The islamofascist Saudi dictator family utilizes an ideology based on violent conquest (terror/extortion/enslavement), hate (non-muslim "kuffars") and contempt for the rights of others incl. women (sharia). And various collaborators are paid to lick this shit and spread its awful smell all over us.China lacks such an ideology. Yet Mrs May chooses Saudi islamofascism over healthy Chinese manufacturing, technological development and trade benefiting people around the world - not wars and religious terror.
Mona Siddiqui pushing the Britisharia wagon (Britishariot) in line with Cameron's wish to make London the world's hub for islamofascist finance.
So how did the English end up as Britishariots? It's all about Saudi islamofascism (incl. its Gulf etc. collaborators)
Theresa May: The perversion of islam which underlines the ideology that has led to violence...
Klevius: ...is the same as underlines the ideology that has led to a sharia complex that, according to ECHR, isn't compatible with European values based on Human Rights. In fact, sharia in whatever form (e.g. the Saudi based and steered muslim world organization OIC), is the absolute opposite to the anti-fascist 1948 Human Rights declaration which considers all humans equal - even women.
Demonizing the truth alternative fake "truths" such as that "islam equals 1.5 Billion muslms" when islam in fact equals the interest of the islamofascist Saudi dictator family (plus its evil radiation).
The "rotten public" of today are the ignorant (or cowardice - or just benefiting from evil islamofascism) but "useful idiots".
If your nice neighbor turns out to be "right wing" (how "right wing" are May's Brexit fantasts) it's usually very bad.
If s/he turns out to be nice but "islamophobic" it's almost like having a potential pedophile as your neighbor. Definitely worse than a potential but nice muslim terrorist.
However, if your nice neighbor turns out to be muslim it's good - no matter how close to the Saudi ideology s/he happens to be.
How come? And why not distinguish between Human Rights violating sharia muslims and other "muslims"? Right, because of sharia finance and lucrative business with the Devil himself. Who mentioned Faust? Mephisto?
Britisharia Broadcasting Company's cleaning* lady Mona Siddiqui* According to historians (e.g. Hugh Kennedy and others) islam started as an attacking and looting religion where the main driving force was the "belief" in booty and sex slaves. And to keep the looters together they had to pray together five times a day so not to have time to slip over to "the wrong gang" - hence securing the cumulation of jihadi. This was then followed up by making as many women as possible pregnant under sharia marriage so that the offspring could be declared muslims. Moreover, these new muslims were then taught that the worst crime they could commit was leaving islam. Klevius thinks such an ideology is disgusting. So what about you" Or are you too intimidated to tell your opinion in the matter?
BBC's house imam Mona Siddiqui from Pakistan frequently babbles totally meaningless platitudes about islam in BBC's so called "news" programs. However, this supporter of islamofascism (defined as being against the most basic of the anti-fascist Human Rights in the 1948 declaration) also functions as the catalyst for the islamofascist Saudi dictator family which has managed to scandalize UN (which was created to defend Human Rights equality) by bribing/threatening member states to rename Human Rights violating sharia as "islamic human rights" and now even got a key Human Rights role within UN although the islamofascist Saudi dictator family arguably has the worst record in the world. In other words, the ultimate desecration of what was meant to be the bastion against precisely such fascism.
Theresa May: "Many British people of different faiths follow religious codes and practices, and benefit a great deal from the guidance they offer."
Klevius: Sharia isn't "guidance"! Sharia is a way to avoid Human Rights equality.
Theresa May: "I start from the position that I don't think government should tell people, I don't think the government should tell women, what they should be wearing.
Klevius: But you think a patriarchal religion should do tell?
Theresa May: "I think it's for women to make a choice about what clothes they wish to wear. If they wish to wear a veil that is for a woman to make a choice.
Klevius: Is Mrs May really that ignorant? We aren't talking about a free individual choice under Human Rights here, we are talking about muslim girls/women under varying theocratic interpretations for the purpose of satisfying what it is supposed to mean to be collectively muslim.