Jeremy Hunt (as interpreted by Peter Klevius): "Britain is a major meddler and cheater on the world stage and intends to remain one!"

U.S.' little sidekick, "global Brexit-UK", represents a boasting, cheating, meddling global security threat to all.

 The 42-year-old Iranian-UK dual national Zaghari-Ratcliffe has been serving home detention in Iran after she in 2016 was sentenced to five years in prison for plotting to overthrow the Iranian government - i.e. what US/UK is working hard to achieve, while protecting the genocides, war crimes and terrorism spreading murderous islamofascist Saudi dictator family.

Jeremy Hunt has written in the Times that for diplomatic protection to have meaning there had to be consequences for Tehran - but not for Riyadh.

“It is not clear to me that there have been any; something that is beginning to make us look weak. We must show the world that if you imprison a British citizen on trumped-up charges you will pay a very heavy price because Britain is a major player on the world stage and intends to remain one. Allowing ourselves to be pushed around like this at the moment of post-Brexit renewal sends the opposite signal.”

Peter Klevius: Big words from a small hypocritical mouth - but not very helpful for achieveing a more relaxed world.


The Foreign Office minister James Cleverly told the Commons the debt was not related to Zaghari-Ratcliffe’s imprisonment.

The shadow foreign secretary, Lisa Nandy, at the time called on the UK government to resolve the issue of the historic debts. She said: “Resolving this issue, which has dragged on for decades where there is a clear UK legal obligation, where the defence secretary has described the UK’s behaviour as ‘un-British’ and ‘obfuscatory’, holds the prospect of putting our relations with Iran on a better footing.”

Peter Klevius comment: A "better footing" is the last thing your US master wants to see.

Iranian officials claim the 42-year-old charity administrator, who worked for the Thomson Reuters Foundation, had been training people to spread propaganda against the country while running a BBC Persian online journalism course.

Btw, WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange, National Security Agency leaker Edward Snowden, and US Army Pfc Bradley Manning are all individuals chased by the US state, not for some criminal acts, but for fighting freedom of information. So what about them Jeremy Hunt?

 

Ron Jones who was tortured by the islamofascist Saudi dictator family: "I have had little support from the UK government. It has shown itself to be more interested in maintaining good trade relations with Saudi Arabia."

Klevius: So English courts chose to defend Saudi islamofascism while ECHR let them do it because of the 'margin of appreciation'. Read Peter Klevius groundbreaking sociological article Angels of Antichrist (1996) to understand this legal device: "The authorized and monopolized interpretations of "the best interest of the child" (created by small and non-representative but strongly influential groups of legislators) has established a powerful and legal child trade system within the social state. (This legal child trade works within the "margin of appreciation" and thus, until now, out of reach for The European Convention of Human Rights)."

 

 

Peter Klevius wrote 2017:

** It's said that the Viking Helsing gave name to Helsingfors (Helsinki in Finnish), Sibbe to Sibbo east of Helsingfors, and Borg to Borgå (Porvoo in Finnish). 'Fors' means stream or waterfall, and 'å' (or 'o' in Sibbo) means creek. Read Origin of the Vikings.

The islamofascist Saudi dictator family and Theresa May demand worldwide criminalizing of criticism of islamofascism.

"Moderate" medieval dictator and likely war criminal Mohammad bin Salman bin Abdulaziz Al-Saud - or whatever, and Theresa May want to criminalize criticism/questioning of sharia islamofascism

The fire of Saudi islamofascism is spreading over the world faster than Human Rights firefighters manage to limit its disastrous effects. This means prolonging of the suffering of sharia islam's victims.

Brexitsharia turning England into the Saudis islamofascist world hub.

Brexitsharia is all about Saudi islamofascism and muslims - for the purpose of islamofascist sharia finance and trade deals with muslim dictators and war criminals.

Every step Theresa May now takes is one step away from Human Rights and towards Human Rights violating Saudi sharia.

Check it out! No matter if it's about Russia or Iran - it's always in line with Saudi wishes.

The new world fascism coming out from 

Theresa May's rhetoric is in an eerie synchronization with that of the Saudi islamofascists.


According to Erdogan and others there's only one islam.

So Klevius asks: If you have a bucket full of ideologies streching from benign to evil, and you want to criminalize criticism of whatever is in the bucket - then which ideologies do you think will benefit the most from your move - the benign or the evil ones?

Klevius, who believes in Universal Human Rights equality, is deeply offended by anti Human Rights sharia muslims and Theresa May's support of Saudi islamofascism. What about you???


When an Iranian citizen is accused by Iran of illegal activities in Iran, then the English parliament and BBC show off everything they can. However, when an Englishman is tortured in Saudi Arabia he gets no help whatsoever.

Klevius wrote:

Thursday, August 24, 2017

Mrs Theresa May thinks Saudi sharia islamofascism is "good for the Brits" - but what about non-muslim EU residents in England?! Not to mention non sharia muslim Brits.

Mrs May hates Human Rights because they stand in the way of Saudi islamofascism and sharia. Will EU residents in the future be ruled by sharia rather than Human Rights?

By getting rid of European Court of Justice (ECJ) she can rob EU residents of more rights than any other group of people in England. Not surprising keeping in mind that London is a muslim city steered by a muslim mayor notorious for defending islamofascists, and that Theresa May is totally under the foot of the islamofascist Saudi dictator family.  

This is why Mrs May used to be so keen on getting rid of the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) - which has ruled (2002) that islamic sharia is against Human Rights - that she (together with Cameron) used fringe exeples out of context to make the people in England believe Human Rights was something bad (compare e.g. that she blamed ECHR for not deporting Abu Qatada etc.). But not a word about the dangers of sharia that Human Rights could protect the English people from.

Mrs May now wants to get rid of the jurisdiction of the European Court of Justice (ECJ) for the purpose of robbing EU residents of their most basic Human Rights.

This would mean robbing EU residents in England from their most basic Human Rights under which they were originally promised to be able to live in England - while English citizens residential in EU would still have their Human nRights protected by ECJ which sorts Human Rights issues in accordance with ECHR.

And for those who naively think that England would still belong to ECHR Klevius wants to remind of what he already in the 1990s wrote about and worked with
namely ECHR's "margin of appreciation" (see e.g. Klevius groundbreaking article Angles of Antichrist, or the cases Klevius as a solicitor brought to ECHR)) which means that ECHR avoids national laws to a certain extent within EU - and much more so with countries outside EU.

Ron Jones who was tortured by the islamofascist Saudi dictator family: "I have had little support from the UK government. It has shown itself to be more interested in maintaining good trade relations with Saudi Arabia."

Klevius: So English courts chose to defend Saudi islamofascism while ECHR let them do it because of the margin of appreciation.