The images on the August 20, 2023 posting: Peter Klevius congratulates Spain for winning football World Cup 2023 - pure football elegance won over physicality used to be the most popular. However, suddenly they just completely disappeared! So here they are again.
Peter Klevius opposes genital mutilation of children - under whatever name. Don't let sex segregation* hinder girls from leading their lives in freedom in accordance with Art. 2 in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights from 1948.
* Sex
segregation/apartheid is the sexist cultural pressure on girls to behave
in accordance with outdated sex roles - to a point where she has to
choose between mutilating her sex (biology) or her "gender" (relative to
religious or historical views). Do realize that heterosexual attraction
(the "male gaze") is the only biological difference between the sexes
that matters relationally, and therefore should not be pushed on women
without their wish and clear consent for it. In other words, although
Peter Klevius since his teens has strongly felt the power of
heterosexual attraction in women, if he were a woman he wouldn't stand
to be seen as a sex object - a sort of necrophilia - in ordinary life.
This is why (negative) Human Rights are so important, i.e. that no
matter of appearance, age, and sex (or no sex or ambiguous sex) we need
to treat each other as fully human without extra connotations or
prejudices. Yet so little thought about this seems to enter the surface
in these last convulsing years of "gender" stupidities, wher we went
from equal feminism to sex segregated glamour feminism to an extent that
painting one's face with chemicals and wearing what Peter Klevius sees
as the most unsexy, unhealthy and ridiculously stupid high heeled
stiletto "shoes". Peter Klevius wants to enjoy the personhood of a woman
without laughing at her stupid choice of shoes. Moreover, no one should
need to feel being taller (or shorter) than they are. How did we end up
calling biological sex "gender"?! Gender is neither biological nor
distinct, but different and continuously changing in every person and
every particular time and setting.
Peter Klevius wrote:
Peter Klevius congratulates Spain for winning football World Cup 2023 - pure football elegance won over physicality.
After 20+ years blogging with highly intelligent Human Rights based content and groundbreaking scientific revelations, with thousands of postings and images, Google still has monumental problem finding Peter Klevius - while Gimp, Duckduckgo etc. easily find him.
Read Peter Klevius Origin of the Vikings from 2005 - now again available after Google deleted it 2014 and again in February 2024.
See how US stole the world-dollar 1971 - and how China's rise challenges US stolen dollar hegemony.
The US demonized China has nothing to do with the real China, but all to do with US dollar embezzlement that makes it possible for US to spend despite constant trade deficit. US is the world's biggest counterfeiter - and a dangerous loser!
To understand US fear of China (the "China threat"), you need to understand 1) the background, i.e. US enormous 1971 dollar theft and its escalating consequences now, 2) the fact that China is already superior in every area* of tech and science, as well as meritocratic real democracy. Moreover, China has no reason to start wars - while US whole existence (the stolen dollar hegemony) depends on warmongering (militarization), and starting and continuing wars. And to understand how low the US led West has sunk, just consider BBC implying Russia deliberately targeting a children's hospital (why would Russia ask for more negative news?!) while not mentioning with a word Israel's slaughtering in Gaza and West bank the same day - not to mention the more than 40,000 Palestinians already murdered - most of them children and innocent adults!
* Both US and China itself try to downplay China's success - for different reasons.
Watch how US stole the dollar. When Nixon 1971 admitted US dollar theft (while lying it was temporary) said 'your dollar may not give you as much abroad as before", that statement actually defined the amount of US embezzlement, because when the US dollar was no longer pegged to gold - only pegged to the whims of US Federal Reserve - it meant that the world dollar (outside US) had to pay for US deficit. So the Bretton Woods (1944) all world currency dollar that was pegged to gold under the custodianship of the Fed, after the theft 1971 (i.e. US violation of the gold connection) the dollar became split in two: a US dollar covering US deficit, and a world dollar that pays for it - both under the custodianship of US. What the US Fed is doing is controlling both currencies while favoring the US dollar.
US
is the real enemy - and modern meritocratic high tech China is the real
friend for any country that chooses peace and prosperity instead of
militarism, war and misery!
Japan and Spain had the most technical teams in the World Cup - and they should really have met in the final.
Read a recorded timeline of Peter Klevius' original scientific breakthroughs.
Read Peter Klevius Origin of the Vikings from 2005 - now again available after Google deleted it 2014 and again in February 2024.
How much does the allowing of "physical" playing hurt the beautiful game? Yet elegance survives crude body bumping. Lionel Messi 169 cm won the World Cup 2022.
Peter Klevius wrote:
Peter Klevius, the world's foremost expert on sex segregation (sad isn't it) to Jenni Hermoso - and all the world's women: Patriarchal ape behavior is history!
Evolutionary heterosexual attraction (HSA) is biological - as are its targets, biological women - but basic (negative) Human Rights are civilized and human!
Outdated
cultural pushing (rapetivism and sex segregation/apartheid) ape
behavior against the best player (together with Aitana Bonmatí) in the
World Cup 2023.
Luis Rubiales may well have had no sexist
intentions but this doesn't remove the sexist cultural heritage under
which he acted in an emotional outburst because of the convincing
Spanish World Cup win 2023 over England.
Although
disgusting fake media BBC every time repeated "1-0" so to lure its
compulsory fee paying listeners to think it was an even match, fact is
that Spain's playing was in a totally different league above England?.
Spain missed a penalty, had many more chances, completely outperformed
the English players who only manage to get to the ball by being physical
instead of technical - which isn't really what "the beautiful game"
should be about.
* Perhaps
England's women still suffer from (except of BBC and others
footballphobia) the 50 year ban on them playing football - see below.
After all, BBC makes its utmost to play down and demonize football with
exaggerated injury and whatever it can dig up "reports" etc. while
constantly boosting stupid (in comparison) cricket, netball and rugby.
BBC "news" "reports" utilizes whatever reason to fill it with cricket
but not football - especially not women playing football, except of
course when BBC feels it has to, e.g. when the England team with much
more luck than skills (and somehow half-blind referees and VAR) managed
to reach final - and much due to good couching by Sarina Wiegman.
It's
precisely because of football being the world's most multifaceted and
challenging sport (no hands and no tools while handling a round external
object together with 21 other players on a 100mx50m pitch)) that women
were supposed to be "inferior" to men and therefore shouldn't really
play football (see below).
Peter Klevius wrote:
Peter Klevius obituary over the best ever: RIP, the worlds best football player, Lily Parr - and the next best, Pele.
Although both scored more than 1,000 goals, Lily Parr did so in headwind!
No
one can be more vulnerable for female sexual beauty (i.e. heterosexual
attraction - ask women who know him) than Peter Klevius - and no one
male can be more ignorant about sexual beauty when seeing a woman
playing football and on the arena becoming human instead of woman. Just
like the early Christian St. Perpetua who said before she faced death on
the gladiator arena 203 AD: 'And I was stripped (for death), and I
became a (hu)man*', i.e. no longer fettered by womanhood/femininity.
* A time when a man was considered the only fully human.
A sport of nature - or a fact of nature?
Social
convention based on a commonsense reaction to the ‘palpable menace of
sexual desire among all human beings, and, most especially, to the known
seductiveness of women’ (i.e. heterosexual attraction) was, at
Tertullian’s* time, i.e. the latter part of the Second Century, shared
by pagans and Christians alike. According to Tertullian, it was a fact
of nature that women were seductive, and Christian baptism did nothing
to change this fact (Brown 1988: 68, 81). However, we are not informed
why the fact that women are seductive, necessarily should imply
restrictions on her. We might guess that a number of Tertullians
transferred to a modern Western secular city might have diverged in a
similar pattern of opinion as would contemporary people. If women were
defined by marriage, by its sexual and procreative roles and by the
sex-based labor assigned to married women, then their refusal of
marriage might move them into a category that transcended womanhood.
Only in the arena of martyrdom can we view these transcendent women
unfiltered by the lenses of male observers (McNamara 1985:104).
Perpetua, a Roman matron, faced the lions in Carthage on March 7, 203.
She recorded her experience in prison which led her to a new vision in
which all her mortal persona was burned away. An unknown spectator'
possibly (most probably) Tertullian , rescued these documents and
appended an eyewitness account of her death, resulting in an authentic
female voice recording the emergence of her 'autonomous spiritual being
from the cocoon of her womanhood' (McNamara 1985:105). Perpetua
renounced everything that made her a Woman. She stripped away the
emotions and the constraints of the feminine role she had once fully
played. On the night before her execution, she dreamed that she had
entered into the arena to fight the beasts. There she was confronted by a
certain “ill-favored -Egyptian" who challenged her to fight with him.
Also, there came to me comely young men, my helpers and aiders. 'And I
was stripped, and I became a man' (McNamara 1985:105).
At the
foot of the ladder lay a dragon of enormous size, and it would attack
those who tried to climb up and try to terrify them from doing so.
* Tertullian has been called "the father of Latin Christianity" as well as "the founder of Western theology".
Not "women's football" but human's football - or just football*!
*
You don't say about a child that s/he plays "children's football", do
you. If it's a girl you say 'she plays football' and if it's a Finnish
girl you say 'hän pelaa jalkapalloa', where 'hän' is a sexless personal
pronoun (as in most other language families except IE and semitic) and
therefore not translatable to the indoeuropean sex segregated s/he. And
when divided by biological sex then it should also say 'men's football',
right.
As Peter Klevius for long has stated,
evolutionary (i.e. biological) heterosexual attraction (the only
analytically relevant distinction between the sexes, according to Peter
Klevius - and islam) has to be "civilized" in our daily encounters - but
without islamic sex segregation*. And the tool for this was given 1948
with Art. 2 of the Universal Human Rights declaration (the world's most
translated document), which main purpose is to stand as the bedrock not
only for legislation but also as a bulwark against sexism hiding in
culture. In other words, we need to get rid of sex segregation. No
matter of biological sex one should be free to lead once life as one
wishes - which also means that you have the right to appear
"feminine"/"masculine" (whatever that means) without being in any way
criticized by e.g. Peter Klevius - as long as it's not part of
sexism/racism against others.
Lily Parr, the world's by far best* football player ever - no matter of sex!
*
If Marta (six times chosen as the world's best football player) when
she was at her best, had time travelled and played against Lily Parr she
would probably have outperformed her in dribbling although perhaps not
in kicking. However, that's not a fair comparison - just think if Lily
had stopped smoking and got the same training etc. possibilities as
modern top players! And compared to Lionel Messi, who as a teenager was
taken care of by the world's then best football club Barcelona FC, Lily
Parr got just the very opposite - a ban on her putting her feet on any
English football ground for the rest of her career!
Lily Parr was
born in St Helens in 1905 where she as a child learned to play football
in games with her brothers. At 5ft 10ins tall, Lily was said to have a
'fearless streak' and 'robust frame'. As a teenager, her first games
were with her local side, St Helens Ladies.
There was a growth in
interest in women's football in the late 19th century and early 20th
because of the huge popularity of men's football combined with the fact
that so many young women met football playing men in factories etc.
Dick, Kerr & Co was such a factory where women worked making munitions.
When in 1917 office worker Alfred Frankland saw the girls beating their male factory co-workers in an informal lunch-time match, he decided to be their manager, hence unleashing them on the general public, resulting in a game-changing and instantaneous success.
This really shows how sex segregation had kept girls/women back.
Dick, Kerr Ladies F.C. was one of the earliest known women's football teams, and remained in existence for some 50 years, from 1917 to 1965, playing 833 games, winning 759, drawing 46, and losing 28. Nettie Honeyball's team in 1895 was possibly the first.
The matches attracted anywhere from 4,000 to over 50,000 spectators per match. In 1920, Dick, Kerr Ladies defeated a French side 2–0 in front of 25,000 people that went down in history as the first international football game played by women. On the request of female physicians and others the English Football Association (FA) banned women from using fields and stadiums controlled by FA-affiliated clubs for 50 years (the rule was only repealed in 1971). There were 150 women's football clubs in 1921 when on 5 December same year the FA ban was announced.
Dick, Kerr’s Ladies was also the first female team to play wearing shorts.
'Big, fast and powerful', Lily Parr was said to 'take corner kicks better than most men' and she scored 'many goals with a left foot cross drive which nearly breaks the net', according to her profile in a programme of 1923.
There were 150 women's football clubs by 1921 when on 5 December the FA decided to ban females from playing on its members' grounds. As a consequence the women's game declined but Lily Parr and other female players continued to play on non-FA pitches.
Dick,
Kerr’s Ladies became Preston Ladies in 1926. Parr became a psychiatric
nurse at Whittington Hospital but continued to play for Preston, finally
ending her long playing career in 1951.
Why the "beautiful game" is also the hardest to master well
Although
Lily Parr was taller than the average woman, most of the best players
have been below average height, like Pele, Maradona, Marta, Messi,
Modric etc.. However, Ronaldo is 187 cm and a former top player like
Crouch is 203 cm. This just emphasizes the greatness of "the beautiful
game" - a sport that fits everyone, yet is the hardest of all sports to
master because it eliminates tools and hands while keeping the feet busy
with multitasking with running and manoeuvring while also controlling
the ball with the same feet.
The page below in this book made Peter Klevius wipe tears several times
How Sweden was an accomplish to the death of English football for women - and how Lily Parr & Co's heritage created the world's best football team in the 1970s in a forgotten rural setting in Sweden.
Peter Klevius has written a book with an in depth analysis about the history of England's hostility against women playing football. Although Sweden played an important role behind the scene, this has never before been scientifically scrutinized. After all, it's all about supporting girl's and women who want not only to play football but also to lead their lives as they wish without sex segregation sexism.
Many (not you dear reader, but really dumb people) have the strange idea that de-sex segregation means "making women men".
Perpetua (203 AD): 'I saw a ladder of tremendous height made of bronze, reaching all the way to the heavens, but it was so narrow that only one person could climb up at a time. To the sides of the ladder were attached all sorts of metal weapons: there were swords, spears, hooks, daggers, and spikes; so that if anyone tried to climb up carelessly or without paying attention, he would be mangled and his flesh would adhere to the weapons.' Perpetua realized she would have to do battle not merely with wild beasts, but with the Devil himself. Perpetua writes: They stripped me, and I became a man'.
Peter Klevius: They stripped Perpetua of her femininity and she became a human!
The whole LGBTQ+ carousel is completely insane when considering that the 1948 Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR) art. 2 gives everyone, no matter of sex, the right to live as they want without having to "change their sex". So the only reason for the madness is the stupidly stubborn cultural sex segregation which, like religious dictatorship, stipulates what behavior and appearance are "right" for a biological sex. And in the West, it is very much about licking islam, which refuses to conform to the basic (negative) rights in the UDHR, and instead created its own sharia declaration (CDHRI) in 1990 ("reformed" 2020 with blurring wording - but with the same basic Human Rights violating sharia issues still remaining). The UDHR allows women to voluntarily live according to sharia but sharia does not allow muslim women to live freely according to the UDHR. And culturally ending sex segregation does not mean that biological sex needs to be "changed." Learn more under 'Peter Klevius sex tutorials' which should be compulsory sex education for everyone - incl. people with ambiguous biological sex! The LGBTQ+ movement is a desperate effort to uphold outdated sex segregation. And while some old-fashioned trans people use it for this purpose, many youngsters (especially girls) follow it because they feel trapped in limiting sex segregation.
Peter Klevius wrote:
Peter Klevius, the world's foremost expert on sex segregation (sad isn't it): US women were smarter than Kamala Harris! A vagina without a brain isn't enough.
Peter Klevius analysis of the problem with sex segregation: Biological/physical heterosexual attraction* as a career tool may be used by some less capable women to outperform more capable ones.
* The evolutionary forces that resulted in heterosexual reproduction is based on heterosexual attraction (long before we got a brain and culture such as e.g. sex segregation) which means physical - not "romantic" as Google tries to spin it. The opposite to heterosexual is homosexual which is also only physically defined. Everyone, no matter of sex or lack thereof, can have "romantic" relations.
Sperms have no brains but have heterosexual attraction to the egg - and we men are our sperms "sex slaves".
Since Peter Klevius reached puberty (and realized he was biologically attracted to women) he has repeated the question 'why is the more attractive sex so busy trying to make itself more attractive'? And although Peter Klevius possess a well functioning brain it was a no-brainer to understand it was all about sex segregation. Women in general (although not e.g. Peter Klevius daughters) have been fostered to rely on heterosexual attraction (aka "femininity") instead of de-sex segregation (as the negative right in art. 2 in UDHR of 1948 - UN's very foundation - would give them right to).
Many (not you dear reader, but really dumb people) have the strange idea that de-sex segregation means "making women men".
Perpetua (203 AD): 'I saw a ladder of tremendous height made of bronze, reaching all the way to the heavens, but it was so narrow that only one person could climb up at a time. To the sides of the ladder were attached all sorts of metal weapons: there were swords, spears, hooks, daggers, and spikes; so that if anyone tried to climb up carelessly or without paying attention, he would be mangled and his flesh would adhere to the weapons.' Perpetua realized she would have to do battle not merely with wild beasts, but with the Devil himself. Perpetua writes: They stripped me, and I became a man'.
Peter Klevius: They stripped Perpetua of her femininity and she became a human!
The whole LGBTQ+ carousel is completely insane when considering that the 1948 Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR) art. 2 gives everyone, no matter of sex, the right to live as they want without having to "change their sex". So the only reason for the madness is the stupidly stubborn cultural sex segregation which, like religious dictatorship, stipulates what behavior and appearance are "right" for a biological sex. And in the West, it is very much about licking islam, which refuses to conform to the basic (negative) rights in the UDHR, and instead created its own sharia declaration (CDHRI) in 1990 ("reformed" 2020 with blurring wording - but with the same basic Human Rights violating sharia issues still remaining). The UDHR allows women to voluntarily live according to sharia but sharia does not allow muslim women to live freely according to the UDHR. And culturally ending sex segregation does not mean that biological sex needs to be "changed." Learn more under 'Peter Klevius sex tutorials' which should be compulsory sex education for everyone - incl. people with ambiguous biological sex! The LGBTQ+ movement is a desperate effort to uphold outdated sex segregation. And while some old-fashioned trans people use it for this purpose, many youngsters (especially girls) follow it because they feel trapped in limiting sex segregation.
Google's disinformation on heterosexual attraction 20241106:
Google: People who are heterosexual are romantically and physically attracted to members of the opposite sex: Heterosexual males are attracted to females, and heterosexual females are attracted to males. Heterosexuals are sometimes called "straight." Sexual Attraction and Orientation (for Teens) - Kids Health
Peter Klevius: Heterosexual is physical, period! Adding non-physical attributes to a table doesn't change its physicality, does it.
Google: People also ask
Is Sapiosexual the same as heterosexual?
Sapiosexuality means that a person is sexually attracted to highly intelligent people, so much so that they consider it to be the most important trait in a partner. It is a relatively new word that has become more popular in recent years. Both LGBTQ+ people and heterosexual people may identify as sapiosexual.5 Jul 2023
Peter Klevius: Yes, some women and men have been attracted by my intelligence - but some have also thought me being "too intelligent".
Google: Is heterosexual the same as straight?
The word “straight” is often used to mean “heterosexual.” It can also mean “heteroromantic.” Heterosexual means you're sexually attracted to the opposite sex only. Heteroromantic means you're romantically attracted to the opposite sex only.
Peter Klevius: What a sexist nonsense! Why would "romantic" necessitate "heterosexual"?! Saying "heteroromantic" as opposed to e.g. "homoromantic" is like saying "tableromantic" to distinguish it from e.g. "chairromantic". 'Hetero' or 'homo' or 'table' stand for pointed out physical properties. So the only reason 'hetero' is used is to physically distinguish it from e.g. 'homo' etc. physicality, which leads back to a particular physicality rather than e.g. "personromantic". However, behind this confusion is the desperate defense of cultural sex segregation. We live in a world where non physical words like 'gender' now is also used as a synonyme for physical a physical world like 'sex'.
After 20+ years blogging with highly intelligent Human Rights based content and groundbreaking scientific revelations, with thousands of postings and images, Google still has monumental problem finding Peter Klevius - while Gimp, Duckduckgo etc. easily find him.
Peter Klevius wrote:
Peter Klevius, the foremost expert on sex segregation (sad isn't it) defends J K Rowling's Human Right to be a woman.
Read Peter Klevius Origin of the Vikings from 2005 - now again available after Google deleted it 2014 and again in February 2024.
However, as evolutionary heterosexual attraction* (HSA) is (mis)used to uphold backward cultural sex segregation/apartheid in a time when we ought to respect basic (negative) Human Rights, there are two options: 1) to culturally de-sex segregate**, or 2) like Perpetua, get rid of unwanted HSA, by changing one's body***.
*
Heterosexual attraction is the genesis of our existence as sexually
reproducing creatures. However, heterosexual biological bodies have been
culturally generalized into
a problematic cultural sex segregation
that keeps the sexes apart to an extent that the non-biological division
becomes a self-fulfilling "truth".
** Meaning everyone ought
to respect everyone else no matter of sex (art. 2 UDHR), i.e. a sex
neutral approach that doesn't sexify the other.
*** Males as
sperm carriers, are biologically tuned to be attracted by the female
body. However, because Peter Klevius (the extremely normal), since his
teens has been an admirer of the female body, while never been caught
pushing for sex or sexifying women he has met - other than when the
woman invites to it.
The first option seems to be the
only defendable solution. And we civilized men have already passed the
test. We don't need to force ourselves on women, but can treat them as
similar human beings as ourselves, i.e. to have integrity and be
respected.
LGBTQ+ or whatever, is all about defending outdated
sex segregation which has led to the ridiculous situation that we trap
people's behavior to their genitals, and the only escape route is to
"change sex", i.e. to mask one's original sex. "Gender" is a loose and
arbitrary ever changing cultural prejudice on how a certain sex ought to
behave, and at every moment there are endless varieties of what this
cultural sex segregation implies. However, they are always tied to
biological sex in one way or another. Cultural sex segregation is the
very referens point for this unnecessary conandrum.
Islam's
origin and very existence hangs on cultural sex segregation (sharia).
Could that have anything to do with the new Scottish law overseen by
Scotland's muslim leader?
A male can medically get his "male
gaze" removed (but why would he), and a woman can similarly alter her
appearance so not to be a potential target for HSA. But when these twp
meet the problem remains for the woman unless the man has a sign stating
"no HSA".
However, according to Peter Klevius, a much easier and better way is to stop sexifying each other.
Criminalize sex segregation instead of JK Rowling!
Klevius wrote:
Friday, April 18, 2014
Gender schizophrenia
Covering up the world's biggest problem (sex segregation/apartheid) in gender babble - but when will the bubble burst?
Oxford Dictionaries definition of 'gender': The state of being male or female (typically used with reference to social and cultural differences rather than biological ones).However this kind of non sense use of 'gender' is more and more common:
Of course there are no 'gender-bending' insects. If a female insect possesses an organ that can pick up semen from a cavity in a male insect, that has nothing to do with gender at all.
Klevius clarification for his dear but sometimes mildly confused readers:
John Money introduced the distinction between biological sex and gender in 1955. Before his work, it was uncommon to use the word gender to refer to anything but grammatical categories. However. In the 1970s feminists embraced the concept as a distinction between biological sex and the social construct of gender. Today, the distinction is strictly followed in some contexts, especially the social sciences and documents written by the WHO. In many other contexts, however, even in some areas of social sciences, the meaning of gender has undergone a usage shift to include sex or even to replace it. This gradual change in the meaning of gender can be traced to the 1980s. The APA's psychoanalytically contaminated Diagnostic and Statistical Manual first described the condition in the third publication ("DSM-III") in 1980 and this was then followed by the so called 'glamour feminism' which has ever since trapped girls/women in a continuing web of cultural 'femininity' that functions as a barrier against those ("tomboys") who dare to try to escape it - leaving no other options than either to conform or to become a so called "transsexual". Why do people have to alter their biology when we have Human Rights that should give everyone the right to live as s/he wishes without restrictions imposed because of one's sex?
It's also noteworthy that the pathological pathologizing of a girl's wish to be free from sex related constrains (a freedom guaranteed adult women in the Human Rights declaration) is a violation of Human Rights but is made possible because minors (and their parents/custodians other than the state) have no legal say (compare what is said in Klevius' thesis Pathological Symbiosis).
It's still an open question how much this disastrous and monstrous sex apartheid has helped islam (the worst crime ever against humanity measured in deaths and enslavements) to exist among civilized people (compare what Klevius wrote in Rapetivism from Freud to bin Laden more than a decade ago). Evil and Human Rights violating islamic tenets that would have been completely unthinkable two decades ago are now defended!
Peter Klevius wrote:
Peter Klevius' - the world's foremost expert (sad isn't it) on sex segregation - analysis on how it and heterosexual attraction* added to the fame and tragedy of Sinéad O’Connor's life struggle with mental illness.
* Heterosexual attraction (HSA) is
the evolutionary implanted biological drive for reproduction that steers
the sperm to the egg. However, in humans this drive has been added by
various cultural superstructures (incl. language use) we may call sex
segregation (not to be conflated with e.g. sex segregated sports etc.).
As a consequence of sex segregation there has built up a statistical
rift between the sexes due to separated life worlds which then is
"explained" as "feminine" and "masculine" "gender" "characteristics -
i.e. not female and male sex characteristics despite the fact that both
rest on biology.
Read how climate change made human evolution possible in SE Asian volatile archipelago - not on a continent like Africa.
Read how
two craniopagus twins born 2006 solved the "greatest mystery in
science" - and proved Peter Klevius theory från 1992-94 100% correct.
Sinéad Magda Shuhada Sadaqat Davitt Mother Bernadette Mary Marie O'Connor* - a restless multi-identity soul now resting in peace.
*
Why is it that on Wikipedia Cassius Clay is first presented as Muhammad
Ali but Sinead O'connor is not first presented as Shuhada Sadaqat?!
Peter Klevius has since his teens said the obvious, namely that all (biological) women are "gay"*. And although reproduction may follow from a rape, Human Rights respect may not.
*
Quotation marks only to be nice against those who want to call
themselves 'gay' without any real reason to do so. What except for
backward sex segregation and the law hinders people from living as they
like without putting a meaningless "gender name" on it? After all, every
sexual act or thought re. genitalia that isn't triggered by
heterosexual attraction (HSA) can be called 'gay' - even heterosexual
sex. Only males are biologically slaves under this HSA evolutionary
blessing/curse of reproduction, which needs females as its target. This
is why all biological women are biologically "gay". However, historical
sex segregation is a cultural hangover which plays together with HSA in a
sometimes insidious manner that both sexes uphold but of different
reason. However, human - not HSA - always ought to be the default state
between individuals in non-sexual everyday activities. This also means
that a woman can look as sexy as she likes in daily life without
islamist covering that offends others as "whores". It was completely
different a situation in early Christianity when some women chose to
becoming nuns by "marrying Jesus" instead of taking the only other legal
route, i.e. heterosexual marriage. We civilized men have no problem
with HSA, only fun - and we want women to be free from HSA harassment.
No covering of female beauty needed. A morally healthy man - as opposed
to a necrrophilic rapetivist - can only become a slave under lust with
the consent of both parties - i.e. no "pushing" for sex. This is also
why we men need to fully appreciate Art. 2 in UDHR of 1948 instead of
falling for ape behavior and anti-Human Rights ideologies such as, for
example, islam's sharia declaration CDHRI from 1990 which denies women
full Human Rights.
In late 1980s she was a sexy looking
young woman seen through Peter Klevius' and other men's evolutionary
heterosexual attraction eyes - and got extra sexy because of her
baldness which emphasized her feminine body attire. Moreover, her shaved
head was an assertion against traditional views of women, where
cultural prejudice based on sex (i.e. sex segregation) gets mixed with
muddled HSA reactions.
2016 Sinéad O’Connor posted suicidal
thoughts, went missing, and was chased by media on a live blog during
Mental Health Awareness Week.
In 2017, she "freed" herself "of the patriarchal slave names - free of the parental curses."
Peter
Klevius: Actually, she became a "slave" under racist islam, the real
patriarchy based on sharia laws and supported by the largest feminist
movement, i.e. the muslim one. After her conversion to the Human Rights
violating ideology of islam (see OIC's CDHRI of 1990) in October 2018,
she condemned non-muslims as "disgusting" on Twitter. “But truly I never
wanna spend time with white people again (if that's what non-Muslims
are called). Not for one moment, for any reason. They are disgusting,"
she wrote. She had been "triggered" by the "islamophobia" aimed at her,
and that she had been warmly embraced by the islamic community.
Peter
Klevius: Triggered by "islamophobia" and warmly embraced by the islamic
community. Sadly this is also the main inroad for evil islamists, and
perhaps the biggest civilian threat today.
"I wear the hijab when
I feel like it. I'm not at my age, required to wear a hijab. To me the
hijab is the same as when I used to wear a crucifix...it's a way of
identifying yourself with your family in the streets."
Peter
Klevius: Compare this to BBC's bigoted and hypocritical Saudi raised
"diversity" star Mishal Husain who doesn't use a hijab and who doesn't
fast ramadan (but can drink some alcohol) or who doesn't care about
mosque visits etc. Moreover, the hijab in islam is meant for younger HSA
women against the gaze of unrelated men, and in this respect functions
as a spit in the face of none muslim women - and Mishal Husain type
"muslims" get away with it by calling their way "a personaö choice".
However, why then flash "muslimhood" all over the place while licking in
the benefits of this bigoted hypocrisy when considering all the poor
girls and women whose career and life are fettered with real muslimhood.
Peter Klevius wrote:
Friday, March 05, 2021
Peter Klevius: Sex segregated feminism is a dead end* for achieving full Human Rights equality for women
*
Instead of diversifying the sexes, feminism and masculinism lead to
ever more segregation as we already witnessed with the 1990s "glamour
feminism" and emergence of the world's largest feminist "community" i.e.
sharia feminism.
Heterosexual attraction* is the only analytical tool possible to understand sex segregation and sexism - yet
no one except Peter Klevius seems to talk about it (sad, isn't it)!
* Peter Klevius, the foremost expert on sex segregation (sad isn't itÅ: Why is the most important subject, i.e. heterosexual attraction, avoided in sex education? Even a centenary woman who has never been with a man and who happens to have lost every possible female curvature in her body is still imprisoned by the cultural effects (sex segregation) of biological heterosexual attraction (the "patriarchal male gaze" in feminist mythology - but the basis of heterosexual reproduction in evolutionary biology). To analyze the relationship between the sexes only heterosexual attraction (HSA) fulfills the measure. Pregancy, delivery, suckling etc. has no defining bearing for such an analysis of relationship. Part of the answer is that women are complicite in using heterosexual attraction when it suits them while denying it when it suits them. This is why Peter Klevius use to say that chauvinists and feminists have much in common. HSA is biologically implanted in men but unlike what islamists think, doesn't mean men can't control their desire. Islam/OIC stipulates via sharia that women shouldn't have full Human Rights as in the anti-fascist Universal Human Rights declaration from 1948 which clearly states that sex should not be used as an excuse for limiting rights.
Perpetua (203 AD): 'I saw a ladder of tremendous height made of bronze, reaching all the way to the heavens, but it was so narrow that only one person could climb up at a time. To the sides of the ladder were attached all sorts of metal weapons: there were swords, spears, hooks, daggers, and spikes; so that if anyone tried to climb up carelessly or without paying attention, he would be mangled and his flesh would adhere to the weapons.' Perpetua realized she would have to do battle not merely with wild beasts, but with the Devil himself. Perpetua writes: They stripped me, and I became a man'.
Peter Klevius: They stripped Perpetua of her femininity and she became a human!
The whole LGBTQ+ carousel is completely insane when considering that the 1948 Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR) art. 2 gives everyone, no matter of sex, the right to live as they want without having to "change their sex". So the only reason for the madness is the stupidly stubborn cultural sex segregation which, like religious dictatorship, stipulates what behavior and appearance are "right" for a biological sex. And in the West, it is very much about licking islam, which refuses to conform to the basic (negative) rights in the UDHR, and instead created its own sharia declaration (CDHRI) in 1990 ("reformed" 2020 with blurring wording - but with the same basic Human Rights violating sharia issues still remaining). The UDHR allows women to voluntarily live according to sharia but sharia does not allow muslim women to live freely according to the UDHR. And culturally ending sex segregation does not mean that biological sex needs to be "changed." Learn more under 'Peter Klevius sex tutorials' which should be compulsory sex education for everyone - incl. people with ambiguous biological sex! The LGBTQ+ movement is a desperate effort to uphold outdated sex segregation. And while some old-fashioned trans people use it for this purpose, many youngsters (especially girls) follow it because they feel trapped in limiting sex segregation.
Whereas classic sex segregation (read more Peter Klevius below to
better understand the concept) is imposed by circumstances,
religious/cultural sex segregation is what is imposed on girls/women
even when it's no longer necessary. In the latter case women have been
held back by men to an extent where incompetency outside "women's
sphere" increasingly became obvious. As a consequence grown up women
started internalizing this incompetency as "femininity" although the
only true femininity is defined by heterosexual attraction (read Peter
Klevius because you'll find nothing anywhere else so far - sad isn't
it).
From 1979 to 2021 nothing has changed in Peter Klevius public* analysis of heterosexual attraction and sex segregation
* Already as a 14-year old Peter Klevius understood this although didn't publish it before 1979.
1993 Peter Klevius wrote 'Daughters of the Social State', 1996
'Angels of Antichrist -social state vs kinship', 1998 'Warning against
Feminism' (Varning för Feminism). The central theme in these was
criticism against separatism (e.g. sex segregation) that tramples the
individual under the foot of "communities".
2003 Peter Klevius
wrote 'Alternative to feminism'on the web
(http://sourze.se/2003/03/15/alternativ-till-feminism__78142). Peter
Klevius asked one commentor how she could be so sure about what it meant
to be a woman? She answered: "I see it in the mirror every morning".
This
happened about the same time as the Swedish public radio censored half
of what I wanted to say about sex segregation and islam. Today "feminist
Sweden" is the 6th worst country on Earth when it comes to women facing
rape etc. hate crimes based on sex.
Islamic/muslim feminism makes complete sense because like all feminisms it feeds on segregation.
Alternative to feminism
15 Mar 2003
by Peter Klevius, anthropologist without masculinity.
All
feminisms are reactionary and really variants of feminist separatism
because the basic idea is based on difference due to sex.
Pascalidou's
unusually naive and sex-confused column may be seen as a cry for help
for the girls / women who are trapped in "femininity". My own, not too
big daughter went through this period when she as a 7-9 year old in the
1990's played icehockey with the boys and was told that she will not be
as strong as the "boys" but that not all "boys" will be strong and some
girls may become quite strong depending on genetic profile/size, PE
environment, etc.
After this, she has been able to let go of sex
segregation completely in her own life, but of course experiences a
certain limitation when it comes to choosing activities and conversation
topics with "girly girls".
Pascalidou comes from an extremely
sex-segregated culture but grew up during a time when it was much more
common - than the golden age of "separatist feminism" today - with
"Tomboy" girls (what an idiotic reactionary term). In addition, it seems
that she never received the much-needed adult guidance that could have
explained the situation to her. And even though she herself thinks she
was "boyish" and cocky, she probably missed a lot because of her sex -
millions of technical and motoric skill experience that the boys were
not eliminated from because they had the "right" sex.
It's not
enough to play hockey or be cocky. Where a single mother's boy learns
from the other boys, the corresponding girl is not given a chance to
embrace the world of natural sciences and technology. She grew up in one
of the Western world's perhaps most sex segregated socieities where
there were almost watertight borders between the sexes when it really
matters. The exceptions confirm the rule. This was shown, among other
things, in Karin Sandqvist's Dad project, where she demonstrated how
girls with more dad and / or brother contact became more independent and
scientifically interested.
Sure, it's a pity that girls and
women who, due to feminized mothers and welfare state, have been
abandoned in a pink chamber without technology, etc., but it is also
quite stupid to deliberately continuing locking innocent young girls in
this very chamber. Replace the feminist word 'patriarchy' with 'sex
segregation' and the world will be seen in a completely different light.
Personally,
I have absolutely no idea about my own "masculinity" - except that I
find women more attractive than men - and I enjoy it very much. Being
able to talk and act with people without constantly keeping track of
what I or they have in their pants actually feels very liberating.
Let
go of "femininity" and "masculinity" as soon as possible so we can all
move on together! In fact, the world out there has long since abolished
sex segregation and that is precisely why it is understandable but at
the same time idiotic to cling to it. Sex stereotyping is like
nationalism - the less real the more constructed.
The original Swedish text:
Alternativ till feminism
15 Mar 2003
av Peter Klevius, antropolog utan manlighet.
All
feminism är reaktionär och egentligen varianter av särartsfeminism
eftersom grundtanken utgår från olikhet på grund av just kön.
Pascalidous
ovanligt naiva och genusförvirrade kolumn kan ses som ett rop på hjälp
för de flickor/kvinnor som fastnat i "kvinnlighetens" fälla. Min egen,
småväxta dotter gick igenom denna period då hon som 7-9 åring på
90-talet spelade hockey med killarna och fick förklarat för sig att hon
inte kommer att bli lika stark som "pojkarna" men att alla "pojkar" inte
heller blir det samtidigt som vissa tjejer kan bli det beroende på
genetisk profil och miljö, etc.
Efter detta har hon kunnat släppa
könssegregeringen totalt i sitt eget liv men upplever förstås en viss
begränsning då det gäller att välja aktiviteter och samtalsiområden med
"flickflickor".
Pascalidou kommer från en extremt könssegregerad
kultur men växte upp under en tid då det var mycket vanligare än nu
under "särartsfeminismens" gyllene epok med "pojkflickor" vilken
idiotiskt reaktionär term. Dessutom verkar det som om hon aldrig fick
den välbehövliga vuxna vägledning som hade kunnat förklara situationen
för henne. Och även om hon själv tycker hon var "pojkaktig" och kaxig så
missade hon säkert på grund av sin könstillhörighet, miljontals små
tekniska/motoriska upplevelser och erfarenheter som pojkarna inte
eliminerats från eftersom de haft "rätt" kön.
Det räcker inte med
att spela hockey eller vara kaxig. Där en ensamstående mammas pojke lär
sig av de andra pojkarna ges motsvarande flicka inte en chans att ta
till sig den naturvetenskapliga teknovärlden. Hon växer ju upp i ett av
västvärldens kanske mest könssegregerade system där det finns nästan
vattetäta skott mellan könen då det verkligen gäller. Undantagen
bekräftar regeln. Detta visade sig bland annat i Karin Sandqvists
Pappa-projekt där hon påvisade hur tjejer med mer pappa- och/eller
bror-kontakt blev mer självständiga och naturvetenskapligt intresserade.
Javisst,
det är synd om flickor och kvinnor som på grund av mammas och
socialstatens feminiserade uppfostran lämnats kvar i en rosa kammare
utan teknologi etc, men det är också lite korkat att med berått mod
stänga in oskyldiga flickebarn i denna kammare. Byt ut det feministiska
ordet patriarkat mot könssegregering så syns världen i ett helt annat
ljus.
Själv har jag absolut ingen aning om min egen "manlighet"
möjligen med undantag av att jag finner tjejer mer attraktiva än män och
jag trivs jättebra med det. Att kunna prata och agera med folk utan att
hela tiden hålla koll på vad jag eller de har i brallorna känns
faktiskt väldigt befriande.
Släpp "kvinnligheten" och
"manligheten" med det snaraste så vi alla kan gå vidare tillsammans!
Världen därute har faktiskt för länge sen avskaffat könssegregeringen
och just därför är det visserligen förståeligt men samtidigt idiotiskt
att klamra sig fast vid den. Könstillhörighet är som nationalism - ju
mindre verklig sådan desto mer konstruerad.
Peter Klevius wrote:
Tuesday, December 20, 2016
In Peter Klevius Yule* sex tutorial Geri Jewell reveals that "the denial was that the passion David had sexually I couldn't equal", and Michelle Thomson that when her friend raped her "it wasn't sexual".
Klevius: All women are gay*. However, not every woman has realized it as yet...
Women, from a male point of view, have wonderful assess - just like feamale dogs from a male dog's perspective. And not only that, women have the potential to reproduce. And when women are receptive there are usually no lack of providers. So women should really not have anything to complain about in this respect. Other than, of course sex segregation/apartheid.The sperm has to be attracted to the egg in some way. That's biological 'heterosexual attraction'. Testosterone is an important hormone in this task. However, the measurements are not easily compared between men and women because labs tend to (why?!) state the percentage of free testosterone for men, but give a measurement in pg/ml for women. Or the male measurements will be in ng/dl requiring a mathematical conversion for direct comparison to the "normal" range of the opposite sex. The level readings between men and women are so vastly different because the number represents a percentage of the TOTAL testosterone. Women naturally start with a much lower total amount, so 2.5% of 40ng/dl is going to be much less than 2.5% of 800ng/dl in a man.
However, even 20 times more Testosterone doesn't mean a man is necessitated to sex - merely that he is always potentially ready for sex (at least Klevius - the "extremely normal" - is and has always been since his adolescence). In other words, Klevius proposes that we lay to rest the old imposing "dog sex" culture and instead all treat each other as humans, not as sexual beings. However, to achieve this we need to teach young girls (and boys) about the only real difference between the sexes, namely heterosexual attraction, so it won't be confused with sexual acts (which people should of course be allowed to perform without any other restrictions than what the law says added with full and informed consent - just like most other civilized behavior. Moreover, and perhaps most importantly, we need to end the mostly male "push for sex" culture, i.e. dog behavior. Asexuality should be the default state of interaction.
And to avoid unnecessary confusion re. Klevius sex analysis, do understand that unlike physical reproduction in the female body (which is completely independent from the male one), heterosexual attraction needs both sexes although the female one is in this respect the passive one. At this point someone (especially women) might have problem reconciling this with the fact that many women do enjoy sexual acts without possessing the male type gaze for HSA. Klevius then repeats that although all women are gay, not all women do or enjoy sex, which fact should be respected equally as respecting that Klevius has never needed drugs or alcohol for being happy or having good sex, nor has he ever deliberately thrown white pepper around just for the pleasure of sneezing (rest calm, Klevius won't ever criticize you if you do).
And you, if you think this analysis is just Klevius opinion then you haven't understood it at all - read and think again. It's the same logic as 2+2=4.
1 HSA isn't sexual acts per se but a biologically inplanted interest for being attracted to having sex with females. Whereas dogs seem to be more excited by the smell of a female dog's pheromones, human males seem to be more interested in the shape of the female body. In fact, analytically there's no difference between gay sex and hetero sex if HSA isn't a factor (however, it would be enough to term it HSA sex if the male at least think about a physical woman - compare e.g. heterosexual men unknowingly being attracted to males disguised as women).
2 Males have way more potential urge for sex than women because of some 20 times more testosterone. And please, don't confuse this with what Klevius calls "rubbing sex", i.e. just stimulation of the genitals without HSA (compare the case of white pepper and sneezing).
3 Being pregnant and having a baby has nothing to do with sex segregation at all because it's entirely a woman affair.
4 This means that all women, incl. asexual and achild ones ought to be treated equal with males. And as a consequence, this analysis also benefits men who want to get rid of their macho masculinity label as well as those who unnecessarily feel they're lacking one.
Peter Klevius drawing 'Woman' from 1979:
Drawing
(1979) by Peter Klevius. For those Humanrightsophobes with really
limited understanding or blinded with prejudice, do note that the DNA
"ladder" has steel rivets (i.e. strong both for trapping as well as for
escaping), and that the female curvature shadows transgress from below
over painful flames into a crown of liberty.
Perpetua (203 AD):
'I saw a ladder of tremendous height made of bronze, reaching all the
way to the heavens, but it was so narrow that only one person could
climb up at a time. To the sides of the ladder were attached all sorts
of metal weapons: there were swords, spears, hooks, daggers, and spikes;
so that if anyone tried to climb up carelessly or without paying
attention, he would be mangled and his flesh would adhere to the
weapons.' Perpetua realized she would have to do battle not merely with
wild beasts, but with the Devil himself. Perpetua writes: They stripped
me, and I became a man'.
Peter Klevius: They stripped Perpetua of her femininity and she became a human!
The
whole LGBTQ+ carousel is completely insane when considering that the
1948 Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR) art. 2 gives everyone,
no matter of sex, the right to live as they want without having to
"change their sex". So the only reason for the madness is the stupidly
stubborn cultural sex segregation which, like religious dictatorship,
stipulates what behavior and appearance are "right" for a biological
sex. And in the West, it is very much about licking islam, which refuses
to conform to the basic (negative) rights in the UDHR, and instead
created its own sharia declaration (CDHRI) in 1990 ("reformed" 2020 with
blurring wording - but with the same basic Human Rights violating
sharia issues still remaining). The UDHR allows women to voluntarily
live according to sharia but sharia does not allow muslim women to live
freely according to the UDHR. And culturally ending sex segregation does
not mean that biological sex needs to be "changed." Learn more under
'Peter Klevius sex tutorials' which should be compulsory sex education
for everyone - incl. people with ambiguous biological sex! The LGBTQ+
movement is a desperate effort to uphold outdated sex segregation. And
while some old-fashioned trans people use it for this purpose, many
youngsters (especially girls) follow it because they feel trapped in
limiting sex segregation.
Whereas classic sex segregation (read more Peter Klevius below to
better understand the concept) is imposed by circumstances,
religious/cultural sex segregation is what is imposed on girls/women
even when it's no longer necessary. In the latter case women have been
held back by men to an extent where incompetency outside "women's
sphere" increasingly became obvious. As a consequence grown up women
started internalizing this incompetency as "femininity" although the
only true femininity is defined by heterosexual attraction (read Peter
Klevius because you'll find nothing anywhere else so far - sad isn't
it).
Whereas classic sex segregation (read more Klevius to better understand
the concept) is imposed by circumstances, religious/cultural sex
segregation is what is imposed on girls/women even when it's no longer
necessary. In the latter case women have been held back by men to an
extent where incompetency outside "women's sphere" increasingly became
obvious. As a consequence grown up women started internalizing this
incompetency as "femininity" although the only true femininity is
defined by heterosexual attraction (read Klevius because you'll find
nothing anywhere else so far - sad isn't it).
Peter Klevius 1979 poem 'My Friend':
en beröring
ord som diffusa budbärare
speglar en glimt av din tanke
i chifferform redan förvrängda
förrän de blivit sagda
av mig och din förväntan
min vän
A rough translation for those poor uneducated individuals lacking Swedish, the origin of the English language (oh, perhaps you were unaware of English being a Scandinavian* language - my deepest condolences):
* The oldest Swedish is Old Nordic. To call it "old Norse" wrongly associates it with Norway and Norwegian, both of which weren't around as entities until after the Viking age. As Klevius has always said: North Germanic, and probably Germanic per se, was a late IE outcome between proto-Uralic and PIE (i.e. what Klevius use to call "old Finland-Swedish").
A perception (see/se, track/tryck, i.e. see-in-track/synintryck)
a touch
words as diffuse messengers (words/ord, bid-bearers/budbärare)
mirror a glimpse of your thought (think/ing, tank/e)
in cipher form already distorted (fore wronged/förvrängd/a)
before they've been said (sagda)
by me and your expectation (fore waiting/förväntan)
my friend ( min frände, min vän)
Women on sex and work
Actress and comedian Geri Jewell, who has cerebral palsy (witch has not affected her intelligence - only motorics), reveals in a new memoir, I’m Walking As Straight As I Can (alluding to her a-heterosexuality as well as her motoric disability) how much she struggled growing up with a disability and how she wrestled with her "sexuality" (or rather lack of it), and reveals she is a "lesbian", which is a code word for not possessing male heterosexual attraction genes nor same level of testosterone.
Geri Jewell was the first disabled actor to take a lead role in a sitcom and she's gone on to challenge ideas about what is possible. She describes the pressures on her to go into a job suited to her disability and what made her rebel against such restricting expectations
Peter Klevius: Her rebellion against such restricting expectations as created by cultural sex segregation is just stunning - although her escape under an equally sex segregated cover ("lesbian", "gay" etc.) is not. Why didn't she claim her Human Rights as described in the 1948 Universal Human Rights Declaration against fascism, which gives her the right to lead her life as she wishes without having to "explain" it. Or is it because she is an American, and the US Constitution still doesn't give women full equality with men - hence necessitating labels?
No comments:
Post a Comment