coalition review.
The nature of Mr Hussain’s involvement in the radical party has already prompted questions over the extent of security vetting.
He has twice accompanied Lady Warsi on trips to Pakistan, and has also been pictured in the House of Lords at a reception for her.
In the early 1990s, sources say, Mr Hussain joined Hizb ut-Tahrir and was nicknamed “Strapper” by other students because of his bulky frame.
He lived for a time in one of its London houses, studying the radical form of Islam taught by its then leader Omar Bakri Mohammed, who is now banned from Britain.
Sayeeda Warsi's political schizophrenia profiled in her twisted relation to Hizb ut-Tahrir - and islam
Hizb ut-Tahrir publicity says it is 'working for the re-establishment of Khilafah, Caliphate, Islamic state in the Muslim world through a peaceful means'.
However, the Government is "actively considering" a second-tier banning order that would outlaw groups that are not outright terrorist organisations but promote extremism and hatred on the streets, and Hizb ut-Tahrir is expected to be the first target of such a banning order.
Home Secretary Theresa May told the Commons home affairs select committee that the anti-terror taskforce set up by David Cameron in the immediate aftermath of the murder of drummer Lee Rigby, was discussing the possibility.
Hizb ut-Tahrir is advocating a system which is in line with OIC and the beliefs of the majority of the Muslim world. A belief that deenies the most basic of Human Rights.
The Hizb ut-Tahrir website talks of:
"Evil democratic systems, corrupt ideologies, export of Aids, hidden agendas, the Islamic solution for homosexuality is death" etc.
Nazreen Nawaz (Media Representative
Hizb ut-Tahrir Britain) + Klevius comments:
The fact that you, Mrs. Warsi, decided to wade into the debate joining the likes of Nick Griffin, Melanie Phillips, and the English Defence League, with your reckless statements against the Pakistani community and suggestion that race played a role in this disgusting crime speaks volumes about you. Despite the fact that sexual abuse of young girls and women is sadly rampant across the UK, perpetrated by men from all communities – the majority however being white, non-Pakistani, and non-Muslim – (Klevius: What an utter lie! Proportionally muslims are extremely over represented) you felt the need to issue your detrimental comments. And in doing so, you aided the peddling of hate and false stereotypes of Asians (Klevius comment: Why do you insult Chinese, Japanese etc Asians when the guys were muslims from muslim countries?!) by racists, and added fuel to the fire of the growing right-wing fascist rhetoric against Muslims and minorities in the UK (Klevius: So Phillips and EDL etc are fascists while anti Human Rights islam (OIC/Sharia) with a history of 1400 years of murdering, pillaging, slavery, genocides and rapetivism, is not!?)
One wonders how you would feel if your failure to declare your rental income on your property in North West London in the Lord’s register of interests, or the allegations that you claimed expenses for accommodation while staying in a friend’s house for free were generalised to a deficiency in integrity displayed by a “minority of Asian Tory Politicians (Klevius comment: Again this strange monopolizing of all Asians. The problem isn't "Asians" but muslims).
Many have understandably concluded that the reports that you are unpopular in your own party played a major factor in your decision to jump onto the Pakistani Muslim community bashing bandwagon, unscrupulously exploiting this issue in the path of personal political expediency. No doubt, your cheap populist comments found favour amongst a number of your anti-migrant, anti-minority, and anti-Muslim Tory colleagues, winning yourself a few cheap political points within your party.
Had you felt any real concern for the sexual exploitation of women, you would have been a champion for their cause against their treatment as mere commodities for the pleasure of men within this capitalist society for it is this that reduces women to second and third-class citizens in the eyes of men. Indeed, the systematic sexual grooming of young girls is simply one of the consequences of the general systematic degradation of women under capitalism. It is to this that media attention should be brought rather than enacting a great injustice to all victims of sexual crimes by erroneously diverting attention to race or the culture of Muslims as the cause of abuse (Klevius comment: Aren't you doing exactly the same by contaminating the rest of society with islam induced crimes?).
Had you been looking for a longer term solution to these repulsive crimes, joining the dots as a politician in government is supposed to do, you would have made the obvious links with sex-trafficking, date rape, the cases of girls being exploited by football stars and the devastating National Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Children (NSPCC) statistics that were issued earlier this year, which revealed that one in six (16.5%) 11-17 year olds have experienced sexual abuse and nearly a quarter of young adults experienced sexual abuse during childhood (Klevius comment: Which includes the over representation of muslims involved in such crimes - so that if the muslim proportion rises it will automatically hugely increase those numbers). Such crimes therefore have nothing to do with race and everything to do with society’s view of women (Klevius comment: It has to do with sex segregation/apartheid, and here islam is definitely the worst culprit, and with neglecting of women's/girls' Human Rights - again a topic were islam is the notorious leader of the pack). The Rochdale sexual grooming cases have nothing to do with Pakistani culture (Klevius comment: Not with culture but with religion, dude! It's not a "culture" that produced the disgusting texts in the Koran and Sharia but the religion) and everything to do with the opportunism of perpetrators and vulnerability of the victims (Klevius - who is also a criminologist - comment: All crimes, including islam, have to do with the opportunism of perpetrators and vulnerability of the victims. Islam's involvement just increases the amount of such crimes ffrom their already existing levels).
If you want to make the abuse of these young girls a cultural issue, then you need to take a look at the liberal freedoms within British society that encourage men to pursue their desires and treat women as they wish (Klevius comment: This is certainly not due to "liberal freedoms" but to still existing sex segregation - which islam supports heavily - and lack of fully accepting Human Rights for women/girls - again a topic where islam fails miserably), rather than scapegoating communities for the fall-out of liberal culture. If you wish to sincerely address these crimes, then you would raise a debate in society as to why such liberal values that are claimed to liberate women actually end up subjugating, humiliating and debasing so many.
Similarly, your comments cannot have arisen due to a sense of duty of confronting problems within the Pakistani Muslim community. For if you had any sincerity towards this community or a desire to confront these complex issues you would have confronted the deeply offensive slanderous assertions leveled at Islam following this case, about which you have been ‘understated’ to say the least. You would have argued that it is actually a lack of Islamic values and the adoption of the ‘pursuit of happiness’ and sexual gratification by any means that led to the problems in Rochdale.
Your statements regarding the Rochdale grooming case and the Pakistani community reflected all the hallmarks of a typical self-serving politician, attempting to secure your own political survival by trying to show your critics that you can be a useful ‘attack-dog’ on issues that your white Anglo-Saxon male colleagues would think twice in expressing.
Klevius comment: So what do you think about that, Cameron?