It's not Chinese "Communism" or Atheism but Western "monotheism" (now mainly represented by islamofascism) that is the root problem*
* The very nature of "monotheisms" is imperialism and colonialism whereas the very nature of Confucianism is the very opposite. China could have colonized the world long before the West but didn't do it.
Lying Liz Peek at Fox News: China’s emissions are more than twice those of the U.S..
This type of anti-China smearing is produced by the West on an industrial scale for the sake of covering up U.S. accelerating declain.
Peter Klevius following Liz Peek's twisted logic: U.S.’ emissions are more than hundred times those of Finland. However, the truth is just the opposite to what Liz Peek claims, because U.S. is four times smaller than China which means U.S. emits more than double that of China.
And because of China's superior infrastructure the per capita emissions will continue to be much lower than U.S. - especially considering how much of China's emissions are actually also US' emissions due to China manufacturing for U.S. consumption.
And what about Trump's and Pompeo's "lab theory"? U.S.' official tin foile hat conspirationalists use UFO tactics: No need for evidence - just keep up suspicion.
Why would a hereto unknown virus on an animal transported to a lab be any different from one transported to a wet market?!
There was no 'laboratory accident' or 'gain of function'. And what the military part of Chinese labs do is of course equally secret as U.S.' (not to mention UK's notorious Portom Down at Salisbury) similar labs. And when mentioning this one might wonder about U.S. people (why call them "Americans" - has U.S. colonized all of Americas) who got the Covid-19 virus (i.e. SARS‑CoV‑2) already in November 2019 - in U.S. before patient zero at Wuhan.
when a Chinese military long time ago said that China has to be
prepared for chemical, biological etc, threats from U.S., it was then
distorted to mean that China planned to attack U.S. with these weapons.
U.S. National Intelligence: “We don't know exactly where, when, or how the Covid-19 virus was transmitted initially but has coalesced around two likely scenarios: either it emerged naturally from human contact with infected animals or it was a laboratory accident.”
Klevius wonders why stopping with only two "scenarios" - of which one
makes no sense other than as a tool for smearing China?
And why is the first part of Fauci's statement almost always excluded in the U.S. initiated anti-China smear campaign?
Fauci: "Certainly, the people who investigated it say it likely was the emergence from an animal reservoir that then infected individuals, but it could have been something else, and we need to find that out. So, you know, that’s the reason why I said I’m perfectly in favour of any investigation that looks into the origin of the virus."
The virus lacks any sign of 'gain-of-function' or other lab manipulations. So if it was in or nearby a lab it must have been transported there. Or it could have jumped from an animal at any stage at any place without anyone having a possibility to know about it.
Peter Klevius wrote: