"British" Pakistani sharia* muslim UK Home Secretary Sajid Javid (who brags about not being "a white man") doesn't want to guard the Channel as Brits "guard" the Mediterranean "because then we'd have to bring them to UK".

* His boss PM Theresa May says "sharia is good for the Brits". Sajid Javid calls himself a muslim and as such has to support sharia. Unless of course, he is a "secular muslim" or a "cultural muslim" who doesn't approve of sharia, i.e. an "islamophobe".

Britisharia neo-imperialism: From a Human Rights moral perspective UK is a ship sinking into islamofascism. Islam, not migrants, is the core problem - yet carefully avoided or covered up by "islamophobia" smear and accusations of "racism".

The insidious "Britishness" today suffers from grace political schizophrenia. The British" colonial empire rat has turned into a cornered mouse, now attacked by the very same monster it used for its imperial purpose. Brexit voters voted against sharia islam. However, the "british" Government gave them more instead.

Muslim is an ethnicity that has an ideology that forbids mixing with other ethnicities.

Klevius reality fact check: What these three sharia supporters have in common is that they don't want to talk about the fact that islam is a supremacist ideology that denies its followers from mixing with other ethnicities. Oh, you got a problem with that sentence, dude? Ok, according to any form of sharia islam (start with OIC) and any possible (without destroying islam) interpretation of the Koran, and without abandoning the (officially non-existing, according to historians) extremely violent warlord Mohammad and his dividing of people in muslims and "infidels", the very core of islam is four wives whose children become muslims without anyone asking them, and told that they commit the worst crime against islam if they leave the ideology. So following islam means not to mix with other ethnicities. Which fact, of course, doesn't exclude "relations" with and "tolerations" by other  religions etc. for the purpose of expanding islam's one way influence and growth.

Only the word "religion" covers the fact that sharia islam is a fascistoid movement seen from the perspective of the anti-fascist Universal Human Rights declaration of 1948 which was supposed to stand as the foundation of the United Nations (UN). However, today sharia islam(ofascism) is represented by the biggest bloc in UN, i.e. by Saudi steered and based OIC.

The only "race" allowed to be hated is today "whites" - except, of course those "whites" who lick these haters in their ivory towers, while spitting at the "white deplorables" who happen to live among the jihadi we are told "are no muslims" and the non-"white" ordinary criminals who "just respond to racism".

BBC on Saturday 29 Dec. 2018, filled its entire morning program with black "white" haters as a variant of its muslim "white" haters. And these well established wealthy blacks in England have nothing to do ith poor Africans other than the color of their skin. In every other aspect they are "white" just like Javid Savid - except of course that unlike the white skinned people can utilize and monetize their skin color.

The pattern is the same as always in imperialism. Just consider how islamic slave imperialism progressed via local chieftains who got paid by muslim traders to betray their countrymen and women.

However, original islam didn't even bother to pay but started as a murderous, pillaging, robbing, enslaving and raping racist/sexist supremacist ideology/religion according to historians like Hugh Kennedy, Robert G. Hoyland, K. S. Lal etc.


Klevius wrote:

Sunday, April 07, 2013

Klevius lesson on bigotry and hypocrisy: BBC licking and bowing islamofascism while neglecting islam's victims

BBC, without scruples, again spits on the poor victims of islam, and by denying islam's true nature, paves the way for more!

 A muslim can commit crimes by just following the text in the Koran. Moreover, islam itself won't be hurt because it's always explained away as "unislamic" while the perpetrators are still counted as muslims.

BBC's Edward Stourton invited an imam (would you believe it) in his program Sunday to answer why muslims are over-represented in cases involving grooming and rapes of white underage girls.

In the program Ibrahim Mogra insisted that sex slavery of infidels has nothing to do with islam although islam from scratch has had sex slavery as its main pillar! However, Edward Stourton made no effort whatsoever to even try to ask him about this undeniable fact!?


Ibrahim Mogra who is an imam from Leicester and a leader of the Muslim Council of Britain (MCB) which is a self-appointed umbrella body for Muslim organizations and institutions, and was established in 1997 to help South-Asian muslims and has increased its representation since then to other Muslim groups in the UK: "I am really totally at a loss to see how people (muslim groomers/pedophiles and rapists) who profess to be from the muslim religion can have these kinds of attitudes."

His good Sharia teaching (incl Sharia finance teaching) Pakistani friend Abu Eesa Niamatullah also lives in UK and is critical of too much integration of muslims into the British society. He has also cautioned against the unrestricted involvement of muslim women in public roles, particularly the working environment. Here he reminds me of the pathetic (but dangerous) Swedish convert, homophobe and misogynist state imam islamist Leif Karlsson (aka "Abd al Haqq Kielan") whom Swedish state media continuously uses to sread propaganda about the "peaceful and misunderstood islam".

Klevius comment: If we remove all the racist/sexist muslims from the muslim Umma islam will suddenly become a "very very" small "religion". In fact, it would be necessary to start questioning whether the "Westernized" remains in any meaningful sense may be called islam anymore.

Islam not only proposes enslavement of the infidels but is itself the very product of this racist thinking

Examples from the Koran


Muslims are encouraged to live in the way of Muhammad, who was a slave owner and trader.  He captured slaves in battle.  He had sex with his slaves.  And he instructed his men to do the same.  The Qur'an actually devotes more verses to making sure that Muslim men know they can keep women as sex slaves than it does to telling them to pray five times a day.

The Qur'an:

Qur'an (33:50) - "O Prophet! We have made lawful to thee thy wives to whom thou hast paid their dowers; and those (slaves) whom thy right hand possesses out of the prisoners of war whom Allah has assigned to thee"  This is one of several personal-sounding verses "from Allah" narrated by Muhammad - in this case allowing himself a virtually unlimited supply of sex partners.  Others are restrained to four wives, but may also have sex with any number of slaves, as the following verse make clear:

Qur'an (23:5-6) - "..who abstain from sex, except with those joined to them in the marriage bond, or (the captives) whom their right hands possess..."   This verse permits the slave-owner to have sex with his slaves.  See also Qur'an (70:29-30).

Qur'an (4:24) - "And all married women (are forbidden unto you) save those (captives) whom your right hands possess."  Even sex with married slaves is permissible.

Qur'an (8:69) - "But (now) enjoy what ye took in war, lawful and good"  A reference to war booty, of which slaves were a part.  The Muslim slave master may enjoy his "catch" because (according to verse 71) "Allah gave you mastery over them."

Qur'an (24:32) - "And marry those among you who are single and those who are fit among your male slaves and your female slaves..."  Breeding slaves based on fitness.

Qur'an (2:178) - "O ye who believe! Retaliation is prescribed for you in the matter of the murdered; the freeman for the freeman, and the slave for the slave, and the female for the female."  The message of this verse, which prescribes the rules of retaliation for murder, is that all humans are not created equal.  The human value of a slave is less than that of a free person (and a woman's worth is also distinguished from that of a man's).

Qur'an (16:75) - "Allah sets forth the Parable (of two men: one) a slave under the dominion of another; He has no power of any sort; and (the other) a man on whom We have bestowed goodly favours from Ourselves, and he spends thereof (freely), privately and publicly: are the two equal? (By no means;) praise be to Allah."  Yet another confirmation that the slave is is not equal to the master.  In this case it is plain that the slave owes his status to Allah's will.  (According to 16:71, the owner should be careful about insulting Allah by bestowing Allah's gifts on slaves - those whom the god of Islam has not favored).

Sufism used by the West to destroy islam

Ameer Jama't-ud-Da'wah Hafiz Muhammad Saeed (2006): The directive for the formation of the Sufi Council in Pakistan and the sudden interest in the promotion of Sufism has originated at the White House. US wants to promote Sufism as a counter measure against jihad. Millions of dollars are being spent in the effort to divert muslim attention towards Mausoleums and Mysticism. The US designs to advance Sufism and to duplicate Turkish secularism in Pakistan will never succeed.

The passing of the so called Women's Rights Bill in the National Assembly and the Senate was just an exercise to please Bush.

US is seeking victory over islam by promoting Sufism.

The Sufi Council patronized by Pervaiz Musharraf and headed by Chaudhry Shujaat is receiving its instructions and directives from Washington. The enemies of islam believe that Sufism is an all embracing religion whose members can be muslims, Christians, Jews, or Hindus without distinction and it should be promoted to divert the attention of muslim youth from jihad.

Hinduism and Christianity has played a major role in the promotion of Sufism. Mysticism is also just another name for Sufism and the two are one and the same thing.

The Hindus and Christians have neglected their religious teachings and have sought spirituality in Mysticism by dissociating themselves from normal society and seeking solace in solitude and monasteries. Such dissociation from the day to day problems and escape from them gave rise to secularism.

The enemies of Allah believe they have found a solution in the form of Sufism to lead people away from it and they are spending extensive amounts of funds for the purpose.

There is an ongoing war between Islam and the West and as long as muslims are eager to give sacrifices in the battles of this war the West will never succeed in its nefarious designs.

Here's what Klevius wrote a decade ago:

The root formula of Islam

Slavery+"infidel" racism+sex segregated rapetivism+anti human rights Sharia/apostasy ban.

Why isn't the worst crime ever against humanity criminalized, but instead protected by the very Human Rights Islam opposes?!
Without these evil racist/sexist/fascist extremist pillars and violent terror threats from so called "unislamic"* and confused morons islam is dead!

AND ALL OF THEM ARE UNCONSTITUTIONAL IN A DEMOCRACY BASED ON UNIVERSAL HUMAN RIGHTS! ISN'T THIS EXTREMISM IF ANYTHING?! FREEDOM OF RELIGION CAN'T MEAN PROMOTING DEATH OF FREEDOM!

Slavery (forbidden all over the world except in Koran/islam) - It's well known that islam allows slavery, although perhaps less well known that islam emerged out of the very idea of sponging on institutionalized slavery. This is why Saudi islamofascist dictators, imams etc. terrorists and terrorist supporters still don't understand (?!) that the Koran is completely wrong, not only because it allows slavery but especially in claiming to be some "god's" unchangeable word hence excluding even the possibility of reformation!

"Infidel" racism (forbidden according to the UN declaration on every humans equal value, but a basic tenet of Koran/islam) - The moral cornerstone needed for taking slaves and abusing others. Today this alluring but evil racism is utilized in a variety of topics from the people of Darfur to the West in particular or general.

Rapetivism (globally forbidden because it's not in accordance with the principle that a person's sex shouldn't be used as a regulator of that person's freedom, but a basic tenet in Koran/islam) - Rigid sex segregation for the purpose of abusing by islam confined girls/women as physical and cultural reproducers of as many new Muslims as possible.

Sharia (forbidden in a democracy simply because it violates democracy and, like the other islamic pillars, a bunch of Human Rights that democracy rests on) - Islam's jurisprudence for sex segregated rapetivism, apostasy ban etc. Ehsan Jami (Dutch ex-muslim): "We have an enormous problem with apostasy in islam. We see a lot of problems where people want to leave islam but they can't,"

Apostasy ban (forbidden because it limits a person's freedom of or from religion, but a basic tenet in Koran/islam) - Children (commonly from birth) and adults (commonly via marriage/rape) are forced to become and stay muslims.

These cannot be erased by mere "interpretations" but need deep reformist castration! And in this sense "majority muslims" are tightly connected to Islamic extremism, i.e. to islam itself.