Peter Klevius UK election analysis: UK's one-party rule continues under an other name - yet with only a tiny fraction of the people supporting its policy.

"British" election "democracy" is a laughing stock as far from the will* of the people you can get. 

* The party whip crashes some half of the main wishes of its voters. This is why meritocracy widely outperforms "one-party democracy".

This short talk from 2013 eerily holds even more today - yet doesn't address the main problem, i.e.  how the dollar thieve (1971-) US desperation now hurts the West and the rest precisely because of China's meritocratic success!

 Labour got 33.9% of active voters but got 411 seats out of 650.

The combined national vote for the Labour and Conservative parties was 57.6%.

The Conservatives took 23.6% of the active voters and won 121 seats.

Number of overall votes: 6,755,953.

14.3% of active voters gave only 5 seats for Reform. 

12.2% gave 72 seats to Liberal party

66% of voters didn't support Labour.

The lower overall turnout means that despite increasing Labour's vote share, the party secured just 9,686,329 overall votes in 2024, compared with a total of 10,295,912 under Jeremy Corbyn in 2019 - a result deemed a catastrophic failure by many.

Elect and regret: Western "democracies" are vulnerable to the evil influence of $-embezzler (since 1971) US, because the "centrist gravity" erases differences while opening up for powerful political coteries steered by US.

Therefore, dissdent voices are labeled "far" and "extremist" even when thay are not.

Meritocratic, and controlled capitalism supporting modern (after Mao) China is as far from far right and far left you can get.