83-year-old man died from "multiple stab wounds to his neck and head" after being attacked while walking his two dogs in woodland. Police lack theories/hypothesizes to work on - but Klevius has one to work from.
Ch Supt Fawcett added: "The motive remains unclear."
He said "dedicated teams" were investigating the case and a mobile police station has been set up at the scene. A cordon remains in place.
Klevius, who also happens to have a masters degree in criminology, now offers his help to the English police for free:
For solving a problem it's always good to start from some possible hypotheses. But such a hypothesis need to be strong and therefore easily falsified. And we do know that violent muslims ready to commit hate crimes against the "infidels/kafirs" are behind most of these kinds of "stabbings to the neck and head". We also know that these muslims usually don't like dogs. So:
Two possible clues:
1 non-muslim stabbed to his neck and head.
Verse (47:4): When ye meet the Unbelievers (in fight), smite at their necks.
Verse (8:12): When thy Lord was revealing to the angels, 'I am with you; so confirm the believers. I shall cast into the unbelievers' hearts terror; so smite above the necks.
2 Dog walker
According to Islam Questions and Answers, "It is not permissible for a muslim to keep a dog, unless he needs this dog for hunting, guarding livestock or guarding crops.
Needless to say, the more radical groups - such as e.g. Saudi supported Salafi muslims - take an even harsher stand in their interpretation of the already negative views expressed in the Koran and the hadiths.
Is Theresa May an accomplice to this murder via her stubborn support of the islamofascist Saudi dictator family and its well known position as the main source of inspiration to islamic hate crimes against non-muslims?
Even if it turns out that this murder had nothing to do with muslims or islam, this fact would in no way disprove the use of such a working hypothesis that statistically is the most likely.
However, Ch Supt Fawcett has been told by Theresa May that, in the name of "diversity" (i.e. islam) and "sensitivities" (i.e. muslims) he should avoid to express hypotheses such as the one offered by Klevius above. Moreover, it could cause more "islamophobia".
Is Theresa May an accomplice to this murder via her stubborn support of the islamofascist Saudi dictator family and its well known position as the main source of inspiration to islamic hate crimes against non-muslims?
And if it turns out that it really was a muslim hate crime against a non-muslim dog-walker, then it will probably be toned down and excused - e.g. by calling the perpetrator "mentally disturbed" etc.
Whereas Klevius defends everyon's Human Rights and never sides with violence and extremism, Theresa May is against Human Rights and indirectly supports Saudi extremism and islamic hate violence via her support of the world's main source of islamic extremism and spread of hate. And whereas Theresa May blames the messengers (the "islamophobes") for some extremely few (compared to attacks by muslims) and exaggerated* incidents by clearly mentally disturbed people, Klevius blames the underlining original hate ideology, its perpetrators and those who inspire them.
* When a mentally disturbed man drove a van against two muslims who were helping a third muslim already lying on the ground because of illness, it was reported that eight muslims were injured and one dead - without explaining that all the other minor injuries came from muslims who afterwards attacked the driver.
Polishphobia and EUphobia seem also to be "good for the Brits".
When a Polish man recently was accused of participating in the kidnapping of a model for to be sold as a sex slave to muslims in Mideast (compare Origin of the Vikings) but freed by the kidnapper "because she was a mother", BBC for many days and in every news report repeatedly emphasized that "the perpetrator was a Polish citizen living in UK" - but not that it was about muslim sex slavery in accordance with the Koran.
No comments:
Post a Comment