It was the fear of Turkish EU membership and/or visa free entry of islamofascists to EU from Turkey, that triggered most of the crucial Brexit votes.
However, these votes were exchanged to sharia finance - which is connected to islamist sharia - and islamists - via Saudi islamofascism.
Mrs May and BBC (Britisharia Broadcasting Co) play cricket jihad in the face of football and Human Rights loving people in England. Pakistan and Bangladesh are muslim countries with most islamofascists - and cricket players. And they play cricket in accordance with how the British colonizers taught them. Is this why Mrs May and BBC are so different from most ordinary Brits - who long since have taken the step up to football? Cricket as one of several tools for creating the new Bristisharia "empire" outside EU and Human Rights?
Islamofascist investment instead of EU investment?
The European Investment Bank (EIB), which is the biggest multilateral borrower and lender in the world, has in total funded £31.3bn of infrastructure spending, entrepreneurship and development in Britain over the past five years. This includes £380m in investment to schools and £345m in hospitals since 2015.
Will the islamofascist Saudi dictator family and its islamist neigbours replace EU money with Wahhabi/Salafi sharia money?
Saudi sharia instead of EU Human Rights?
Sharia finance is directly connected to conservative islam - called islamism only when it delivers its inevitable rotten fruits.When EU laws no longer apply in England (and muslim steered London) it means sharia laws will have much more room (due to the "margin of appreciation") and can avoid ECHR's decision to declare sharia not compatible with Human Rights in Europe. This will have a tremendous effect on the lives and security of people in England. However, Mrs May & Co try to blink this.
While muslim without exception are always considered good by BBC and politicians, EU residents are vilified for the purpose of playing a double deal with the race card.
The rights of EU citizens who have legitimately made their home in the UK (often as a result of the UK begging them to settle for good in the first place) ought to be protected by a body outside the UK legal system because the Withdrawal Bill means that the EU’s Charter of Fundamental Rights will not be adopted into UK law.
Mrs May's and Mr Johnson's confused financial illiteracy.
Labour’s Chuka Umunna said Johnson had already had a chance to vote in favor of delivering an extra £350m to the NHS in February.
“He refused to do so. He promised to guarantee the rights of EU citizens living in Britain, and nothing has happened. No one can trust a word he says,” said Umunna.
“The £350m a week promise was a fib, and there is absolutely no chance of it being delivered. Boris should be apologising for his disgraceful conduct in the referendum, not continually making the same impossible promises.”
No comments:
Post a Comment