Some 150,000 Labour party "members" can't overrun the parliamentarians voted in by some 9 million voters. Moreover, Jeremey Corbyn is a dumb, or alternatively, shrewed, racist/racism supporter.
If Labour voters were informed that Corbyn's use of "islamophobia" doesn't mean their cultural non-sharia muslim friend but something way more sinister, then probably only islamic sharia extremists would give him their "vote", i.e. a "vote" from a "voter" who is against democracy and "British values":.
Jeremy Corbyn couldn't for his life first remember that he had welcomed this extremist muslim. Only under hard pressure did he later managed to recollect his suppressed memory. Is he demented or something much worse?
Jeremy Corbyn's attacks on Human Rights defenders (calling those critical of Human Rights violating sharia, "islamophobes") while supporting racist and sexist islamofascists, fulfills not only the most common criterion on racism, but also mirrors the very same socialist "radicalization" that created the Nazi party, i.e. the socialist workers party that departed from its mother party, the German social democrats. Only now it's the islamic sharia Umma that constitutes the "national" part of the movement. So whereas conventional Labour voters may still associate it with NHS, welfare etc. (however, remember that Labour acted exactly in line with the conservatives about cutting benefits), the party has now become a dis-proportional power base for Human Rights violating sharia islam.
Whether Jeremy Corbyn is just so dumb (let's hope so), or just so canny (i.e. a typical shrewed politician selling out his alleged incentives for the purpose of cheap votes) remains to be seen. However, as Klevius wrote in a previous post, he might just stick to the evil of state socialism which tramples the rights of the individual, hence constituting a perfect partner for e.g. islamofascism.
Labour hypocrisy
Labour want more young people to vote because they know that young people are more vulnerable for certain propaganda at schools in media etc.
Young people are usually also more racist than more mature people. The only thing they need to take to the streets is a "good cause". This is natural keeping in mind the amount of socialist propaganda they are showered by combined with lack of life understanding.
However, before giving younger people the vote they (as well as all others) ought to be educated on:
1 Universal (negative) Human Rights equality
2 How islamic sharia (in whatever form) is incompatible with the most basic of Human Rights (compare ECHR's decision)
The most basic of Human Rights are the so clalled "negative rights", i.e. right to freedom from state or religious impositions. However, these rights are not shared by socialist ideologies, as pointed out in Klevius 1994 article below.
To understand the difference between state socialism and fair welfare politics you may read the most important (because it also deals with sex segregation) sociological paper from the last century, Angels of Antichrist (Klevius 1996).
An English translation is on the way.
Klevius wrote:
Wednesday, September 09, 2015
Klevius to Human Rights loving refugees: Welcome to help fight islamofascism and BBC's misinformation about sharia islam!
BBC now uses its most treacherous and fanatical pro-islamic forces to keep the Brits unaware about the danger of sharia* muslims among the refugees from sharia* islam
BBC's hypocrites and islam's muslim bigots
To be a sharia* muslim is to be the ultimate bigot.And although BBC's hypocrites want to do their utmost to convince you that there are "moderate" strains of islam, nothing could be more false. When islam becomes "moderate" it has lost its allure, i.e. its ra bodiescism and sexism hidden under a "religious" cover. Moreover, "moderate" islam in whatever form are just fringe phenomenons, showroom prototypes only meant for flashing but never for real production. And by 'real production' it's here meant the acceptance of a of main muslim bodies.
However, these muslim bodies have never been seriously questioned about sharia* islam. Why? Because BBC knows that the answer is too horrifying (sharia*)
So called BBC now uses their most eager islam campaigners to misinform the compulsory BBC fees, taxes etc. paying Brits about the fact that by bundling all non-European immigrants/asylum applicants as "refugees", sharia* muslims (i.e. islamofascists) among them will not be noticed.
Wife of muslim supremacist jihadist murderer in France: “We are normal muslims"
Klevius: Indeed you are! That's the problem, when islam and being muslim is stretched all over the place - yet we all have to listen to "muslim sensitivities" within that very same wide spectrum!
Do the muslim test by asking them if they are against Human Rights. If they are not then they are no real muslims, according to OIC (all muslims world Ummah).
BBC's muslim (apostate?!) presenter Mishal Husain (rooted in Pakistan and grown up in Saudi Arabia): I don't care to fast during Ramadan but rather eat and drink some alcohol. And I will never wear a hijab! And I see no threat against my way of life.
Klevius: Well, that's due to Human Rights - not sharia! Isn't this a disgusting spitting in the face of all those true refugees who escape sharia islam?!
The simple but extremely dangerous formula seems to be: Call it/them all islam/muslims and define islam/muslims at its most favorable point - i.e. a point that is more of a fantasy product than real.
Why hasn't BBC fired their bigots? Are the Brits really ok with paying compulsory fees and taxes to support these senseless lies about islam?!
They happily report about extremely rare occasions of so called "white supremacist hate crimes" while not even mentioning these word and 'muslim' when triggered by islam (yes, you're right they are all triggered by islam).
* Anti-sharia means being against the most basic of Human Rights. To understand this distinction (and to avoid those dangerous BBC idiots who like to confuse it by talking about meaningless consensual "religious" sharia practices, while hiding what makes it truly islamic, i,e, against Human Rights) consider that muslims' main global organization, Saudi based and Saudi steered OIC, couldn't accept UN's Universal Human Rights declaration - not even with some national exceptions - but had to replace it with a sharia declaration that in effect nullifies whatever Human Right if it clashes with islamofascist sharia.
How do you differ a hateful sharia* muslim from refugees from sharia islam?
Warnings against "islamophobia" is the cover under which islamofascism thrives. And the main messenger in UK now seems to be the socialist wannabe leader Jeremy Corbyn
Klevius wrote:
Sunday, September 06, 2015
Remove the poisonous islamic sharia* sting from muslim refugees before accepting them!
1 Demand muslims to commit apostasy against islam!
The worst crime one can commit against sharia islam is to leave it (apostasy). So by openly in writing and wording abandoning islam while assuring this is not made as taqiya etc. (e.g. by repeating it in accordance with sharia until the criterion for apostasy are fulfilled) a muslim can then be treated as a Human Rights "muslims".
True original islam is a hateful parasitic slave ideology which carries the seeds of destruction within it.
2 End Saudi & Co's racist/sexist islamic hate mongering for good!
While this little boy died Obama visits and supports his murderers
Sleazy politicians like muslim born (apostate?!) "president" Barry Barakeh Hussain Mohammad Obama Dunham Soetoro (or whatever) and Jeremy Corbyn have in common a strong aversion against criticism of islamofascism.
If islam is squeezed to fit the most basic of Human Rights - i.e. abandoning Human Rights violating sharia - then that would mean the definitive cure against Klevius "islamophobia".
We need more "islamophobia" to protect our children - not criminalize it as Jeremy Corbyn (and the Saudi dictator family) wants!
Raed Salah: Very soon, Muhammad will be the most popular name in Europe.
Klevius: Question is, will most of those Muhammads have dropped that name when realizing the difference between Human Rights and evil Muhammad islam?
Saturday, September 05, 2015
Klevius proposes: Give a visa to civilization to every muslim who abandons Human Rights violating sharia islam!
How many in this muslim invasion are sharia muslims?
The Saudi dictator family is the by far worst single cause to islamic evil in Mideast and elsewhere today. And because they own both media and politicians, average people are still equally ignorant about islam as were the two UK girls visiting Zanzibar. Here's from Klevius blog 2013:
Klevius: Yes, it's perfectly normal. What a pity no one has told you before. Islam is the very essence of ultimate racism! This is why muslims are so sensitive about criticism against islam while showing extreme contempt and insensitivity against others. And this is also why OIC (all muslims world organization) not only have abandoned and even criminalized Human Rights (via UN) but also made it a crime to criticize islam (the worst ideological crime history knows about).
Later these girls were attacked by, most probably the muslim sons, who threw acid in their face.
We need more "islamophobia" and less sharia muslims. Politicians like Jeremy Corbyn, however, do the opposite and thereby cause even more suffering among islam's victims.
.Muslim countries without oil or aid
No comments:
Post a Comment