Acknowledgement: Dear reader, you start realizing why Klevius has these loads of Japan related pics etc all over his sites, don't you! Yes, it's all about bias hunting.
Is there a religious reason to Japan's technological and quality superiority? I.e. the lack of (Judaic)religion!
Japan is a country that has managed (geographical location and smartness) to avoid the Judaic "monotheist" traditions of which there are and have been many varieties - although only the violent ones are usually named, i.e. the official state religion of the Roman empire (aka Christianity) and the parasitic and violently spread robber religion of the Judeo-Christian Arabs (aka islam). Jews were the people God chose to slaughter the Canaanites. Christians were the community Constantine chose to slaughter the "Barbarians". And muslims were the community Mohammad chose to slaughter and enslave all of them, i.e. the "infidels".
Whereas the homeland of islam, Saudi Arabia hasn't by itself managed to produce anything except dates from slave worked palm plantations, the homeland of Shinto, Japan, has been the indisputable tech and quality leader of the world.
May 2010
January 2015
But Robert Anderson on January 27, 2015 had no idea about this when he wrote that: 'Have you ever thought of sailing in sunlight? No? The idea indeed sounds like some kind of magic or dream. The scientists are all set to turn this dream into reality'.
Peter Klevius: Top tier! Is he a "muslim science" writer!
Robert is announced as a top tier university graduate in journalism. A professional journalist with several published articles and working as a free-lancer in his field, he has been able to capture public eye on his work. With the abilities he posses, he takes the readers by a swift.
Peter Klevius: What's wrong with me? I'm not swifted at all! And no wonder our media is so full of lies about islam etc. with these kind of journalists.
Some technical data about the Japanese IKAROS spacecraft
IKAROS is the first spacecraft to successfully demonstrate solar-sail technology in interplanetary space.
Whereas the US solar sail that is planned for a short test fly in May 2015 is only the size of a loaf of bread, the inter-planetary IKAROS sail has a diagonal of 20 meter.
IKAROS was successfully launched together with Akatsuki (the Venus Climate Orbiter) aboard a Japanese H-IIA rocket from the Tanegashima Space Center on 21 May 2010.
The IKAROS probe is the world's first spacecraft to use solar sailing as the main propulsion. It was planned to demonstrate four key technologies:
Deployment and control of a large, thin solar sail membrane
Thin-film solar cells integrated into the sail to power the payload
Measurement of acceleration due to radiation pressure on the solar sail
Attitude control via variable reflectance liquid crystal panels
The mission also includes investigations of aspects of interplanetary space, such as gamma-ray bursts, solar wind and cosmic dust.
The probe's instrument (ALDN-S and ALDN-E) measured the variation in dust density while its Gamma-Ray Burst Polarimeter (GAP) measured the polarization of gamma-ray bursts during its six month cruise.
IKAROS is to be followed by a 50 m (160 ft) sail, intended to journey to Jupiter and the Trojan asteroids.
The craft contains two tiny ejectable cameras, DCAM1 and DCAM2. DCAM2 was used to visualise the sail after deployment on 14 July 2010. One of those photos was considered in 2013 by Discovery News as one of the best space robot selfies. IKAROS has been recognized by Guinness World Records as not only the world’s first solar sail spacecraft between planets, but also that its two separated cameras, DCAM1 and DCAM2, are the smallest size of a spacecraft flying between planets.
Albert Einstein (born a Jew) and Peter Klevius happen to have the same view on the laughable* but also heavily tragic concept of a "god"
* Are we still allowed to laugh at people who believe in ghosts - or is it already considered an offense against ghost sensitivities - hence making you a racist? That it's considered racist to offend the sensitivities of the guy below on the pic we already know.
Albert Einstein: "For me the unaltered Jewish religion like all other religions is an incarnation of the most primitive superstitions. And the Jewish people to whom I gladly belong and with whose mentality I have a deep affinity have no different quality for me than all other people. As far as my experience goes, they are also no better than other human groups, although they are protected from the worst cancers by a lack of power. Otherwise I cannot see anything 'chosen' about them."
Peter Klevius: Einstein said this in 1954 when he and most others thought we had finally got rid of both ideological, national and religious fascism by the help of the 1948 Human Rights declaration. However, now islam is not protected from the worst cancers by a lack of power - on the contrary, evil islam is protected from scrutiny and criticism by that very same organization due to Saudi based OIC and its islamofascist leader Iyad Madani.
Einstein expressed his skepticism regarding an anthropomorphic deity, often describing it as "naïve" and "childlike". He stated, "It seems to me that the idea of a personal God is an anthropological concept which I cannot take seriously. I feel also not able to imagine some will or goal outside the human sphere. My views are near those of Spinoza: admiration for the beauty of and belief in the logical simplicity of the order which we can grasp humbly and only imperfectly. I believe that we have to content ourselves with our imperfect knowledge and understanding and treat values and moral obligations as a purely human problem—the most important of all human problems."
On 22 March 1954 Einstein received a letter from Joseph Dispentiere, an Italian immigrant who had worked as an experimental machinist in New Jersey. Dispentiere had declared himself an atheist and was disappointed by a news report which had cast Einstein as conventionally religious. Einstein replied on 24 March 1954:
It was, of course, a lie what you read about my religious convictions, a lie which is being systematically repeated. I do not believe in a personal God and I have never denied this but have expressed it clearly. If something is in me which can be called religious then it is the unbounded admiration for the structure of the world so far as our science can reveal it
Klevius question to BBC's muslim sharia presenter Mishal Husain: So what about you? Do you believe in a personal "Allah" or a muslim OIC/Ummah sharia "Allah"? Klevius and BBC's listeners expect an honest answer!
No comments:
Post a Comment