A fascist medieval type dictator "monarchy" created by Theresa May's predecessors is now the worst enemy of people around the world.
The Saudi islamofascists do exactly as the Islamic State - teaching hate to be randomly exchanged to terror against random individuals worldwide.
Today again BBC's house sharia islamist (and the "expert" Mrs May asked to check Human Rights violating sharia "courts" in England) Mona Saddiqi continued her plattitudes repeatedly trumpeted from BBC's minarets over compulsory fee paying ignorant English "kaffirs": "It's a mystery why Allah allows evil".
Klevius (who is a real expert* on islam - i.e. not an islamist): You're very wrong Mona. It's not a "mystery" at all. As Klevius has repeatedly informed since 9/11, "Allah" was deliberately cut out ("Allah willing") from original islam for the very purpose of giving room for human evil like racist booty jihad attacking, looting and murdering/raping "kaffirs", enslaving, ethnic cleansing, genocides, sex slavery etc. (read the history of the emergence of islam - starting e.g. with Hugh Kennedy and K. S. Lal, and continuing e.g. with Ohlig/Puin's The Hidden Origins of Islam, and Fernandez-Morena's The Myth of the Andalusian Paradise, if you are so dumb so you don't trust Klevius).
* Only an Atheist relying on the anti-fascist Universal Human Rights declaration of 1948 can be a true expert on islam.
And when Theresa May says "islam's a great and peaceful religion" it only covers a version of islam based on wishful (or just deliberately lying) Western thinking while neglecting islam's evil allure, apostasy ban, and extremely appalling history.
If true islam would really be as Mrs May allegedes (but compare her "best ally", the islamofascist Saudi dictator family's Wahhabi/Salafiislam), then islam would be dead in no time - except as a laughable creed for morally confused social outliers - i.e. those very muslim extremists who belive her nice words about islam and who then check up on the most original islam, and how the "custodians of islam" and other experts on islam tell them to go for the original rather than "Westernized islam".
Islam can never stand up to the high standards of the anti-fascist Universal Human Rights declaration of 1948. Sorry muslims if this "offends" and/or "demonizes" you. You then need a mirror.
And if you don't believe Klevius, then check with islam's most powerful world organization, Saudi based and steered O.I.C. which has openly declared that islam can't tolerate Human Rights (epecially not for girls/women and other "kaffirs") and therefore has Human Rights violating sharia (called islamic "human rights" so to sound better in U.N. etc. presentations).
This is also why/how the worst Human Rights violator and spreader of islamic hate all over the planet, the islamofascist Saudi dictator family sits on U.N. Human Rights council. I.e. supposedly the very bastion for anti-fascism has been occupied by - islamofascists clad in oil money.
Last but not least. This isn't Klevius' "Saudiphobia" or "islamophobia". That the islamofascist Saudi dictator family has been the worst and most intolerant spreader of islamic hate over the world is well known and repeatedly confirmed in most quarters.
So why has Klevius to rant about it so loudly? Because most people are afraid of being labelled "islamophobes" by Theresa May and other similar politicians etc. It's a fascistoid demonization of Human Rights defenders for the sole purpose of protecting the islamofascist Saudi dictator family.
And because most media are faked and corrupted by the fear of "islamophobia" - with the biggest one also being the worst, namely BBC.
And only when Trump was forced to lick the islamofascist Saudi ass did he get a slight ceasefire, sort of, by the media. However, that move made him also sink into that very swamp he promised to drain.
However, part of this may also be blamed on his naivety about the real financial state of the country he planned to steer.
Perhaps he didn't fully understand terms such as 'Seven Sisters', 'petro-dollar', 'gold standard', 'printing money', 'Sino-Russia cooperation' etc.
Trump himself was steered away from Russia because of the islamofascist Saudi dictator family. A tiny country same size or smaller than e.g. Netherlands. How come?
Two almost similar sized countries (Saudi population may even be smaller as some half of it consists of immigrants who are mostly more or less slave workers - only a minority consists of well educated experts).
Most of the Saudi population live in ten cities - making the populated country area also less than Netherlands.
Saudi medieval theocratic dictatorship
GDP (official exchange rate):
$639.6 billion (2016 est.)
GDP - real growth rate:
1.4% (2016 est.)
4.1% (2015 est.)
3.7% (2014 est.)
country comparison to the world: 161
GDP - per capita (PPP):
$55,200 (2016 est.)
$55,700 (2015 est.)
$53,900 (2014 est.)
Netherlands modern democratic monarchy
GDP (official exchange rate):
$771.2 billion (2016 est.)
GDP - real growth rate:
2.1% (2016 est.)
2% (2015 est.)
1.4% (2014 est.)
country comparison to the world: 129
GDP - per capita (PPP):
$51,000 (2016 est.)
$50,300 (2015 est.)
$49,500 (2014 est.)
The open secret of how the evil Saudi dictator family manages to bully the world: Islamofascism (custodians of islam) and the two Os (OPEC and OIC).
Sitting on easily (i.e. cheaply) extractable oil/gas and helped by US exploiters the islamofascist Saudi dictator family managed to heavily influence OPEC so that in 1973 they caused the so called energy crisis and 1974 they collected a ransom deal with US resulting in the so called petro dollar as well as even more influence to the Saudis under the cover of mighty America.
Soon the islamofascist Saudi dictator family started utilizing the many tensions/problems (caused by islam in the first place) in muslim (or partially muslim) countries. For this purpose they established OIC which became the biggest single pressure block in U.N. Via OIC's sharia declaration the islamofascist Saudi dictator family also avoided UN criticism of its appalling Human Rights record, by simply introducing OIC's sharia as "islamic human rights".
The biggest meddler in US politics is the islamofascist Saudi dictator family.
It's likely that the islamofascist Saudi dictator family also threatened the US with leaving the US dollar in its oil "sale" (oil from stolen/occupied land).
As with its "cooperation" with Israel (although no Jews really tolerated in islamic Saudi Arabia) the "cooperation" with the US is just to get allies against its main rival Iran who in turn is backed by Russia - therefore the enormous noise in Washington.
And of course there has evolved many personal ties to the "kaffirs" in the West, but these are just based on money and influence - and the islamofascist Saudi dictator family's wish to leave as Westerners while spitting on them via islam, hence boosting the picture that islam is anti West, hence also boosting inferiority and hate complex among muslims.
9/11 made it painfully obvious that the main evil of the world today is the undemocratic, Human Rights violating islamofascist Saudi dictator family.
Yet the US chose to hug its worst enemy.
So today the tiny oil wealthy Saudi gang has managed to create a dangerous state of a new cold war where it holds the world's muslims hostage for its own sake and the US threatens everyone who the Saudis don't like.
But the world could end this evil cancer in no time if voters in democratic countries would stop voting for any politician positive to the evils of the islamic hate spreading islamofascist Saudi medieval dictator "monarchy".
Persia is probably still waiting for revenge after 1400 years. Is that what Trump had in mind when he applauded Iranians while codemning their muslim leaders?
Klevius wrote:
Friday, May 26, 2017
Will the islamofascist Saud dictator family attack England again during Ramadan?
Klevius question to Theresa May: Do Saudi Salafist values comply with "British values"? And if not, is it really good for England to threaten Russia, which has never attacked England, while having one's worst enemy source, Saudi, as a "close ally"?! Has Klevius missed something...
If you dislike Nazi ideology then you easily qualify for disliking Saudi ideology as well.
Could anything be more worthy of disliking than a bunch of multi billionaire Salafi sharia muslims who use their oil wealth for gaining even more power by bombing their neighbors and spreading islamic hatred over innocent people around the world in a stealthy manner so to be able to "excuse" themselves by saying "it wasn't me who did the bomb or handled the knife, gun, acid, car/truck etc".
Trump lost all respect when he turned from a harsh Saudi critic to an eager supporter of Saudi state (i.e. dictator) terrorism via more or less stealthy channels - hidden behind the very fact that it's a medieval dictatorship. In other words and as so much else in the "islamic world", evil covers even more evil.
At least, Theresa May has been consequent in her love affair with the islamofascist Saudi dictator family. And why wouldn't she. After all, she shares the Saudi view that "sharia is good for the Brits". Only Klevius wonders: Which Brits - the sharia muslim "Brits"? And what about the non sharia English people who respect universal Human Rights equality instead of Human Rights violating sharia? England is a modern sovereign state, "Britain" is a pompous and dangerous colonialist nostalgia term in which sharia "diversity" hides its ugly face.
The islamofascist Saudi dictator family is the core tumor of the cancer spreading from Mideast. Giving additional nutrition to cancer cells is not an acceptable strategy.
No young jihadi mind will ever believe that he's completely off the target as long as the "custodians of islam" preach the same hatred and are respected by politicians like Theresa May and Donald Trump.
The monetary stakes are admittedly high but nothing compared to the Saudi Human Rights violations and its costs. May's and Trump's Saudi politics is just "creative book keeping" and a cynical disrespect for the security of innocent people.
As the Saudi "custodians of islam" having the same Sunni Salafi (i.e. original islam) ideology as the muslim terrorists, that alone should be enough reason to vote out any politician who supports Saudi islamofascism.
However, there's also a much larger problem with the islamofascist Saudi dictator family. That's the Saudi based and steered OIC which "peacefully" promotes Salafi sharia hate all over the world. And with the help of mainly muslim countries OIC has managed to make Saudi islamofascism "ok" via UN by accepting that sharia can be whatever - even islamofascist Saudi Salafist Wahhabism.
Klevius has noted that his hits go down when he writes about the islamofascist Saudi dictator family. How come?
How England as a "British" colonizer created the worst evilon the planet. Of course they weren't aware back then about the monetary effects of oil that would then later multiply this evil.
Does the islamofascist Saudi dictator family already possess more nuke missiles than Israel?
The islamofascist Saudi dictator family funded the Pakistani nuke program and has extremely tight connections with Pakistan re. nuke technology.Klevius suggestion: Israel's fooling around with the Saudis doesn't promise any good for the region - or for Israel itself. So the best thing an Iranian president could do now is partnering with Israel...
* Saudi King Abdul Aziz Ibn SaudIn 1901, Twenty-one-year-old Abdul Aziz Bin Abdul Rahman Al-Saud left Kuwait, determined to fight along-side the British forces against the Islamic state in order to get power over all of the territory once occupied by his pirate forefathers and to extend his occupation over the holy cities of Makkah and Medinah.
In 1902, The Exiled Abdul-Aziz Bin Abdul-Rahman Al-Saud and his gangsters (the Wahhabi movement) stormed Riyadh and shot and killed the Wali (the governor of the Khilafah:Aal-Rasheed) as another gift for Britain. This event marked the beginning of the formation of the pirate kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
1902-1913, After establishing Riyadh as his headquarters, Abdul Aziz proceeded, over the following decades side to side with the British soldiers to loot and kill the soldiers and supporters of The Ottomani Khilafah and he succeeded in many cities.
In 1914, Britain started to send a stream of agents (including William H.Shakespeare, Harry St. John Phil by and Percy Cox) to woo and encourage Abdul-Aziz Bin Abdul-Rahman in her task on the Arabian front. Abdul-Aziz Bin Abdul-Rahman’s campaign was one of sabotage and stabbing in the back, it was never face-to-face confrontation.
In 1915, Britain dispatched an agent by the name of William H. Shakespeare as a close advisor to Abdul-Aziz Bin Abdul-Rahman. The soldiers of the Khaleefah killed William alongside some Wahhabi conspirators.
In 1915, Britain dispatched another agent by the name of Harry St. John Philby, who soon appeared in full Arab dress on top of a camel with Abdul- Aziz Bin Abdul-Rahman as a saudi warrior. Philby was called by Abdul-Aziz Bin Abdul-Rahman the “new star of Arab firmament”. Philby in return described Abdul-Aziz Bin Abdul-Rahman as the Arabs “man of destiny” however Abdul-Aziz Bin Abdul-Rahman was the arch political sell-out, many times offering to sell himself to the British. He once said to Philby, “If anyone offered me a million pounds I would give him all the concessions he wants”.
In December 1915 the Anglo-Saud friendship treaty was concluded. This treaty made the house of Saud an outpost of the British Empire. Britain was given trading privileges and was superintendent of Saudi foreign policy. A guarantee of British military protection and arms supplies ended the Khaleefah’s authority in central Arabia.
In 1916, Abdul-Aziz Bin Abdul-Rahman received from the British 1300 guns, 10,000 rupees and 20,000 pieces of gold in cash.
1917-1926, Abdul-Aziz Bin Abdul-Rahman and his organised Wahhabi gangsters in military style and with the help of the British soldiers succeeded in controlling the Whole of Arabia i.e. Najd and Hijaz.
In On 8 January 1926 Abdul-Aziz Bin Abdul-Rahman ( Known as Ibn-Saud) was self-proclaimed king of Arabia. King Abdul-Aziz was embroiled in discussions with the British representative, Percy Cox, for the determination of the borders of the new entity. The British Public Records described king Abdul-Aziz’s demeaning stature at these meetings “like a naughty schoolboy” in front of Cox. When Cox insisted it was his decision as to the frontiers between Kuwait, “Ibn-Saud almost broke down and pathetically remarked that Sir Percy was like his father and mother who made him and raised him from nothing… and he would surrender half his Kingdom, nay the whole, if Sir Percy ordered. Cox took out a map and pencil and drew a line of the frontier of Arabia”. Surely no Muslim can ever read such a statement except with abject shame at the way the sacred sites of Makkah and Medinah and the land of Hijaaz were put in the hands of a family with such debased and dishonorable pedigree.
1926-1932, King Abdul Aziz Bin Abdul-Rahman (Ibn-Saud) courted the British unashamedly, showing sublime affection towards Britain’s envoys. He offered to put Arabia under their control. For his loyalty to the British crown, like so many other British agents, Ibn Saud was awarded a knighthood (presented to him by his self-proclaimed “father and mother” Percy Cox) and British
documents referred to him as “Sir” Abdul Aziz Bin Saud for many years afterwards.
In On September 23, 1932 the self appointed king, Sir Abdul-Aziz Bin Abdul-Rahman replaced the names of Najd and Hijaaz by the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia and he laid the foundations of the current Pirate state.
Eisenhower and Nixon at Dinner with King SaudIn 1953, The pirate king Abdul-Aziz Bin Abdul-Rahman died.
In 1953, Saud the eldest son of Abdul Aziz Succeeded the throne upon his father’s death and became king.
In 1957, King Saud made the first trip by a Saudi monarch to the United States.
In 1962, Saudi Arabia by special request of the British government sponsored an international Islamic conference, which fostered the Muslim World League, which has its headquarters in Makkah.
In 1964, King Saud Bin Abdul-Aziz died.
In 1964, Faisal Bin Abdul Aziz became king.
King faisal Bin Abdul AzizIn 1971, King Faisal by special request of the British government was a central force behind the establishment of the Organization of the Islamic Conference (the OIC) in Jeddah.
In 1975, King Faisal Bin Abdul Aziz was killed by his brother Fahd (The Who Became the king Afterwards).
King Khalid Bin Abdul Aziz. aIn 1975, Khalid Bin Abdul Aziz became king.
In 1982, King Khalid was poisoned by his brother Fahd .
In 1982, Fahd became king.
King Fahd Bin Abdul Aziz.1982-2005, King Fahd Bin Abdul-Aziz is the pirate ruler of the pirate state of so-called Saudi-Arabia.
2005 – 2014 Until Today King Abdullah bin Abdul Aziz is the Pirate Ruler King Abdullah Bin Abdul Aziz Al Saudof the British Sponsored State of the So Called Saudi Arabia .
The “Royal Family” of Saudi Arabia is the leading champion of all efforts to silence Islam, and to wipe out and demolish its identity. Najd and Hijaaz were the former names of so-called Saudi Arabia today. As everybody knows, Makkah and Madinah are Islam’s place of birth. Makkah houses “Al-Haram Al- Sharif”, and Madinah houses “Al-Masjid Al-Nabawi”, these are known as the “Two Holy Mosques”. The darker history of Hijaaz started with the ruthless, coward, savage and murdering Abdul-Aziz Bin Saud, who established himself as King back in 1932.
With the help of the British, King Abdul-Aziz replaced the country’s name of Hijaaz with Saudi Arabia which is the only country in the world that is named after its Dictator. King Abdul Aziz sexually abused many women, he now has more than 44 known sons and lots of known and unknown daughters. This dark history continues with the so-called “royal family”, and their leader King Fahd, the so-called “Guardian” whose title should be, “The Robber of the two Holy Mosques”, from the Arabic Expression: ” Ha-miha..Ha-ramiha “, which means ” Its Protector is really Its Robber “.
No comments:
Post a Comment