* Peter Klevius: Clearly the biggest ever fraud because the Bretton Woods agreement essentially covered the whole world.
Peter Klevius asked US made AI: Isn't US embezzling on the world dollar after 1971 when it violated the Bretton Woods agreement?
Answer by US made AI: It was a response to economic pressures rather than outright embezzlement.
Peter
Klevius: Really! Which court would drop an embezzlement case because it
was caused by "economic pressures"?! US dollar theft 1971 followed an
accelerating "economic pressure" due to the Vietnam war, military race
and space race, which US paid by embexxling from the gold backed world
dollar.
Ron
Paul points to the $-elephant in the oval office that others pretend
not to see: “I can remember it precisely. One Sunday night (1971) I was
sitting in front of the television watching the news come in and oh, a
special news clip. And they put up President Nixon and all of a sudden,
boy, did my eyes open.”
In that televised address, Nixon
announced he had directed then-Treasury Secretary John Connally to
suspend the dollar’s convertibility into gold — a move that effectively
violated the Bretton Woods system.
Ron Paul: “And I said, ‘This is a big deal... It might be one of the biggest things that ever happened in monetary history’.”
The
$-theft marked a sharp turning point. Since 1971, the US dollar has
operated as a fiat currency, meaning it is not backed by anything else
than US authoritarian dictatorship. And because the Federal Reserve can
print money in unlimited quantities, Ron Paul thinks (like Peter Klevius
has warned for many years) that serious consequences now lie ahead.
Ron
Paul: “We’re approaching that time when bad stuff will really be
happening to us because you just can’t print money and lie to the people
forever. It’s all based on a lie and it’s fraud, it’s counterfeit
money.”
When US creates excessive amounts of dollar, its value
inevitably declines. $100 in 2025 had the same purchasing power as just
$12.58 did in 1971.
Peter Klevius: US 55 years of delayed
bankruptcy has built up a timebomb that makes US the most dangerous
country in the world. No matter who is the US president s/he faces the
same dilemma as Trump.
Jeffrey Sachs: And then always in the background, one has to add, British Russophobia, because Britain, to my mind, is madness. It is imperial nostalgia to this moment. Even as Starmer goes down the drain, they put Ukraine as a great national project because they’ve hated Russia since 1840.
Peter Klevius: The UK/US "special bond" rests on inherited pure evil such as piracy, colonialism and war - between the two and the rest of the world.
Jeffrey Sachs: New European
Military Bloc for War Against Russia. Germany is losing its industrial
base, but what Merz is doing is going to possibly provoke a disastrous
war, but leave Germany even farther behind economically. It’s completely
the wrong track.
Peter Klevius: When Western companies cannot
compete with Chinese technology, then they turn to military production
which is protected against competition from China by the US led "China
threat" mantra - while 100% unreliable US outdated militsry tech is
accepted.
* Russia opposed NATO's offensive (nuke) enlargement into Ukraine, and thought it would stop Finland's parliament from deciding for the NATO menbership Marin and Niinistö had initiated. And therefore Russia also in the Istanbul treaty proposal would have accepted Ukraine to keep Dombas as an autonomous region inside Ukraine if Ukraine promised not to join NATO (which nukes would have been the very opposite to Ukraine's promised status as nuke free) and to stop attacking the overwhelminh majority of Russian speakers there and give back their rights that Ukraine's government had taken from them. However, UK PM Boris Johnson - probably ordered by US - stopped this process and asked Zelensky to contiunue the war with UK assistance.
Two Strands Driving Europe Toward Catastrophe, according to Jeffrey Sachs.
So
all of this is to say that I see two strands at work right now. Most of
Western Europe, not so much in this agenda. Eastern Europe, absolutely —
or much of Eastern Europe, the Baltics and Poland in particular,
pushing this anti Russophobic line. Germany, absurdly, tragically,
unaware, self-unaware, now even championing this idea.
So just to
add one coda to this. All of this is to say that at the best we have
the classic security dilemma that Europe is taking defensive steps that
are going to lead to war because they are really offensive in what
they’re doing. But what we see is a complete lack of political and
security imagination in Europe. What started as a misguided project for
Central Europe and for American hegemony has turned into an absolutely
profoundly dangerous European project for remilitarization that would be
the march to war.
No comments:
Post a Comment