The evil Saudi muslim supremacist hate mongering dictator family
The Islamic State is more or less a copy of Saudi Sunni Salafist (Wahhabi) islam simply because it was originally invented in and supported by Saudi Arabia as their military tool to spread their evil influence in other countries under cover. However, the chickens are now coming home to roast which fact reveals the bottomless depth of the Saudi state's bigoted evilness and hypocrisy. As a result of the Saudi dictator family's hate campaign against non-Sunni/Wahhabi muslims, Shia groups have now formed self-defence units within the Eastern Province of Saudi Arabia hence forming a third internal factor of dissonance. And to justify atrocities against the Shias, the Saudi dictator family accuses non-Arabic Shia Iran.
An example of how islamic hate works
In a closed Afgan appeals court, with no journalists or other observers present, eliminated the death sentences imposed on four muslim men for their part in the mob killing of a young woman, Farkhunda Malikzada, in Kabul in March 2015, when she was attacked at an islamic shrine after being falsely accused of burning a copy of the Koran..
Moreover, the court also acquitted the keeper of the shrine, known only as Omran, who was the one to incite the mob to kill Farkhunda Malikzada, 27, after she had "argued" with him. She was stoned to death, her body was run over by a car and set on fire. 8 police who didn't do anything to stop it were also aquitted.
Kimberley Motley, an American lawyer in Afghanistan who represented the family during the previous trial: "There's very strong evidence through video and through eyewitness testimony that justified the original sentences that were imposed on these men."
Klevius comment: Farkhunda Malikzada was "a devout muslim" just like those who murdered her.
Klevius wrote:
Tuesday, May 19, 2015
According to BBC, Farkhunda Malikzada's lynching would have been justified if she really did burn the Koran!
Again an islam induced appauling crime committed by pious muslims that "had nothing to do with islam, the Koran or muslims"
Farkhunda Malikzada was a 27-year-old Afghan woman who was lynched by a muslim mob in Kabul on March 19, 2015. She was murdered after allegedly arguing with a so called mullah (a muslim sorcerer) who falsely accused her of burning the unholy manual for racism, sexism, slavery and genocide that they call Koran.
BBC today: She was lynched for burning the Koran but it turned out that the accusation was false.
Klevius today: Shouldn't BBC rather focus on the muslim lynching mob and the evil message in the book that led to this evil deed instead of bothering about the fate of the material book and the possible feelings of these evil muslims?!
Farkhunda had previously been arguing with a mullah, in front of a mosque where she worked as a religious teacher, about his practice of selling charms at the Shah-Do Shamshira Mosque in Kabul. During this argument, the mullah reportedly accused her of burning the Quran. She responded:
"I am a Muslim, and Muslims do not burn the Quran!"
According to eyewitnesses, hundreds of angry civilians flocked to the mosque upon overhearing the mullah's accusation. They dragged out Farkhunda and started to beat her. She was thrown from a roof, run over by a car, and beaten with sticks and stones outside the mosque. The mob then set her body alight and dumped it in the Kabul River while police allegedly looked on. Farkhunda's parents said the killing was instigated by the mullah with whom Farkhunda had been talking, who, according to Tolo News, began loudly accusing her of burning the Quran "in order to save his job and life." An eyewitness said that the mob was chanting anti-American and anti-democratic slogans while beating Farkhunda.
However, BBC was more eager to fill British ears with one of the worst apologists for muslim jihadism, Penny Green prof. of Law and Globalisation at Queen Mary University of London (also co-director of International State Crime Initiative - a Saudi filial?). Her illogic is beyond belief but understandable considering she mingles with empty brain like Noam Chomsky etc. And Penny Green was of course as fanatic as usual when she called the fate of jihad spreading Rohyngia muslims from Bamgladesh a "genocide". Muslim Bangladesh to which they belong doesn't accept them, and Britain was part of the original problem which is now utilized by Saudi Arabia and OIC etc.
An example from 2013 of Penny Green's unintellectual approach:
Penny Green: The most powerful way of addressing Egypt's problems would not be to see General Sisi, who led the coup against Morsi, in front of the International Criminal Court, says Green. "I would prefer to see ordinary Egyptians making decisions about the way in which Mubarak or Sisi or Morsi are dealt with. But the more important thing is actually undoing the structures of repression inside Egypt, that would be a very big chore, because that's part of the problem, the institutions of repression of the security services, the ministry of the interior, the police force, the military, and intelligence services all remain intact. And so each successive regime has been able to draw on them when they haven't delivered and when popular protest demonstrates their unpopularity."
Klevius: I refer to the top of the posting and rest my case.
Penny Green's so called ISCI was awarded £830,000 by the UK's Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC) for a project entitled, ‘Resisting State Crime: A Comparative Study of Civil Society’ (ES/I030816/1). The project aims to study the role of civil society organisations in defining, censuring and resisting criminal acts committed, instigated or condoned by state agencies. It is a cross-cultural, comparative study which focuses on countries which are all undergoing processes of reconstruction following severe violent conflict, but which have very different levels of economic and political development. The project will explore the ‘life histories’ of a range of grass roots civil society organisations dedicated to challenging state violence and corruption. The study compares Burma, Colombia, Papua New Guinea, Sierre Leone, Tunisia, and Turkey.
Klevius: Can't see Saudi Arabia on the list, can you!
Obama's list of State Sponsors of Terrorism also lacks the worst - Saudi Arabia. Wonder why?
Countries determined by the Secretary of State to have repeatedly provided support for acts of international terrorism are designated pursuant to three laws: section 6(j) of the Export Administration Act, section 40 of the Arms Export Control Act, and section 620A of the Foreign Assistance Act. Taken together, the four main categories of sanctions resulting from designation under these authorities include restrictions on U.S. foreign assistance; a ban on defense exports and sales; certain controls over exports of dual use items; and miscellaneous financial and other restrictions.
Designation under the above-referenced authorities also implicates other sanctions laws that penalize persons and countries engaging in certain trade with state sponsors. Currently there are four countries designated under these authorities: Cuba, Iran, Sudan, and Syria.
Country Designation Date
Cuba March 1, 1982
Iran January 19, 1984
Sudan August 12, 1993
Syria December 29, 1979
However, compare this list to the following facts:
Saudi Arabia is still executing witches and sorcerers after sharia "trials" were their "guilt" of such "crimes" is determined. It also sponsors most of world jihadism. Moreover, it harbours OIC, all the world's muslims sharia organization!
This (Saud based OIC and its Saudi Sharia Fuhrer Iyad Madani) is islam today - and it's against the most basic Human Rights! No matter how many times you or your informants tell us islam is nice!
Saudi Arabia is said to be the world's largest source of funds and promoter of Salafist jihadism, which forms the ideological basis of terrorist groups such as al-Qaeda, Taliban, ISIS and others. Donors in Saudi Arabia constitute the most significant source of funding to Sunni terrorist groups worldwide, according to Hillary Clinton. According to a secret December 2009 paper signed by the US secretary of state, "Saudi Arabia remains a critical financial support base for al-Qaida, the Taliban, LeT and other terrorist groups."
The violence in Afghanistan and Pakistan is partly bankrolled by wealthy, conservative donors across the Arabian Sea whose governments do little to stop them. Three other Arab countries which are listed as sources of militant money are Qatar, Kuwait, and the United Arab Emirates, all neighbors of Saudi Arabia. Taliban and their militant partners the Haqqani network earn "significant funds" through UAE-based businesses. Kuwait is described as a "source of funds and a key transit point" for al-Qaida and other militant groups. The Pakistani militant outfit Lashkar-e-Taiba, which carried out the 2008 Mumbai attacks, used a Saudi-based front company to fund its activities in 2005. According to studies, most of suicide bombers in Iraq are Saudis. 15 of the 19 hijackers of the four airliners who were responsible for 9/11 originated from Saudi Arabia, two from the United Arab Emirates, one from Egypt, and one from Lebanon. Osama bin Laden was a Saudi by birth. His family is a wealthy one intimately connected with the innermost circles of the Saudi royal family.
Starting in the mid-1970s the Islamic resurgence was funded by an abundance of money from Saudi Arabian oil exports. The tens of billions of dollars in "petro-Islam" largess obtained from the recently heightened price of oil funded an estimated "90% of the expenses of the entire faith."
Throughout the Sunni Muslim world, religious institutions for people both young and old, from children's maddrassas to high-level scholarships received Saudi funding, "books, scholarships, fellowships, and mosques" (for example, "more than 1500 mosques were built and paid for with money obtained from public Saudi funds over the last 50 years"), along with training in the Kingdom for the preachers and teachers who went on to teach and work at these universities, schools, mosques, etc.[103] The funding was also used to reward journalists and academics who followed the Saudis' strict interpretation of Islam; and satellite campuses were built around Egypt for Al Azhar, the world's oldest and most influential Islamic university.
The interpretation of Islam promoted by this funding was the strict, conservative Saudi-based Wahhabism or Salafism. In its harshest form it preached that Muslims should not only "always oppose" infidels "in every way," but "hate them for their religion ... for Allah's sake," that democracy "is responsible for all the horrible wars of the 20th century," that Shia and other non-Wahhabi Muslims were "infidels", etc. While this effort has by no means converted all, or even most, Muslims to the Wahhabist interpretation of Islam, it has done much to overwhelm more moderate local interpretations, and has set the Saudi-interpretation of Islam as the "gold standard" of religion in Muslims' minds.
By its nature, Saudi Wahhabism encourages intolerance and promotes terrorism. Former CIA director James Woolsey described it as "the soil in which Al-Qaeda and its sister terrorist organizations are flourishing."
Klevius wrote:
Saturday, August 17, 2013
Imam who allegedly planted burned pages of Koran in a Christian girls bag not indicted
Did you get that? No indictment whatsoever. The imam wasn't "freed" as now reported by confused Western news channels. HE WAS NEVER EVEN INDICTED FOR ANYTHING! And he wasn't under suspicion of framing the girl but of suspicion of having burned Koran pages (Pakistan's beloved "blasphemy" Sharia law). So logically this decision today to drop the investigation equals putting the guilt back on the poor Christian girl and her family who had been heavily harassed by their racist and hateful supremacist muslim neighbors. It seems that Klevius again hit the bull's eye in the posting one year ago seen below.
This is what Klevius wrote about Rimsha Masih and the imam a year ago:
Sunday, September 09, 2012
Klevius islam tutorial for Los Angeles Times: Blasphemy and "islamophobia" are synonymes!
LAT got islam all wrong! How many others have?
According to Los Angeles Times headline, Muhammad Khalid Chishti was accused for "framing". Well, that's quite far from the truth!
Klevius: The muslim Cleric wasn't accused of framing a Christian girl. He was accused of blasphemy against islam (the worst crime ever against humanity)!
Why is it that every evil deed originating in islam is "interpreted/transformed" into something else that looks less bad for evil islam?A muslim Pakistani cleric, Muhammad Khalid Chishti, was detained on suspicion that he had teared out pages from the Koran. That these pages then were put into Ms. Masih’s bag was irrelevant although the police, probably in a kind pr gesture to foreign reporters, said that it was possible that other charges could follow.
Evil ideologies need evil protection and evil leaders - and to be supported by ignorance
Islam is a disastrous ideology, even worse than National-socialism (popularly called Nazism for the purpose of trying to make a socialist party with a bad reputation "right-wing") because islam doesn't stop by the nation but wants to be totalitarian.
And precisely because of islam's enormous evilness (that the "negative" freedom part of the Universal Declaration on Human Rights so effectively has revealed) it needs every means to protect itself from criticism. This task is now in the hands of the Hitler of our time, OIC's Fuhrer (or Caliph as he himself has said he wants to be called) Egyptian born Turk, Ekmeleddin Ihsanoglu. He's one of the world's most eager proponents for blasphemy laws under Sharia, which he then presents in the West under the title "islamophobia".
How long will the World tolerate this evil islam hoax?
Russell D. Moore: If a Christian majority existed in a country, with the will to enforce all the laws it could, would this country be justified in outlawing Islam or atheism or Wicca? Why not? Fundamentally, this is because blasphemy laws and other uses of state power to enforce religious belief or worship are themselves a repudiation of the beliefs themselves. A religion that needs state power to enforce obedience to its beliefs is a religion that has lost confidence in the power of its Deity.
Klevius comment: Apart from the fact that islam isn't a "religion" in any meaningful sense it's all about state power in the form of the muslim state called Umma and led by the oil fueled Saudi/OIC network. The utterly dumb strategy to excuse medieval fascism in our time on the grounds that it needs time to mature into a modern civilized world should be replaced by the speeding up of the process by addressing islam's deep incompatibility with the basics of Human Rights (an incompatibility that islamofascist OIC and its Fuhrer Ekmeleddin Ihsanoglu readily have admitted by replacing Human Rights with Sharia in UN and elsewhere). Only then we can spare the lives and sufferings of the victims of islam.
No comments:
Post a Comment