Why are islamofascists considered more welcome than President Trump to the UK?

Klevius acknowledgement as a proud "islamophobe": I'm forced by islam to criticize Human Rights violating muslim sharia which is against my ethical conviction based on Human Rights equality in accordance with the 1948 Universal Human Rights Declaration. Everyone who's got a problem with that needs first to face a mirror before spitting.

Where were the demonstrators when EU citizens were attacked in UK after the Brexit vote?! 

Sharia is pure sexism - yet Trump gets the blame while sharia goes free.

 

BBC and an islamist supporting socialist MP and shadow PM in UK dictate US on how to behave.

BBC and some politicians encourage islamist terror attacks.

Klevius question: If we root out "islamophobia", will IS, al-Qaeda, OIC etc. sharia muslims really stop hating us? Promise!

Ed Milliband (MP for Labour): Trump's ban is "divisive, discriminatory and horrific. I don't believe a state visit can go ahead. It's an "insult to many muslims". After a week as President, see what it means for the world."

Klevius: Isn't it sharia islam that is the most "divisive", "horrific" and "discriminatory"? So why not to challenge this hateful ideology just as we used to challenge other hateful ideologies, instead of appeasing it?


In Klevius series disgusting Human Rights desecrating hypocritical politicians.

Klevius wrote:

Raed Salah (a friend of Jeremy Corbyn): Very soon, Muhammad will be the most popular name in Europe.

Klevius: And most of them are muslim violators of Human Rights! If we don't start educating muslims about Human Rights instead of lying to our children about islam, then these future Muhammads and Muslimas will never understand the very evil origin and nature of Human Rights violating sharia islam.


So what to do?

Simple. Most muslims have a brain and understand logic. So face them with Human Rights logic according to which their system is hateful, racist and sexist. Most of these young males will probably abandon sharia islam if seriously challenged at all societal levels with the illogic of this supremacist ideology. And those who don't, then clearly define themselves as hateful and racist supremacists.

UK's former Labour leader Ed Miliband wants to root out "islamophobia" as a hate crime. And according to Jeremy Corbyn "islamophobia" is disgusting and deeply offensive".

Social state socialists* have never defended the rights of the individual because they are rooted in a mass movement (French revolution, Soviet Union, National-socialism, Mao's China, Cuba, DDR, Pol Pot etc.). This is why basic individual Human Rights freedom (the so called negative Human Rights) isn't defended by state socialists. As a consequence, these socialists are wide open for totalitarian systems like sharia islam. 

* The self-evident idea that we need a fairer distribution of wealth shouldn't be allowed to be monopolized by socialists who, in the end, prioritize themselves via the state rather than individuals in general. This is why Klevius throughout his adult life has proposed so called "citizen salary" for everyone. Initially the Green parties seemed to follow the same line of thoughts. However, when they turned out to be supporters of state socialism Klevius had to abandon them (see Klevius paper The Green Dilemma, 1984).

Some voices about Ed Milliband's sharia association

Leo McKinstry: Ed Milliband is far more dangerous than his awkward image suggests. An unprincipled, ruthless, opportunistic left-wing ideologue, he represents a serious menace to Britain’s future. Backed by the ScotsNats and Labour’s trade union paymasters, his regime would be one of debts, bureaucracy, mass immigration and constitutional chaos.

But now an even more sinister aspect to his leadership has emerged, one that threatens our essential freedoms. Miliband says he will make Islamophobia a serious crime to be prosecuted by the full might of the state. Flushed with self-righteous zeal, Miliband wants to ensure that the offence “is marked on people’s records with the police to make sure they root out Islamophobia as a hate crime.”

Anyone who believes in liberty will be truly alarmed. Miliband’s proposal goes against the entire tradition of western democracy, which holds that people should be punished only for their deeds, not their opinions.

In the name of tolerance, Labour wants to impose a form of totalitarianism, making a mockery of the concept of free speech. Like so many socialist policies, Miliband’s plan conjures up the dark, Orwellian world of the Thought Police, where all citizens are required to obey the ruling orthodoxy. I n January Miliband echoed the global outrage at the Charlie Hebdo massacre by Muslim terrorists in Paris, even joining other political leaders in the French capital’s official protest march. But his call for a British law against Islamophobia exposes the hollowness of his indignation.

Under his proposal, most of the Charlie Hebdo staff would have been in prison over their satirical cartoons.

Islamofascist state visits to the UK:

30 October – 1 November 2007      Saudi Arabia     Monarchy     King Abdullah Bin Abdul Aziz Al Saud of Saudi Arabia, RVC (2007)
Islam's homeland where the islamofascist Saudi dictator family function as "the custodians of islam" and together with Saudi based and steered OIC spreads hateful racist/sexist sharia islam against "the West" and Human Rights. Islam's homeland is considered the most intolerant country in the world (North Korea being an other top contender albeit quite limited in comparison when it comes to spreading hate propaganda).

25–28 October 2010      Qatar     Monarchy     Emir Sheikh Hamad bin Khalifa Al Thani, GCMG (1976) and Sheikha Mozah bint Nasser Al Missned

Salafi version of Sunni islam is the state sponsored in Qatar as in Saudi Arabia. The state of human rights in Qatar is a concern for several non-governmental organizations. Sharia law is the main source of Qatari legislation according to Qatar's constitution. Flogging and stoning are legal in Qatar due to Sharia law.

According to Human Rights Watch in June 2012, hundreds of thousands of mostly South Asian migrant workers in construction in Qatar risk serious exploitation and abuse, often amounting to slavery.

27–29 November 2012      Kuwait     Monarchy     the Amir Sheikh Sabah Al-Ahmad Al-Jaber Al-Sabah GCB (2012)

According to Human Rights Watch annual report 2016, Kuwaiti authorities have invoked several laws to prosecute people for criticizing the emir, government on fake, sorry, social media. Kuwait has also been found to be one of the worst offenders in human trafficking according to a report issued by the United States Department of State. Migrant workers are subjected to conditions of involuntary servitude (slavery) by employers in Kuwait. The workers were subject to physical and sexual abuse, non-payment of wages, threats, confinement to the home, and withholding of passports to restrict their freedom of movement.

30 April – 1 May 2013      United Arab Emirates     Monarchy     Khalifa bin Zayed Al Nahyan

According to human rights organizations, the government of the United Arab Emirates violates a number of fundamental human rights. The UAE does not have democratically-elected institutions and citizens do not have the right to change their government or to form political parties. There are reports of forced disappearances in the UAE, many foreign nationals and Emirati citizens have been abducted by the UAE government and illegally detained in undisclosed locations. In numerous instances, the UAE government has tortured people in custody and has denied their citizens the right to a speedy trial and access to counsel during official investigations.

Flogging and stoning are legal forms of judicial punishment in the UAE due to Sharia courts. The government restricts freedom of speech and freedom of the press, and the local media is censored to avoid criticizing the government, government officials or royal families. Freedom of association and freedom of religion are also curtailed.

Despite being elected to the UN Council, the UAE has not signed most international human-rights and labor-rights treaties, including the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, the Convention on the Protection of the Rights of All Migrant Workers and Members of Their Families, and the Convention against Torture. Journalists from overseas frequently record and document human rights abuses that occur within the UAE.

Klevius: But otherwise ok! Good enough for official visits to UK and the Queen. But democratically elected President Trump - no way. Moreover, these countries also use real medieval torture for getting confessions - not marin "waterboarding" training against fanatic muslim terrorists who are known for having committed gruesome terror acts and whose information might save lives. No dude, Klevius doesn't approve of "waterboarding" etc. in any cases, no matter how "mild". But you know, Klevius is a wimp in these matters - and Klevius would probably get more info by just using his IQ. There hasn't been a lie invented as yet that Klevius would have fallen for. To be honest, it feels quite awkward sometimes.

How come that muslims get so much more support than other groups?

First muslims attack WTC twice (1993 and 2001) and the continue with countless terrorist attacks sponsored from Mideast (especially the Saudi dictator family), and then trying to prevent it is said "to breed anti-American sentiments" among muslims. Catch 22. However, we never see anything similar against other ideological criminals who commit hate crimes. On the contrary, "right wings", Buddhists, etc. seem not to be affected by the "propaganda tool".

There's nothing (except islamofascist apostasy ban) hindering muslims from adopting Universal Human Rights equality.

Between a third and a half of the Germans were Nazis. However, no one, I assume, would believe they were all keen on exterminating disabled people (the T-4 Program for " a programme of involuntary euthanasia" established in 1939 was the start of the Holocaust long before the Jews became involved), Slavs, Romani people, Communists (incl. white Communists), homosexuals (incl. white homosexuals), Jews etc. So how would the above reasoning have worked in Nazi (National socialist) Germany?

Wouldn't it have been better forcing the German Nazis to either abandone their ideology or at least marking a distinct line between moderate and radical National socialists?

How dumb are those morons who defend muslim terrorists?  Are these guys representative - or are they below average of supporters of islamofascism?

These fake facts guys really run into history as double fools, don't they. Do they also believe that Apollo landed in a West American desert added by a back projection of Earth?!

It wasn't the planes but the heat of the fire that changed the beam structure to a point when it could no longer keep up the many floors above the impact point. And when the top of the building hit the impact floor the force was enough to start a downward chain reaction causing the lover beams to vibrate /bend, hence causing what some morons thought were "explosions" caused by the US government. Klevius said it immediately when seeing the collapse first time on TV.