It's not Chinese "Communism" or Atheism but Western "monotheism" (now mainly represented by islamofascism) that is the root problem*
*
The very nature of "monotheisms" is imperialism and colonialism whereas
the very nature of Confucianism is the very opposite. China could have
colonized the world long before the West but didn't do it.
Lying Liz Peek at Fox News: China’s emissions are more than twice those of the U.S..
This
type of anti-China smearing is produced by the West on an industrial
scale for the sake of covering up U.S. accelerating declain.
Peter
Klevius following Liz Peek's twisted logic: U.S.’ emissions are more
than hundred times those of Finland. However, the truth is just the
opposite to what Liz Peek claims, because U.S. is four times smaller
than China which means U.S. emits more than double that of China.
And
because of China's superior infrastructure the per capita emissions
will continue to be much lower than U.S. - especially considering how
much of China's emissions are actually also US' emissions due to China
manufacturing for U.S. consumption.
And what about Trump's and Pompeo's "lab theory"? U.S.' official tin foile hat conspirationalists use UFO tactics: No need for evidence - just keep up suspicion.
Why would a hereto unknown virus on an animal transported to a lab be any different from one transported to a wet market?!
There
was no 'laboratory accident' or 'gain of function'. And what the
military part of Chinese labs do is of course equally secret as U.S.'
(not to mention UK's notorious Portom Down at Salisbury) similar labs.
And when mentioning this one might wonder about U.S. people (why call
them "Americans" - has U.S. colonized all of Americas) who got the
Covid-19 virus (i.e. SARS‑CoV‑2) already in November 2019 - in U.S.
before patient zero at Wuhan.
And
when a Chinese military long time ago said that China has to be
prepared for chemical, biological etc, threats from U.S., it was then
distorted to mean that China planned to attack U.S. with these weapons.
U.S. National Intelligence: “We don't know exactly where, when, or how the Covid-19 virus was transmitted initially but has coalesced around two likely scenarios: either it emerged naturally from human contact with infected animals or it was a laboratory accident.”
Peter
Klevius wonders why stopping with only two "scenarios" - of which one
makes no sense other than as a tool for smearing China?
And why is the first part of Fauci's statement almost always excluded in the U.S. initiated anti-China smear campaign?
Fauci:
"Certainly, the people who investigated it say it likely was the
emergence from an animal reservoir that then infected individuals, but
it could have been something else, and we need to find that out. So, you
know, that’s the reason why I said I’m perfectly in favour of any
investigation that looks into the origin of the virus."
The virus
lacks any sign of 'gain-of-function' or other lab manipulations. So if
it was in or nearby a lab it must have been transported there. Or it
could have jumped from an animal at any stage at any place without
anyone having a possibility to know about it.
Peter Klevius wrote:
No comments:
Post a Comment