Finland's socialdemocratic PM Sanna Marin knows very well that the US backed corrupt extreme right wing marionette dictatorship in Ukraine committed genocide against its Russian speaking population since at least 2013 - long before the Russian invasion!
And how can this immoral monster have the nerve to praise an alleged rightwing extremist neo-nazi Dmytro Kotsiubailo who has participated in the Ukrainian genocide against Russians?!
Mika Paavola, director of Finnish Institute of
International Affairs - aka Nato's branch office in Finland (left)
admiring a notorious antique US bomb plane from the 1950s over Finnish
territorial water - and Finland's PM Sanna Marin hugging corrupt
Ukrainian dictator who is complicite genocide against his own people
(right).
Historical
record shows that Washington has meddled in the political affairs of
dozens of countries—including many democracies. An egregious example
occurred in Ukraine during the Euromaidan Revolution of 2014.
Ukrainian
president Viktor Yanukovych was not an admirable character. After his
election in 2010, he used patronage and other instruments of state power
in a flagrant fashion to the advantage of his political party. That
high‐handed behavior and legendary corruption alienated large portions
of Ukraine’s population. As the Ukrainian economy languished and fell
farther and farther behind those of Poland and other East European
neighbors that had implemented significant market‐oriented reforms,
public anger at Yanukovych mounted. When he rejected the European
Union’s terms for an association agreement in late 2013, in favor of a
Russian offer, angry demonstrators filled Kiev’s Independence Square,
known as the Maidan, as well as sites in other cities.
Yanukovych had been duly elected in balloting that international observers considered reasonably free and fair.
However, the extent of the Obama administration’s meddling in Ukraine’s politics was breathtaking.
Western
leaders made it clear that they supported the efforts of demonstrators
to force Yanukovych to reverse course and approve the EU agreement or,
if he would not do so, to remove the president before his term expired.
Sen. John McCain (R‑AZ), the ranking Republican on the Senate Armed
Services Committee, went to Kiev to show solidarity with the Euromaidan
activists. McCain dined with opposition leaders, including members of
the ultra right‐wing Svoboda Party, and later appeared on stage in
Maidan Square during a mass rally. He stood shoulder to shoulder with
Svoboda leader Oleg Tyagnibok.
Victoria Nuland madetelephone call
in which she and U.S. ambassador to Ukraine Geoffey Pyatt discussed in
detail their preferences for specific personnel in a post‐Yanukovych
government. The U.S‑favored candidates included Arseniy Yatsenyuk, the
man who became prime minister once Yanukovych was ousted from power.
During the telephone call, Nuland stated enthusiastically that “Yats is
the guy” who would do the best job.
Nuland and Pyatt were engaged
in such planning at a time when Yanukovych was still Ukraine’s lawful
president. It was startling to have diplomatic representatives of a
foreign country—and a country that routinely touts the need to respect
democratic processes and the sovereignty of other nations—to be scheming
about removing an elected government and replacing it with officials
meriting U.S. approval.
Washington’s conduct not only constituted
meddling, it bordered on micromanagement. At one point, Pyatt mentioned
the complex dynamic among the three principal opposition leaders,
Yatsenyuk, Oleh Tyahnybok, and Vitali Klitschko. Both Pyatt and Nuland
wanted to keep Tyahnybok and Klitschko out of an interim government. In
the former case, they worried about his extremist ties; in the latter,
they seemed to want him to wait and make a bid for office on a
longer‐term basis. Nuland stated that “I don’t think Klitsch should go
into the government. I don’t think it’s necessary.” She added that what
Yatseniuk needed “is Klitsch and Tyanhybok on the outside.”
The
two diplomats also were prepared to escalate the already extensive U.S.
involvement in Ukraine’s political turbulence. Pyatt stated bluntly that
“we want to try to get somebody with an international personality to
come out here and help to midwife this thing [the political
transition].” Nuland clearly had Vice President Joe Biden in mind for
that role. Noting that the vice president’s national security adviser
was in direct contact with her, Nuland related that she told him
“probably tomorrow for an atta‐boy and to get the details to stick. So
Biden’s willing.”
Both the Obama administration and most of the
American news media portrayed the Euromaidan Revolution as a
spontaneous, popular uprising against a corrupt and brutal government.
A
February 24, 2014, Washington Post editorial celebrated the Maidan
demonstrators and their successful campaign to overthrow Yanukovych. The
“moves were democratic,” the Washington Post concluded, and “Kiev is
now controlled by pro‐Western parties.”
It was a grotesque
distortion to portray the events in Ukraine as a purely indigenous,
popular uprising. The Nuland‐Pyatt telephone conversation and other
actions confirm that the United States was considerably more than a
passive observer to the turbulence. Instead, U.S. officials were
blatantly meddling in Ukraine. Such conduct was utterly improper. The
United States had no right to try to orchestrate political outcomes in
another country—especially one on the border of another great power. It
is no wonder that Russia reacted badly to the unconstitutional ouster of
an elected, pro‐Russian government—an ouster that occurred not only
with Washington’s blessing, but apparently with its assistance.
Peter Klevius wrote:
Friday, February 25, 2022
Why did Finlad suddenly jump for F35 instead of (as palanned) Swedish Gipen? Because Gripen can't carry US new mini nukes!
How stupid and dangerous can Finnish politicians be who try to push Finland into US extended nuke army (i.e. NATO)!
US is 100% to blame for the Ukraine disaster as well.
STOP US (+ its Anglospheric puppets), the worst threat to the world right now!
This monstrous rogue state $-freeloading U.S.:
1. Is adding more than 600 nukes to its already more than 6,000.
Because of smaller size, better transportability, higher accuracy,
and US first strike policy (unlike e.g. Russia, China etc.)
the risk of use of nukes by US has dramatically increased
- especially considering the end of $-hegemony because of China
outperforming it in tech and healthy development.
2. US can at any time read and silence your free speech, or stop your
transaction - wherever you are in the world (except in China).
3. UK/AUKUS bought US mini nukes (e.g. for Trident) and NATO+Finland bought
F35 which can carry them.
Peter Klevius wrote:
This year Peter Klevius cannot congratulate Finland on its traditional Independence Day because it's not neutral and independent any more.
And as US/CIA raped Finland with militaristic NATO (i.e. US) and US nukes (F-35 with s.c. mini-nukes), so does Finland rape the demilitarized Åland.
Finland's
PM Sanna Marin warns (on order from US?!) countries to not trade with
China – New Zealand’s largest trading partner. “We will see in the
future that technologies and the digital environment will only be more
in our societies than now, and we have to make sure that we don't have
that kind of dependencies that becomes vulnerabilities and risks that
will come to realise.
Peter Klevisu: Right! Stop your dependancy of the financial- and war-criminal US!
Peter Klevius to Sanna Marin: Are you dumb or corrupt?! If the former then you may benefit from these facts:
1.
Everything that - since China surpassed US in economy and technology -
now comes out from Uncle Sam's rottening mouth is the wording of a
desperado who doesn't see any way out of its own criminal dollar
counterfeiting (since 1971) other than trying to harm the challenger by
using US financial and militaristic global hegemony and monopoly - and
stupid poiticians of its "allies"/puppets!
2. According to
several US made research the leadership in modern China has by far the
best approval rating from its people compared to other technologically
advanced countries. And it has nothing in common with North Korea but
everyting with US' "ally" Vietnam (which is tiny and much less
technologically advanced than China) when it comes to politics and
government.
3. Chinese leadership has been by far the most
successful when it comes to lifting people out of poverty and improving
infra-structure, both at home and worldwide.
4. China has a privacy law that is equal to that of EU but makes US look like a Medieval dictatorship in comparison.
5.
Islam's biggest and most important global organization OIC carefully
inspected the alleged "Human Rights violations" and "genocide" against
Uyghur muslims, and not only declared them totally unfounded but also
credited the Chinese leadership for its treatment of muslims in China.
6.
China has been most successful in handling Covid by offering (not
commanding) a real vaccine to its people, and especially to those
elderly who are vulnerable. That many elderly have been reluctant to
take it has to do with Chinese traditions and suspicions due to the
vaccine scandals in the West. And the reason the Chinese leadership
didn't enforce vaccination was precisely because of the old Confucian
tradition of respect for the elderly - which we in the West seem to have
abandoned. The rigid Chinese lockdown was the will of Chinese people -
not the "Communist dictatorship" as US/CIA steered media want us to
believe. Against this background it's pathetic that Finland kicks out
Confucian institutes because US ordered it to do so, but has no problem
with islamist mosques and institutes paid by the islamofascist Saudi
dictator family. And to top it all, now China, as the first country in
the world, has developed a recombinant human monoclonal antibody vaccine
that fully protects against all variants; uses own human antibody
cells; has no side-effects; is cheaper then Western vaccines; and can be
taken as a nasal spray - i.e. directed precisely to the first barrier
of defense, which then goes farther and kills the virus already in the
lungs.
7. China, according to US research, is now by far the
world leader when it comes to R&D. Abandoning ties with China will
inevitably lead any country incl. Finland into backwardness in the near
future.
8. The only way for US to stop China from developing even
further and faster is to start a war. That's why US makes every effort
to subvert Taiwan-China and mainland-China ties, by supporting the the
anti-China party against the pro-China party in Taiwan, as well as
militarizing Taiwan itself and the whole of the East Asian territory,
and even pushing for NATO extension against China. Do you Snna Marin
want to support Uncle Sam's own criminal interests and starting one more
war initiated by US?!
9. So dear Sanna, why did you choose Uncle Sam's nukes while abandoning China?!
And the alleged "authoritarian censorship" in China pales in comparison with the West, and should also be seen against the background of US/CIA's continuous efforts to subvert and destabilize China. Moreover, see how US and its puppets brutally faked and distorted information about the opthomologist doctor in Wuhan who wrongly put on the Chinese social media Weibu that Covid-19 was the much more dangerous original SARS virus. After an hour he realized his mistake, and according to the law (as in all Western countries) spreading such possibly dangerous rumors made it necessary for the hospital to report it to authorities. However, after a couple of days the police just asked him to explain and then told him not to do it again. And after that he could in peace continue his work at the hospital without any kind of sentence or fine etc. So how does this fact as well as the fact that he could say whatever he liked on Weibu fit an "authoritarian dictatorship"?! But in the West he was "a suppressed whisteblower silenced by the Communist dictaorship". Similarly, when the unhealthy and dement former Chinese leader Hu Jintao got worse during the long lasting congress and was helped out, the Western media and especially BBC, desperately tried to make readers and listeners belive the poor man was "silenced" by the "dictator" Xi. Same story with the mentally ill "whistleblower" woman, and the "batwoman" etc. etc. the list could go on.
Peter Klevius wrote:
Tuesday, November 01, 2022
Finnish politicians and "experts" lie about US' NATO nukes straight in the face of the Finnish people.
When Newsweek rightly pointed out that 'Finland May* Allow NATO to Place Nuclear Weapons on Border With Russia' it just repeated what Peter Klevius warned for almost a year ago when Finnish politicians made the disastrous NATO decision without asking the Finns.
*
In fact it's inevitable that if Finland really goes through with this,
then the road for US nukes is wide open, no matter if the nukes are
physically there before a conflict or not.
At
the heart of US' aggressive nuke policy is the B61-12 Life Extension
Program with s.c. low-yield (Hiroshima+ size) ground penetrating nuclear
warheads, tailored for stealth attacks with F-35b departing from
countries close to Russian or Chinese borders.
According to the
Helsinki-based newspaper Iltalehti, the bill regarding potential NATO
membership the Finnish government will put before parliament doesn't
include any opt-outs for nuclear weapons.
Speaking to the paper,
defense sources said Finland's foreign and defense ministers, Pekka
Haavisto and Antti Kaikkonen, gave a "commitment" to NATO in July that
they wouldn't seek "restrictions or national reservations" if Helsinki's
application is accepted.
However, now the same Iltalehti has the
nerve to call this information a "fake", and pretends to excuse the
move by writing that 'Finland hasn't asked for nukes'. Well, if you sign
with the Devil which clearly wants to utilize your position as a border
against Russia, and which has produced more than 600 "mininukes"
tailored for exactly those 64 F-35 you were cheated to buy instead of
the Swedish ones that had for long been the plan, then only a fool or a
deliberate lier/cheater would argue as Iltalehti does.
Here's Iltalehti's nutty "defense" translated by Peter Klevius:
Iltalehti's
article doesn't argue that NATO plans to bring nukes to Finland. The
article deals with information according which the government's bill
doesn't explicitly prohibit this.
'Iltalehden artikkelissa ei
väitetä Naton suunnittelevan ydinaseiden tuomista Suomeen. Artikkeli
käsittelee tietoja, joiden mukaan hallituksen lakiesitys ei erikseen
kiellä tätä.'
Peter Klevius: I rest my case! Rest in US nukes, Finland!
No comments:
Post a Comment