When Lady Hussey tried to be "diversity" PC it backfired against Fulani's prejudicial and stubborn 'I'm British' attitude. Does she suffer from inferiority complex?!

 

 BBC has as its main task (except for spreading US/CIA lies about China) to segregate people in accordance with their muslimhood and skin color "diversity" background, i.e. where "their people came from".

 

Lady Hussey: Where are you from, where are your people from? My people are from France.

Ngozi Fulani: I'm British, but I'm proud of my Afrcan heritage.

Peter Klevius: However, according to BBC's way of using words, "her people" are actually blacks, Caribbeans and belonging to "the Windrush people" - and of course "Africans" because according to BBC, all people are from "Africa", and "whites" and "yellows" are just some sort of bastards. Well, as you dear reader know I've convincingly showed that humans evolved in the SE Asian archipelago and the last version, i.e. we, hybridized with big skulled mongoloid (cold adapted) Homos in NE Asia, from where the later version spread and mixed out all other Homos while leaving the racial pattern we are accustomed with today. Real modern Homo sapiens have a head form that differs from archaic Homos, which don't even exist anymore. Just saying cause I'm aware of all the guns loaded with "racist" accusation ammos direćted against me as well.

However, what everyone seem to have missed is the fact just opposite Fulani's claim of "interrogation", i.e. her own stupid answer 'I'm British' which gave Lady Hussey no choice than continue trying to make her understand what she meant, because just leaving would have really left her open for accusations of clumpsy "racism".

Lady Hussey of course just tried to be nice when she saw Fulani's very special attire that indicated some sort of ethnicity, so it must have felt almost like a duty to address this sign of the all important made issue of "diversity". So it had nothing to do with age or racism at all - quite the contrary. And Fulani herself caused it by her clumsy and stubborn prejudicial attitude.

Btw, Peter Klevius is against kingdoms because today they are just theatrical spectacles paid by the people. Real kingdoms were dictatorships like e.g. the Saudi dictator family still today, i.e. a Human Rights violating medieval museum that spreads evil islam based terror around the world while peaceful Chinese Confucian institutes are declared "a threat" like whatever else Chinese - unless of course it's Chinese who spit on China while being compensated for it by the West.

When Meghan, Duchess of Sussex, told Oprah Winfrey in 2021 that a member of the royal household had "concerns" (it was actually the opposite to "concerns") about the color of her son Archie's skin before he was born, Ngozi Fulani tweeted: 'I can't stay silent about this. I admire Meghan for speaking out.' However, the "concern" was extremely well meaning as a "hope" for more "diversity" skin color in the royal house. But Meghan, like Ngozi Fulani, somehow managed to turn it into "racism". 

However, this time the royal family kicked Lady Hussey out instead of calmly trying to heal the situation for both parties. A new royal era?!

Peter Klevius anti-PC Old Nordic etymology: Lady Hussey's "people" came from Viking descendants settled in France called Waldegrave, i.e. Vallgrav in modern as well as old Swedish. 'Wall grave' in the Nordic creole dialect now called 'English' after the pre-Viking age Anglo-Saxons, also from Sweden as described in Beowolf and Hamlet.

The British puppet and its criminal master

Just as in the gang world, a militaristic but tiny puppet country thrives with a powerful militaristic rulebreaking* master. However, if the puppet sees something else, like China, being more powerful than its master then it can't join China no matter how big military power China has because China isn't an aggresive global warmonger like US.

* There simply doesn't exist a bigger rule breaker than US when it 1971 run off with the dollar and continued until now to let the rest of the world pay for its crime. And like most robbers, US is violent and doped its army with stolen dollars. This is also the reason why we today have the schitzophrenic situation that Wall street want to join with China while Pentagon want war with China.

 

Peter Klevius wrote:

 

Monday, March 8, 2021

Peter Klevius honestly* defends UK royalty against falsehood about racism against "colores" people - and on Women's Day still waits for the kiss a true women's knight deserves.

* You can be sure "islamophobe" Peter Klevius would never be awarded a UK knighthood.

How come that when BBC barely opens its mouth without talkimg abot skin color, a well meaning person in the royal house doing the same is declared a "racist".

Meghan brought "falsehood" against the royal family by saying (when Harry wasn't even there yet with her and the interviewer) that some royal(s?) was "racist" by asking if the child's skin would be darker than white. Peter Klevius analysis: There's no way anyone in the royal house would say something like that but highly likely that it was an expression of hope for visible "diversity" among the royals. Yes, it was clumsy in these PC/woke times but not racist.

Meghan also wanted Archie to be a prince against a 100 year old rule and convention just because he's "mixed race", i.e. his skin color would make it "racist" not to do so.

Meghan also complained about not getting royal security - well knowing that was a result of hers and Harry's decision to separate from the royal institution.

Btw, Meghan's decision - against advice by people in the royal house - to repeatedly wear ear rings given by a known Saudi murderer and war criminal dictator isn't a good sign and might well be behind some of the "bullying" controversy.

Posted by klevius at 10:13 AM