Trump's egocentrism only fills the already 1971 made mold of the criminal rogue terrorist state $-embezzler US desperation when now facing losing its stolen hegemmony because of China's success.

However, Peter Klevius wonders whether you* really understand how cheated you are by $-thief US totalitarian finance and media dictatorship and warmongering - and how it robs your country of access to Chinese high tech?

* Absolutely no offense because most people have valid excuses for "not seeing the forest for all the trees".

Alex Lo: A genocidal warmongering nation disguised as a democracy? From its inception to the present, the US rarely distinguishes between diplomacy and war. Today, it has ambassadors working in one-third of the world’s countries, but has special force operators active in three quarters of them

Peter Klevius: Yes, the pathological symbiosis between US and UK made both of them piracy states. However, the 1971 dollar theft planted the seed for a giant step on the rogue state ladder.

Some headlines re. UK's former colony, $-freeloader US desperate attacks on China, the world's oldest civilization. After all, the world's by far oldest pottery was made in China, as was the world's oldest millet and rice cultivation. Although Western definitions of a civilization are deliberately made to exclude China, antone who seriously dig into Chinese prehistory and history, will be convince that everything point to China being more advanced earler than Sumer - and probably also being the source of later development in the West.  

 

Human Rights Watch (essentially a US government organ for anti-China propaganda): 'The Tiananmen Massacre was precipitated by the peaceful gathering in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square and other Chinese cities in April 1989 of students, workers, and others calling for free expression, democratic reform, and an end to corruption. On June 3-4, People’s Liberation Army soldiers opened fire upon and killed numerous protesters and bystanders in Beijing. Chinese authorities have long banned commemorations of the massacre on the mainland. No steps have been taken to provide information or compensation to the families of those who died or to prosecute those responsible for the killings.'

Peter Klevius: Not exactly! Compare text  below which is based on early US sources before the US made history falsification.

Listen to Chai Ling, leader of the Tiananmen riots who wanted to provoke Chinese leadership "to shed blood" while she went to US.

Peter Klevius wrote: 

Media's US led depiction of the 1989 Tiananmen "democracy"* riots in China is as far you can get from the truth.

May 23, 2024

* Even if some of the violent rioters really believed that "democracy" would be better for China, history now tells them how wrong they were. Moreover, just consider dollar embezzler (1971-) US reaction if China had become even stronger technologically, economically, politically and morally (if the latter is even possible for a 1.4 billion country)? That wouldn't have extended US stolen hegemony, right.

$-freeloader US extreme anti-China cognitive, financial, militaristic warfare is made possible with US 1971 stolen world dollar hegemony and is a crime against humanity and most people are too busy/ignorant to understand the danger of the cornered US - but instead fear China which offers best consumer goods, infrastructure etc, without imposing its system as US does! 

 Sadly, many haven't understood the enormity of US financial fraud 1971. And US economists - and some stupid US puppets called "allies" - just "explain" away how US as the only country in the world can prosper and militarize the rest of the world despite constant trade deficit. "We're just so good" is Bloomberg's and others answer!

When US 1971 stole* the world dollar it could manipulate it as it wanted and have the world pay for its trade deficit. However, China is now back and challenges it with superior tech which makes consumers happy. China's capitalist reform got severely hit 1988-89 because of US Feds chock rate increase. That caused havoc in a still extremely vulnerable China on its path out from Maoism.

 * 1944 Bretton Woods "agreement" pegged the world dollar to US dollar which was then pegged to gold under US Feds custodianship. 1971 US was bankrupt and arbitrarily violated the gold connection but kept the custody over the world dollar. Although it hit poor countries the most, China was especially vulnerable because it was in an intensive opening-up trade development following Deng Xiaoping's capitalist reform policy. 

Peter Klevius analysis of the US controlled media massacre of the truth about the Tiananmen square incident by neglecting cause and effect while producing anti-China* smear. 

* No, it's not just CCP! Undemocratic Christian theocracy US uses Sinophobia as synonymous with "democracy", well knowing that the absolute majority of Chinese people don't share the US view on "democracy", although young Chinese in the late 1980s realized the difference in living standard between US and China after Deng Xiaoping opened up the China that Mao had closed. So when US again manipulated the world dollar it hit hard (up to 19% 1989 inflation from 7% 1987) on China's economy. 

 Peter Klevius agrees with Klaus Schwab (WEF) who said "I respect China's tremendous achievements … over the last forty years. China could act as a role model for many countries, but in the end, each country should be left to make its own decision regarding the system it wants to adopt. We should be very careful in imposing systems but the Chinese model is certainly a very attractive model for quite a number of countries." Peter Klevius: Especially for US!

Wu'er Kaixi (aka Örkesh Dölet) Of Uyghur heritage from Xinjiang had a leading role during the 1989 protests.

Peter Klevius: What did he think about the old Uyghur jihad battle cry "kill the Han and the Hui"?

Summary of Peter Klevius Tiananmen analysis: There were two distinct and mutually exclusive groups of protesters who were not distinguishable by their appearance. 

The absolute majority were peaceful protesters. However, the rest were intent for violence, and their leaders even openly admitted that they wanted to provoke PLA to also use violence "so the world could see it". But even this wasn't enough. As crit­ics of Chai Ling’s role in the move­ment point to the infam­ous “last words” interview she gave to US journ­al­ist Philip Cun­ning­ham on May 28, just days before the riots. With the move­ment facing an uncer­tain future, a deeply pess­im­istic and fear­ful Chai gave video testi­mony to Cun­ning­ham in which she described her intention to leave the square, adding “I want to live”. But, other stu­dents would have to stay until the square was “washed with blood,” she said.

Much of the rioters brutality was the result of Beijing’s decision on June 2 to send in unarmed soldiers to clear the Square. The unarmed soldiers  were set upon immediately by rioters around the Square waiting for the chance to attack the soldiers. Beijing’s armed battalions were sent in later.

US Embassy daily reports of what was happening at the time.

The US Embassy report for June 4 notes:

    “the beating to death of a PLA soldier, who was in the first APC to enter Tiananmen Square, in full view of the other waiting PLA soldiers, appeared to have sparked the shooting that followed.”

So it was the rioters, not the government soldiers, that started the bloody confrontation.

State Department chroniclers continue their unbiased summary of events:

    “.. the initial moves against the students suggested to many that the Chinese leadership was still, as of the morning of June 3, committed to a relatively peaceful resolution to the crisis.”

From there we go to:

    “fascinating eyewitness accounts of the disorganized and confused retreat of PLA soldiers from the center of Beijing after their advance on Tiananmen Square was halted by crowds of demonstrators on the morning of June 3.’ ..the soldiers were ridiculed by Chinese citizens and scolded by elderly women who called them “bad boys” and “a disgrace to the PLA.”

On the day after, on June 4, however: “thousands of civilian (rioters - not peaceful protesters) stood their ground or swarmed around military vehicles. APCs were set on fire, and demonstrators besieged troops with rocks, bottles, and Molotov cocktails.”

Media reports confirmed this rioters violence.

According to the Wall Street Journal of June 4:

    “As columns of tanks and tens of thousands soldiers approached Tiananmen many troops were set on by angry mobs … [D]ozens of soldiers were pulled from trucks, severely beaten and left for dead. At an intersection west of the square, the body of a young soldier, who had been beaten to death, was stripped naked and hung from the side of a bus. Another soldier’s corpse was strung at an intersection east of the square.”

Even ABC, later to one-sidedly dramatize cruelties by government forces, describes how in front of the Australian embassy a PLA solder was beaten to death, disembowelled and left with his penis stuck in his mouth.

But those who condemn government violence  at Tiananmen need to explain the seeming hatred of the government among protesters that triggered Tiananmen events .

Chai Ling, like many other Tianamen rioters became Christian and welcomed in US. Listen to her video to measure her bloodthirstiness - and cowardice.

The "tank man" hoax* 

* The photographer used Peter Klevius favorite film camera (before F4) Nikon Fe2. 10 years earlier Peter Klevius bought a Nikon Fe because of its fast (for fill in flash) titanium shutter, which also handled better in cold than Canon's slow and cold sensitive fabric shutter. Moreover, whereas Canon A1 was useless with low battery (which was also really expensive), Nikon Fe (and Fe2) could still do B and 1/90 mechanically. Double exposure and good depth and field control also helped. However, the best thing was the wonderful metering system with both manual and auto relative to each other on the side of the viewer.

Although the "tank man" photo is authentic, its usage is almost never. As Peter Klevius has always said: Cameras never lie - pictures do. And in this case it's the presentation against a background on an extremely distorted Western presentation of the "Tiananmen massacre", that completely eliminates the "hero" against the "evil CCP" mantra - at a time when CCP had abandoned everything Maoist. 

Peter Klevius was first reluctant to even mention the "tank man" in the post because he thought most people already understood the silliness in it. However, a brief check revealed that BBC and other fake media still uses it deeply tendentiously and polemically. According to Peter Klevius, the incident clearly shows that PLA had strong orders to be careful with non-violent people no matter what they did. Otherwise any army would hav just taken the guy for interrogation - as any police would have done in any other country. Moreover, his strange behavior can only be described as either mad or just joking in front of the crowd. There was nothing to "protest" against - or did he want them to park on a normally busy street, or even worse, return to Tiananmen square?! 

1) 5 June 1989 everyone in Beijing knew that PLA wouldn't hurt non-violent civilians. Yes, that happened accidently in the chaotic battle the day before with the rioters who deliberately started the violence (already 3 June) against unarmed PLA soldiers whom they burned alive and hanged etc. That the PLA may have used excessive force is in line with any army in a similar situation. Just listen to Chai Ling and understand how deliberate the provocations from the rioters side were. Btw, also check the Waco siege and similar incidents in US.

2) It didn't happen at Tiananmen square, and the tanks were not going against protesters but just the contrary, i.e. back home.

3) Little, or nothing is publicly known of the man's identity or that of the commander of the lead tank. 

4) An endless list of "theories" have been put forward. Shortly after the incident, London newspaper Sunday Express named him as "Wang Weilin" (王维林), a 19-year-old student who was later charged with "political hooliganism" and "attempting to subvert members of the People's Liberation Army." This claim has been rejected by internal Chinese Communist Party documents, which reported that they could not find the man, according to the Hong Kong-based Information Center for Human Rights. One party member was quoted as saying: "We can't find him. We got his name from journalists. We have checked through computers but can't find him among the dead or among those in prison."

There are several conflicting stories about what happened to him after the "demonstration". In a speech to the President's Club in 1999, Bruce Herschensohn, former deputy special assistant to US President Richard Nixon, alleged that he was executed 14 days later; other sources alleged he was executed by firing squad a few months after the Tiananmen Square protests. In Red China Blues: My Long March from Mao to Now, Jan Wong writes that she believes from her interactions with the government press that they have "no idea who he was either" and that he is still alive somewhere on the mainland. Another theory is that he escaped to Taiwan and remains employed there as an archaeologist in the National Palace Museum. This was first reported by the Yonhap news agency in South Korea.

The Chinese government has made few statements about the incident or the people involved. The government denounced him as a "scoundrel" once on state television. In a 1990 interview with Barbara Walters, then-General Secretary of the Chinese Communist Party Jiang Zemin was asked what became of the man. Jiang first stated (through an interpreter), "I can't confirm whether this young man you mentioned was arrested or not", and then replied in English, "I think [that he was] never killed." The government also argued that the incident evidenced the "humanity" of the country's military.

In a 2000 interview with Mike Wallace, Jiang said, "He was never arrested." He then stated, "I don't know where he is now." He also emphasized that the tank stopped and did not run the young man over.

Cui Guozheng, was an unarmed cook in the 348th Regiment of the 116th Division. He was murdered by rioters because he did not stay close enough with the other troops.

Read how Peter Klevius solved "the biggest mystery in science".

A recorded public time-line of Peter Klevius original research on evolution, consciousness, existencecentrism, anthropology and sociology 1979-2012 - and some thoughts about self-citation  

Read Peter Klevius in-depth research on The Psychosocial Freud Timeline.

Read Peter Klevius Origin of the Vikings from 2005 - now again available after Google deleted it 2014 and again in February 2024. 

Read how climate change made human evolution possible in SE Asian volatile archipelago - not on a continent like Africa. 

Peter Klevius opposite reading and correction of Greenland data compared to researchers biased with climate hysteria.

 Read how two craniopagus twins born 2006 solved the "greatest mystery in science" - and proved Peter Klevius theory from 1992-94 100% correct.  

 Read Peter Klevius thesis Pathological Symbiosis in LVU on how a hoax child-psychoanalytic concept is still used by the Swedish social state to abduct children on subjective grounds.  It also reveals (see email correspondens in appendix) how legislators were lured to pass a Human Rights violating law which was then blinked by ECHR because it was seen as below the "margin of appreciation". 

 

Peter Klevius started as an empty origo/singularity whose existencecentrism (mind) now is the sum of his experience with his surroundings and due synaptic adaptations, while also constituting part of the surroundings of others. A canvas which doesn't have a soul/self of its own but does reflect what it has experienced and adapted to. However, the false impression of having a "self", "free will" etc. rests on language, i.e. the use of the word 'I' which animals and humans without language lack. As a human with language you are in the same position as Peter Klevius, and together we all (incl. non-language humans) make up the total existencecentrism of humankind - and the key to a universal human with (negative) Human Rights without irrational exceptions and impositions. So when Peter Klevius talks/writes/acts, he does so against a background that includes the latest synapses combinations in his brain as well as what his other nerve signals bring to his thalamus from his body and other surroundings. 

Peter Klevius (1981, 1992): The ultimate question ought to be: What is it like to be a stone? There's no difference between human consciousness polished through living, and the "consciousness" of a stone that has been smoothly shaped in streaming water against other rocks, stones etc. It started its "life" as a rugged piece of rock in a mountain and adapted to its life in streaming water down hill, or perhaps as a piece of rock falling on a beach and polished by waves. 

 

How US robs the world

 

. 

 

 

Ron Paul, now at 90, remembers US $-theft 1971: 'One of the biggest* things that ever happened in monetary history.'

* Peter Klevius: Clearly the biggest ever fraud because the Bretton Woods agreement essentially covered the whole world.

UK's fascist* state media BBC today had a long sob report about Afghanistan chidren dying from malnutrition - without mentioning that the West under US dictatorship stopped the money that the Afghan government had lived on for 20 years under US occupation, and froze Afghan assets.

* The most common definition of fascism is anti-communism, initiated by US "Red Scare" propaganda 1917 - two tears before Mussolini's anti-communist fascism popped up in Italy. Media fascism refers to the use of media and communication technologies to promote anti-communist ideologies, manipulate public opinion, and suppress dissent. It often involves propaganda that simplifies complex issues and demonizes perceived enemies. BBC ticks most of these boxes, while ultimately resting on UK's "special relationship" to US. BBC's media fascism rests on US led anti-communism, no matter what the word "communism" stands for, and neglecting the Maoists' persecution of Xi Jinping and his family, as well as the enormous difference between modern communist China and Maoist "Communism" USSR "communism", PolPot "Communism" etc. 

Ironically the same fascist BBC happily uses to lump the democratically elected genocide supporting and war crimes committing US president together with Xi Jinping as  "strongmen", despite Xi Jinping's meritocratic grassroot connection in every aspect is the very opposite to Trump*.

* Trump's, or any US president's for that matter, only grassroot connection rests on continuing US embezzlement of the 1971 stolen world dollar. The allure of the "Greater US" and the "Greater Israel" imperialism.

 Peter Klevius wrote:

Why Peter Klevius and Xi Jinping are both anti-Maoists - and how now desperate $-embezzler US under false flag with impunity is a malign actor that has taken the freedom to act without consequences.

* The world's dilemma: A successful Chinese meritocracy with clean super tech vs a dirty (US as a country is the worst netto polluter - add to this its ~1,000 military basis worldwide which alone stand as the third biggest) and now desperate blackmailing/embargoing/sanctioning/threatening $-thief bully who does it to avoid bankruptcy by continuing its enormous and accelerating embezzlement which started with its $-theft 1971 (violation of Bretton Woods). US Fed is the lonely wolf guarding/printing all dollars in the world, but cares only about (part of) US. Trump now underlines Peter Klevius analysis by threatening other countries to keep supporting the otherwise dying $. And he does so by using the bullying tools US has developed with that very stolen gains from the world-$. However, US can only print $ to a tipping point, defined as when the pain from devaluation of the $ gets unbearable (do understand the difference between the price of a $. Moreover, Chinas accelerating R&D superiority will inevitably force other governments to oppose US and eventually let their people have what they demand, i.e. Chinese high tech, research cooperation etc. China's Maoism was a self-containemnt parenthesis caused by 1) Western efforts to colonize China (which began with the opium war) and 2) a violent, revolutionary Communism that Mao was taught in Paris, which was a far cry from traditional Chinese philosophy - to which Xi is pointing.

US containing of China means blocking other countries access to clean super high tech from China while simultaneously forcing them to buy outdated US militarism.

A recorded public time-line of Peter Klevius original research on evolution, consciousness, existencecentrism, anthropology and sociology 1979-2012 - and some thoughts about self-citation  

Read Peter Klevius in-depth research on The Psychosocial Freud Timeline.

Read Peter Klevius Origin of the Vikings from 2005 - now again available after Google deleted it 2014 and again in February 2024. 

Read how climate change made human evolution possible in SE Asian volatile archipelago - not on a continent like Africa. 

Peter Klevius opposite reading and correction of Greenland data compared to researchers biased with climate hysteria.

 Read how two craniopagus twins born 2006 solved the "greatest mystery in science" - and proved Peter Klevius theory from 1992-94 100% correct.  

 Read Peter Klevius thesis Pathological Symbiosis in LVU on how a hoax child-psychoanalytic concept is still used by the Swedish social state to abduct children on subjective grounds.  It also reveals (see email correspondens in appendix) how legislators were lured to pass a Human Rights violating law which was then blinked by ECHR because it was seen as below the "margin of appreciation".

Watch how Xi Jinping was haunted by Maosim and later turned China into the opposite direction - while reinstalling the world's oldest philosophy.

$-thief US militarism against China of course resulted in China being forced to defend itself - and therefore producing the best modern high tech defense industry.

Will the resulting US self-containment end up like Cuba's US enforced containment*?

 After all, China leads in every high tech sector already, and it's only US blackmailing/embargoing/sanctioning etc. that marginally and temporarily slows it. Unlike Cuba, China's high tech is too attractive to resist. More importantly, China's size, talent pool, and upward trajectory guarantees its continuing acceleration no matter what. 

Containing China doesn't stop a 1.4 billion civilization to continue developing - and leaving the rest in the backwater.

Do realize that China, because of modern tech, is already similar (although more advanced) to most countries in daily life (just ask tourists), and that even a transition to Western style "democratic" ruling wouldn't change anything (incl US behavior)* because of the deep cultural basis of its meritocracy which is rooted in an ancient philosophical tradition that young (compared to China) infighting "monotheist" "multicultural" Western nations lack.

Since 1971 people in US have been lured that US economy is the best in the world. But it's not, it's the worst when seen by those outside US who have been forced to pay for it. 

US 1971 $-theft (violation of Bretton Woods) causes now accelerating $-inflation at the pace of fiat-$ paid by less wealthy US people and the rest of the world. US is the only country able (because of the $-theft) to counterfeit itself out of deficit and debt because it alone dictates the world-$. However, paying US deficit with US fiat while lacking a normal healthy economy where debits and credits are balanced against trade and debt, US has to continue stealing the difference in an accelerating tempo.

US Fed is the lonely wolf guarding/printing all dollars in the world, but cares only about (part of) US and not at all about the rest of the world which has been tricked (violation of Bretton Woods, the petro-dollar deal with Saudi islamofascism etc) to continue using the dollar. This evil game has now become truly poisonous because China's progress challenges US hegemony and therefore even the dollar. Do consider that US is your real authoritarian dictator - not China. Everything you do is not only spied on by US but can also (and already is) be weaponized by US at will. And US will is defined by whether you or your country confirm to it. Donald Trump recently admitted it by threatening that those who abandon the dollar will face sanctions/tariffs etc. This is a gangster state's "rules based order" that has already for long been directed against China, which has no need at all to do the same, quite the contrary because of its superior R&D.

US bullies countries to keep supporting the otherwise dying $. And it does so by using the bullying tools US has developed with that very stolen gains from the world-$. However, US can only print $ to a tipping point, defined as when the pain from devaluation of the $ gets unbearable for enough people. Moreover, Chinas accelerating R&D superiority will anyway inevitably force governments to let their people have what they demand, i.e. Chinese high tech and research cooperation etc.

Peter Klevius, who was kept in slave bondage without a family of his own during his childhood, now understands Xi Jinping, but was completely ignorant about politics while using any extra time for feeding his brain with science, philosophy and history. Xi, on the other hand, was 100% political due to Maoism that surrounded him and destroyed his family. Add to this that Peter Klevius lacks completely Xi's talent to get people listening to him. It may have to do with social position, i.e. although most people consider Peter Klevius tolerant and nice, they immediately stop listening when he says something they consider over his social grade.

Peter Klevius as a child also believed the lie that his mother had abandoned him when he had actually been kidnapped. So he took all the beatings and hard work and disgusting accomodation as a given, somehow blaming himself.

Western critical thinker Peter Klevius is closer to Chinese values - and he thinks most Westerners are if let out of the strangle grip of their anti-democratic leadership and racist/sexist "monotheisms".

Peter Klevius and Xi Jinping are twins; highly intelligent, humble*, down to earth, anti-Maoist football lovers (no dude, not stupid "American" handball).

Sadly, Western "democracies" under US 1971 stolen and now heavily inflated dollar dictatorship can never produce such grassroot meritocratic politicians as Xi Jinping, because the best are destroyed in the election process, and the rest are distorted by media and US lobbyists.

* Yes dude! Peter Klevius is far from wealthy, yet wouldn't change his way of living, clothing, moving around etc. if he was a billioner. Everyone who knows him can tell you that.

The pushing of his name and intellectual bragging is not Peter Klevius but a reflection of West's* distorted (by "monotheisms" and colonialist imperialism) through twisted discursive channels.

* Yes, nothing could be easier than cherry picking bad stuff from China. However, US $-embezzlement problem belongs to a completely different category.

Although true humility avoids pushing for limelight, Peter Klevius realm is the opposite, i.e. cut out from any light - hence explaining his reach for the light switch so to make sure his potential contributions to society aren't missed out. Moreover, Peter Klevius has for all of his adult life tried to be a good example for his children and others in his surroundings. A small but telling example is the fact that although Peter Klevius has lived in 22 different locations (of which only 5 his own), he has never had problems with neighbours (although as young he was so popular that some thought he had too amny guests - although none of them did anything wrong because they respected Peter Klevius), incl. some troublesome ones. I.e. a humility that safeguards against unnecessary conflicts. Peter Klevius has never showed/felt any ego/strive for power but rather cowardly avoided it. However, I can see how circumstances such as Xi's could have flushed me into similar directions. In fact, as a 23-year old Peter Klevius was asked by many friends (and their friends) to step on a perfect ladder of politics, but he cowardly refused.

Peter Klevius foundational humility is perhaps best seen in all his writings about basic (s.c. negative ) Human Rights, meaning that the only true approach to be a humane human is to adhere to the acceptance of every other human's equal rights where local laws may differ but ought to be guided by Human Rights - not "monotheist", fascist etc. segregational supremacism.

The "way" (Tao)

Early on due to necessity Peter Klevius realized that a cheap, used Japanese car in every aspect outperformed his neighbors' new same category Western ones - which fact made him aware of East Asian cultures. Peter Klevius has never been guilty of colliding with other cars, people, or animals (other than a few young birds on the windscreen) yet loved to drive like cracy on dark and slippery Nordic winter roads, or safely outperforming taxi drivers in the city with his old (but beautiful and cool) "rice cup". And when Peter Klevius worked for Finland's broadcasting company YLE he was offered a heavy, expensive Nagra tape recorder with short runtime and sensitive to movements, he saw on the shelf a Sony freestyle cassette recorder (Sony WM-D6 Professional) and realized it could do everything that the Nagra couldn't yet with high quality sound and two hours runtime compared to Nagra's less than 15 min. He also quickly realized the danger of Western TVs compared to Japanese (like Western cars, Japanese TVs extremely rarely failed or caught fire, and Sony had always the best picture). The last Sony (165" 4K 3D) 'bought a decade ago - so the next one will be a Chinese display. Same with watches. For a fraction of the cost of a Suisse watch Peter Klevius could buy a Japanese that in very asppect beat the Suisse one (compare Seiko, Citizen etc.). Same with cameras. A clumsy outdated Zeiss SLR could never compete with a Nikon that cost a fraction! So today Peter Klevius being able to carry the world's best watch (until he gets a Chinese one) which is a decade old satellite controlled atomic Citizen Ecodrive chrograph that never needs a battery or any other attention. Same with his many years old Nikon P1000, the world's by far best alround camera which costs a fraction of a professional camera - which anyway would be impossible as an allround because of weight and clumsiness. Etc. etc. And today Peter Klevius wouldn't even consider buying anything else than Chinese stuff - because the 12 times bigger and independent China has replaced US occupied and steered Japan as the world's techno leader whom no one can catch up with but should rather cooperate with.

Peter Klevius would probably profile himself different in a Chinese milieu - if he could ever penetrate the cultural barrier the West has built against China.

Also, do understand that although no country can be a Utopia, no country should be allowed to be a global desperado as US sadly has become because of its 1971 dollar theft.

 

Rogue state US is now busy continuing its destructive undermining of other countries exemplified  by its and its "allies" use of islamists in Syria and Nato (via EU) in Georgia.

And BBC continues to keep silent about US ban on aid to the more liberal faction of Taliban being the reason why the more extremist took over which meant harsher treatment of women and girls. Instead (otherwise sharia applauding) BBC "complains" about women's rights in Afghanistan and  propagates for more US led interventions - and supporting islamists in Syria.

Read Peter Klevius' recorded public timeline about his original scientific breakthroughs on evolution, consciousness, the dynamics of human societies, sex segregation/heterosexual attraction, psychoanalysis, and sociology.

Read Peter Klevius Origin of the Vikings from 2005 - now again available after Google deleted it 2014 and again in February 2024.

Read how climate change made human evolution possible in SE Asian volatile archipelago - not on a continent like Africa. 

Read Peter Klevius opposite reading and correction of Greenland data compared to researchers biased with climate hysteria.

Read how two craniopagus twins born 2006 solved the "greatest mystery in science" - and proved Peter Klevius theory from 1992-94 100% correct.

How US robs the world since it 1971 by violated the Bretton Woods agreement and then started printing dollar costed by the rest of the world. Relase US fiat bomb by clicking it.

.

Peter Klevius declared* Alex Murdoch, Amanda Knox, and "Skandiamannen" (PM Olof Palme murder) innocent, and media and authorities guilty.

* for details see the old postings below. 

 As the ultimate bias assassin Peter Klevius focuses on notorious cases where the justice system favors  its dislike of the accused rather than the evidence or lack thereof.

 The Alex Murdock case also reveals the arbitrariness and often reliance of a single judge who conducts a civil crowd collected under the weird and outdated jury duty system still popular in US and UK*.

* A recent exaple is Andrew Malkinson who was imprisoned for 17 years for rape despite totally innocent and an other man's DNA found on the victim but neglected by the crown prosecutor.  Malkinson could have been released after 6½ years but was not because he maintained his innocence.

Peter Klevius wrote:

Lynching is back in US! Alex Murdaugh avoided death penalty only because the prosecutors knew they would not then have secured a conviction.

March 05, 2023

 Alex Murdaugh was sentenced on empty "circumstantial evidence" for life for the double murders of his wife Maggie (who the same day on the phone had asked if he wanted 'foot massage') and much loved son Paul (who the same day rode and joked together with his dad).

 
Everything in the big selling Alex Murdaugh case points to a deliberate judicial witch hunt. They took all his assets so he couldn't even pay the bail but was jailed for over a year before the trial - so he was hence hindered from defending himself.

Peter Klevius thinks a similar case but with a white judge and a black lawyer as the suspect, the result may have been different.

Alex Murdaugh may have been sloppier than most lawyers but chances are that his and his fellow lawyers "Ponzi scheme" didn't differ that much from average ones which are perhaps better wrapped. However, that's not murder. Moreover, as exemplified in the housekeeper case below, someone might argue that something is better than nothing, and that only the lawyer's hard won expertice made it possible. These kind of transactions happens legally on Wall street all the time.

After a one and a half year long smear campaign while they kept him jailed for an alleged economic issue, the trial took only a month!

The whole process since before the murders in June 2021 was a long depinberate character destroying smear campaign against an already heavily troubled human being who suffered cocaine addiction and was even prepared to commit suicide to rescue his other son's future.

The murder scene was (deliberately?) completely destroyed by authorities, making DNA, blood, foot prints etc. impossible to recover.

Although the murdered son Paul had got serious threats against him because of a boat accident he had caused years before where one passenger drowned, no effort was made to follow this obvious lead which included Paul's stolen rifle which had been used to shoot Maggie five times, while Paul was shot with a shotgun just yards apart. The guns were never found. Moreover, the very same week but some days before the murders, Paul Murdaugh was facing a hearing in a lawsuit brought by the family of Mallory Beach who died in the 2019 crash in the Murdaugh family boat. Paul was allegedly drunk driving the boat at the time and crashed it, throwing them all overboard.

However, here one has to take into account the Murdaugh lawyer family's notorious reputation of "always getting away with it", and that somebody might have thought of taking the law in their own hands before a possible acquittal.

There are no eyewitnesses. There is nothing on camera. There's no forensics tying him to the crime.

The main circumstantial "evidence" in the murder case was that Alex didn't tell the police that he had also been on the place some time before the murder i.e. 8:44 (Alex voice in the background on the phone video of some dogs), when according to the coroners estimate the death happened between 9:00 and 9:30. Alex called Maggie 9:04 and the police around 10:00 after having come back and discovered the bodies. So as a lawyer he certainly knew what most people know, i.e. that he would be the main suspect. So he chose first not to mention it before the video turned up.

Two semiautomatic guns (rifle and shotgun) were used, and from an angle that didn't match the tall Alex at all. Moreover, why use two guns? And the bodies were just yards from each other.

The muder weapons were never found but the rifle cartridges seemed to match old ones weathered ones  found around the hunting plot, which fact could easily be explained by the murderers using Paul's rifle witch had been stolen long before.

Alex Murdaugh became the individual target for the "privilieged" white Murdaugh family tree. Just compare how negatively it's presented on Wikipedia, while other similar families are presented in much more positive light.

SLED also "reopened" an "investigation" into the "mysterious" 2018 death of housekeeper Gloria Satterfield and "planned" to exhume her body - but never did. And why should they because there was absolutely nothing "mysterious" at all - but only served the witch hunt on Murdaugh. The media tried actively to insinuate for the readers that she died from "violent impact" and mostly "forgot" to mention that she was treated for weeks on a hospital and told staff there that she just tripped by herself (possibly in contact with dogs on the stairs). She later died from pneumonia - possibly partly caused by injury on her lungs after the fall.

Murdaugh represented the clients in wrongful death lawsuits before allegedly pocketing part of the settlement money for himself in a Ponzi scheme (much like U.S. itself) on top of legal fees. In fact, he himself offered the idea to the Satterfields to sue him for wrongful death so they could get some money - which they did - although he took most of it for himself.
 
Shamefully, the only motive to the murders prosecutors could come up with was that Mr Murdaugh’s alleged financial crimes were key to proving his murder case, claiming that he killed Maggie and Paul "to hide his other crimes and scandals which were catching up with him". Rather the witch hunt - i.e. nothing like an ordinary investigation based on assumption of innocence until proven guilty.

Timeline

7 June 2021 – Maggie and Paul were shot dead at the family’s sprawling estate in Islandton. Maggie was shot five times with an automatic rifle and Paul was shot twice – once in the head and once in the chest – with a shotgun. Murdaugh made a dramatic 911 call at 10.07pm claiming he had returned home from visiting his elderly mother to find their bodies.

17 June 2021 – Murdaugh’s brothers Randy Murdaugh IV and John Marvin Murdaugh appeared on Good Morning America insisting their brother was not involved in the murders.

22 June 2021 – SLED announced that it was reopening an investigation into Smith’s death, based on information gathered during its investigation into Maggie and Paul’s murders.

22 July 2021 – Investigators released the 911 call made by Murdaugh on the night of the murders. In the call, he is heard sobbing as he tells the dispatcher “it’s bad” and “my wife and child have been shot badly”. Mr Murdaugh also tells the dispatcher that he hasn’t seen anyone on the property.

3 September 2021 – Murdaugh was confronted by the partners at his law firm PMPED after they discovered he was allegedly misappropriating millions of dollars of clients’ funds. He was forced to resign.

4 September 2021 – Murdaugh was shot on the side of a road in Hampton County. He survived and called 911, claiming he was ambushed in a drive-by shooting while he was changing a tyre on his vehicle. He was treated at a hospital for a “superficial gunshot wound to the head”.

5 September 2021 – Murdaugh entered rehab, announcing he was struggling with a 20-year opioid addiction and that he had resigned from his law firm PMPED.

13 September 2021 – Murdaugh confessed to police that he had orchestrated his own shooting as part of a botched hitman plot. He said he paid Curtis Smith, 62 – a former client, distant cousin and allegedly Murdaugh’s drug dealer – to shoot and kill him in an assisted suicide plot so that his surviving son Buster could get a $10m life insurance windfall. The two men were arrested and charged but Mr Murdaugh was allowed to be released on bond to return to rehab. SLED also opened an investigation into allegations that Mr Murdaugh had been misappropriating funds from his law firm.

15 September 2021 – SLED announced it was reopening an investigation into Satterfield’s 2018 death.

14 October 2021 – Murdaugh was released from rehab only to be dramatically arrested on charges of stealing funds from Satterfield’s family. The family had reached a wrongful death settlement with Mr Murdaugh but said they didn’t receive a dime. They filed a lawsuit against Mr Murdaugh claiming he pocketed the money.

19 November 2021 – Murdaugh was charged with almost 30 counts over the Satterfield wrongful death settlement.

3 June 2022 – SLED announced that it was planning to exhume Satterfield’s body.

12 July 2022 – The Murdaugh family was notified that Murdaugh would be charged with Maggie and Paul’s murders. The same day, Mr Murdaugh was disbarred from practicing law in South Carolina by the state’s Supreme Court.

14 July 2022 – Murdaugh was charged with the murders of Maggie and Paul – two counts of murder and two counts of possession of a weapon during the commission of a violent crime.

20 July 2022 – Murdaugh appeared in court on the murder charges where he pleaded not guilty.

22 November 2022 – Russell Laffitte, former Palmetto State Bank CEO, was convicted of financial fraud charges in connection to Murdaugh’s alleged white collar fraud schemes.

23 January 2023 – Murdaugh’s murder trial began in Colleton County Courthouse with jury selection. Opening arguments began two days later. By this time, Murdaugh was also facing more than 100 other criminal charges over the suicide hitman plot and the alleged white collar fraud scheme where he is accused of stealing more than $8m from clients. He is also facing several civil suits.

24 January 2023 – A judge approved the settlement agreement in the wrongful death lawsuit brought against the Murdaugh family by the Beach family.

23-24 February 2023 - Murdaugh takes the stand at his murder trial and confesses to financial crimes and to lying about his alibi but insists he did not kill his wife and son.

2 March 2023 - A jury convicted Murdaugh of the murders of Maggie and Paul.

3 March 2023 - Murdaugh is sentenced to life in prison.

Posted by klevius at 3:01 PM