Peter Klevius wonders whether DNA vaccines and RNA wannabe "vaccines" are equally poorly anchored as is the impossible out-of-Africa "theory"?

After a second fact check: Yes, they are!

 When Peter Klevius a year ago had to face the choice of being called an "anti-vaccer" or take a DNA or RNA jab, he settled for a compromise, i.e. a single DNA which he considered the least scary because it was associated with a virus - not naked as the RNA-drug. Nothing has changed since, and although the following was available online as late as 1 June 2021 (Received 24 March 2021, Revised 10 May 2021, Accepted 25 May 2021), it's in line with Peter Klevius understanding of the field a year ago. However, what really scared Peter Klevius was research made long before Covid, which showed that cats injected with RNA "vaccine" died prematurely compared to a control group.

There are known events of adenovirus vector or SARS-CoV-2 RNA reverse transcription DNA integration. However, we don't know exactly how rare or what effect they will have in the future.

It's proposed that SARS-CoV-2 infection alone may be associated with integration of viral RNA reverse transcripts, possibly meaning these events therefore could occure in any SARS-CoV-2 infection. However, this is questioned by other research, e.g. 2021 Jul 28, No evidence of human genome integration of SARS-CoV-2 found by long-read DNA sequencing. So the proposed integration may be biased for the purpose of equaling the risk between vaccine and disease on this point.

It's also unknown whether adenoviral gene products could be coexpressed with the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein after injection of vector vaccine. Peter Klevius hopes it does if it enters his genome. At least it would then inform that it's not naked but associated. However, that would also mean that it's useless when encountering Covid-19.

At present, we simply cannot assess the possible effects of the DNA-vaccines and the RNA-drug on the human organism, incl. if they are actually expressed. According to pro-vaccer reearcher Walter Doerflera (Institute of Genetics, University of Cologne) 'the opportunities and risks, both at the same time, remain beyond our expectations'. He continues: 'Clinical observations of long-lasting positive RT-PCR test results involving integration of SARS-CoV-2 DNA into the human genome in the course of some Covid-19 cases make apprehensions about vaccine-associated integration events unrealistic compared to the expected benefits of Covid-19 vaccination.'

Peter Klevius summary of the status of DNA vaccines and RNA drugs:

The "expected benefits of Covid-19 vaccination" (sic). Who expected?!
We "cannot assess the possible effects of the DNA-vaccines and the RNA-drug on the human organism".
Risks "remain beyond our expectations".