Every country - and especially UK - needs decoupling, or at least de-risking from $-embezzler (1971-) US, which gets more dangerous and desperate at the pace of China's accelerating R&D superiority! To continue its criminal abuse of its dollar and military against even its "allies" US has not only full monopolistic hegemony over the dollar but also over ALL www (incl. access to ALL personal data), which it will no doubt weaponize against the world instead of making bankruptcy when the trust in dollar stops (because at some point China won't accept the dollar anymore in exchange for world leading products). Trust bias free Peter Klevius who sadly doesn't know* a single Chinese and has never visited the country - which is a problem for US evil tentacles. Decoupling from US until it gets its criminal record fixed, is in the best interest of the world (incl. most US people). * As of Oct 2024. And the real problem is that in the many countries Peter Klevius has the right to stay, you never know if a Chinese is "approved" (i.e. in effect anti-China) or a "suspected spy for CCP", i.e. whatever except anti-China. Some 100 million Chinese are party members (i.e. actively supporting the democratic meritocracy that has proven superior in China's gigantic success), so knowing a Chinese who happens to know some family member or friend of a meritocrat, might be enough for "suspicion". Peter Klevius wonders how hard is it to understand that we in the West now are ruled by a US dictated neo-fascism using the old but empty slogan of anti-Communism - which in WW2 caused the majority of Holocaust victims to be Communists (incl. many Jewish Commnists).

How US stole the world-dollar

Sanction US! Nixon 1971, after having admitted stealing the dollar , also admitted that 'if you go abroad the dollar will give you less than before'. Peter Klevius: This difference is what US has stolen from the world - now in an accelerating tempo! Do BBC's Sarah Montague & Co really understand this?!
China is by far the best for consumers. That’s why $-freeloader (1971-) US wants to block it so to prolong US stolen $-hegemony. China has no reason to harm its trade – US has! Google, Facebook etc. are now directly connected to US military and spy organizations – i.e what US wrongly accuses Tik Tok for. Forget everything you’ve heard about China through US controlled/influenced media (incl. BBC which, before Tianamen 35 anniversary, sent senseless anti-China hate ranting lies in 10 acts). Sadly, it’s almost impossible to get balanced info about China in the West. This blog - which is almost invisible on Google but visible on duckduckgo - is deliberately on Google precisely to show 1) that US "freedom of expression" is a farse*, and 2) to leave a historical track of US criminal behavior and extreme censorship and falsification of the truth, which chokes the minds with steered ignorance in ordinary busy people who don't have a chance to really check it out. After all, whom do you trust, an anonyme blogger like Peter Klevius, or US, "the mighty defender of freedom, Western values, and the rules based world order". Simply by declaring what Klaus Schwab calls “a model country” a “threat”, US dictates its “allies” to do the same – in the face of tho people who want more Chinese tech and less hate against Chinese people. Moreover, Peter Klevius wonders whether China really would have been better off with the "democracy" protesters in China 1989 asked for, than the meritocratic high tech and on controlled capitalism resting post-Mao China we see today? And if so, then how would $-embezzler (1971-) US have reacted when "undemocratic"* China is already now seen as a "threat" against US stolen $-hegemony? According to research Chinese meritocracy reaches the will of the people much better than US "democracy"! * Google has to pretend being "fair", yet cunningly uses its algorithms and censoring power to suppress what its real master, the US militant oligarchy doesn't like - no matter how logically or morally correct and Human Right it is.

Peter Klevius: We live in a black hole from where nothing can escape - not even Hawking radiation.

Peter Klevius religion tutorial: The racist/sexist curse of "monotheism" has as many "gods" as "believers". Even though the seed for Zoroastrianism and Ahura Mazda (the intelligent deity) originally came from China (e.g. the Yellow Emperor), it got distorted into the "chosen people" policy where Jews slaughtered the Canaanites, and Christians and muslims slaughtered Jews. So although Judaism came from Iranians and islam from Arabs, US 1971 $-embezzlement led to US supporting both Zionism and the islamist Saudi dictator family (petrodollar). Because of the evil and illogical origin of "monotheisms", PC West tries to blur the concept of 'religion' by 1) including non-monotheist "religions", while 2) still pushing for "monotheism" as the supremacist religion, so to fit US anti-China agenda. But all other s.c. "religions" are Atheist because they lack the "monogod" mantra - which shouldn't of course be conflated with supreme "deities", "forces", "spirits" etc. concepts residing inside our existencecentrism. Most people have always understood that humans aren't almighty (P. Klevius 1992:21). However, "monotheists" "believe" they somehow belong to something "outside" our existencecentrism, which is impossible. Whatever you believe resides inside your existencecentrism while having no access out of it. You may call the world the "observable universe" where you can "observe" whatever "belief" you come up with. Chinese Taoism understood this long before the "monotheism" fallacy came about. And while our existencecentrism is a mess of changes, it's nonsense to think of a "way out". Islam underscores this and, unlike Moses (who even "wrestled" with "god"), therefore Muhammad wasn't allowed to meet with "Allah" but only with his (yes, "his") messenger Gabriel. "God willing" is a handy reflection of the impossibility to talk about "god" because then you don't need to explain why "god" treated his good servants badly. Our existencecentrism limits us from the "external world" to which we can never have access. So trying to imagine or believe something beyond one's existencecentrism just bounces back. The wildest made up fantasies are no different from "believing in something beyond human understanding" because this is just an other internal concept. But to admit our existencecentrism by saying 'there's nothing outside it' is not a statement about the unknown which, of course, cannot be talked about, not even with the word 'nothing', which that can only be defined and used internally. However, "smart" "monotheists" avoid "god" and make up alleged "positives", but by doing so just keep fueling the orthodoxy they tried to avoid. It's not "free world vs CCP" but US militant theocracy vs Atheist super tech. US more than any other country subsidies everything with Feds stolen (since the world's biggest embezzlement started 1971) fiat money. US authoritarian military kleptocracy blocks US people from buying their dreams. The desperate* dictatorship puts 100% tax on those cars etc. people are most likely to want to buy. * Peter Klevius has nothing against US people but is worried about how US antidemocratic, rules making and breaking order, and desperate fear of losing its hegemony will negatively continue to affect the world. This is why Google (linked to Washington) suppresses Peter Klevius on the webb. Can't even find him despite 20 years of thousands of postings and pics on Blogger!


How US robs the world

Trying to understand the polarizing and warmongering without incl. the consequences of US 1971 $-theft - which are now coming home to roost because of China's superior R&D - is an equation without an x. From a pro-war politician's mouth always comes a copy of the original in US. US inflamed the existing racial tensions in Ukraine for the purpose of getting US nukes and US anti-nuke missiles on Russia's border, so to protect itself in its planned war against China - because only by creating a similar chaos as in WW2 on the Eurasian continent would US be able to continue its stolen dollar hegemony.

How US stole the world-dollar 1971

From US "exorbitant dollar privilege" (financial abuse of vulnerable countries - but the dollar still connected to gold) 1944-, to US financial fraud 1971- (US self-indulgent disconnection of the dollar value from gold after having spent too much on wars and space race etc.). US' "China threat" demonizing is now code for US own threat, i.e. US masking its own desperation when losing its 1971- stolen dollar hegemony because of China's growing high tech superiority. How many understand this simple truth - and how many blink it?! Before 1971 there was only one world-dollar (since Bretton Woods 1944). After the "Nixon chock" 1971 there were two: One for US dictated by US (Feds), and an other for the rest of the world, also dictated by US. And the difference was that the US-dollar made it possible for US to prosper despite trade deficit, because the rest of the world has paid the difference.
Warning! www.klevius.info has been taken over by someone not connected to Peter Klevius. All old klevius.info can be found on Klevius web museum 2003-2008.
Forget about Nature! Here you get your by far most qualified and least biased (not steered by peer "reviews" or PC editors, but by super high IQ not corrupted by religion, politics or money) scientific overall understanding of evolution (1981), human evolution (1992-), consciousness (1992-94) and AI (1979-), and Human Rights (1979- incl. sex segregation). In his topics of scientific interest Peter Klevius has got highest possible recommendations from world leading professors on the topics. And no, the author has never been caught with mental problems, abuse or criminality, and has successfully fostered all of his children. So why presenting himself like this?! Simply because his best services to science can't get properly through via other media, and here it's often dismissed as "just a blogger's opinion" - which is quite rich when considering much peer reviewed nonsense PC "science" allowed on Nature! And non-scientific posts here of course utilize the same brain power.

US/UK choose war and genocide instead of ceasefire

When terrorists attacked, raped and slaughtered more in Xinjiang than terrorists did in Israel, US declared China's peaceful law and order response a "genocide", while calling Israel's real war genocide against Palestinians "Israel's right to defend itself"! Moreover, US and its little militaristic puppet UK (where the military budget is expanding while economy is stalling and people suffer) both actively participate in Israel's genocide!

US smearing and censoring China

US smearing and censoring China
US historical anti-China laws
Why is a meritocratic, capitalism and trade supporting, Chinese president, with more than 2/3 approval rating, called a "dictator", while a wild capitalism and protectionism and anti-China sanctions and smearing supporting, militaristic warmongering US president with 1/3 of indirect votes on electors who were chosing among candidates chosen by the big money, is called "democratic"?! It seems that "Christian democracy" is a similarly empty but magic wording as is "the Atheist Communist dictatorship".

Peter Klevius and Robert Sapolsky lack "free will"

$-freeloader (since 1971-) US supports Israel - no matter what!

How craniopagus twins born 2006 proved Peter Klevius' 1992 theory on consciousness/thalamus right.


Acknowledgement: Everything produced by Peter Klevius stands for those Universal Human Rights of 1948 which islam's main representative OIC rejected 1990!

China's progress reveals the tech loser and $-freeloader (since 1971-) US' "democratic" nakedness!

Atheist (like the overwhelming majority of Brits) Peter Klevius (whose genetist declared him an Anglo-Saxon) to figurehead King (but not at all absolute monarch) Charles 3: Please celebrate the year 1948 when you and the Universal Human Rights Declaration were born, by asking for forgiveness for all the atrocities England has done on the British Isles and around the world - especially the less talked about, e.g. like the opium wars, and how England was an accomplice to the islamic slave trade which is the worst ideologically based crime against humanity ever. Also please mention all the Communists and other people who constituted more than the Jews in the Holocaust but whose suffering and death is sadly not talked about at all. And do apologize for the British horrifying firebombings against civilians in the end of World War 2 whila Russia was fighting the Maxi army. And why not also apologize for stealing the Chagos Island from the Chagossians, then deporting them from their own land, and renting it out as a military base for rogue state US! Also don't forget evil British meddling and militarism consuming from foreign aid and starving and freezing Brits. And don't forget to criticize BBC which has no problem with the invitation of the islamofascist muslim terrorism supporting Saudi dictator family (a real absolute kingdom which, unlike China, doesn't accept Human Rights) but never stops its unfounded racist Sinophobic spitting on China and its extremely balanced Hong Kong policy against seditious British backed terrorism against the "one nation two systems" incl. the attacks against Hong Kong governmental and parliamentary buildings even worse than the Capitol demonstration in US which BBC paints in exactly the opposite way. Or UK's senseless "genocide" against muslims accusation against China despite the world's largest muslim organization OIC praised China for its good treatment of muslims in Xinjiang and elsewhere. Wheras BBC cherry picked jihadist stories and some random incidents not approved by the Chinese government, OIC sent a big delegation to inspect the allegations and talked with the non-jihadi muslim community! Charles! You talk about indigenous voices - did you include e.g. the Chagossians - held crucial messages about preservation of the land, respecting community and shared values, resolving conflict, and recognizing and making good on past iniquities, right! Don't worry about demonstrations and stupidities. And if you're curious about the biggest scientific questions as you say you are, then welcome to my blogs - however, Google may ask you to sign in because truth and Human Rights are "sensitive"! Read how climate change made human evolution possible in SE Asian volatile archipelago - not on a continent like Africa. And read how two craniopagus twins born 2006 solved the "greatest mystery in science" - and proved Peter Klevius theory from 1992-94 100% correct. And much more!
How did US become the devil of the world? The seed was planted 1971 when US chose the criminal path by stealing the dollar! And today US lures, abuses, corrupts and threatens the rest of the West through its stolen dollar hegemony which it uses for demonizing, warmongering, and militarization against modern China - a country that in every aspect beats US and could stand as a model for the confused West, and which success means that even Taiwan starts leaning towards mainland China (to which it belongs and even US itself admits it does) because it promises a better future (just see how much wealthier Hong Kong is already per capita compared to Taiwan). Moreover, some half of the Taiwanese don't share the ruling party's anti-China policy - which fact scum media BBC never tells its compulsory fee paying brainwashed listeners about. So evil US wants war against China before China-Taiwan relations become even better.
20230314 US drone wasn't protected by "freedom of navigation" because it participated in the Ukraine war before taken down by Russian fighter jet. Everyone who has followed me knows that I am, and always have been, anti-Maoist - but modern China is something else entirely. First, the U.S. declares modern China a "threat" and then militarizes against this contrived threat. Sinophobic demonization of modern China is inspired by US/CIA propaganda and its own prejudices. And the warmongers of Brexit UK submit to the US and go against the people suffering from US dollar hegemony inflation. Take away the racist glasses and Xi&Co almost comes across as a Jesus, and as far from "dictatorship" as you can get compared to the dictatorship of the United States and how the West's politicians go against the will of the people regarding, for example, NATO and militaristic warmongering. Modern capitalist China has nothing in common with Mao's China, but uses the word 'communism' partly to imply continuity, but above all to refer to something to which all countries even in the West refer, i.e. fairer distribution. Nor has China historically ever engaged in the same kind of colonialist and imperialist expansion as the West. This makes modern China credible as it claims to support all countries' right to self-government and free from interference. Xi has no power of his own, but only reflects the absolute majority of the will of the people and was therefore 100% unanimously re-elected - only an idiot would propose an inferior leader, just look at Xi's track record. China's "Communist Party" has a better functioning meritocratic democracy than the West ever had because China's leadership since Mao's death, has been about doing what Mao used as a floundering but never allowed in practice, i.e. "the dictatorship of the people". Take the example of Covid where the modern "Communist Party" was forced to submit to the people's age-old Confucian respect for the elderly, i.e. protect them from contagion - and then again because of the will of the people (with a little "help" from the CIA) to open up when Omicron turned out to be mild. We should all be afraid of the US - not be against China. The Silicon Valley bank could be the beginning of the end for the rotten United States — and hopefully the beginning of a better and more peaceful United States! The current direction only leads to regression and perhaps war. In the West, politicians try to brainwash voters with the help of US-controlled or influenced media, while in China it is exactly the opposite, that is, the leadership is constantly (not only in elections as in the West) sensitive to the will of the people. And why is the US/CIA/West on the side of the Islamists - in the same way that they are on NATO's side by constantly spitting CIA lies about China?! China is the opposite of threat compared to the US/NATO/West. But the U.S. has since the dollar theft in 1971, painted itself into a corner - which modern China's R&D frms have laid bare to anyone (who wants) that sUSA should be put out of business and pay for its dollar theft in 1971-, but instead allows the US's so-called "allies" to deceive themselves as useful idiots under the US criminal dollar hegemony. OIC has checked the senseless alleged "genocide" against muslims in China and not only found any evidence but instead even praised China's leadership for its good treatment of muslims. Islamism supporting USA and its Western "allies" behave exactly as the most conservative Taliban, i.e. not letting the women out in education and work. And the Western lies about Hong Kong and democracy is just against democracy, because the West tries to support a tiny (CIA influenced?) anti-China movement - which is exactly the opposite to the agreed "one country, two systems" principle - which clearly excludes the possibility of Hong Kong not belonging to China. And Taiwan is less wealthy per capita than Hong Kong and a huge part of the Taiwanese actually want to belong to mainland China.
20230314 US drone wasn't protected by "freedom of navigation" because it participated in the Ukraine war before taken down by Russian fighter jet. Everyone who has followed me knows that I am, and always have been, anti-Maoist - but modern China is something else entirely. First, the U.S. declares modern China a "threat" and then militarizes against this contrived threat. Sinophobic demonization of modern China is inspired by US/CIA propaganda and its own prejudices. And the warmongers of Brexit UK submit to the US and go against the people suffering from US dollar hegemony inflation. Take away the racist glasses and Xi&Co almost comes across as a Jesus, and as far from "dictatorship" as you can get compared to the dictatorship of the United States and how the West's politicians go against the will of the people regarding, for example, NATO and militaristic warmongering. Modern capitalist China has nothing in common with Mao's China, but uses the word 'communism' partly to imply continuity, but above all to refer to something to which all countries even in the West refer, i.e. fairer distribution. Nor has China historically ever engaged in the same kind of colonialist and imperialist expansion as the West. This makes modern China credible as it claims to support all countries' right to self-government and free from interference. Xi has no power of his own, but only reflects the absolute majority of the will of the people and was therefore 100% unanimously re-elected - only an idiot would propose an inferior leader, just look at Xi's track record. China's "Communist Party" has a better functioning meritocratic democracy than the West ever had because China's leadership since Mao's death, has been about doing what Mao used as a floundering but never allowed in practice, i.e. "the dictatorship of the people". Take the example of Covid where the modern "Communist Party" was forced to submit to the people's age-old Confucian respect for the elderly, i.e. protect them from contagion - and then again because of the will of the people (with a little "help" from the CIA) to open up when Omicron turned out to be mild. We should all be afraid of the US - not be against China. The Silicon Valley bank could be the beginning of the end for the rotten United States — and hopefully the beginning of a better and more peaceful United States! The current direction only leads to regression and perhaps war. In the West, politicians try to brainwash voters with the help of US-controlled or influenced media, while in China it is exactly the opposite, that is, the leadership is constantly (not only in elections as in the West) sensitive to the will of the people. And why is the US/CIA/West on the side of the Islamists - in the same way that they are on NATO's side by constantly spitting CIA lies about China?! China is the opposite of threat compared to the US/NATO/West. But the U.S. has since the dollar theft in 1971, painted itself into a corner - which modern China's R&D frms have laid bare to anyone (who wants) that sUSA should be put out of business and pay for its dollar theft in 1971-, but instead allows the US's so-called "allies" to deceive themselves as useful idiots under the US criminal dollar hegemony. OIC has checked the senseless alleged "genocide" against muslims in China and not only found any evidence but instead even praised China's leadership for its good treatment of muslims. Islamism supporting USA and its Western "allies" behave exactly as the most conservative Taliban, i.e. not letting the women out in education and work. And the Western lies about Hong Kong and democracy is just against democracy, because the West tries to support a tiny (CIA influenced?) anti-China movement - which is exactly the opposite to the agreed "one country, two systems" principle - which clearly excludes the possibility of Hong Kong not belonging to China. And Taiwan is less wealthy per capita than Hong Kong and a huge part of the Taiwanese actually want to belong to mainland China.
The ultimate U.S. hypocrisy against China: When all muslims' world organization O.I.C. visits Xinjiang etc. and thanks Beijing for its good treatment of muslims - then US cherry picks CIA and BBC fake "reports" based on interviews with jihadist families or cases of prison or police abuse (which happen in every country - and especially in US). It's appalling that the West supports OIC's sharia which violates the most basic of Universal Human Rights, but doesn't listen to OIC when it comes to China!

Google censors Human Rights!

Google censors Human Rights!

Necrophilia vs Human Rights

$-freeloader U.S. is the main threat to the world!

Warning, don't invest in US because it's going down! How? It's not the debt ceiling nor the dollar per se but simply because US can't keep up with China's R&D, which fact will become inevitably apparent for consumers globally. US makes its own rules and imposes them globally. China makes its own rules and lets others do their own (the Global Security Initiative). US' dollar theft from 1971- is coming to an end when people realize that after China's rise US is no longer an asset but a risk - then US bonds will be worthless. So to keep floating US abuses its weaker "allies" while calling China "enemy". Don't let a declining and dangerous U.S. take over your country! U.S. tries in vain to contain China so to be able to continue its criminal dollar hegemony by sucking money and blood from the rest of the world in the wake of its massive dollar theft beginning in 1971 when U.S. betrayed its promise to keep the dollar fixed to gold. The undemocratic U.S. Fed then in effect became the world's financial dictator. U.S. dollar theft means a general decrease in purchasing power outside U.S., i.e. the price the world has to pay for U.S. stolen wealth. U.S. is the only country in the world that despite trade deficit and massive national debt, via its criminal dollar hegemony can force the rest of the world to pay for it. You need a super computer to exactly calculate U.S. debt to the world. However the suffering caused by U.S. fraud and militarism is even beyond a super computer. Let the world vote about whether U.S. should be defaulted and prosecuted! Western politicians - seduced by the popular Old Nordic dialect (or creole) called English - seem to reason that by being "allied" with $-freeloader U.S. ("the greater U.S.") they will benefit technologically and financially. But the reality (1971-) is just the opposite. Only Japan and Korea can compete with China when it comes to homogenity, general IQ, education amd R&D - except that they are ten times smaller, and their cooperation with the extortionist parasite U.S. will inevitably weaken them. In a very short future not only Wall Street and some tech geeks, but people in general will start understanding they took the wrong train going in the wrong direction on a faulty track into the arms of an armed blood sucking dying giant.


We live in a world in which an authoritarian state, $-freeloader narcissistic U.S., controls the digital infrastructure, enjoys the dominant position in the world's technology platforms, controls the means of production for critical technologies, and harnesses a new wave of general purpose technologies, like biotech and new energy technologies, to transform the world society, economy and military, to continue feeding U.S.' parasitic needs. However, the really funny thing is that US smears China for exactly what US itself is.
Why didn't NATO (US) stop the real genocide and grave Human Rights violations (since 2014) in Ukraine?! And when Russia did, the NATO (US) attacked Russia. And what about the islamofascist Saudi dictator family's atrocities in Yemen - just to mention one from the Saudi pile?!

Peter Klevius art analysis: When kings possessed antidemocratic total power (as the Saudi islamofascist murderer and terrorist war criminal "king" still today), they could deliberately show off their personhood. However, when kingdom became art - not to say sign post - then a "good" king or queen became someone who like Elizabeth had to shut up and instead be filled with the content of "the eye of the beholder" - just like art, which is always excluded from its artist. My guess is that she could only really trust her husband - 'husband' is Swedish meaning 'hus' (house) and 'band' means ties like in 'bond'. However, her son Charles has an extremely poor record at that - which may be entertaining, especially for republicans.

US should be the "enemy" rather than modern China

When will Liz Truss declare the islamofascist "custodians of islam", the Saudi dictator family - who has murdered, tortured, terrorized and committed war crimes - an enemy? And what about US?! With the U.S. dollar as the world's main reserve currency - since 1971 criminally disconnected from its promised gold connection - and with the U.S. controlling global financial and monetary flow U.S. has raised massive debt while printing money - not "out of thin air" but out of the world. The U.S. economy hence rests on financial colonialism and imperialism, i.e. forcibly robbing its value from other countries. And when excess liquidity drives up global inflation, and the Fed raises interest rates and tightens monetary policy, it also widens its interest rate gap with other countries, while attracting international capital to the otherwise empty (and doomed) U.S. dollar. The Brits should blame US, the militant financial $-freeloader (since 1971) - not modern China, the peaceful tech and wealth building rescuer at home and around the world! Bank of England is a helpless pawn against the feds. At the very moment when especially UK but also the rest of the world needs China the most, then dangerous and militant (CIA steered?) Liz Truss declares China an "enemy". Hello! It's US that 2014 ignited the low scale Ukrainian civil war to a fullblown deadly genocide against Russians, and 2022 to a real proxy war via NATO threatening Russia for the ultimate purpose of attacking China. And it is the US' antidemokratic (decoupled from democratic institutions) Federal Reserve that is behind inflation and the fall of the pound and other financial problems outside US. US is the only country in the world that can survive heavy deficit by counterfeiting money. It's US that is the root of high inflation, energy costs, supply shortages etc. (because of modern China). The feds has since 1913 been the factual dictator of US, and when US became bankrupt after a costly Vietnam war and space (incl. military) program it 1971 unscrupulously cheated with the promised dollar connection to gold. US hence started a fullblown robbing of the world with the dollar as the world currency and now culminating in an untenable money printing that together with China's economic and tech rise threatens US criminal $-freeloading. US is a theocracy if measured by how much "in god we trust" is involved in policy and politics, and that the Supreme Court is 100% religious, in stark contrast to the huge number of Atheist people in US. This has also led to US using islamists against China.

China's SO BAD - says $-freeloader US


How come that this US patriot shares Peter Klevius view on US?



Whereas anyone can bacome a researcher, to qualify as a scientist you also need top intelligence and a very good overview of the topic. Long time ago profssors used to at least fulfil the latter. However, due to an increase in non-scientific influence this is no longer the case - which opens up a wonderful workspace for Peter Klevius. So why trust Peter Klevius instead of professors, BBC and other trolls? Because 1. Peter Klevius lacks such vulnerabilities and has a much higher IQ (beware of IQ-phobia) than most professors or world leaders - not to mention journalists 2. Peter Klevius has a long and clean life record when it comes to women, children, crimes, drugs etc. 3. Peter Klevius has no finacial or career ties to anything he writes about 4. Peter Klevius doesn't (sadly) know (20220326) a single Russian or Chinese, and has never visited the countries nor having any other connections 5. Peter Klevius groundbreaking scientific achievements (e.g. about evolution, consciousness, sex segregation, sociology, psychoanalysis etc.) can all be dated to publications, theses (and after 1998 also on the web) or correspondence with professors considered top of their game. Possibly all of them may also qualify as first of its kind - or at the very least certainly not copied from others - as others seem to do with Peter Klevius' works, without even giving him credit. 6. Peter Klevius had the most unprivileged start of life and adulthood - but also the most privileged when it comes to brain power, dopamin-serotonin balance and psychological stability - to an extent that he can't possibly believe in the psychological non sense excuse that "we're all a little mad".

U.S. rape of the Maid of Finland

Peter Klevius to Boris Johnson: It was only half of the Brits who voted Brexit, and it was only half of the Ukrainians who voted for Ukrexit. However, in Ukraine it ended with civil war instigated by UK's ally $-freeloader rogue state US. You should really have kept your peaceful Huawei instead of being pushed to the militant F35!

US has already sunk below the surface but abuses the "West" as its snorkel. What most people don't realize is that by following US you step downwards in future development compared to China. Little Japan already showed the world how to beat the West in technology. China is more than ten times bigger. And when people - sooner or later - realize the difference, the backlash will be harsh. Peter Klevius asks: Which war (post WW2) has NOT been instigated by rogue state $-freeloader US? Korea, Vietnam, Serbia, Iraq, Georgia, Ukraine, Libya, Yemen, Syria etc.. US, which has also used nukes, biological wepons, and torture, tops by far the list of war criminals - and US allies are gravely complicit!
We're constantly told "not to incite hatred against muslims" when we're just criticizing sharia islam for its lack of Human Rights. However, when US/CIA not only incites hatred but also weaponizes it, no one in the West seems to care. Why?! How many more should suffer and die because of US senseless behavior when facing a future where its $-freeloading is coming home to roost because of China's success?

20220221: BBC main news hour at 13:00 today for the first time didn't mention Ukraine and Putin at all - while the worst shelling against Russian populated parts of Ukraine significantly escalated, leading to a peak of over 50,000 refugees fleeing to Russia to escape the genocide the $-freeloader (and now desperate because of China's growth and success) US iniitiated, agitated and assisted with weapons (together with its coerced, or just stupid/evil Western puppets) - while continuing spitting on Putin/Russia.

World economies (CIA World Factbook 2022): 1 China 2/3 US, EU 4 India 5 Japan 6 Germmany 7 Russia 8 Brazil 9 France 10 UK
Dear reader, stop supporting/aiding dangerous rogue state US! Otherwise US $-desperation (i.e. that it will lose its financial stealing hegemony because of China's growth) will lead to it deliberately starting a WW3. Except for human suffering and lower standard, it would be the great reset for $-freeloader US to stand in the ruins and continue being a stealing and ruling world dictator. No other country poses a similar threat.
Religion is segregation. Judaism: We are the chosen people! Christianity: Christ will forgive, you sinner! Islam: Everyone is born muslim, you infidel! Human Right is de-segregation, you human!
Peter Klevius wonders if you can spot the difference between the People's republic of China, the Congress' republic of US, and the Parliament's/government's "democracy" of UK. Hint, the clue is in the word 'people' and the fact that Chinese are more satisfied with their democracy than US and UK people. Moreover, can you spot the difference between modern China and Stalin's, Mao's, Castro's, Pol Pot's etc. Communist countries? And when it comes to unjust sentencing, spying, surveilling, detaining/torturing/killing people, US is definitely worse than China. Not to mention US global meddling, militarism and dictatorial fiat $-freeloading. A US that can't manufacture its own chips but tries to hinder China from it. And if you aren't on US sponsored IS-Uyghurs side - why spit on China?! And if you aren't on US sponsored IS-Uyghurs side - why spit on China?! Why is US calling anti-islamism "human rights violation"?! And when will US stop dealing with Saudi, NATO (e.g. Turkey) etc. Human Rights violators?!Btw, Peter Klevius suggests buying Chinese property stocks now. After all, there are more rural Chinese than the entire US population, waiting for getting urban after this temporary slow down.
Why doesn't Peter Klevius publish his groundbreaking science in Nature? Because he has no peers! Peer review, according to Google, is the evaluation of work by people with similar competence. Peter Klevius healthy mind and total lack of institutional/financial/political/career bias combined with extra high intelligence is unique in science - and it's precisely therefore his best scientific achievments can't be evaluated by peer-biased people but need a blog to be presented because 1) they would never be peer approved in Nature 2) they would never be produced in a "proper" form with painstaking efforts to squeeze in citations/references etc. that contribute nothing. Whom should Peter Klevius quote about EMAH/consciousness, out-of SE Asia, or about hetersosexual attraction and sex segregation? When I made my phd on sex segregated resistance against female football I was asked to quote feminists. I did, and after every quote I had to negate it. Alternatively it would have silenced the women's voices in my in-depth interviews re. thair experience about resistance. After all, it was feminists behind the 1921 ban against women's football in England, and it was the most powerful feminists in Sweden who for a decade opposed girls and women playing football after the Swedish FA had included it. So instead of me testing Nature, you test me - before "anti-feminism", "anti-out-of-Africa" and "anti-religion" are criminalized as "hate speech"! - In anthropology fossils usually get all kinds of nicknames before scientifically "baptized". However, precisely because Homo floresiensis (the definite proof that humans evolved in SE Asia) was the "missing link" that afropologists wanted to find in Africa (how could an allround mover and allround eater ever evolve on a continent?!) they needed to dismiss it at every level incl. continue calling it a "hobbit". And when it comes to EMAH/consciousness it's extremely simple - yet not "simplistic" at all. However, the culprit is what humans are most proud about, i.e. language. By giving something one doesn't comprehend but wants to put in a package, a name, will continue to contain its blurred definition. This is why EMAH only deals with 'now' and the body of past this now lands on. Of course this leads to everything having "consciousness". A brick "remembers" a stain of paint as long as it's there - and with some "therapeutical" investgation in a laboratory perhaps even longer. And a stain of paint on your skin is exactly the same. However, unlike the the brick you've also got a brain that may also be affected by the stain. This could be compared with a hollow brick where the paint has vanished from the outside but submerged so that when cutting the brick it "remembers" it and tells the cutting blade about it. And for more "sophistication" just add millions of differect colors unevenly spread. Our brain is no different from the rest of the body. If Frankenstein with tomorrow's tech had created an adult human body, then that body wouldn't be able to walk or talk etc. because it lacked the body program we've been programmed with by living.
The US-led climate hoax against China: $-freeloader US uses its hegemony to cover up the worst global threat, i.e. itself. And targets China which challenges its hegemony. A sustained and coordinated campaign aimed at undermining the credibility of China. China is already way more democratic than US - especially when considering that its infrastructure today is already where it inevitably will be tomorrow in a technologically lagging US. In other words, technology itself puts ever more distinction on our behavior - compare e.g. the shift from unmarked cash to marked card/online payments. And as an extra bonus China has extremely low criminality, better privacy law, and incredible record of improving poverty and welfare both home and abroad compared to US. Just consider how US has painted itself into a corner by the 1971 cheating that disconnected the dollar from US' own means, hence creating a situation with no other return than lowering its standard (i.e. stopping printing dollar that the rest of the world have had to pay for due to US' global financial empire tentacles) or a new war (which US is already brewing). Where US uses CIA meddling, sanctions and militarism, China has risen with honest manufacturing and trade.
20211103: Why is BBC 4 news so silent about CIA's murder plot and ongoing extradition request against Julian Assange, but instead has plenty of news time to repeatedly tell listeners about some cricket player (muslim?) who 'was allegedly hurt' because of 'verbal abuse'?
Peter Klevius: Do note that my klevius.info is an experimental webmuseum made 2003 and deliberately hasn't been touched upon since 2007.
$-freeloader US is the main driver of dangerous global militarism and state terror. It's also a many times bigger per capita polluter than China. Why is BBC repeating the lie that "China is the biggest polluter" when in fact it's one of the smallest?! And the only reason to not use per capita would be that China, unlike e.g. similar size Africa, has a single government. But even then China shines as the by far best led country. China is the technological future that we all have to walk - not led by the Chinese, but by technology. And because of US's desperation as its dollar-thieving (since 1971) is now threatened by China irresistibly passing them technologically and economically, China actually serves as a protected "soft landing model" for the future AI world (China's new privacy law, tech crackdown etc.) is exactly what most people want), while aggressive U.S. is a threat to peace and prosperity. Google is precisely the state link Chinese companies are accused of being, and US's "alliance" with "colored" and muslims is basically Sinophobia, i.e. the fear of losing control of those whom it has abused - it simply divides the world into good colored/religious and evil Chinese/Atheists (and evil whites who disagree). US-led "anti-communism" is not about communism or any belief that China would attack the rest of the world (as the US has done, after all). Almost everyone understands that today's China has nothing in common with Cuba, the Soviet Union, Pol Pot, and Mao's China.
eter Klevius has collected US Google News China headlines for years and never seen them (algorithms) so extremely anti-China as now. US' (+its puppets) Taiwan lies in perspective: UN Resolution 2758 which was approved on October 25, 1971 states that "The representatives of the Government of the People's Republic of China are the only lawful representatives of China to the United Nations" and "decides to expel forthwith the representatives of Chiang Kai-shek (i.e. Taiwan) from the place which they unlawfully occupy at the United Nations and in all the organizations related to it." Again, U.S.-linked disinformation campaign against China is made up as it goes along. So how much of US' "anti-Communism" rant is actually Sinophobia spized with greed and fear of losing its parasitic world sucking position? Btw, the worst polluters on measure of culpability as weighted annual per capita greenhouse gas pollution taking relative per capita income into account include the Anglosphere countries US, UK, Australia, New Zealand, Canada and Ireland. Isn't it shameful that these hypocrites point finger at China?! And why is BBC so silent about the volcanic catastrophe on La Palma that not only keeps continuing but also is getting more vicious by the day?! Volcanos can at any moment start an abrupt iceage - and we are anyway already overdue to the next statistical iceage.
20210926 UK became even more a totalitarian right wing militaristic one party state when Labour cut off its left wing. And unlike China, UK has no meritocracy demand on MPs, nor has it any people's democracy even close to that of China (just consider how the Western, US steered, media told you Xi ordered less gaming for kids when in fact it was a broad demand from parent). And China forces its companies to use less energy - and the Sinophobic West of course spits on this environmental effort when some energy companies break the limits and can't deliver.

The West, not China, is the biggest emitter of pollution. What's not to like about China?! Best privacy law: least crimes: best high tech: best tech control: best poverty extermination: best manufacturer: best meritocratic democracy happiness: best trust in leadership, applauded by OIC for treatment of muslims, etc. And badly behaving $-freeloader and financial (and militaristic) global dictator U.S. jailed Huawei CFO Meng Wanzhou in a foreign country for her normal business in an other foreign country (whose prsidential candidate was murdered by US in a third foreign country) that US didn't happen to like as it didn't like the success of Chinese Huawei.

How $-freeloader U.S. has robbed the world since 1971

China hating bigoted and hypocritical West (i.e. US+puppets) - which strangly calls itself "the international community" - worries about Taliban sharia while West's close ally, the islamofascist Saudi dictator family (behind 9/11 and most other islamic terror) has the most medieval form of sharia of any muslim country! Btw, most feminists are sharia muslims - and feminism ticks most fascism boxes. Peter Klevius to his readers: Never forget that fascism emerged in the very midst of what is now in anti-China rhetoric called "the international community" or the West. And the roots of Western fascism has never been treated but live on. Ask yourself, what if China had behaved like the murderous terror rogue state $-freeloader U.S.?!



Islamism wants islamic "human rights". Feminism wants women's "human rights". Peter Klevius wants Human Rights. Together with their close ally Saudi Arabia, US and its puppet UK have among the worst Human Rights records - yet they blame China and Russia instead. Peter Klevius fact correcting of BBC's deliberate lies about China: Rogue state $-freeloader U.S. is the by far much worse per capita greenhouse gas polluter than China.
Peter Klevius (the only serious anthropologist?!) to afropologists: If you honestly and with simple words would explain the essence of the out-of-Africa myth/hoax to a child s/he wouldn't believe a word of your story: A cold adapted (mongoloid phenotype) population P1 (Homo sapiens), which eats everything and has almost infinite time and skills to move anywhere on land - lives all over a southern "island" (Africa) that has an easily accessible bridge (Sinai) to an other "island" (Eurasia), but somehow cannot get out for hundreds of thousands of years. And when they tried they couldn't survive on places where their primitive relatives (Homo erectus) for 2 million years had thrived all over the places from the tropics to the northern cold. Then the kid would probably ask why you keep telling things that make no sense. And when you answer by saying that this now living population P2 on the warm island - but with features seen in all cold adapted populations P3 far north of the bridge - has the oldest DNA, then the kid would probably ask you if you have ever considered the possibility that those genes were aquired in the cold north far on the other side of the bridge. And your last resort to convince the child concists of some bone fragments that fit in a shoe box together with a decent pair of shoes - and there is no agreement about what they really are - and are the only thing we have between the chimp-like Lucy and the human-like erectus. And what would you answer when the kid then asks how a tiny Lucy-like (poor bipedalism) population A4 could possibly make it out of Africa all the way over the Wallace line to Flores as well as to the Philippines, long before Homo sapiens managed to do so? Peter Klevius suggests you and your kids learn from the best: Peter Klevius theory Speciation needs isolation over time and the best evolutionary lab has been SE Asian archipelago. Like all primates, carnivores, ungulates etc. we also came out of SE Asia with a new brain setup (due to island shrinking and mainland enlargement of this new brain setup), got coldadapted in the north and then spread all over the world while mixing with other Homo sapiens in a pattern easily recognizable.

Peter Klevius evolution formula.

Peter Klevius evolution formula

Peter Klevius serious questions to you "out of Africa" believer! Ask yourself: How come that the oldest primates came from outside Africa; that the oldest great ape divergence happened outside Africa; that the oldest bi-pedals are from outside Africa; that the only australopithecines with a Homo skull lived as far from Africa you can get; that the oldest truly modern looking skull is from eastern China (and to Chris Stringer - its slightly archaic bun fits a very old age); that the oldest Africans are mongoloid; that the latest genetic mix that shaped the modern human happened in northern Asia and is traced to SE Asia; that the earliest sophisticated art (e.g. a drilled and polished perfect shiny stone bracelet from Siberia, perfect paintings and figurines) and tools (e.g. a perfect sewing needle, flutes etc) are found from Iberia to Sulawesi - but not in Africa so far; that the oldest round skulled Homo sapiens in sub-Saharan Africa is much younger than similar skulls in Eurasia; that we lack ancient enough DNA from Africa to use as evidence (although afropologists happily do), etc. etc.? Peter Klevius theory answers all these questions - and more.
U.S. main brain asset is East Asians - same with China... East-Asians (mostly Chinese) also took most gold medals in Tokyo Olympics. China won shared gold in the gold-medal race (39 golds - why are some excluding Hong Kong's gold).
Peter Klevius suggests taking the knee for Human Rights instead of for certain "races" based on skin color, religion - or sex.
The main threat against Taiwan is U.S. starting a war. But China just has to wait until the Taiwanese anyway want to rejoin because of Cnina's fast growing superior R&D, high tech, infrastructure, privacy law, economy etc.. For U.S. it's just the opposite. And West's hollow rant about "liberty" and "party-democracy" echoes back against China's democracy where the Chinese vote for truly merited individuals and against corruption. And Chinese hightech will, after some political delay come near you anyway - while in the meantime being called "assertive threat from CCP". And there's no more "Communism" in China's progress than there is Christianity in U.S' militaristic war mongering, criminal sanctions, $-freeloading, extrajudicial murders, unfair justice, torture, spying on everyone, use of islamists etc.. U.S. "Americans"! Payback time! When Peter Klevius bought his Japan made Citizen Eco Drive chronograph watch it cost ~ $240 in US and ~ $340 in EU. Those ~ $100 is what "American" (i.e. U.S. people - not all Americans) $-freeloaders owe to the rest of the world because of benefitting locally by money printing and pricing the main global reserve currency - but the end is near. $100 trillions - or more?!
Apoorva Mandavilli (New York Times): "Someday we will stop talking about the lab leak theory and maybe even admit its racist roots. But alas, that day is not yet here." Peter Klevius wonders what made her later delete it?! Fiat-money-world-$-freeloader-US' intention is not at all to clarify anything but instead to keep up hate against China. Would Fiat-money-world-$-freeloader-US and its UK puppet let Chinese inspect Fort Detrick and over 200 US bio-labs all over the world and UK's notorious military research at Porton Down, Salisbury. So while Chinese and "Chinese" looking people now are the most harrassed, BBC gives it no real attention while filling its news with BLM and "worries about islamophobia". Btw, if you poke any s.c. "free speech debate" you'll always find islamic efforts for "blasphemy" laws - and never laws against real blasphemy against basic negative Human Rights of 1948. The West has abandoned Human Rights for the sake of sharia islam and is again becoming what it fought against - itself. Communistphobia (an "autoimmune" reaction now boosted by US' collapse and due aggression) led to Fascism, Nazism and WW2. Why do the worst (per capita and consumption) militant polluters and hypocrites (Fiat $-freeloader US, UK, Australia etc.) lie about China. the world's best source for cleaner tech?! Fiat $-freeloader US' influence behind Sinophobic attacks against China, the world's by far largest economy and future of tech, privacy law and Human Rights, and with less assaults, rapes and murders etc. than e.g. US and EU, while the "democratic West" turns sharia theocratic and militant. And why is islamism called "religion" and Confuzianism "propaganda"?! Peter Klevius: Why would religious precepts and Human Rights denial be more worthy of protection than political ones? After all, Human Rights are there to guide legislators and the Chinese trust their politicians much more than Westerners trust theirs. So there's a case to be made against anti-China hate propaganda which harmfully affects Chinese and "Chinese" looking people. The senseless flaw of monotheism: The pompous self-delusion of oneself as "god's" chosen individual while projecting one's "beliefs" on "god's" chosen "community" - which in turn projects a collectivist "belief" on its individuals. Freedom of thought doesn't mean freedom from law - and freedom of religion doesn't mean freedom from Human Rights. The only "ideology" that flawlessly fits negative Human Rights is Atheism (not believeing in any supremacist "god"). Lod/Lydda in Israel should be a warning that convinces anyone about the necessity to abandon racist and sexist monotheist religions and instead support the basic negative Human Rights of 1948 to guide legislation and behavior for a positive human future for all. https://negativehumanrights.blogspot.com/2021/05/negative-human-rights-for-positive.html When should islam pay for 1400 years of genocides?

Why African continent was impossible for Homo speciation and SE Asian volatile archipelago perfect for human evolution. Africa's indigenous people (with the oldest genes have cold adapted Asian features. Lack of transitional fossils (H erectus appeared out of the blue) and aDNA. Oldest bipedals in Eurasia. Oldest modern (HSS) humans from Asia. Denisova aDNA Homo mix, oldest art, oldest sewing needle. H floresiensis can't possibly have come from Africa and is certainly not a dwarfed H erectus.


Why is it that the West allows islamic abuse of the positive Human Right to religion even when (OIC etc.) it clearly violates the most basic negative Human Rights of others? It's not a Human Right to desecrate Human Rights.

The West (and the world) has to disconnect legislation from religion and reconnect to basic (negative) Human Rights as agreed 1948. Negative Human Rights are the only true ones (because they respect and protect every individual human from religious etc. impositions) - and are lacking in islam (e.g. OIC's sharia). Islam's original formula: Attack, rob, kill, rape, humilate and enslave - and blame the victim for being an "infidel"! Confucius (551–479 BCE) about Ren (the basis of Confucianism): "Don't do to others what you don't want done to yourself. And if you seek Ren you've already found it. Rén is human."


Why Peter Klevius 1992 brain/mind/"consciousness" theory is the only one that fits reality - but not human bias.



20210503: The world needs urgently a tougher stance on US and its aggressive hypocrisy and criminal behavior! Every anti-China rant Western politicians puke is licking a sick US ass and boosted by populist Sinophobic Western nationalism. New Zealand is now blamed for not spying and hating China enough while the criminal Saudi dictator family is a close ally and OIC's violations of Human Rights is ok.

20210416: US' puppet sidekick UK cowardly runs away when it cannot hide in the master's shadow anymore - leaving Afghanistan's women without protection against islamic evil.

US declares Turkish murder and islamization of more than a million Armenians a genocide while UK declares China's de-islamization and education of backward Chinese Uyghurs a "genocide".

Joe Biden's threat: "China will not become the leading country in the world, the wealthiest country in the world, and the most powerful country in the world on my watch!”
And history proves US is the dangerous one that wants to dictate and bully the world to keep its $-freeloader hegemony.
Xi Jinping: "China will never seek hegemony, no matter how strong it becomes."
And he has the longest civilization to back it up with.

Peter Klevius warns the Brits about the danger posed by spy master Jeremy Fleming
's delusional, dangerous and Sinophobic China "analysis" which, if followed, may lead to stagnation and even US initiated war. It's all about UK either chosing a dangerous puppet status under US decline and stagnation by supported US' populist riding on pre-existing anti-Chinese (and anti-mongoloid racism, compare e.g. footballer Son Heung-Min and BBC lacking to report hate crimes against Chinese etc) sentiments - or simply benefitting from China's success through cooperation. The "danger" of new Chibese surveillance tech becomes ok later on in the West. However, China has now better privacy protection than the West, and China's meritocratic political representation combined with the world's toughest anti-corruption, makes West look bleak in comparison. And unlike UK, China has a real written constituion that gives women the same rights as men without exeption - someting US is still lacking, as are UK's sharia courts.

Don't respect islam as long as islam doesn't respect Human Rights! And if you don't trust Peter Klevius (2001-) on this, then trust Council of Europe's (2019) basically similar criticism of islam's main worldly (except Gabriel) representative, Saudi based and steered OIC's Human Rights violating sharia declaration CDHRI! Moreover, the most pious muslims seem to be the ones furthest distancing themselves from Human Rights.

Peter Klevius to the women of Greenham Common: Aren't the Saudi allied and posturing "in cheat and global nUKes we trust" right wing Sinophobic Brexiters a bigger threat than Iran?

BBC is the world's main spreader of anti-Sinoist hate speech and populist Sinophobic propaganda on an industrial scale and therefore guilty of inciting crimes against humanity!

First spitting on China and then using China's reaction as an excuse for more spitting.

The original (negative) Human Rights (1948) means the individual is not to be imposed an action of another individual, group, government, religion etc. Negative Human Rights hence function as the guidance and guardian against unneccessarily restricting legislation. Sharia islam, i.e. in praxis Saudi based and steered OIC's notorious* sharia declaration, is the very opposite. However, UK and BBC seem to approve of islam's Human Rights violations while calling China's efforts to stifle them "human rights abuse".

* Similarly criticized by Peter Klevius and the Council of Europe. Are both "islamophobes"?!


Global China for peace and wealth vs. "global UK" for more hate incitement, lies, threats, nukes, warmonger and miltarism under the shield of the militaristic world dictator and $-freeloader US. Compare this to UN's Resident Coordinator in China, Siddharth Chatterjee, who says "we stand in a unique position to cooperate with the Government of China and apply its successes of lifting hundreds of million people out of poverty globally. China has shown its firm belief in the principles of multilateralism. As I witnessed in Kenya, China's donations of personal protective equipment and other supplies played a critical role during the disruption in global supply chains in March 2020. And every day I am in China, I am inspired by what I see around me, what China has achieved and can achieve as a country."

But US/UK do their utmost to stop "assertive Chinese influence". And a Sinophobic parliament shouts "genocide" when China protects women's Human Rights.

Without a fair reason UK declares Chinese a "threat" while Brits and other "infidels" are constantly threatened by Human Rights violating islamism.

20210320: The world's master fake news troll farm BBC today still uses conspiracy theorist, warmonger and China hater Pompeo to smear China and spread anti-Sinoism - but nothing about islamist Human Rights violating atrocities (e.g. 50 children beheaded by islamists in Mocambique etc.), !? Btw, UK abducts proportionally many more children than China - and expose them to islamist child abuse. Peter Klevius feels truly ashamed of looking like a Westerner. Btw, how can you excuse US criminal behavior: First benefitting from monopolizing global web tech and then using this monopoly as a weapon against competitors?!

$-freeloader US and its UK puppet don't care about the wellbeing of Chinese but want only to damage China's success. Sinophobic UK parliament should just shut up talking about China and democracy. People living legally in their own state EU were robbed of their democracy by UK! And even UK nationals are just subjects, not citizens.

BBC, the world's worst war mongering and hate spreading propaganda troll farm, uses Chinese "Guantanamo"* prisoner fotage out of context as "evidence" of how "truthful" BBC is! * US detained muslim terrorist suspects outside US! BBC stereotypes whatever to fit "genocide" in China but doesn't mind US-UK-Australian torture and murder of civilians. Where China stands for tech and wealth development $-freeloader US + UK-Australia stand for spreadinng lies and militarist tensions. And why so silent about UK torture of Assange while declaring an Iranian spy suspect as "innocent" simply because she says so (Iran, like US, doesn't approve of double citizenship).

Uncritical democracy with islam inevitably means the death of Human Rights. Peter Klevius probably has some half of muslims on his side in saying so.

BBC welcomes Jo Johnson when he now says "China is authoritarian, almost neo-totalitarian regime". Peter Klevius wonders how that fits with a country which leadership is much more approved of than Western ones?! Even an idiot (but not BBC) can see that China's modern Communism has nothing to do with Maoism or Soviet Communism. The only criticism left the West can come up with is name calling. The welfare, progress and out of poverty success for Chinese people has nothing in common with "conventional Communism". On the contrary, it delivers exactly where s.c. "democracies" (one might even argue that China is closer to democracy than the West) often fail. "Democracies" are anyway one party states supported by at the most some half of the population compared to China's qualified majority. So China's "authoritarian" Communist "dictatorship" is as far you can get from the West's beloved Sunni islamist theocracy, steered by the murderous and war crimes committing Saudi dictator family. So why is China declared an enemy while Saudi is an ally! Moreover, China's new privacy law will protect the individual much better than any similar laws in in the West. Why? Because China's leadership thinks the individual's privacy is too important to fiddle with (read the draft). Something the West has given up (to US). And who was it that started smearing, lying, spreading rumours and conspiracy theories, military threats etc. against China in the forst place? Sinophobic racism from the West for the purpose of aiding the US $-freeloader.

Peter Klevius: Every muslim is responsible for muslims racism and sexism. So stop shouting "you're not a muslim" to a muslim who believes and knows the Koran by heart! Immigration is ok - if you criminalize anti-Human Rights sharia muslims (and their accompllices)!

In cheat we trust: UK decreases aid to Yemen while increasing weapons sale to the muslim Saudi dictator family and spending more on militarism. And BBC is more concerned about Uyghurs than Yemenites. And worries more about Buddhists who don't like to be attacked, raped, murdered etc. than about their radicalized muslim attackers.

Lord Palmerston, UK PM who supported the Confederacy in the US civil war, hoping a dissolution of the Union would weaken the US: "The Chinese are uncivilized and the British must attack China to show up their superiority as well as to demonstrate what a civilized nation could do."

US is now the worst global threat that only cooperating with China could mitigate - instead of being US' puppets. Peter Klevius: Why is US ordering 600 new nukes - i.e. the double of China's total?
Why is China the only NPT state to give an unqualified negative security assurance with its "no first use"?
Why isn't UK's parliament more interested in the real genocide in Yemen than the made up "genocide" in Xinjiang?!
Why is UK applauding the conviction of Syrian soldiers while UK soldiers go free from similar crimes against humanity.
Why isn't the real genocide that muslim Uyghurs have committed against non-muslim Uyghurs talked about?! When Dominic Raab visited Saudi Arabia he failed to raise the question of Saudi Human Rights abuses.However, in UN he lied about "China's industrial scale Human Rights abuses". He deliberately conflated unchecked BBC "reports" by East Turkestan jihadis with China's out of poverty and de-radicalization programs. And of course forgot to say sterilization was offered after three (3) children and with economical and educational incentives for muslim women tied at home by sharia.

The militant $-freeloader US' spread of misinfo about China has made Chinese the most hated ethnicity while sharia muslims are the most protected - and US' puppet UK's Dominic Raab keeps spitting Sinophobia while supporting anti-Human Rights islamism.


Peter Klevius (like e.g. most really intelligent Jews is an Atheist, not confined with "faith", politics, career, finance etc.): While the West accepts OIC's Human Rights violating sharia islamism, China defends Human Rights against islamism. And unlike US' constitution, China's constitution is fully aligned with women's rights in the 1948 Human Rights declaration. So to avoid the West turning into a full muslim theocracy (OIC sharia) fractioned in infighting, we better become Sinophils instead of Sinophobes! "Anti-democratic ommunism" is now the only (empty - the only difference is that MPs in China are under harder scrutiny) argument the West still swings.


20210127, BBC (fake) News: "We are memorizing 6 million Jews in Holocaust." Peter Klevius: So why not include the more than 6 million non-Jews?! See BBC's diabolically wild lies about Uighurs!

Many Afgan women's dream is to be treated like Uighur women in China. However, the criminal militaristic war mongering rogue state U.S. abandons them and instead declares islamist Uighur terrorists not terrorists anymore and accuses China's emancipation efforts for "genocide" and "human rights violation".

How come that anti-Communist and hardcore Human Rights defender Peter Klevius, with no interest or connection to China, happens to exactly share Elon Musk's view?! Elon Musk: “China rocks in my opinion. The energy in China is great. People there – there’s like a lot of smart, hard-working people.. When I meet with Chinese government officials, they're always very concerned about this. Are people going to be happy about a thing? Is this going to actually serve the benefit of the people? It seems ironic, but even though you have sort of a single-party system, they really actually seem to care a lot about the well-being of the people. In fact, they're maybe even more sensitive to public opinion than what I see in the US.”


1990 islam officially and globally (via UN) rejected Human Rights (the Saudi based and steered OIC's sharia declaration witch gravely violates the most basic of Human Rights)!

If Atheist Chinese had reproduced like muslims, there'd be more s.c. "Mongoloids" than the whole world population today.

BBC is the world's biggest lying and faking propaganda troll - BBC's agenda has absolutely nothing to do with journalistic principles but is a mix of US pressure spiced with the worst of "Britishness" (UK cuts foreign aid from 0.7-0.5% and adds the same money to militarism) meeting in Saudi/OIC islamofascist sharia against basic Human Rights. BBC: UK has to aid Saudi war crimes and genocides cause else Russia and China would do it. UK's future is as a militaristic puppet for US (compare BBC's campaign against Johnson and Corbyn). Peter Klevius to BBC's Sinophobic muslim presenters in their ivory minaret: How many muslim women are detained in UK's sharia camps?

US secretary of state, Pompeo declares Islamic State Uighur jihadi not terrorists - so they can attack China and get support from US (as in Syria).


Peter Klevius defends basic Human Rights equality - and if it offends you, then you're racist and/or sexist.

Peter Klevius to Chinese people: I'm not a racist Sinophobe - although I certainly look like one.
Btw, when will US women get the same rights as Chinese women - ERA is still lacking from US constitution? Chinese constitution, Article 2: Women shall enjoy equal rights with men in all aspects of political, economic, cultural, social and family life. It's an irony that China now seems to offer the only defense of those very Human Rights it's accused of not following - while US and its puppets support islamism that violates those Human Rights (compare Saudi based and steered OIC's global sharia declaration against Human Rights). Moreover, apostasy (i.e. leaving islam, which is the worst crime in islam) and the fact that the muslim man determines the faith for the children no matter who is the mother, together have to be added to any estimation of muslim population growth.

Islamophilia feeds islamofascism - "islamophobia" feeds Human Rights equality. The West's entanglement with anti-Human Rights islam has eroded "Western values" beyond recognition. And behind every "Chinese aggression" you'll find US aggression - because US doesn't want to lose its global freeloader position.

Islam, because of its origin (in which it's stuck by Muhammed, sharia and apostasy ban) inevitably paves the way for islamist extremism and due road to medieval backwardness. However, possibly more than half of s.c. "muslims" don't want this anti-Human Rights sharia, but sadly, islam has put all muslims under an apostasy ban, and Western idiots don't give freedom loving "muslims" a helping hand but instead help sharia islamists by calling sound criticism against islam "islamophobia". However, US is the real problem - wherever you see islamist uprising (e.g. near China or its belt-and-road) - check for US/CIA meddling.

Nation of Islam: Black lives matter more than other races! Black is original! Peter Klevius: Aka supremacist racism! No, black is adaptive and isn't "original" at all because there's no "black gene". The darkest skin in the world is as far from Africa you can get - and the darkest African skin developed quite recently. And black skin is doomed to vanish anyway. And the Homo lineage was light skinned until 1.2 Myr when they were already all over the old world. And the oldest modern humans are light skinned mongoloids.

Big Afropological words from a big (on the web) "Piltdown man" - with a PC dwarfed brain? John Hawks' "explanation" to how Homo floresiensis "travelled from Africa to Flores" wouldn't impress a 3-year old.
The Even More Astonishing Hypothesis (EMAH explaining your brain and AI and what you thought was "consciousness".
Peter Klevius sex tutorial and suggestion for DSM-6. An analysis of sex segregation and heterosexual attraction.

US' and its puppets' Sinophobia campaign rooted in UK's appalling opium wars against Chinese people

US' and its puppets' Sinophobia campaign rooted in UK's appalling opium wars against Chinese people

Why do Sinophobic BBC and UK parliament call it "deradicalization" in UK, US and Saudi Arabia, but "genocide" in China?! And why wasn't one-child policy against Atheist Han Chinese called "genocide" while Uighur muslims were allowed to have many children?! Btw, e.g. Sweden abducts many more children than China does in Xinjiang - and for extremely questionable reasons (read Peter Klevius' thesis Pathological Symbiosis and ask yourself why Sweden gets away with its Human Rights violations). Answer: It's all about U.S. being a lousy loser and therefore behaving appalingly badly with smear, threats, illegal sanctions, militaristic aggression etc! Btw, China is already number one in economy and most technology - and accelerating compared to US. So you stupid US puppets - take note!

Shame on everyone who blinks Saudi based and steered OIC's anti-human rights sharia for all the world's muslims while spitting on China!

Should BBC and some politicians be put on a Nurenberg trial after this relentless and demonizing Sinophobia campaign and deliberate lies?

US is rottening fast and should therefore go for peace and cooperation! Despite using $-freeloading, sanctions, breaking treaties, murdering officials and politicians in other countries during state visits etc., hindering the use of tech previously used to monopolize US companies globally etc., US now wants to destroy Huawei and other Chinese companies, not for security but because US is inevitably losing the tech race. And no, it isn't the Chinese state support any more than US uses state support for force-feeding Apple, Google etc. and backed up by US state militaristic interventions, spying, interference, threats etc. globally. And China was the first to recognize the danger of Covid-19 - not "delaying" anything" but quite the contrary (see below)!
BBC News' deliberately misleading and dangerous anti-China rant 20200706:
"China ought to be our enemy! We can't do any business with China because of Hong Kong, and the sterilization of Uyghur muslims which some people (BBC and its cherry picked guests?!) think amounts to genocide". Peter Kleius: That Chinese muslims should follow the same laws as other Chinese, and that China uses similar deradicalization programmes proposed in the West, BBC thinks is "suppression". And volontary sterilization in the West BBC calls "genocide" in China. And Hong Kong's security law is similar to those in the West - and not as bad as US - and are definitely neccessary to keep "one nation" together under the immense pressure from US and its puppet regimes.

2020 4th of July: Peter Klevius wonders when US women will get the same rights as Chinese women - ERA is still lacking from US constitution? Article 2, Chinese constitution: Women shall enjoy equal rights with men in all aspects of political, economic, cultural, social and family life. Peter Klevius also wonders why aggressive and assertive US attacks peaceful China (every schism has US fingerprints) while siding with the war crimes committing murdeous islamofascist Saudi dictator family whose OIC sharia clearly denies eqaulity for women?! China is doing more good to more people than any other country today. Is this the reason?!

20200701: BBC News asks for war against China but complains "we have only two aircraft carriers". Peter Klevius wonders how sick BBC has become?!
20200618: Why is the most cemtral witness, Inge Morelius (later aka Mårelius) in the Swedish PM Palme's murder case, deleted by Google's search engine from Peter Klevius revealing murder analysis?!
20200616: When China discovers Covid-19 with a European DNA profile on a cutting board for Norwegian salmon, the BBC thinks it's the communist party.
Why is BBC so quiet about Churchill's secret (until 2018) pact with Stalin in 1939 which would have divided Scandinavia between Russia and UK?! And US' NATO puppet Jens Stoltenberg repeats like a parrot his master's voice against China - while a civil war is going on inside NATO between Greece and Turkey.

African Pygmy lives matter! Colonized and enslaved for more than 3,500 years by the Eurasian Bantu etc. intruders we now call Africans. It's a senseless irony that "Africans" (Bantus etc. newcomers) who enslaved and mixed with original Africans (Khoisan and especially Pygmies from whom they got their phenotype) and later were enslaved by muslim Arabs and their "African" collaborators now get a brain drop at the West African ports where islam exported slaves. Any old African genes come from Khoisan and Pygmies - and ultimately out of Asia - not Africa. "Out-of-Africa" and BLM are created by white idiots and only feed supremacism. Read "out-of-Africa" more dangerous than the Piltdown hoax.

Peter Klevius 20200604: What if Floyd had been white or Chinese?! And the officers members of Nation of Islam? And how do we even know that any racism was involved? And what about a fair trial? All human lives matter!
20200603: UK's Sinophobic right wing anti-EU migration Brexiters now want to import 3 million Chinese from Hong Kong!?
20200529: In its everyday Sinophobia rant BBC today managed in one sentence to accuse Chinese, China and Xi separately - and even missing the stock smear, i.e. the "communist party". However in a very near future China will develop and export a world leading ecosystem of non-US software, hardware, fintech, social media, telecom infrastructure etc. that everyone will long for. Stubborn and dumb stiff lipped Sinophobes will become Neanderthals in no time. Sadly few politicians understand how powerful Chinese tech development is. Japan did the same but wasn't hampered by Maoist communism and was ten times smaller. High IQ and an Atheist culture they both have in common.

The pro-Saudi and anti-China "party-within" UK's governing party is committing long term criminal harm to UK. China is the future and US is rottening with accelerating speed (the desperate sanctions against China tell it all). Only tech cooperation with China will benefit Brits and Americans. So why are UK politicians and BBC so eager to shoot their own PM and the Brits in the foot by being dictated by Pompeo, Trump and the Saudi dictator family, and boosted by a general Sinophobia racism? The "communist" scare mongering has no relevance because in practice China behaves in no way different than US - but is under constant smear and subversion attacks. And China's surveillance has actually developed less fast than that of US. US is a rogue state state that murders and surveils in other countries (e.g. murdered top politician in Iran and surveilled Merkel - and you). And who likes ISIS and al-Qaeda etc. Uyghur jihadi terrorists anyway? Pompeo, Erdogan and Saudi steered islamofascists.

20200522: BBC and some right wing MPs call it a "draconian move" when China wants to stop foreign interference and people using Molotov cocktails. Really! So what about in UK?!

20200518: BBC again repeated the anti-China lie about "a silenced doctor" by inviting the former right wing and pro-Saudi (anti-)EU Research Group - now (anti-)China Research Group. How bad a journalist isn't Sarah Montague then when she didn't even try to question it - or is she muffled?! Eye dr. Li Wenliang wrongly spread out it could be SARS. It wasn't and just one hour later - and long before any police etc. had contacted him - he corrected his mistake (see fact check below).
$-freeloader US provoking China with war ships while simultaneously "leaking" "classified" rumours. Why?! Its Sinophobia is all about trying to stop China's success as the foremost spreader of wealth and high tech both in China and the world. It's not the leadership but China's success that US can't stand.

BBC sides with whoever Sinophobes - and would probably even have used Goebbels against China if he was still around. UK universities etc. are littered with dangerous Saudi (OIC) anti-Human Rights sharia jihad propaganda (incl. supprt of IS Utghur jihadi) - yet China has always been aggressively smeared all the way since UK's opium war attacks on China when it was declared "inferior" and "uncivilized". Today the problem seems to be that China is too superior and too civilized - but thankfully they have a "communist" party to blame, although the leadership has behaved better than most in the West. And when BBC talks about the "West" against China it actually means US spy organization Five Eyes (with the puppet states Australia, UK, Canada and NZ) and whoever other Sinophobes it can find elsewhere - like the Israel supporting and anti-muslim right wing Axel Springer, Europe's largest media (practically a monpoly) which is accused of e.g. censorship and interference in other countries (just like state media BBC).

Should China sue BBC and UK (not to mention US) and the far-right, anti-China and anti-muslim UK "think tank" the Jackson Society (with associated Sinophobic MPs and lords) - whose Sinophobia (disguised as "against communism" etc.) complements leftist and pro-sharia jihad muslims BBC which now so eagerly gives it a platform, as well as the closely connected US spy organization Five Eyes which has demonized China for years long before Huawei or Covid-19? The lies about China they have spread are indistinguishable from those of Pompeo and Trump. Is this baseless (compared to US/UK) hate mongering really conducive to the welfare of UK? And when China reacts to this massive Sinophobia campaign then BBC calls it "aggressive Chinese propaganda".

US "warns" about China "stealing" vaccine info because US knows that China now produces much better research than US.

BBC anti-China fake 20200506: "Hundreds if not thousands of people were likely to have been infected in Wuhan, at a time when Chinese officials said there were only a few dozen cases." Peter Klevius fact check: BBC deliberately conflates real time confirmed knowledge with calculations in retrospect.

US has made all the mistakes it accuses China for. Here's one from the top of the iceberg: Whistleblower Dr. Rick Bright, the director of the Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority, pressed for urgent access to funding, personnel and clinical specimens, including viruses, which he emphasized were all critically necessary to begin development of lifesaving medicines needed in the likely event that the virus spread outside of SE Asia. He was then cut out of critical meetings for raising early alarm about the virus and ousted from his position.

Chinese 5G much more reliable than US' Five Eyes, the world's most dangerous misinfo and conspiracy spreading US spy and smear organization (together with its puppet states UK, Canada, Australia and New Zealand) which "leaked" a 15-page dossier alleging "probing the possibility" the virus came from the Wuhan Institute of Virology. As Peter Klevius has said before, it didn't come from bats to humans but from some other host animal. Fake news and anti-China propaganda videos are making false and unfounded claims about "delays" and "late" human to human transmission report. Again, it was only in retrospect anyone could have known the nature of early cases. Many weren't even connectded to the wet market and many weren't affected at all despite intimate contact. Moreover, the wrong early SARS diagnosis was corrected the very same day but spread by a "whistleblower" eye doctor (see fact check below). And despite being first affected China acted better than US etc. countries. 5eyes equals Nazi Goebbels in propaganda misinfo. Every single accusation so far has built on deliberate distortion of facts. And possble improvements in retrospect would have been exactly the same in even the best of Western countroes.

Peter Klevius to Chinese people: I'm not a racist - although I certainly look like one.

Origin of Sinophobia: The 19th century Opium Wars were triggered by UK's imposition of the opium trade upon China. Lord Palmerston regarded the Chinese as uncivilized and suggested that the British must attack China to show up their superiority as well as to demonstrate what a "civilized" nation could do. The resulting concession of Hong Kong compromised China's territorial sovereignty. There's also the background to South China Sea.

"God", "Allah", or whichever "monotheistic" idol is a pathetic fallacy and "monotheism" is a ridiculous and dangerous self-delusion because your "god" is used to defend the undefendable. There are equally many "gods" as there are individuals - and the collective "god" only functions as cherry picked confirmation of the individual's "god". However, the collective "god" may combine individual evil - never individual good, because that can only be achieved by (negative) Human Rights. After all, as Peter Klevius always has said, the only way of being fully human is to allow others full humanhood (what else could possibly unite all humans) - without religious impositions/exclusions.

Pentagon, islam - and China?!

Pentagon, islam - and China?!

Peter Klevius asks for an independent international inquiry on BBC's racist Sinophobia and its support of sharia islamism - incl. how many victims and suffering it has caused because of its worldwide propaganda influence.

In the early 1990's US accused Japan of selling superior cars in US without buying crappy cars from US. And a congress woman warned for tech theft if selling US planes to Japan - but was told that those planes wouldn't even fly without Japanese high tech. At the same time EU was created to build a trade wall against Japanese products. However, Japan is more than ten times smaller than China - and isn't at the hotbed of different coronaviruses in SE Asia.

Dear reader, if you think Peter Klevius has a problem with self-assertion you're very wrong. Apart from it being connected to Peter Klevius criticism of citation cartels (see Demand for Resources, 1992:40-44) Peter Klevius main problem is your self-assertion.

Demand for Resources

Is this MP a clown?

Sinophobic BBC working hard for a Coup d'état together with Saudi loving and China hating MPs against PM Boris Johnson.

Peter Klevius wonders why Sinophobic state media BBC (with Tom Tugendhat etc.) goes against the state (PM, MI6 etc.) in being so extremely worried about unfounded claims about China while having no problem with the threats posed by the worst of the worst, the islamofascist Saudi dictator family's influence over UK - and BBC?!

20200417: BBC's Sinophobic muslim Razia Iqbal together with Tom Tugendhat arrange a pathetic propaganda theatre of BBC's 22:00 news hour for the most senseless and even childish smearing of China. And how can this clown (just listen to his laughter etc.!) be a leader of UK's foreign affairs committee?! Moreover, Razia Iqbal even uses Trump as an expert! Desperate...!

20200416: State media BBC's Sinophobic Uganda rooted muslim Razia Iqbal lies about Chinese "racism" against Ugandans without telling that it was a local matter that was caused by some Africans linked to a cluster of cases in the Nigerian community in Guangzhou at a time when China had already curbed Covid-19. At least eight people diagnosed with the illness had spent time in the city's Yuexiu district, known as "Little Africa". Five were Nigerian nationals who faced widespread anger - not for being Africans but because of reports that they had broken a mandatory quarantine and been to eight restaurants and other public places instead of staying home. As a result, nearly 2,000 people they came into contact with had to be tested for Covid-19 or undergo quarantined. Guangzhou had confirmed 114 imported coronavirus cases – 16 of which were Africans. The rest were returning Chinese nationals.

20200407a.m.: UK's best PM, Boris Johnson, is much shorter (same as Einstein and Klevius dad) than Trump - but also much more intelligent. It's OK to say so when Trump is white - and loves to play on height, right?

20200412: The reason the Chinese government wanted extra control of DNA results was the previous failed report (see below) which wrongly indicated SARS. However, British media (BBC etc.) blatantly lie about it and first accused Shi Zhengli's lab for spreading infected bats, while some weeks later making her a hero and accusing the government. And no, it didn't spread from bats - but possibly from civet cats. Suspected animals are now forbidden from the market.


SINOPHOBIA RACISM. US tries to pull you away from Chinese high tech superiority so US can keep feeding you with its outdated tech and influence - just as it used to do with cars and wars. Your pick: US militarism with Saudi led islamofascism - or highspeed Chinatech towards Chinese democracy and global wealth. China is the very opposite to Cuba - and already, in practise, almost identical to Western governments. Excluding China only prolongs the democratic process - and even speeds up China's high tech inside its 1.4 billion market.

UK/Matt Hancock (20200402): "We will work (against Covid19) with our friends and allies." Peter Klevius: That excludes the best, i.e. China, which you, on order from US, have declared an "unfriendly enemy"!

Peter Klevius fact check: "COVID-19 has a natural origin and there is no evidence that the virus was made in a laboratory or otherwise engineered" (Nature). China swiftly sequenced and shared the genome worldwide. China's remarkable response on all stages was praised by WHO (but not BBC) and is in line with its superior tech advances (Mao's China would never have made it). There isn't a trace of an alleged (by BBC etc. fakes) Chinese Covid19 reporting "delay" that wouldn't have been bigger in the West. And the reason is that for China good reputation is all that matters - now when it has already won the tech competition. China's defense against West's smear campaign is called "propaganda" - in the West.
Dear US, it's time to behave! You lost the tech war to little Japan long ago. Now you've lost it against big China. Get over it. So Peter Klevius advises: Do as Wall Street, shake hands instead of producing unfounded Sinophobic smear propaganda!

Covid19 timeline
17 November 2019: A retrospectively confirmed case.
1 December 2019: The first known patient started experiencing symptoms but had not been to the Huanan Seafood Wholesale Market. No epidemiological link could be found between this case and later cases.
8–18 December 2019: Seven cases later diagnosed as COVID19 were documented; only two of them were linked with the Huanan Seafood Wholesale Market.
18-29 December 2019: Bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BAL) that will eventually be used for viral genome sequencing is collected from patients.
25 December 2019: Wuhan Fifth Hospital gastroenterology director Lu Xiaohong reported suspected infection by hospital staff.
26 December 2019: Zhang Jixian identified a CT scan that showed a different pattern from other viral pneumonia.
27 December 2019: She reported to Jianghan district CCDC with four cases. During the following two days, the hospital received three similar cases, who all came from Huanan Seafood Wholesale Market. The hospital reported to the provincial and city CDC directly which initiated a field investigation with a retrospective search for pneumonia patients potentially linked to the market. They found additional such patients and on 30 December, health authorities from Hubei Province reported this cluster to CCDC who immediately sent experts to Wuhan to support the investigation. Samples from these patients were obtained for laboratory analyses.
30 December 2019: Wuhan Municipal Health Committee informed WHO, Weibo etc. about an "urgent notice on the treatment of pneumonia of unknown cause". There had been "a successive series of patients with unexplained pneumonia recently." However, a DNA report inaccurately indicated SARS on one patient. Late same day (17:43) ophthalmologist Li Wenliang WeChatted "There were 7 confirmed cases of SARS at Huanan Seafood Market." He included a patient's CT scan. At 18:42, he admitted that it wasn't proven SARS.
31 December 2019: US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention were alerted by China of an unexplained "cluster of 27 cases of pneumonia” in Wuhan.

US worst nightmare is a democratic China - which wouldn't change China but make it even more like one-party "democracies" in the West - because that would mean losing US only argument. US deliberately seeks Sinophobic confrontational aggression against China - which hampers the development and peace of the world.

US island puppets against China and EU. US, who used to treat Japan as it now treats China, is now parasitizing on former enemy Japan in an (in vane) effort to keep China high tech down, and on the much tinier UK ally to trouble EU.

Something sinister is behind when Sinophobic far right extremist politicians so desperately risk future development in UK with false accusations of "possible risks in the future", skewed presentations, and unfounded demonization of Chinese high tech. And while Klevius is posting this, all in his machine is spied on and sent to US. And why is BBC constantly only hosting Sinophobic guests who also happen to be supporters of the islamofascist Saudi dictator family and happy to allow US spying on you via US companies? The only risk Huawei poses is that the Chinese state gets fed up and makes it illegal to sell Chinese top tech to UK. China is the future of high tech, so stepping off the bus means retardation. Btw, the two main accusations against China could easily be made against US/UK as well. China wants to trade and therefore doesn't want to risk reputation. US doesn't bother about its reputation. And when it comes to clean up muslim "communities" from islamofascist extremists there's really no other difference than in numbers. Moreover, NATO/Turkey uses extremist Uyghurs against civilians in e.g. Idlib - and hypocritically accuse China when these jihadi return.

Klevius to women: NATO makes a deal with the Taliban to continue sharia oppression of women, and NATO+IS=true because NATO is the main culprit behind the suffering in Idlib. Without the support from NATO the worst muslim terrorist group would never have survived. Like IS, NATO ally Hayat Tahrir al-Sham wants to create an islamic state. Turkey/NATO backs SNA well knowing that it's together with HTS. I.e. a NATO member state invades its neighbor, sides with terrorists and gets full support from NATO when its soldiers get killed while helping the terrorists. And what about Yemen?! It's truly pathetic that muslims seem more worried about islamofascism than the West!

Peter Klevius to climatists: Sinophobia is a threat to the environment, because China has the slowest population growth and is the the least per capita polluter of main economies (see table below) and the main producer of alternative and conventional super high tech! Moreover, China lacks the same proportion of natural resources as e.g. Sweden, Norway etc. (e.g. hydropower) but instead has to deal with the dust smog blowing from the Gobi desert and the extreme cold from the north. And China bears the manufacturing pollution for products other countries then consume and profit on.

NATO (Turkey supported by US/UK) is siding with the worst muslim terrorist organization Hayat Tahrir al-Sham (some 10,000 IS jihadi) against the people of Idlib while BBC News spreads misinfo propaganda against Syria, Russia and Iran - and nothing about the Saudi dictator family.

BBC (20200217) wants to stop Chinese tech because China opposes islamofascist Uyghurs. Klevius suggests the world should stop dealing with US/UK because of involvement in war crimes and genoscides against Shia muslims.

Why is Wikipedia allowed to spread polemical, tendentious and deliberately misleading info about islam? And not a word about islam's original supremacist enslavement, booty and humiliation ideology?! This misinfo is the most harmful of all!

From a true (negative) Human Rights, as well as from a historical perspective, original islam may rather be seen as original fascism. The oldest Koranic texts and the historically verified beginning of islam both emphasize supremacism as the main tenet (blamed/excused on "Allah"). Islam conserves racism, sexism and supremacism as pointed out by true muslims (aka "fundamentalists") reinforced through sharia (e.g. by Saudi based and steered OIC's world sharia which is heavily criticized both by Klevius and the Council of Europe etc.). Islamic (and therefore muslim) supremacism is easily distinguished as it doesn't approve of Human Rights equality.

And why does Wikipedia deliberately conflate the history of islam with the fairy tales of believers in islam?!

Sinophobia is racism but "islamophobia" is criticism of an ideology. "Islamophobia" shouters are directly responsible for islamic hate crimes based on Koranic texts and hitting children of "infidels".

The Saudi-US-UK axis of evil

Chinese eyes less intrusive than Five Eyes (US and its puppets) - because China prioritizes trade and reputation while US prioritizes global spying, meddling and military control. The Saudi loving US puppets Duncan Smith, Davis, Paterson, Green, Ellwood and Seely etc. produce baseless "security" arguments for Sinophobic MPs.

U.S. flu this season Feb. 2020: 19 million illnesses, 180,000 hospitalizations, and over 10,000 deaths (China has a third less common flu than US). 2019-nCoV, 6 Feb. 2020 (estim. total death rate 0.1-0.2%, i.e. same as common flu): 28,018 cases (not illnesses) and 563 deaths. Did the eye doctors SARS rant on social media delay response in China? It wasn't SARS but much closer to common flu - but without vaccine. Instead of assisting, US/UK/BBC did the utmost to smear China with it!

Klevius warning to Finland (and the rest of the world): Don't be useful idiots in US' export of militarism! It will create tension and pull fire on you in a conflict. Four balancing power blocs is safer than one or two. Moreover, China will become the world's first true democracy thanks to AI. Don't let Sinophobia blind you. US is going down unless it starts cooperating instead of trying to rule the world. Non 5G iPhone sells well - in US - where there's no true 5G.

BBC's bigoted and hypocritical Pakistan rooted, Saudi raised and Cambridge schooled "muslim" (no veil, no Ramadan fasting, but yes to alcohol etc.) presenter Mishal Husain, like many Saudi/OIC supporters, represents the "security risk" between islam's "core" (OIC sharia) and "periphery" (e.g. "Euro-islam", "cultural islam" etc.).

Peter Klevius suggests cooperation instead of unfounded incl. religious) hate!

Klevius is ashamed over hateful, racist Western Sinophobia - and support of hateful sharia jihad. BBC's sharia supporting (?) muslim Mishal Husain now eagerly sides with Sinophobic extreme right wing politicians who support Saudi islamofascism but demonize China and Chinese (except if critcical of China). Sinophobes would treat China exactly the same if it copied US "democracy".

BBC today (20200129) forgot to tell about China already having isolated the virus for vaccine (and helped Australians to do so).
However, BBC repeatedly lied that the death rate is 20%. Common flu and the new corona virus deaths (~2%) are extremely rare outside very vulnerable groups - who don't travel much.

BBC, who otherwise don't hesitate to spit on Trump, has no problem using his advisor when it comes to racist Sinophobia against Huawei. US is blackmailing UK so to hinder China's tech success and the "security issue" is actually US itself.

Niklas Arnberg, Swedish professor in virology: "Considerably higher mortality than ordinary flu." BBC: "Death toll rises as disease spreads from China."
Peter Klevius: Both are faking! Arnberg used overall death numbers although most (all?!) of these deaths have been people who could have died from ordinary flu as well. And do you really think BBC would ever have written similarly about the deadly camel flu from Saudi Arabia?!

Why is BBC only talking about Jewish victims - and why is BBC silent about the fact that most "anti-semites" (i.e. anti-Jews) are muslims? Holocaust: 6 million Jews and 11 million "others" were murdered by the German government for various discriminatory practices due to their ethnicity, Atheism, or LGBT+.
Hitler: "All character training must be derived from faith." Himmler: ""We believe in a God Almighty who stands above us; he has created the earth, the Fatherland, and he has sent us the Führer. Any human being who does not believe in God should be considered arrogant, megalomaniacal, and stupid." Klevius (the Atheist "other"): That's a description of me by most Americans and muslims. Btw, why are muslim sex predators (compare Koran and sex slaves) from Pakistan called "Asians"?! And why have they been protected while Klevius has been muffled?!


Islam trumps LGBT rights in English schools - and hateful sexist and racist muslim supremacism defending BBC is silent as usual (e.g. about Parkfield Community School 2020).

Klevius: Do you really support US/UK/BBC's disgusting racist Sinophobia madness - and their support and use of anti-Human Rights muslim islamism?! Wikipedia: In the Xinjiang riots Turkic speaking Uyghur muslims shouted/posted "kill the Han (Chinese) and Hui (Chinese speaking muslims)"!

Why is BBC so silent about Iran Air Flight 655 that was recklessly shot down by US over Iran territory killing 290 incl. 66 children?! Is it the new US puppet empire agenda? Did US aggression also cause the latest plane crash?

When BBC announces "the threats of 2020" the murders, terrorism and war crimes committing Saudi dictator family isn't included. As isn't US/UK militaristic meddling and proxy wars in Syria, Yemen, Iraq etc. However, China's peaceful trade and high tech manufacturing is!?

Saudi based and steered Human Rights violator OIC is the main legal guidance for the world's sharia muslims. BBC eagerly supports it by neglecting to criticize it while spitting on those who do. OIC's Cairo Declaration on "Human Rights" in Islam (CDHRI) is against freedom of religion - but abuses real Human Rights for the promotion of anti-Human Rights sharia islam. The CDHRI concludes in Articles 24 and 25 that all rights and freedoms mentioned are subject to the Islamic sharia, which is the declaration's sole source. OIC hence keeps the gate open for continued islamofascism in the "muslim world" - and as a convenient tool for meddling in "hostile states".

You believer in "islamophobia"! Doesn't it scare you that if Peter Klevius is right about islam but wouldn't say anything, then who would when you're doomed on the market if you do? If Marx had been called a "messenger" then Marxism would have been protected by freedom of religion, and critics called "Marxophobes". All "monotheist" religions make excuses not to fully accept Human Rights equality, but islam is by far the worst - not the least due to its origin and the fact that it's protected, unlike other threats to Human Rights. Whereas totalitarian Marxism used to be the enemy of the West, today US is on the totalitarian islamofascist side using it for Saudi gains against declared "enemies". It's truly a grim irony when BBC protects islamofascist terrorist groups by telling you that the suffering in Syria is due to the Syrian government and Russia. US could stop the muslim terrorist groups at any time - but doesn't because it wants the war and suffering to continue.

Peter Klevius fact/fake check: Why does Google (and BBC) lie and fake straight up your face about China?! When searching for 'world's biggest per capita polluters' China comes up with extra big letters despite being one of the least polluting of major economies (47th on a reliable polluters list). Moreover, China is not only the world leader for alternative technologies, but its pollution number also includes the biggest production of products exported and consumed all over the world outside China. Source: EDGAR and incl. all human activities leading to climate relevant emissions, except biomass/biofuel combustion (short-cycle carbon).

Peter Klevius Christmas greeting to BBC and Tesco: Ever thought about the possibility that muslim islamists don't like making Christmas cards but are encouraged by US/UK/BBC etc. to smear China. "We are foreign prisoners (muslims?) in Shanghai Qingpu prison China. Forced to work against our will (islamic Christophobia?). Please help us and notify human rights (ultimate bigotry if sharia muslims ask for HR) organisation (Saudi based and steered OIC?!)."

US/UK (NATO) don't accept muslims like Uighur islamists (other than as proxy soldiers) - but demand China to accept them.

NATO's Sinophobia is a threat to world peace, environment and prosperity. NATO is all about US monopolizing space for its own militarism and to block China's success? In 1990s Russia was proposed as a member of NATO but is now demonized by US/UK (and BBC) as the "main enemy" together with "the challenge from China" (sic). But NATO members are guilty of offensive wars, occupations, annexations, use of chemical weapons, use of islamist terrorists, foreign interventions, extrajudicial murderings in other countries - and use of similar muslim "re-education" camps as China (why not just criminalize original evil islam?!). NATO (US) threatens the free flow of tech and wealth, and provokes hate and defensive attitudes among Chinese - hence forcing China (world leader in tech) using its financial muscles more for defense (China can't be starved like USSR in 1980s) than environment. Btw, Chinese per capita GDP is 1/3 of US, and total GDP much bigger than US - and faster growing. A fraction of the effort given to demonize "islamophobic" islam criticim, would do wonders to reduce Sinophobic racism against Chinese. And stop using the "Communist threat". China is now a capitalist country similar to Western powers - except technologically much better (and the West copies everything China does in surveillance). Do you really think much would change if China would be fully democratic - except chaos caused by NATO? NATO (US/UK) would be equally Sinophobic. In fact, what is called "democracy" in the West functions quite similarly as the leadership in China. Media propaganda, lying politicians and empty promises combined with silencing the real issues (compare BBC's fake "news") - and therefore a truly democratic vote. Moreover, the only reason capitalist China has a non-democratic leadership for the moment is precisely its justified fear for leaving it vulnerable for what happened in the past when UK and US meddled and attacked with great suffering for the Chinese people. NATO should turn against the real evil, the islamofascist Saudi dictator family.

England voted (for the second time) against Merkel’s islam import from Turkey.

Can islam be rehabilitated from its evil origin and deeds - and can unrehabilitated islam be allowed in public and private spheres?

Why is Saudi based and steered OIC's Islamic State of Gambia accusing Aung San Suu Kyi for the consequences of islamofascism OIC's sharia protects - and why isn't the murderous islamofascist war criminal and genocide committing Saudi dictator "prince" accused of anything? And why is BBC's leading muslim extremist propaganda presenter Mishal Husain allowed to "present" an absolutely one-sided pro islamist picture for BBC's compulsory fee paying listeners?

"British" nationalist hypocrisy: Get back control - and meddle, influence, intervene, spy and control all over the world.

More than half of muslims in UK are "islamophobes" (against sharia) - just like Peter Klevius, Council of Europe etc. - but opposite to BBC and many UK politicians (source: A survey of UK’s muslim communities by Martyn Frampton, David Goodhart and Khalid Mahmood MP).

BBC awards a white man who plays an odd sport few are interested in the title of "sports personality of the year 2019". Why?! Because cricket is a "british" colonial sports and also fits BBC's special interest in "asians" - but couldn't find a "british asian" good enough.



Is BBC killing UK democracy and paving the way for islamofascism?
DEMOCRACY DENIED: WARNING TO UK VOTERS ABOUT BBC's HUMANRIGHTSPHOBIA! WHO's RIGHT ON ISLAM - BBC OR THE COUNCIL OF EUROPE?
BBC undermines your most basic Human Rights. BBC's "islamophobia" propaganda machine (incl. Sayeeda Warsi) boosts OIC islam while neglecting Council of Europe's sharp ("islamophobic") criticism of OIC's world sharia (Cairo declaration). SO HOW COME THAT BBC IS ALLOWED TO MEDDLE IN THE VOTING PROCESS BY ATTACKING AND SMEARING THOSE CANDIDATES WHO SHARE THE VIEW OF THE COUNCIL OF EUROPE - not to mention the anti-fascist Universal Human Rights declaration of 1948?! And how come that racism against e.g. Polish and other EU people in UK is of no interest for BBC while the "problem" of "islamophobia" fills all BBC "news"?

How Merkel paved the way for Brexit (Erdogan deal) and aided jihad in EU. NATO (US) with former fascist state Germany now sides with islamofascism - especially Erdogan's Ottoman aspirations - and supports Uyghur jihadism in hope of placing NATO (i.e. US) nukes between Russia and China. Peter Klevius wonders whether this ill-directed jihad propaganda will promote peace and safety?
The world bully U.S. thinks it owns and rules the world after having colonized it via dollar manipulation, infiltration, spying, meddling, sanctions and the unscrupulous use of militants and militarism.
Thanks to the global dollar scam, Americans have been freeloaders on the rest of the world, the biggest per capita polluters and the U.S. by far the biggest threat to world peace via weapons built with money it stole from the world. Said by Peter Klevius who has been an anti-socialist all his life. Btw. the world's industrial revolution didn's start in England but in Sweden already in the late 17th century by inventor Christopher Polhem and capitalist Gabriel Stierncrona. Without Polhem's automation to get the rich Swedish iron ore from the mains, England had no chance to start real industrial production.

A nun's gear doesn't sign other women as "whores". However, what about a woman in an islamic "chastity" gear?

K.S. Lal (a giant among historians): Mahmud of Ghazni had marched into Hindustan again and again to wage jihad and spread the Muhammadan religion, to lay hold of its wealth, to destroy its temples, to enslave its people, sell them abroad and thereby earn profit, and to add to muslim numbers by converting the captives.

Is BBC 100% steered by muslims? Not only can you ever hear anything critical about islam and muslims - but all main channels are also occupied by sharia (OIC) supporting (i.e. against basic Human Rights equality) muslims. Nazir Afzal ('Moral maze', news, culture etc.), Mishal Husain (news, culture etc.), Samira Ahmed (news, culture etc.), Razia Iqbal (news, culture etc.). And they all keep cheating the public about it and instead pointing finger to "dumb and hateful xenophobes". Not a word about e.g. Council of Europe's harsh critcism (see below) of muslims biggest sharia organization, the Saudi based and steered OIC. Foreigners isn't the peoblem - sharia islam is!

BBC's muslims and their PC supporters also meddle in UK election by demonizing "islamophobia", i.e. trying to stop critcs of islamofascism.

Muslim child/youth fascism induced by an islam interpretation from family and strengthened by PC media, politicians etc.

The Saudi Aramco confidence scam


Peter Klevius: Everyone - incl. every muslim who respects Human Rights - ought to make sure to vote for an "islamophobe"! BBC and Sayeeda Warsi will make their utmost to stop critics of islamofascism in the election. Don't be robbed of your democratic right. And of course you know that the only real problem with migration is islamofascism.

BBC's "man in Hong Kong" asked street terror leader Joshua Wong if they could possibly escalate violence. And they could. One day later they put a Chinese on fire in a murder attempt.

BBC dosn't want to save 4,000 steel-workers' jobs because "it's a Chinese buyer and because of the leadership". However, BBC doesn't complain about the murderous and islamofascist Saudi leadership and more than 200 UK/Saudi joint ventures between UK and Saudi companies, and some 100,000 Saudi nationals in UK (equivalent to 14 Million Chinese).

BBC, in an interview about Corbyn, also desperately tries to agitate for more militarism and use of nukes
- although fact being that a UK with nukes and war meddling globally may draw more attention and due risk for the Brits than without.

Peter Klevius: The Saudi Aramco sale is the biggest ripoff in the world. If there's any future in oil and you don't care about environment, then why buy what's at its peak when Venezuela's PDVSA is bigger and as low it can get?!

Are you an "islamophobe" if you don't like islamist Human Rights violations? Islam has (via OIC's sharia declaration) abandoned the most basic anti-fascist Human Rights from 1948. Islam is hence the only religion in doing so - not even the Catholics have needed to replace Human Rights with "Catholic human rights".

The seed for world fascism is dormant in Saudi based and steered OIC's world sharia - opposed by ECHR and Peter Klevius, but supported by Sayeeda Warsi.

Sayeeda Warsi, UK's biggest "islamophobia" shouting mouth against Human Rights, is for OIC sharia

Sayeeda Warsi, UK's biggest "islamophobia" shouting mouth against Human Rights, is for OIC sharia

While US/UK aim for militarism and war China aims for health and wealth.

While US/UK aim for militarism and war China aims for health and wealth.
How could the Brexit party possibly avoid the Parliament?! Breakit instead of Brexit because what's the point of leaving one EU while still staying in an other called UK? England voted leave.

However, unfortunately BBC demonizes China on behalf of UK's relying on militarist meddling, weapons sales and islamofascist sharia finance. So you see the solution: Cut off sharia etc. islamofascist ties and open up for prospering with China - not the over-selfish game of spying and dying of US.

BBC boosts stupid nationalist "Britishness" with peculiar "sports" like cricket and rugby because the world has already "colonized" football and the English language is a global property.

1 Nov 2019 BBC's Sinophobic muslim presenter Razia Iqbal spent most of World Tonight ("in depth news reporting and intelligent analysis from a global perspective") to defend muslim connected street terror in Hong Kong while smearing China. However, nothing about muslims in UK attacking journalists and non-muslims celebrating the Diwali which is globally seen as 'a day of light and hope'. The rest of the time Razia Iqbal boosted rugby. Intelligent? No. Propagandistic, tendentious, bigoted, hypocritical and misinforming while neglecting - yes.

Nigel Farage is like BBC against "islamophobia" and pro-Saudi - but Boris Johnson doesn't like letter boxes and was criticized by Theresa May for being critical against the Saudis while serving as her foreign minister.

China (laws against sharia islamofascism) and EU (Human Rights against sharia islamofascism) are now the only ones protecting basic (negative*) Human Rights.
* Religious people and socialists don't like negative Human Rights simply because they prefer collectives ("communities") rather than individuals. That's why the web is full of misinfo about these rights. Read Peter Klevius definition instead if you want a deep view - or listen to Lauren Chen starting from 7:11 if you want it light
The Saudi "custodian of islam" has some 1.5 billion "citizens" in the muslim world Ummah nation - and demands the world to bow them no matter what (as long they aren't Shia or so, of course). China, on the other hand, keeps its citizens and laws within its own borders. IS islam IS fascism and islam (even the archbishop agrees). So why is sharia fascism not separated from an "islam" that submits to basic Human Rights? As it stands now Saudi based and steered OIC's sharia (the 1990 Cairo declaration) still stands as the basic Human Rights violation via sharia muslims all over the world. And whereas China actively tries to erase sharia islamofascism, EU keeps promoting import of it while judicially telling us it's not right, yet doing nothing to stop it.
Unlike the West, China hasn't aggressively meddled militaristically in other countries around the world, but rather being the world's foremost spreader of new technology and wealth. And whereas the West has eagerly supported Mohammed's totalitarian aims, China has, in practise, implemented in law most of the Human Rights advices that The Council of Europe has directed against OIC. Against this background West's Saudi backing and China smearing is deeply bigoted and hypocritical.

John le Carré: I'm depressed and ashamed of British nationalism. Nationalism needs enemies but today we really have no identifiable enemies except among ourselves.

North Atlantic (sic) Treaty Organization invades a country in Mideast and attacks (with chemical weapons) a people without a country.

UK's Brexit business model: Sharia finance, weapons sale and militaristic meddling?UK Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs (sic) and Global Neo-Imperialist and Militarist Meddling, Jeremy Hunt, 15 Oct. 2019: It's wrong to accuse Donald Trump - it's Americans isolationism because American taxpayers don't want to pay between 1/2 and 2/3 of the defense of Europe. And Turkey is very skilled at finding wedges and gaps between allies. UK should be EU's bridge to US.
Peter Klevius: No, EU should take care of its own defense - against whom? The Saudi dictator family who is the world's no 1 spender on weapons and islamic terror incitement and who hates EU's anti-sharia legislation? And UK taxpayers should not have to pay more for dangerous militarism. Militaristic meddling is a bad and dangerous business idea.

Read K.S. Lal (free online) on islam's evil spread!

A Google (i.e. U.S. web monopoly) search (20191006) reports 'islamists Hong Kong' "missing". Really! No islamists in Hong Kong? Peter Klevius also wonders if EU citizens in UK are UKongers and can peacefully demand the same rights as Joshua Wong violently demands (and eagerly broadcasted by BBC) for Hong Kongers?

Peter Klevius congratulates Savid Javid for abandoning the islamofascist "islamophobia" smear. BBC’s bigoted hypocrite Mishal Husain and others ought to follow!

BBC's Mark Mardell couldn't get a visa to China because of his extreme and hateful Sinophobia - but that didn't stop him/BBC from producing a fake anti-China program series while pretending to be there. Is Sinophobia really better than cooperation?


Are EU citizens in UK included in Tom Tugenhadt's "British people"?

Sinophobe Tom Tugendhat, chair of UK's Foreign Affairs Committee (who has studied islam and Arabic in Mideast) suggests that English speaking universities should consider banning Chinese students because "they might be used as leverage like Huawei". Peter Klevius wonders if one could be any more racist than this, and if he doesn't see any islamofascist sharia supremacist "leverage" at all? Btw, there are more than 50,000 Chinese muslims in Hong Kong. Peter Klevius wonders how many of them are "radical" ones and participate in BBC's lengthy anti-China propaganda "news" - while the world doesn't suffer from Chinese but from muslim violence and Human Rights violations?
US/UK destroyed the lives of millions of Chinese during some hundred years of evil militaristic meddling. BBC is now busy smearing China all the time while supporting Saudi islamofascism and violent Hong Kong demonstrators - but neglecting the mass of peaceful pro-China demonstrators. BBC also "worries" about Chinese "surveillance state" while the truth is China's technological superiority. US is much more insidious in its surveillance policies but lacks the techno - can't even produce a working 5G so far. US/UK follow exactly China but utilize the meantime to smear it. And who is really behind the Hong Kong riots? Someone who can't take China's success? But the Syria tactics won't work. US (and its UK puppet) wants to be able to meddle militarily near China - therefore its interest in Taiwan, Hong Kong, Korea, Tibet, Myanmar, Uyghur extremist muslims etc.

As Greta Thunberg is allegedly reported to the Swedish social authorities, Peter Klevius suggests that her parents read his thesis Pathological Symbiosis in LVU, Relevance, and Sex Segregated Emergence. Keeping in mind that Peter Klevius daughter was only 15 when she entered university and at 16 made her graduate paper about women in ancient times, it shouldn't be considered too sensitive for Greta either. Also read the attached email correspondence which clearly shows how democracy is manipulated. And why not consider Angels of Antichrist, the Social State vs the People (P. Klevius 1996). And last but not least, Peter Klevius 1981/1992 Demand for Resources (original titel Resursbegär).
Peter Klevius and the Council of Europe share exactly the same "islamophobia".
Council of Europe. Resolution 2253 (2019), Sharia, Saudi based and steered OIC's Cairo Declaration and the European Convention on Human Rights: Human Rights protect the right to freedom of thought, conscience and religion as enshrined in Article 9 of the European Convention on Human Rights. The right to manifest one’s religion, however, is a qualified right whose exercise, under Article 17 of the Convention, may not aim at the destruction of other Convention rights or freedoms.

People in UK-land (especially women) will loose their Human Rights after Brexit - while sharia prevails in UK, and UK citizens in EU are protected by the European Court of Human Rights.

Brexit was meant to protect UK from muslim invasion via Turkey's proposed visa free deal with Merkel. Even the possibility of temporary membership in ECHR (in case of a deal) isn't enough - especially considering UK will be out of reach of the European Court of Justice.

US loosing the tech war - and starting a real one?

US loosing the tech war - and starting a real one?

Do Americans and Pompeo share the Saudi hate against Shia muslims?

BBC supports muslim persecution of Christians etc.

BBC supports muslim persecution of Christians etc.

Saudi investigating Saudi double tap airstrikes aided by US and UK

In the 8 October 2016 Sana'a (Yemen) funeral bombing by Saudi Arabia 155 people were killed and at least 525 more wounded when two airstrikes, about three to eight minutes apart, hit the packed Al Kubra hall. US and UK happy with the Saudis investigating it.

This Swedish muslim MP wants to criminalize Peter Klevius islamophobia. Really!

West's indulgence of islamofascism (sharia) has made its boasting against China about "democratic values" empty. The risk of you being stabbed, raped etc. by a hateful jihadi is created by your political leaders, BBC etc. - who also have arranged so it's not even called a hate crime.

BBC squeezes in Eng-land cricket in every news report - while UK-land plays borderless Brexit - and football is divided in four UK-lands, Welsh, English, Irish and Scottish players, and two top leagues with whatever players!? Confusing? Not even close to the "British" measuring decaphobia. English isn't "British", it belongs to the world. British stands for imperialism, colonialism, slavery and cooperation with islamofascists.

Peter Klevius stands for these "stops" and due huge implications - all shame on him if you can prove him wrong (click links if you need to educate yourself before saying something stupid): Stop using the misleading 'gender' instead of sex (sociology)! Stop islam's abuse of Human Rights (jurisprudence)! Stop saying humans came "out of Africa" (anthropology)! Stop talking about "consciousness" when you don't know what you're talking about (philosophy/ai).

Islam is the problem - China is the solution.

If China today became a full democracy (and even accepting full Human Rights) - nothing would change, because it's not the rulers but the high tech industry in China that outperforms the West. And unlike islam, China doesn't have tenets against Human Rights. However, islam is tied to its supremacist and sexist sharia tenets (OIC) which deny women full Human Rights - just the opposite to what is said in the anti-fascist Universal Human Rights declaration from 1948. If islam would accept full Human Rights it would not be islam anymore. China's economic expansion has been a non-aggressive big contributor to wealth around the world, but when China reached out its Belt and Road hand, then the West bit it and supported extremist muslim terrorists. Islam induced hate crimes and terror are based on a shared evil ideology (a global muslim collective rather than as nationals, which inspire and hail each other) - but because most are committed by lonely or gang muslims, and because police and media are told muslim "ethnicity" ought not to be revealed, then the public are kept unaware of most muslim hate crimes. How come that evilness is protected? The answer is in the question. To hide its original evilness. And how come that BBC and UK politicians dare to support islamofascism in Kashmir? Freedom from sharia for women in Kashmir!

* UK PM Theresa May opposed Human Rights.

Peter Klevius: BBC supports the islamofascist Saudi dictator family's strategic use of supremacist islam which has spred muslim hate all over the world's streets, institutions etc. (and usually not correctly, if at all, reported by BBC which instead doesn't hesitate to give long coverage of "alternative news" that better suits its propaganda) - while muslim terrorist organizations keep it within muslim territories. So if true Salafists became the "gurdians of islam's holy places" then that would mean less muslim terror elsewhere. And less to cover up for BBC. How big a contributor to the suffering of islamic supremacist hate crimes has BBC's fake (and lack of) info been? Will we in the future see BBC in an international court accused of crimes against humanity? As it stands now the spill over effect of BBC's cynical support of proxy evil is stained in blood and rape etc. over innocent people. And if true Salafists took over in muslim countries, they would quickly become non-muslim countries. A better option than today's prolonged suffering caused by the hopeless effort to "adapt" a medieval slavery ideology to a modern world based on everyone's Human Rights equality. And if it's so important to keep islam in name only - then islam would loose all of its racist and sexist "we and the other" appeal anyway.

Why is BBC aiding islamofascism?

Why is BBC aiding islamofascism?

Why didn't islam go to the moon?!

Why didn't islam go to the moon?!

Sex segregation/apartheid (aided by religion and poverty) means over-population.

Sex segregation/apartheid (aided by religion and poverty) means over-population.

Statues of football player Nilla Fischer and Caroline Seger vandalized in Sweden

Statues of football player Nilla Fischer and Caroline Seger vandalized in Sweden

Islam (represented in UN by Saudi based and steered OIC and its sharia called “islamic human rights”) is against Human Rights!

Sweden’s Supreme Court has found a man guilty of rape for having sex without explicit consent from a "teenage woman" who had been passive and gave no clear expression that she wanted to participate in the sexual acts. Lack of a partner’s spoken agreement or any other clear approval can hence be considered rape. However, islamic sharia gives a muslim man the "right" to have sex with wives and and concubines his "right hand possesses" (e.g. "infidel" girls/women). The neo-islamist rational (original openly supremacist islam didn't need one) is that "it satisfies the sexual desire of the female". Peter Klevius wonders if Swedish Courts will accept this reasoning - perhaps only for muslims?!

Peter Klevius also wonders whether BBC's leading presenter, the alcohol drinking and not Ramadan fasting, Pakistan rooted and Saudi raised muslim, Mishal Husain, approves of sharia?


UK introduced face recognition after for many years accusing Chinese for having it. Peter Klevius wonders how this fits UK's face covered muslims and others who utilize it?

In UK both Tories and Labour are against "islampohobia" - so apparently also against Human Rights? And if not, then they are "islamophobic" after all. So how do you vote for someone critical of islam's Human Rights violations if parties don't allow "islamophobia"? Is it democracy?

What do BBC and Jeremy Hunt have in common? Both support the islamofascist murderer and war criminal Mohammad bin Salman.

Peter Klevius: Girls' emancipation needs more football and less cricket, netball etc.

BBC's cricket propaganda is a slap in the face of young girls who need equally much moving around and spatial skills as young boys. However, there's a huge sex segregation in females motivation and access to football - not only the world's by far most popular physical sport, but also the only one that doesn't use tools or hands to handle the ball, and which makes all participants moving most of the time even without the ball. Moreover, the very nature of the sport forces participants to a never ending series of spatial and strategic challenges - with or without the ball and even while playing alone. So why is BBC so hostile to the Queen of sports (the "beautiful game") that is perfect for the physical and spatial development of girls - and in the face of the football loving majority who has to pay compulsory fees (and paying extra for football channels) to this faking regime propaganda media that uses stiff and lifeless colonial cricket for neo-colonial purpose?! England banned football for girls/women already 1921 and suggested cricket, land hockey and netball instead - almost like today except it's not called a ban. And what about the laughable notion of a "world cup" in cricket?! When is the "world cup" in caber tossing between Gotland and Scotland?


BBC, the world's biggest fake/selective news site - with an evil agenda

BBC, the world's biggest fake/selective news site - with an evil agenda

The murderous war criminal, Saudi muslim "custodian of islam" (and OIC) "prince" MBS is OK but Human Rights defender Peter Klevius isn't. Why?! Because the former isn't an "islamophobe", dude!

Stop US global bullying! What moral right does US have trying to dominate Earth and space? "God"?! Or the Saudi murderer and mass murderer "prince"?! Hasn't US sucked out enough already from the rest of the world? A global dollar manipulation favoring US and paid by the rest. A US marked global license and patent imperialism - and Android. Is Internet next?

26 June 2019: BBC's leading presenter, the alcohol drinking and not ramadan fasting Pakistan rooted muslim, Mishal Husain (brought up in Saudi Arabia), worried about Boris Johnson not having cricket as his hobby.

25 June 2019: BBC's leading presenter, the alcohol drinking and not ramadan fasting muslim, Mishal Husain (brought up in Saudi Arabia), sounds desperate when trying to smear Johnson. Is it because Boris 2016 was critical against the Saudis while foreign minister and 2018 critical of muslim women packed in burqas etc.?
BBC thinks the militaristic Saudiphil Jeremy Hunt "is a safer option" as UK PM. What about you?

BBC News 8:00 AM 23 June 2019: Johnson financially unfit because he spilled wine on a couch.

BBC  News 8:00 AM 23 June 2019: Johnson financially unfit because he spilled wine on a couch.
Is the Saudi "custodian of islam" a muslim - and is the very question "islamophobic", "muslimophobic" or "Saudiphobic"?
Why is BBC comparing Saudi with China?! China's leader isn't a murderer, war criminal, and spreader of terror on the streets! "If we drop the Saudis then we can't deal with China either." Really?! BTW, 'Diversity' means different/conflicting whereas its antonym stands for similar/friendly.

Blinked by BBC's fake "news" which instead boost militaristic confrontation and the smearing of China: The Saudi war criminal "custodian of islam" who murdered Khashoggi is now the world's new Hitler. However, unlike Hitler's Germanic language imperialism, bin Salman's Arabic language imperialism is added by a totalitarian imperialism due to the fact that he is a muslim and as such represents the totality of islam (inc. the Saudi based and steered all muslims world organization O.I.C.'s sharia declaration against Human Rights). Peter Klevius has for long pointed out that we need to distinguish between Human Rights obeying "muslims" and "extremist" muslims, but for some reason they are all bundled as 'muslims'.

Your choice: China high tech or US/UK bombs?

Your choice: China high tech or US/UK bombs?

US puppet empire UK's Jeremy Hunt wants to double spending on militaristic meddling for US

US puppet empire UK's Jeremy Hunt wants to double spending on militaristic meddling for US

Racist Sinophobia disguised as "security" while muslim terror spreading Saudi murderous dictator and war criminal is "an important security ally"!?



Existence-centrism (Peter Klevius 1986)

When muslim terrorists mass murder more than 100 in Mali, BBC gives it less time (2 min.) than an item on animal cruelty, Russian journalist arrest etc. in a 45 min "news" program!

Read this: The "out of Africa" hoax is worse than the Piltdown hoax - and much bigger and more worrisome.

When will “out of Africaphobia” be criminalized?

Nothing in Primate/Haplorhini evolution came out of Africa - not even Africa (it was disconnected due to tectonics).

A “definition” of “islamophobia” ought to be balanced with a definition of muslim Human Rightsphobia.

"Diversity" without basic (negative) Human Rights is like having a car without steering - dangerous.

In its senseless and continuous "islamophobia" ranting BBC says to be 'muslim' is the same as to be 'English'. Klevius thinks not. A 'muslim' is one who wittingly or unwittingly adheres to what historical records show being the most evil enslaving ideology ever around (from a Human Rights perspective). And Klevius doesn't count as real muslims those who call themselves "cultural muslims" for the purpose of benefiting from a certain "ethnicity", or those who against their will are trapped in muslimhood because of the evil apostasy tenet in islam. And islamic "modesty" attires is a protected way of calling other women "whores".

The most serious threat to our Human Rights is the hate campaign against "islamophobia" which really is directed against Human Rights.

As long as most muslims in the world are ruled by a sharia (e.g. Saudi based and steered OIC) that gravely violates the most basic of Human Rights, and as long as the most devout muslims do the same by simply following original evil (according to Human Rights) islam, you can't legislate against criticism of islam without simultaneously legislating against Human Rights. Why do you want to hinder muslims from apostating? It's a Human Right! Islam should not be allowed to traumatize apostates. Authentic original (e.g. Wahhabi/Salafi) islam doesn't fit in the boots of "Euro-islam" and Human Rights.

Klevius suggests the UK baby should be named Muhammad. After all, according to BBC, the Queen is related to him and all politicians love islam. And several hadiths describe him as white (one even proposing the killing of anyone who says he was black). Only problem being that he then may be described as a white supremacist. Luckily the baby, according to BBC, is “mix-race”.


Klevius to EU voters: If you respect Human Rights - don’t vote for anyone who supports the islamofascist Saudi dictator family who spreads Human Rightsphobia via the Saudi based and steered OIC’s world sharia!

And if you respect your Earthly home – don’t support a hate ideology that encourages over-population and sex apartheid. We don’t need more workers because the most profitable sectors have the least jobs – a trend that AI accelerates.

No true muslim can be fully human.

Why? Because islam's dividing the world in muslims and (not fully human) "infidels" makes it impossible. Only by fully accepting the basic (s.c. 'negative') Universal Human Rights equality - which islam can't accept (see e.g. Saudi based and steered all muslims world Ummah sharia organization OIC) without committing ideological suicide - can we meet every human as basically equal, in the same way as we can give every road-user a basic equality in traffic, i.e. we have traffic sense. So Klevius asks muslims whether they have "traffic sense"? And for all the rest of you - to be 'human' in a global sense can only be achieved by giving every human you meet basic equality - no matter how alien that human might feel to you. Because every human has the right to be "alien" and there can't even be any alternative to this as long as we don't accept brainwashed totalitarianism (see e.g. Klevius 1996 paper Angels of Antichrist). This is the only way to meaningfully talk about 'humankind'. And to alien hunters Klevius says you probably meet them every day already.

So when BBC and other fake media talk about xenophobia against muslims, they actually contribute to spread xenophobia themselves.

A "good muslim" is one who suppresses and distorts original islam so to fit Human Rights. However, some just pretend to do so - and some just continue hating the "infidel".

Peter Klevius to Greta Thunberg: Saudi salafist oil funded supremacist islam or Chinese Taoist (kindness) high tech - which one do you think is the real threat to the people and environmment in EU and the world?

Ultimate bigotry and hypocrisy – militant spying and war mongering 5 Eyes instead of true 5G?

Saudi hate spreading antennas (Salafi/Wahhabi mosques etc.) or Chinese world leading 5G tech? No one knows the amount of street etc. victims of Saudi hate because when the haters are muslims their attacks are not recorded as hate crimes. If a Chinese would attack shouting 'Tao' it would most certainly be classified as a hate crime. However, chances are slim that it ever occurs compared to hate attacks made by muslims.

Arabic (not "white" etc.) islam has been the by far biggest enslaver throughout 1,400 years. Islamic language imperialism via the Koran. And all races have been complicit in the muslim Koranic slave trade. So how do you distinguish between descendants of slaves or slave traders? Will Cambridge check today's "Caribbeans", "Africans" etc. about it? Klevius warns there might be unwelcomed surprises, e.g. that many of those who come to Europe are actually descendants of slave trading black Africans on whose wealth lineage top they are better privileged than those from slave lineages. And what about "whites" like Klevius who were cut off from any lineages? Should the skin color Klevius was born with be used against him because of the privileges of others with the same skin color? Same question may be asked about sexism. Klevius doesn’t see it fair to blame him for male sexism just because he happens tp be male, do you!

The real threat is the US led Saudi supporting spy organization 5 Eyes, which 1) tries to block superior tech, and 2) uses China as a scapegoat for US/UK privacy breaches. It's not China but US that wants to control you! So "securing 5G from Chinese influence" actually means giving US/UK a technical space for spying/influencing etc. In short, trying to hinder US/UK customers from accessing the best technology while spying on them.

BBC collected a UKIP hating mob to shout "islamophobia" against islam criticism.


However, the very same BBC also willfully misleads people about islam so that most people in UK are completely unaware of that Saudi based and steered OIC and its extreme Human Rightsphobia is a world guide for (sharia) muslims. Moreover, BBC's top presenter (Mishal Husain) who seems to be muslim in name only (drinking alcohol, not fasting on Ramadan, no muslim attire, no Haji, no sharia, etc) so to dupe the public about islam.

The 1948 Human Rights declaration was created to protect against fascism. Accepting islam without a clear border against sharia that violates the most basic Human Rights, allows space for islamofascism (i.e. original supremacist islam).

However, the new fascist mob is shouting "islamophobia" because islam can't comply with it (compare Saudi based and steered OIC's sharia declaration against Human Rights). This smear is then "enhanced" by connecting it to murderers, Nazis, right wing extremists etc. Islam's sharia sexism and racist supremacism is the problem - so why is addressing it "bad"?!

BBC is also keen on silencing the only truly free media, i.e. bloggers etc. social media.

The crystal clear connection between the surge in knife, rape etc. attacks and islam - and its custodian, the islamofascist Saudi dictator family - is desperately silenced by BBC and politicians (BBC now tries to cover this up by airing long programs about "conventional" knife crimes instead). This means they are directly complicit, doesn't it. Klevius suggests boycotting BBC and Saudi bribed politicians. They constitute the worst security threat.

Muslim terrorists get legal aid to stay in UK - EU nationals don't!



The best explanation to the surge in knife crimes since 2015 is the Islamic State's exhortation to street jihad.

However, the police don't record hate crimes as muslim - other than if directed against muslims. And do consider that IS and the Saudi dictator family both rest on the same Salafi islam that most young true muslims in the West follow. Following Salafism (etc. true muslimhood) involves distinguishing muslims from others, to show that one only belongs to islam and that true muslims ought to be strangers to the "infidels". When Klevius sees a muslim woman in burqa, veil etc. he thinks that's a supremacist and rapist attitude towards other women. And certainly contempt of Human Rights.

UK/BBC's extreme double standard re. the islamofascist Saudi dictator family and China.

Klevius: How come that islamofascist tech poor Saudi property-, media-, infra structure- etc. 'vulnerable' investments and supremacist hate spreading mosques, is considered no threat to UK but instead an 'important ally' while China, which doesn't tick any danger boxes, is deliberately painted by BBC propaganda as the worst threat? And how come that China's peaceful Belt and Road spreading of wealth and high tech is considered worse than UK's continuing militaristic and (un)security meddling within an EU that UK decided to leave for the purpose of EU not meddling within UK?!

UK continues even after Brexit to use EU citizens as bargaining chips by placing their rights in an unsafe statutory instrument instead of in the law.

Stop security cooperation with UK whose close connection to the the suspected murderer, war criminal and islamic terror spreading islamofascist Saudi custodian of islam, Mohammad bin Salman, constitutes the by far worst threat against the security of people in EU! Moreover, sharia islam (the only real islam for real muslims) which is a racist and sexist supremacist ideology that violates Human Rights, is supported by UK.

Don't let haters and Human Rightsphobes get away with it by calling themselves 'believers'!

Either religion is (grades of) supremacist hate and sexism and you better become an Atheist (and therefore universal human) - or you keep your "beliefs" for yourself. In traffic you can think what you want about other people, but you can't drive over them!

You muslim should be ashamed of calling Human Rights defenders "islamophobes"

- and take responsibility for your own supremacist sharia, represented by Saudi based and steered all muslims world organization OIC, which violates the most basic Human Rights! And do note the difference between universal impositions and universal freedom! Full respect of the other rests on accepting her/his freedom. This is the only way of being universally human.

Islam is an evil* supremacist and divisive ideology - why isn’t this told by BBC, schools etc.?

* weighed against the anti-fascist, anti-supremacist, anti-racist and anti-sexist Universal Human Rights declaration of 1948 that all civilized people are supposed to build on. Islam doesn't fit these goals, so OIC (the legal world Umma steered from and by the Saudi dictator family) decided to replace them with medieval racist, sexist and supremacist sharia.

Article 24 of the Saudi based and steered OIC's sharia declaration (CDHRI) states: "All the rights and freedoms stipulated in this Declaration are subject to the Islamic Sharia."

Article 19 says: "There shall be no crime or punishment except as provided for in the Sharia." CDHRI also fails to guarantee freedom of religion, in particular the right of each and every individual to abandon their religion, as a "fundamental and non-derogable right".

Article 10 of the Declaration states: "Islam is the religion of unspoiled nature. It is prohibited to exercise any form of compulsion on man or to exploit his poverty or ignorance in order to convert him to another religion or to Atheism." Since in Islamic society all reasons for conversion away from Islam are considered to be essentially either compulsion or ignorance, this effectively forbids conversion away from Islam.

CDHRI denies women equality with men by imposing "own rights" and "duties to perform".

A global world is only possible under the guidance of (negative – i.e. individual freedom from racist/sexist impositions) Human Rights - as outlined in the original anti-fascist Universal Human Rights declaration of 1948. It excludes any religious or other supremacist tenets or impositions on the individual.

Due to the above and due to the West (politicians and media) having locked itself in with the islamofascist Saudi dictator family (the custodians of islam) we now have a deficit of (negative) Human Rights education – but massively more religious propaganda (e.g. Saudi spread “islamophobia” smear) against these rights. Against this background it's utmost hypocrisy to point against wealth spreading China while supporting islamic hate, terror and war crimes spreading hegemonic Saudi dictator family.

This Viking tells you a lesson you didn't get in school, but you really need.



Klevius 1992-2010: From tropical SE-Asia to cold and protein/fat rich North Eurasia to global human


Peter Klevius was the first to connect the big Jinniushan woman with small mongoloid Khoisan (1992) and SE-Asia with the new brain setup due to island dwarfing (2004).

"Out of Africa" is no longer terminally ill - it's equally dead as Monty Python's parrot. So why do media and some anthropologists keep babbling when faced with overwhelming evidence to the contrary. Not even all tricks in the book (like e.g. the spurious stretching of what counts as "anatomically modern human" - i.e. incl. long skulled species) can save OoA. But the simplest way of understanding human evolution is to place it where all primates originally came from, i.e. SE Asia and its volatile tropical archipelago which could do evolutionary tricks the African continent couldn't. The oldest "Africans" are the mongoloid Khoisan. However, no one can become mongoloid (i.e. cold adapted) in Africa. This means they must originally have come from northern Eurasia - just as their look-alikes, e.g. Shompen and South American natives. Khoisan population is extremely small and, except for Pygmies, most "Africans" entered the continent within the last 10,000 years. Khoisan are mongoloid together with e.g. Shompen in SE Asia, and tribes in South America.




Do you support Human Rights or sharia?

If you don't like Klevius (very few do) you may check if it's him or the anti-racist, anti-sexist and anti-fascist Universal Human Rights declaration you can't digest - but which Klevius stubbornly keeps feeding you.

Iran, Corbyn, bin Laden's son etc. - it's more about protecting BBC's poster boy, war criminal and state terrorist Mohammad Salman, than protecting people on the streets from Saudi exported racist islamic hate terror.

Saudi and BBC hate propaganda against Iran and Shia muslims behind attacks on Corbyn's "anti-Semitism"? BBC's inflammatory and offensive hate mongering use of the oxymoron "anti-Semitic" (reinforced by "islamophobia") protects Semitic (Arab/Sunni/Saudi) muslims from criticism while excluding non-Semitic Shia muslims (e.g. Iran). BBC also use "Asians" when they mean non-Semitic former British Asian muslims, i.e. again not incl. Iranian Shia muslims. Why? Because BBC's poster boy Mohammad Salman hates Shia. England also got a massive problem with "Asian" (sic - read 'mostly Sunni muslim') sex offenders. But no one dares to ask if islam's hate teaching of taking "infidel" sex slaves - and "muslim sensitivity" policies - may encourage it?


The world's biggest fake news producer, UK state media BBC, 20190221 gave the Japanese asteroid landing just a few seconds but managed to squeeze in the fake "info" that "it is the first attempt to bring back samples to Earth" (Cathy/PM 17:00) when the previous Japanese sond already 2010 brought back samples from an other asteroid. No one else has managed to do this except the Japanese. This is in line with BBC's usual racist attitude against Japan and China.

Klevius wonders whether BBC/UK government count Islamic State muslims who can't be directly tied to atrocities, as "peaceful muslims"?

Klevius wonders why semitic attacks on Jews are called "antisemitism"?

WARNING about "Five Eyes" and BBC, and their "close ally", the hate, terror and war crimes producing islamofascist "custodian of islam", the Saudi dictator family!
If you prefer peace, democratic non-fake information and positive development - ask your politicians to avoid US/UK's war mongering militarism and the world's biggest state propaganda tool BBC, which constitutes the most serious threat to free information. UK government is pushing for neo-British imperialist militarist meddling and intervention around the world - and making its propaganda tool BBC "the custodian of fact checks", i.e. a wolf among sheep.

Theresa May wants to leave EU. That should include UK militarist meddling within EU as well. Leave means leave! Don't let UK and its "close ally" the islamofascist Saudi dictator family contaminate EU citizens lives. Don't let the insidious spy organization Five Eyes spy on EU citizens and their leaders and parliamentarians. Don't let BBC's or islam's glossy surface (i.e. normal news/info and non-sharia muslims respectively) lure you to not see the evil core. Klevius is the opposite. WYSIWYG. No hidden evil core, just defense of your (whoever you are) basic Human Rights that islam wants to deny you.

UK government wants to force EU to put a border on Ireland - so it can blame EU for something UK-Brexit caused. Brexiters want to eat the cake while still having it. Unconstitutional UK has become a cancer that hopes to survive by creating metastases in line with old fashioned British imperialism.

Klevius islam logic: If I is SI and SI is not HR then I is not HR.
For those who don't understand formal logic: If islam is sharia islam and sharia islam violates Human Rights, then islam violates Human Rights.

Theresa May & Co defend sharia by saying "it's just a a contract". This is utter lie because any meaningful islam demands sharia and stepping out of the "contract" is the worst sin you can commit as a muslim (s.c. apostasy). Theresa May's and others deception is built on the mass of secular muslims, i.e. not true muslims. And these "secular muslims" get away with it as long as there's not enough true muslims to demand sharia all over the pitch - as yet. Moreover, Saudi led sharia finance demands sharia compliance - as does Saudi based and steered OIC, all muslims world organization.

Klevius supports "secular muslims" - Theresa May supports sharia muslims.

Fake journalism steered by Saudi islamofascism

Fake journalism steered by Saudi islamofascism

Theresa May & Co and state media BBC play with race cards

Theresa May  & Co and state media BBC play with race cards

UK is drowning in sharia islamofascism while BBC is silent

UK is drowning in sharia islamofascism while BBC is silent

US/UK is a security risk - not China. Tell your EU politician!

US/UK is a security risk - not China. Tell your EU politician!

Klevius "islamophobic" heroine Nawal El Saadawi from Egypt

Klevius "islamophobic" heroine Nawal El Saadawi from Egypt

Anti Human Rights muslim or not?

When Klevius writes 'islamofascist' it should always be understood as islamic default tenets (e.g. OIC's world sharia) that are gravely opposite UN's anti-fascist 1948 Universal Human Rights declaration. So Klevius suggests every muslim to openly declare if they oppose the most basic Human Rights or not. This is particularly important when it comes to media people and politicians who say they are muslims but hesitate on this most crucial issue.
Klevius supports no border on Ireland. Follow the will of the people, i.e. let England leave and let Scotland and Northern Ireland stay. UK is an unconstitutional mess which now wants to leave EU without controlling its border to EU. A proper constitution would have demanded qualified majority in two consecutive elections/votes about such a crucial matter as Brexit - and being aware what the vote is about. The root of the problem is England's mad man Henry 8's colonialization of Ireland and lack of constitution. The preposterous "British" Brexit parody is then spiced with the government's and BBC's use of religious hate mongering etc. In summary UK is an anomaly of countries trying to be a state in a world of federal states united as countries.

Britisharia Human Rightsphobia



Calling criticism of islam "islamophobia" is pure racism and also supports islamic racism and sexism

Calling critics of islam "islamophobes" is pure racism and also supports islamic racism and sexism

Calling critics of islam "islamophobes" is pure racism and also supports islamic racism and sexism
BBC isn't much interested in anti-semitism, homophobia etc. but uses them as an excuse for its Saudi/OIC supported "islamophobia" smear campaign against Human Rights.

Is BBC's Pakistan rooted and Saudi raised muslim(?) presenter Mishal Husain an "islamophobe" against evil* islam, or an apostate supporting toothless** "islam"? She doesn't fast during Ramadan but rather drinks some alcohol, and doesn't veil herself and says she doesn't feel any threats to her way of life (Klevius: thanks to Human Rights - not sharia islam), well knowing how muslim and non-muslim women suffer in muslim sharia countries like Pakistan and Saudi Arabia without Human Rights. What would she say to a muslim terrorist asking her if she's a muslim? Isn't it about time to stop this bigoted and hypocritical indirect support of islamofascism that this Saudi/OIC initiated "islamophobia" smear camopaign against Human Rights*** is all about?

* Human Rights equality violating sharia islam
** in line with the anti-fascist, anti-racist and anti-sexist U.N.'s 1948 Universal Human Rights declaration.
*** Socialists have an ideological problem with individual Human Rights, and are therefore vulnerable for islamism (see Klevius 1994).

British militarist neo-colonialism

British militarist neo-colonialism

Why is Theresa May excused for her secret ties with islamofascism?!

Why is Theresa May excused for her secret ties with islamofascism?!

Saudi induced muslim attack on UK Parliament. How many elsewhere? And what about Saudi/OIC's sharia

Saudi induced muslim attack on UK Parliament. How many elsewhere? And what about Saudi/OIC's sharia

A "close ally" of the islamofascist Saudi dictator family mixes OIC sharia with Human Rights

A "close ally" of the islamofascist Saudi dictator family mixes OIC sharia with Human Rights

Is UK turning into a militaristic unconstitutional islamofascist rogue state?

First UK people voted to join and share borders with EU. Then England voted to leave while Scotland and Northern Ireland voted to stay. And now UK politicians want to leave while keeping the Irish EU border open. UK lacks a modern constitution according to which a constitutional issue has to pass at least two majority votes.

Rabbi Sacks: "BBC runs Britain." Klevius: Pro-sharia BBC meddles worldwide.

Rabbi Sacks: "BBC runs Britain." Klevius: Pro-sharia BBC meddles worldwide.

The islamofascist Saudi dictator family criminalizes Human Rights and calls them "islamophobia".

Are you or your representative(s) for or against basic universal Human Rights equality?

Peter Klevius global morality can only be challenged by violating the most basic of Human Rights.

Everything Peter Klevius writes (or has written) is guided by the anti-sexist. anti-racist, and anti-fascist Universal* Human Rights declaration of 1948. In other words, what is declared immoral and evil is so done as measured against the most basic of Human Rights (the so called "negative" rights - i.e. the rights of the individual not to be unnecessarily targeted with restrictions and impositions). Unlike the 1948 Universal Human Rights (UHR) declaration, islam denies Human Rights equality to women and non-muslims. And violation of such basic Human Rights can't be tolerated just by referring to "freedom of religion".

* This means accepting everyone - without exception due to e.g. sex, religion, lack of religion, "security" etc. - as equal in Human Rights. The individual is protected by negative Human Rights, but of course not against substantiated legal accusations - as long as these are not produced as a means that violates the basic Human Rights (compare "not necessary in a free, democratic country"). The legislator may not produce laws that seek to undermine some individuals rights. This also includes e.g. "freedom of religion", i.e. that this freedom doesn't give the right to unfree others, or cause others to be in an inferior rights position. If by islam you mean something that fully adheres to basic Human Rights equality, then you aren't targeted by Peter Klevius islam criticism. However, if you mean islam accepts violations of the most basic of Human Rights, then you may also call Peter Klevius an "islamophobe" - and he will be proud of it. And when it comes to "security" it can't mean "offending" opponents to basic Human Rights.

This is why any effort to twist or accuse the writings of Peter Klevius as "islamophobia" etc. can only be made from a standpoint against these basic Human Rights. As a consequence, no body of authority can therefore accuse, hinder etc. Peter Klevius without simultaneously revealing its own disrespect for these Human Rights. Conversely, Peter Klevius can not accuse anyone who agrees on these rights - i.e. this leaves e.g. "islamophobia" etc. accusations against Peter Klevius without merit.

Every effort against these basic Human Rights is treason against a country calling itself free and democratic.

Saudi terror, war crimes, sharia - and "islamophobia" smear campaign against Human Rights.

Racist UK Government and BBC

Racist UK Government and BBC

The world's most dangerous war criminal is the guardian of islam's holy places and OIC

The world's most dangerous war criminal is the  guardian of islam's holy places and OIC

UK's sharia ties to Saudi islamofascism threaten EU (and UK) security

UK's sharia ties to Saudi islamofascism threaten EU (and UK) security

Warning for BBC's faked "news" and support for Human Rights violating Saudi/OIC islamofascism

Warning for BBC's faked "news" and support for Human Rights violating Saudi/OIC islamofascism

Peter Klevius "islamophobia"/Human Rightsphobia test for you and your politicians

Saudi war criminal "prince" "reforms" islam to fit Saudi islamofascism against Human Rights

Saudi war criminal "prince" "reforms" islam to fit Saudi islamofascism against Human Rights

Saudi "ally" responsible for chemical attacks (Jaysh al-Islam)

Warning for a muslim robot!

Sharia and weaponry keeps Brexit-UK in EU - with leaking borders and against the will of the people

Sharia and weaponry keeps Brexit-UK in EU - with leaking borders and against the will of the people

EU closes internal borders - and opens its external ones.

EU closes internal borders - and opens its external ones.

Welcoming UK's main security threat - and committing treason against the will of the people

Welcoming UK's main security threat - and committing treason against the will of the people

What's left for UK when finance is fully AI? Profiting from conflicts and wars.

What's left for UK when finance is fully AI? Profiting from conflicts and wars.

The ultimate treason against people in England, Ireland and Scotland

The ultimate treason against people in England, Ireland and Scotland

True Brits for the islamofascist Saudi dictator family and against Human Rights

Klevius: Face it, Wikipedia/BBC etc. fake media - Finland was first in the world with full suffrage

UK PM candidate Rees-Mogg: Germans needed Human Rights - we don't. Klevius: I really think you do.

Definition of Negative Human Rights - i.e. the very foundation of the freedom part of the anti-fascist Universal Human Rights declaration of 1948.

Most people today are A(mono)theists, i.e. not "believing" in an impossible "one god"*. Such a "collective god" would mean equally many personal "gods" as there are believers/interpretors. "Monotheisms" are for racist/sexist movements - not for individuals. Human Rights are for individuals living among individuals with same rights.

Religion always means a total or partial reduction of some people's (e.g. women''s) Human Rights equality.

Being against A(mono)theism must be categorized as contempt of basic Human Rights equality because "monotheists" have doctrines which can't comply with basic Human Rights equality.
Klevius moral formula is a bedrock you can't beat:

1 There's no absolute and fixed moral in a dynamic society.

2 Therefor we have to repeatedly agree on a minimum moral and equality for all.

3 In doing so we are logically forced to approve of negative Human Rights, i.e. not to impose restrictions other than necessary in a democracy based on as much freedom as possible for all individuals - no matter of sex, race etc. And, for the truly dumb ones, do note that this definition excludes the freedom to restrict freedom.

* Though some people keep calling their own racist/sexist "interpretation" as "god's/allah's will").

"Brits" who are racist against EU citizens but dare not criticize muslims - here's your passport.

"Brits" who are racist against EU citizens but dare not criticize muslims - here's your passport.

Klevius 1979: Human Rights rather than religion

Klevius 1979: Human Rights rather than religion

BBC (imp)lies that 84% of the world is "monotheist" although most people are A(mono)theists

BBC (imp)lies that 84% of the world is "monotheist" although most people are A(mono)theists

Klevius can no longer distinguish between the techniques of BBC and Nazi propaganda - can you!

By squeezing in Atheist ideologies/philosophies as well as polytheisms under the super set BBC calls "religion", and by narrowing 'Atheism' to what it's not (Atheism is what it says on the tin - no god) they produced the extremely faked proposition that 84% of the world's population is "religious". Moreover, BBC also proudly claimed that the 84% figure is rising even more. Well, that's only by relying on those poor women in Pakistan, Bangladesh, English muslim ghettos (where most so called "British" women don't even speak English) etc., who still produce many more children than the average in the world. But Klevius doesn't think this abuse of girls/women is anything to cheer.

Klevius CV

Some basic facts to consider about Klevius* (except that he is both "extremely normal" and extremely intelligent - which fact, of course, would not put you off if you're really interested in these questions):

* The son of one of Sweden's best chess-players and an even more intelligent Finnish mother. He was mentored by G. H. von Wright, Wittgensteins's successor at Cambridge. However, G H v Wright sadly didn't fully realize back then (1991) the true power of the last chapter, Khoi, San and Bantu, in Klevius book. Today, if still alive, he would surely see it.

1 Klevius' analysis of consciousness is the only one that fits what we know - after having eliminated our "pride" bias of being humans (which non-human would we impress, anyway?). Its starting point is described and exemplified in a commentary to Jurgen Habermas in Klevius book Demand for Resources (1992:30-33, ISBN 9173288411, based on an article by Klevius from 1981), and is further explained in a commentary to Francis Crick's book The Astonishing Hypothesis under the title The Even More Astonishing Hypothesis (EMAH), which can be found in Stalk's archive and which has been on line since 2003 for anyone to access/assess.


2 Klevius out of island/mainland fluctuating Southeast Asia Denisovans up to big skulled Siberians as the birth of much more intelligent modern humans who then spread all over the world, is the only analysis that fits both genetic reality as well as tool and art sophistication seen in e.g. the Denisova cave (no dude, Blombos etc. don’t come even close).

3 Klevius criticism of Human Rights violating sharia islamofascism (e.g. OIC) which is called "islamophobia" by islamofascists and their supporters who don't care about the most basic of Human Rights (e.g. re. women). Klevius' "islamophobia" has two roots: 1) UN's 1948 Universal Human Rights declaration, which, contrary to any form of muslim sharia, doesn't, for example, allow sex to be an excuse for robbing females of their full Human Rights equality, and 2) the history of the origin of islam ( e.g. Hugh Kennedy, Robert G. Hoyland, K. S. Lal etc.) which reveals a murderous, pillaging, robbing, enslaving and raping racist/sexist supremacist ideology that exactly follows precisely those basic islamic tenets which are now called "unislamic" but still survive today (as sharia approved sex slavery, sharia approved "liberation” jihad, academic jihad etc.) behind the sharia cover which is made even more impenetrable via the spread of islamic finance, mainly steered from the islamofascist Saudi dictator family.


4 Klevius analysis of sex segregation/apartheid (now deceptively called “gender segregation”) and heterosexual attraction - see e.g. Demand for Resources (1981/1992), Daughters of the Social State (1993), Angels of Antichrist (1996), Pathological Symbiosis (2003), or Klevius PhD research on heterosexual attraction/sex segregation and opposition to female footballers (published in book form soon).

Racist Theresa May robs EU citizens of their Human Rights

This (via Saudi steered sharia finance) is the biggest threat to your Human Rights

This (via Saudi steered sharia finance) is the biggest threat to your Human Rights

UK's security pact with the Devil himself

UK's security pact with the Devil himself

The islamofascist Saudi dictator family spreading its hate and losses over you

The islamofascist Saudi dictator family spreading its hate and losses over you

Is Mrs Theresa May digging a racist "British" sharia "empire" under the Brexit cliff?

BBC's compulsory fee funded propaganda for Saudi sharia islam

Tuesday, November 21, 2017
Today England's parliament vote between islamofascist sharia and Human Rights - without even mentioning sharia. Shame on you England, to even have to vote about it!

While Theresa May tries to pave the way for islamofascist Saudi friendly sharia by trashing Human Rights, BBC fills its news with the suffering of Rohyngia muslims - without a word about the Saudi backed muslim terrorist attacks against Buddhists that preceded it.

Support Klevius' Atheist anti-fascism against islamofascism

This is what BBC's muslim sharia presenter Mishal Husain "forgot" to report. Mishal grew up in the very same theocratic medieval dictatorship which now harbors and rules all muslims world organization OIC and its Human Rights violating sharia. While also spreading islamic hatred over the world through a variety of channels.

Klevius to dumb (or just evil) alt-left "antifa" people who support the worst of Human Rights violating evil:

True anti-fascism in its purest form is laid down in the Universal Human Rights declaration of 1948. Islam (OIC) has in UN decided to abandon the most basic of these rights (the so called negative Human Rights).

Fascism is, according to Google's top hit, "a political philosophy, movement, or regime that exalts nation and often race above the individual and that stands for a centralized autocratic government headed by a dictatorial leader, severe economic and social regimentation*, and forcible suppression of opposition." 23 Aug 2017

So let's face islam with this definition.

A political philosophy, movement, or regime (islam) that exalts nation (Umma) and often race (muslims) above the individual and that stands for a centralized autocratic government (Koran text/Mohammad's example) headed by a dictatorial leader (the caliph - e.g. the Saudi based OIC's Saudi leader), severe economic and social regimentation* (sharia), and forcible suppression of opposition (apostasy ban against muslims wanting to leave islam, and demonizing defenders of Human Rights by calling them "islamophobes").

And islamofascism gets away with it by calling itself a religion and thereby being protected by those very Human Rights it opposes.

* According to Cambridge dictionary, "extreme organization and control of people".

Theresa May's sharia = >23,000 jihadi - before Brexit. How many after?

Theresa May's sharia = >23,000 jihadi - before Brexit. How many after?

The earliest truly modern human skull was found in Liujiang/China.

The Viking phenomenon started with bilingual Finns raiding/trading sex slaves to Abbasid (ca 750)

UK DID NOT vote Brexit. EU residents weren't allowed to vote while non-EU residents were.

The islamofascist Saudi dictator family is the root of most islam induced suffering

While Klevius is forcing islam into a Human Rights corner, Obama continues supporting islamofascism

The "Birmingham Koran" hoax - and a sonless "prophet" invented after it!

Homo Naledi - and a late "West" hating lawyer relative. A judge for May?

BBC lies and fake news

Lego won't sponsor the defense for Human Rights equality - but islamofascism and sharia is ok

Apostate (?) Obama's bio- and adoptive dads were both muslims

Choudary and May both want more sharia and less Human Rights - so what about Brits?

Islam is the hide-away for racist/sexist supremacists

Nazi-muslim cooperation: Audi then built by Jewish slaves - today dangerous quality problems

Japan 10 yrs ahead of Europe ln hybrid/fuelcell cars, space tech etc

God is bad semantics - Science is good math

Origin of Goths and Vikings

The world's oldest real portrait ever found (Central Europe). Carvings dated to 26-29,000 bp.

Origin of islam: Sharia slave finance and sex apartheid

Muslims and Hillary against Human Rights

We're all born unequal - that's why we need Human Rights, not islam!

"Allah" is man made racist/sexist interpretation against Human Rights

Muzzammil Hassan (the man on the pic who receives award from the influential islamofascist US organization CAIR-PA's Chairman Iftekhar Hussain and CAIR National's Chairman Parvez Ahmed) founded Bridges TV "to correct misconceptions about islam in America". He then stabbed his divorcing wife nine times and decapitated her in accordance with islamic Sharia tradition in the premises of Bridges TV. Being a believing muslim he was leniently sentenced only for second degree murder for this gruesome islamic honor killing.

Contrast these scumbags against those (incl. Klevius) who relentlessly volunteer for spreading knowledge about Human Rights and are called "islamophobes" simply because islam doesn't submit to Human Rights (this is why the islamofascist organization OIC has openly abandoned Human Rights and replaced them with islamofascist Sharia).

Klevius is probably now the world's foremost expert on sex segregation (sad, isn't it) and islam (the worst hate cime ever) is the most evil expression of sex segregation. By 'islam' Klevius means Sharia as described by Bill Warner and as adopted by OIC in their Human Rights violating Saudi initiated Cairo declaration (Sharia) from 1990 which replaces Universal Human Rights for women and non-muslims with sexism and racism! Why? Because it's the very soul and origin of islam which wouldn't survive if applied to full Human Rights!

The islamic extermination of the Jews

Burn OIC's islamic anti-Human Rights declaration!

Samantha Lewthwaite, Mishal Husain and Michael Adebolajo have sharia islam in common

Iceage refuges were rooted in Eurasiatic - IE came much later

Klevius altruistic virtual volunteering in defense of Universal Human Rights

Ferrari is a poor quality but expensive Fiat

Ferrari is a poor quality but expensive Fiat

Saturday, December 31, 2016

Klevius New Year's wish (pst, tell everyone): The by far best form of "multiculturalist diversity" emanates from Peter Klevius fight for every woman's right to Human Rights equality.


Musliculturalism or multiculturalism?

Drawing (1979) and photo (2012) by Peter Klevius.

 Will women's Human Rights rights offend islam? Yes says Saudi based and steered OIC. Well, Klevius is extremely sorry if he hurts an ideology by defending women's (and all others) basic Human Rights equality. However, it isn't helpful and conducive for the good of the world that such an ideology exists, is it.


Peter Klevius fact checking BBC: Although BBC keeps lying that Trump said he wanted to ban all muslims, Trump never said that - only the bad ones - which Klevius understands as sharia muslims who are racists and sexists and who violate basic Human Rights equality. And no, we're not talking "locker room" sexism here - we're talking about an islamofascist ideology that wants to legalize true racism and sexism..


However, as Klevius predicted, US worst "president"* ever, muslim born (apostate?!)** Mr. X*** (or Mr Nobody, if you prefer) Barry Barakeh Hussein Obama Dunham Soetoro**** (or whatever) is maximizing his evil just before he's kicked out of office by US voters.


* His mother hadn't fulfilled the criterion of five years as an adult before delivering a baby whose male genitor was not a US citizen. 
** The male genitor was a muslim because his father was a muslim and in islam the muslim father - not the mother - makes a child a muslim. And there isn't the slightest evidence of any of them committing apostasy. Except for Obama himself if his "Christian faith" is honest, of course.
***  No other modern time US president has got so many records legally classified or covered under media misinfo as Obama.
 **** Soetoro was his second muslim Dad.


It wasn't enough for a "president" who wanted to islamize the US Constitution. Compare his choice of Ingrid Matson (the woman on his left ear on the pic above) who produces so called fantasy islam. Fantasy Islam: A game in which an audience of non-Muslims wish with all their hearts that Islam were a “Religion of Peace,” and a Muslim strives to fulfill that wish by presenting a personal version of Islam that has little foundation in Islamic doctrine.

How much better wouldn't it have been if US had had a true African woman like Ayaan Hirsi Ali instead of a half white US half black African man?


The solution in Mideast is that the islamofascist Saudi dictator family has to go


Peter Klevius is convinced that Ayaan Hirsi Ali never would have sided with the islamofascist Saudi dictator family and the muslim terrorists they support for the purpose of expanding their interest in Syria - leading to a tremendous suffering for the Syrian people. Nor would she had sided with any other islamofascist constellation. US could easily have helped stopp the war before it escalated - was it not for the idiotic "Assad has to go" mantra". Every single escalation in Syria has been caused by Obama's backing of the islamofascist Saudi dictator family.

Even Merkel admits that islamic terror is the worst threat to the world. However, is she smart (or honest) enough to also admit that islamic terror includes much more than spectacular terror attacks? However, of some funny reason she calls it 'islamist' instead of 'islamic'.

Tom Wallace and Shahram Hadian: Since the only witness, the only authoritative source in Islam, is Muhammad, there is no check on his accuracy. All of Islam, their god, their scriptures, their practice, all stand or fall on this one man. Too many Christians don’t understand that the whole purpose of Islam is that Muhammad is the final messenger. He came to refute that which came before him. We lose site of the fact that his purpose was to supplant Judaism and Christianity with his new religion.

Today everyone just wants all religions to get along and hold hands. This blinds people from seeing that everything about Islam stands on the authority of Muhammad. He is not only the authority on their holy book, the Qur’an, his is the authority on how Islam is to be practiced. There are at least 93 times where the Qur’an states that Muhammad is the perfect man, and he is to be emulated. This is why the secondary sources, the Sunna, are so important in understanding Islam. The Sunna gives Muslims the practice of Muhammad so they can follow his example.

We need to stop making excuses for Islam by saying “it’s your interpretation.” We need to look at how Muhammad interpreted the Qur’an.


Atheist* Peter Klevius agrees with these Christians. The PC "handholding" with sharia islamofascism is truly at the core of the problem.

* Klevius loves to title himself 'Atheist' (sometimes even has to explain that Klevius as an Atheist has nothing to do with Communism etc. for those morons who still think so) for those who still live in the same medieval darkness as those muslims they criticize.

Simon Wiesenthal Center: Hatred of Jews from within the family helped incubate the hate that radicalized the San Bernardino, California terrorist who murdered 14 people.

Peter Klevius: Exactly the same applies to muslim hatred against all non-muslims.

Sunday, November 11, 2007


Origin of the Mosque, the center-piece of dead end sexist infidel racism: A market-place for grim trafficking in slave girls and castrated boy slaves*


The efforts made to mislead us abt islam are proportional to the historical facts surfacing! Since the origin of Islam "jihad" has most frequently been used for violence against infidels than anything else! Not to tell/warn innocent kids is then deception/child abuse! Educate yourself on Origin of Koran(s) For ORIGIN OF MOSQUE see below! Original islam isn't comparable with anything else because it's genetically predatory, abusive and incapable of standing by itself. YOU MUSLIM! Are you proud of a "faith" that has to be protected from truth and defended by wahhabists, terrorists and suicide-murderers?! Hamas leader's son Mosab Hassan Yousef:"The root of the problem is Islam itself as an idea" Klevius comment:Indeed, islam hinders muslims from being humans in a spiritual meaning, i.e. the sense of non-totalitarian global belonging that most of us non-muslims share, and which is reflected in the negative human rights that islam opposes. Islam rides on the popular but empty usage of the word "religion". Monotheisms are no real religions (see Klevius Definition of religion) and in the case of islam it's only a disguise for global fascism.

August 26, 2008 Klevius comment (on the democrats convent): Sambo, with his penis, again walks into the kingdom before the vagina people! Isn't it an irony that political correctness has led to an extremely disproportional influence of sexist black racists on US politics (who are representing/defending Latinos, Asians, white Americans, Indians etc?)! And that women are again fooled (and fool themselves) by black male betrayers more than a century ago! But the bottom line really is: How can a democratic party vote for a racist candidate who is a born muslim who hasn't openly committed apostasy against an ideology that wants to replace the US constitution with a totalitarian Sharia constitution! President Lincoln "America will never be destroyed from the outside. Don't interfere with anything in the Constitution. That must be maintained, for it is the only safeguard of our liberties." Klevius coment: We are not discussing Hussein Obama’s smile but the problem his candidacy reveals abt the clash between islam and the US Constitution. Islam is every bit at odds with the founding documents of the US!

August 23, 2008: Is Joe Biden an islamofascist or just an idiot?! Some quotes abt him: Joe Biden really is the stupidest man in the Senate! Joe Biden better get elected president before he starts any wars.
Joe Biden should re-read his old speech! Joe Biden, lickspittle Dhimmi of the Mohammedans! Klevius comment: What we do know is that Joe Biden thinks "the Saudis are nice cause they are afraid of Al-Qaeda"! He has also said that "Barack Hussein Obama is the first Afro-American who is articulated, smart, clean and handsome"! And finally: "I would be honored to run with or against John McCain because I think the country would be better off".

August 15,2008: Zakaria Botros has made such a successful criticism of islam through a local AM radio station that Imam Baqir Berry, of the Islamic Instit male betrayersute of Knowledge (sic) together with his pals had to "convince" the station owner Birach who then "promised to make them stop defaming the 'prophet' (i.e. the violent caravan robber who was long since dead when the koran was invented)"! However, Zakaria Botros' well articulated and referenced critique in Arabic, and by the help of radio waves, has helped millions of Arabs to leave islam. Klevius comment: Without the prolonging caused by artificial sex segregation, stupid "interfaith dialogues" (an islamic invention to protect itself), oil and political correctness the evil medieval dragon would have caused much less harm and suffering before its inevitable death! And what should we do with all the mosques then? And with the remaining sex segregation that invited evil islam in the first place?! Muslim-majority “moderate” Malaysia has now banned the naive thoughts of “Sisters in Islam”. Naïve because these sisters have completely missed the basic tenet of islam namely sex segregation. Klevius comment: As a human equipped with a penis I feel embarrassed to be the only one on the net (so far) issuing this fundamental problem. Where are you vagina-people? Name yourself “Confined Sisters in Islam” or get out from it! ISLAM IS NOTHING BUT ARTIFICIAL SEX SEGREGATION ORIGINATING IN SLAVERY! AND GIRLS WERE THE FIRST SLAVES OF ISLAM (i.e. what Klevius terms rapetivism)!

Btw, A political moron (pro-Obama of course) has commented that "unlike race or gender, advanced age represents a real physical impairment rather than some insignificant physical trait". Klevius correction: Unlike race, sex, like advanced age (i.e. REALLY ADVANCED & synonymous with sickness!), represents a real physical "impairment" rather than some insignificant physical trait. I.e. if we call below male average physical performace an "impairment". The same apparently applies to poor brain performance, no matter what age! Read Klevius Definition of negative human rights and Definition of sex segregation! Reminds me of a woman who told me that men have 30% more muscles than women! Apart from that that's probably a huge exaggeration because men exercise more, even with 90% more muscles it wouldn't of course in any way alter Klevius sex segregation point! Moreover, who's the average man? The physical decline is fastest around the age of 30!

Btw 2. How hard could it be to get it?! If your father was a muslim you are also a muslim, according to islam! Barack Hussein Obama’s both fathers (Kenyan genitor & Indonesian stepfather) were born muslims! Moreover, Barack Hussein Obama, alias Barry Soetoro (or whatever else name he uses), is also an Indonesian citizen and officially registered as a muslim. And if you refer to some imaginary Utopian “reformed” Islam where apostasy is permitted, that is in fact non-islam! Moreover, B. Hussein Obama was (perhaps - or maybe somewhere else outside the US - Kenya?!) born on an occupied territory outside the US. His father wasn't a US citizen and his mother was too young to qualify him as a natural born US citizen! An irony, isn't it, if US gets a born-muslim president whose legality (natural born citizenship) is founded on a birth certificate issued on the occupied and colonialized Hawaii and the due overthrow and imprisonment of its native female ruler!

August 14, 2008: Quotes of the day:Tãrîkh-i-Wassãf: “The Mohammadan forces began to kill and slaughter, on the right and the left unmercifully, throughout the impure land, for the sake of Islam, and blood flowed in torrents. They plundered gold and silver to an extent greater than can be conceived, and an immense number of precious stones as well as a great variety of cloths� They took captive a great number of handsome and elegant maidens and children of both sexes, more than pen can enumerate� In short, the Mohammadan army brought the country to utter ruin and destroyed the lives of the inhabitants and plundered the cities, and captured their off-springsWill Durant:“The Mohammedan conquest of India is probably the bloodiest story in history. The Islamic historians and scholars have recorded with great glee and pride the slaughters of Hindus, forced conversions, abduction of Hindu women and children to slave markets and the destruction of temples"

August 12, 2008: 36 % of British muslims believe apostates should be killed! Klevius comment: What abt Obama?

August 10, 2008: Saudi Arabia, which arranged an “inter-faith” meeting (outside Saudi Arabia, of course), forbids the practice of any religion other than islam. And because it has become apparent that islam’s grim origin and history doesn’t stand open scrutiny without total meltdown, Organization of the Islamic Conference (OIC), a Saudi-funded international UN body of 56 Islamofascist states seeks GLOBALLY to punish citizens who “defame” (i.e. e.g. research etc critique) any religion but, of course, Islam in particular. The new definition of “defamation of religion” includes the protecting of a religion, or some interpretation of it, or the feelings of its followers.

July 16, 2008: Is the Canterbury bishop out of his mind! He says both Islam & Christianity have a violent past. Klevius comment: But hey, according to today's twisted logic of political correctness Mohammed & Co and the Crusaders weren't true Muslims or Christians at all! He also raves abt Christianity's abandonment of its peaceful origin while forgetting abt Islam's extremely violent origin! "Peace" in Islam is totalitarian submission under the Islamic jihad sword and doesn't cover Infidels! And isn't he deeply pathetic when he now tries to bribe Muslims by selling out a couple of Christian "Trinity" gods?! Do I smell a new Nicea meeting! Monotheist (read ‘totalitarian’) faith(s) alone "can truly ground a commitment to a tempting lethal cycle of violence"! And the main attractions of Islam are sexism, racism and violence while sharia confined Islamist women are busy producing ever more jihadists through sexist and dead end (apostasy ban) sharia rapetivism

July 4, 2008: Monotheism? Kiss my ass! It's called Islamofascist totalitarianism! The government does everything to bolster the status of Islam in Islamofascist Malaysia where Christians and other non-Muslims are now denied to call God Allah "because it might confuse Muslims"! Furthermore Muslims are denied to legally leave Islam while the demolition of Hindu temples etc by state authorities and others continues!

July 3 2008: Diana West: "Think of it: For writing about the repressive ideology of Islam, for arguing against the inequities of Sharia (Islamic law), for making a video ("Fitna") to warn about Islamic jihad, Wilders lives in his own non-Islamic country under a specifically Islamic death threat."

True Muslims would never say they believe that many faiths besides their own can lead to real salvation! This fact may explain that whereas more than 80 percent of US Jews, Hindus and Buddhists agreed with the statement that "many religions can lead to eternal life" only abt half (the ignorant "moderat" Muslims?)of the Muslims did! The same survey also asked the senslessl and stupid question whether people believed in "God"! What do you mean with "God" (for a mature and informed view see Klevius Definition of religion) except for using the word to boost your own "religion"?! "God" is an empty jar for you where to spit your personal racist/sexist prejudices & political agenda!

Ahmed Mohammad al-Kuffari: “I'm a young male and was born into "freedom" but because of my small stature (Klevius comment: What an insult on the majority of females!), bad teeth, pitted skin, large nose, small chin and my squeeky voice, I could never find a girlfriend or fit in with society in general. I was insecure in my appearance and mannerisms and was constantly teased by others. I was always angry and my schoolwork was failing. Then one day I visited a Mosque and, Lo and Behold, I discovered my appearance wasn't an issue anymore because all the other men in the Mosque were similarly unattractive, and I could grow my beard to hide my face anyway. Muslims didn't need to study hard anymore; they just need to memorise the Qur'an. I discovered my small stature didn't make me feel impotent anymore, because the power of Jihad energized me. Most amazing, I discovered I (as a Muslim male) could rule over women and the first (of several, I hope) brides, was recently assigned to me. Additionally I learned that non-Muslims are filth and will spend eternity in Hell so the decision to become a Muslim was quite easy.” Klevius comment:Except that this description fits all sorts of males (and females eagerly assisting in their own oppression/subjugation) living under sex segregation. This is the curse that propels fascist Islam, the worst crime ever against humanity!

June 30, 2008: "The world's most peaceful Muslims" (Ahmadiyya) now legally forbidden by "moderate" Indonesian government aided by rallies/atrocities by the world's most violent Muslims who are, in turn, protected by the Islamic Lawyers’ Organization! Klevius comment: Reminds me of Obama and his Islamofascist supporters!

June 30, 2008: The Dark Continent seems to rest in almost total darkness about Islam as the main source of African slavery from the 7th century on! How come?!

June, 26, 2008: Hugh Kennedy: ”Before Abd-al Malik (Caliph 685-705) Mohammed is never mentioned on any official document whatsoever nor any form of religious pronouncement"
Klevius comment: For at least some 60 years after Mohammed's death he was a nobody to the Arabs! Btw, Abd-al Malik was the same cruel guy who systematically killed those who didn't speak Arabic. Malik was also responsible for the first Zanj slave upraisal. Furthermore he was the guy who enslaved and Islamized what is now Pakistan! No wonder that Malik's policy also included a wast program for mosques, i.e. slave trade centers!

June 23, 2008: Islamic sex slavery today (compare Origin of Vikings): Some 20-40 % of the girls of the north-eastern Assam region in India are now forced to become sex slaves. "They are initially raped and flogged almost to death and then sold to Islamic sheikhs from the Middle East. According to Rajeev Sharma (GOLD) “The girls are in high demand because of their Mongoloid features" (see The Mongoloid complex).

June 22, 2008: SHAME ON YOU USA! US MOST ISLAMOFASCIST, RACIST AND SEXIST ORGANIZATION (Nation of Islam) GETS OIL-MONEY FROM SAUDI ISLAMOFASCISTS TO DECEIVE US VOTERS TO VOTE FOR THEIR CANDIDATE (Barack Hussein Obama)

Benito Mussolini's jihad: "We arm ourselves in mind and material to defend ourselves"! Freemasons (the "Supreme Being" guys) heavily sponsored Mussolini on his way to power!Already in 1910 leftist Mussolini published La Lotta di Classe (Class Struggle)! According to Prezzolini the success of fascism was that they didn't hesitate to use violence ( compare Islam, Nation of Islam etc)! Klevius comment: What is new is that many of the leading fascists (and their supporters) of today pretend that they don't make use of this violence! According to Prezzoli "The fascists murdered and intimidated without, in most cases, being punished. In the first half of 1921 only 162 violent fascists were arrested compared to 2240 non-fascist workers who were sent to jail". The fascists were not only sure they wouldn't be punished, but they also got direct help from the police. Btw, the role of women in Mussolini's Italy was subordinate and procreative (i.e. sexism and rapetivism) - just as in Islam!

Hitler in 1943: “Nazis could be Moslems and Moslems could be Nazis.”

Himmler hated Christianity but he liked Islam.

Goebbels: “The National Socialist movement may be called ant-Semitic no longer, but only anti-Jewish. We have nothing against Arabs and other Semitics peoples….”

R.H. Lockhart (1938): Frenchmen writing home from Nazi Germany “Everything is moving toward a supreme conflict between the Christian world and the new Islam.” Furthermore, British and American businessmen, diplomats and journalists began to view Nazism as a new Islam.

Nazi book titles like: All-Islam: World Power of Tomorrow.

Obergruppenfuhrer Gottlob Berger boasted: “A link is created between Islam and National-Socialism on an open, honest basis. It will be directed in terms of blood and race from the North, and in the ideological-spiritual sphere from the East.”

Volontary Moslems assisted in the Jasenovac concentration camp, where over 10,000 Jews and over 40,000 Christians were murdered by the Nazis and their Islamic allies. Many Moslems saw Hitler as the possible Twelfth Prophet of Islam.


THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN "MODERATE" ISLAM AND ISLAMOFASCISM IS IGNORANCE

June 8, 2008: HILARY CLINTON SELLS HERSELF TO SEXIST SUPPORTERS OF THE FASCIST ORGANIZATION NATION OF ISLAM

OBAMA'S TICKET TO THE SENATE & THE PRES RACE WAS ISSUED ON NATION OF ISLAM'S HOME TURF WHERE HIS WIFE IS SAID TO SHOUT RACIST ABUSE TOGETHER WITH ULTRA-FASCIST N.O.I. LEADER FARRAKHAN!

June 7, 2008: UNBELIEVABLE IGNORANCE ABT OBAMA expressed on BBC by a woman (sic) who accused Hilary for being aggressive against Iran when Obama has already threatened Pakistan/Iran with nukes! Coward and double-talking Obama is a shame of the world if measured against e.g. Ayaan Hirsi Ali, the victim of that very sexist/racist Islamofascism (+ Kennedy etc ignorance) that has boosted Obama's race!
ISLAM KIDNAPPED AND SOLD THE AFRO-AMERICAN SLAVE-UNCLE KINTA KUNTE TO AMERICA JUST AS IT DID WITH MILLIONS OF OTHER HUMANS AROUND THE GLOBE! WHAT A SENSELESS SUPER HYPOCRISY WE ARE NOW WITNESSING WHEN TRUE FASCISTS ARE TRYING TO "CHANGE" US!

June 4, 2008: DO US DEMOCRATS REALLY PREFER A RACIST/SEXIST N.O.I. SUPPORTING ISLAMOFASCIST (if Nation of Islam cannot be classified as Islamofascist then nothing can - see further down) AS THEIR PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE OR ARE THEY JUST PLAIN IGNORANT AND EASILY CHEATED BY EMPTY TALK AND A SCREAMING MOB? A populist "man" who doesn't say anything but nonsense while trying to cover up and use NOI-racism at the same time! Hitler and Mussolinin also wanted "change" and fascism was a great word back then because, like now, few realised what fascism was really about! A $140.000 award from L.A. county for a Nation of Islam leader who obstrued and resisted a legal action by the police (assisted by the same type of "lawyers" as Obama), Islamofascists "patrolling" the streets of Miami, Cities and districts made blacks only etc etc!

AN EVIL PREHISTORIC MODEL FOR ISLAMIC RAPETIVISM AND RACISM WAS REVEALED
in a 7000 year old mass-murder grave
in Germany containing males only. The immigrants from Mideast used, according to the researchers, to raid the small local communities to steal the attractive girls and women. KLEVIUS COMMENT: Thos females were especially good looking because of their mongoloid features and they talked a Finno-Ugric language and belonged to the original Europeans (with similar people also spread all over Siberia - see Out of Africa as Pygmies and back again as global Mongoloids). This is perfectly in line with Klevius explanation to the inherited he/she sexim (in Finnish, for example, it's simply 'hän' for both sexes)in Indo-European and Semitic languages - i.e. the very same ones that have become "monotheistic"! The prehistoric site hence reflects the darkest side of human existence and behavior! As does Islam - and with exactly the same original tenets - see Origin of Islam!

WHY DOES MEDIA CONTINUE TO SPREAD LIES TO THE PUBLIC ABT ISLAM? The continuing stream of fairy tales abt "Islamic "science" for example! The troublesome truth is that Islam has always been incapable of progress precisely because its basic tenets rest on backwardness, infidel-racism (a handy tool for slavery) and rapetivism-sexism. This is why Koran can't be changed! see e.g. Origin of Vikings). "Islamic science" and "Islammic progress" are per definition impossible, and "Islamic scientists" and "Islamic inventions" were just stolen from those people Islam conquered and suppressed! Of cours, the medi's eagerness to boost historical lies abt Islam is the symptom of the disease: The worst crime ever against humanity! The eagerness to create "Potemkin wings" around Islam seems strikingly proportional to Islam's historical emptiness.

style="font-weight:bold;">THE HISTORICAL FACTS ARE OVERWHELMING! So why don’t we tell our children that Islam was created and upheld on the very idea of slavery (infidels) and rapetivism (Sharia confinement of girls)?
And that its violent original expansion was fueled by the same fascistoid racism (seeing others as infidels) and sexism (institutionalized confining and raping of Muslim girls and sex-slavery of non-Muslim girls) as today (clearly visible also in “Western” nations)? Unlike the rest of the world history Islam has not progressed precisely because it is trapped in its original slave-ideology. Submission under Koran, the original manual for slavery, rapetivism and conquest! The “Western” world first abolished slavery some thousand+ years ago, and then again and now globally, some 200 years ago! – see Origin of Vikings.

Isn’t that a crime and pure child abuse with long lasting traumatic effects (Sharia marriages, rapes, threats, assaults, murderings, apostasy ban etc) not to tell children abt it?! And if you tell, don’t tell them Islamic slavery was better than other slavery. It was not, it was much worse because of its totalitarian infidel racism and Sharia rapetivism.

So when a young (male of course) Bosnian Catholic priest tries to “befriend” a young (male of course) Islamic imam the latter becomes corrected by his elders not to stretch Islam, this is an example of the same young ignorance that fuels Obama’s racist campaign. However, the extremely stupid and naïve ignorance shown from the non-Muslim side is equally bizarre among BBC reporters and senior clergyMEN as well! Islamists may pretend but NEVER CHANGE!
Face it! Islam stands for the ugliest past of humanity, and because its slavery/rapetivism has been around for some 1400 years there is no doubt whatsoever that Islam constitutes the worst crime ever against humanity.


ISLAM, THE WORST CRIME EVER AGAINST HUMANITY!
When a Chinese one-child-mother is crying over her 18-year old son dead in the earthquake, while Muslim mothers are busy under sexist rapetivism to deliver and Islamofy 8-12 children (often aided by "Western" taxpayers) in an overpopulated world, the stupidity and evilness of Islam is well pictured - apart from its (eagerly blinked) evil and colonialist origin as a slave trade religion! That the real historical nature of Islam isn't taught in schools etc but instead an incredibly misleading picture is offered in media, is almost unbelievable when considering the records at hand!

When a white guy is stopped by the police because he and his vehicle etc matches a common illegal pattern HE CAN'T REFER TO HIS SKIN COLOR AND RACISM! Furthermore, black police racism (no matter if the target person matches illegal patterns or not) is common (as are racist attitudes from black air hostesses, officials etc! AND MOST OF THIS RENEWED RACIAL TENSION CAN BE BLAMED ON ISLAM(ofascism) AND PEOPLE LIKE OBAMA, SAUDI ABDULLAH ETC WHO BOOST & UTILIZE IT! Likewise Obama's "sweetie"-sexism is just but the tip of the iceberg of a change to the worse. A slip of the tongue that reveals a scandalous exploitation of racist/sexist under-currents for the purpose of gaining votes while pretending to stand for the opposite! Ever thought abt why Freud's sexist psychoanalysis became so popular some 100 years ago? Well, read From Freud to bin Laden and Klevius Psychosocial timeline! Today Islam(and its hypocritical supporters) is the carrier of the worst threat against a free non-racist non-sexist humanity!

Also consider how Islam stole, partly destroyed, and now hides the Floresiensis remains discovered by "Western" scientists! And if you want to be ahead of the pack on this issue see Klevius Out of Africa as pygmies and back as global mongoloids and Klevius hybridization theory that explains why what we have used to call human ancestors were so stupid despite their big heads! However, this is hard reading for believers in totalitarian Islam!

CURE YOUR IGNORANCE ABT ISLAM! Apostasy (leaving Islam) is ALWAYS considered the worst of crimes in Islam, although punishment may differ (see more abt Obama's born-muslim hypocrisy below)!
ISLAM ONLY ACCEPTS INTERNAL, NOT EXTERNAL, EQUALITY! Most people are ignorant abt this important fact! THIS IS WHY RACISTS WITH INFERIORITY COMPLEX USE ISLAM!
THE MOST PATHETIC & IGNORANT ISLAM DEFENSE: "It's a great religion and most Muslims are peaceful"!
Whereas Islam is totalitarian (see Origin of Islam and Shinto meets Islam), Klevius stands for pluralism (see KLEVUX and Definition of negative human rights), and whereas Islam is "right", Klevius is "uncertain" (see Definition of religion), and whereas Islam segregates on the basis of sex Klevius does not (see a surprising Definition of feminism and What's sex segregation?)! The naive view that Sharia is binding only on believers misses the very foundation of Islam namely the apostasy ban. A human being if born to a Muslim father is always a Muslim unless s/he commits the worst of crimes, i.e. leaving Islam! THIS IS WHY ALL ISLAM IS ISLAMOFASCISM/RAPETIVISM! No wonder then that the heartland of Islam Saudi Arabia is the worst violator of human rights!

April 6, 2008: DALAI LAMA OR DARFUR? Much talk about Dalai Lama, but what about the victims of Islamic atrocities in Darfur?!
April 4, 2008: BLAIR'S STUPID SEXIST MIDEAST FAITH NEGLECTS THE WORLD'S MAJORITY OF NON-MONOLITHEIST FAITHS/NON-FAITHS! Catholicism is anti-human and Islam, in whatever form, is extremism!
March 18, 2008: OBAMA THINKS WHITE EVIL ISN´T "EPIDEMIC" (BUT COULD BE CURED BY A VOTE)! He also said that his beloved hate preaching pastor (see more below) isn't worse than "the black community"! Klevius comment: He mentioned slavery as the basic sin but forgot to mention that it was Islam that exported all black slaves to America! By the help of greedy black Africans who were already in the business by enslaving the original African ("Pygmies" and "Bushmen") and now had learnt the far more commercial Islamic slavery from the Arabs.
March 16, 2008: KLEVIUS RENEWED WARNING! Islam is abusing UN to confuse ignorant people about real human rights - NOT ISLAMIC ANTI-RIGHTS, i.e. Cairo declaration which, for example, denies women true rights! This move includes a worldwide strategy to implement Islam by forbidding criticism of Islam, i.e. what is called Islamophobia
March 15, 2008: John Gray's pathetic, naive and dangerous defense of "religion": Firstly, there are false "religion(s)" (i.e. sexist Mideast god-monolitheisms) and true religion (ancestor warship, which the former use to name "pagan" (see Klevius Definition of religion and the Vagina gate). Secondly, Gray's stupid comment (about secular humanists) "the ugly fantasy that the Earth exists to serve humans" seems utterly ill-thought and even extremely fascistoid. Thirdly, what this moron tries to do is to equalize totalitarianism (e g Islam) with its perfect opposite, the negative human rights! Based on Koran you can slaughter people, based on negative human rights you can not!
March 15, 2008: Islam vs China in Tibet. Will Dalai Lama join with islamofascists? March 15, 2008: Klevius "Out of Africa with a chimp brain & back as global mongoloids again confirmed"!
March 13, 2008: The Iraq-Al-Qaeda connection: ISLAM!
A child named Scarlett Keeling, 15, was raped and murdered by ISLAM on Goa.
Obama: The Islamic call to prayer from a minaret "is one of the prettiest sounds on earth" Klevius comment: Hypocritical or ignorant abt Islam? See below what the minaret stands for!
When "political" Islam commits massacre directed against civilian children Hamas & muslims celebrate - and their supporters excuse it "because they don't have equally good weapons"!? Translate that to other areas of life and you'll see the evil illogic in it! Btw, Islam is historically by far the worst occupier, colonialist & slave trader!
A new intelligent species found in 2004 is still denied by Islam and its naive supporters (see Out of Africa with a chimp brain)!The last stupidity on this topic is offered from University of Western Australia (where students from the worst human rights violating country on the planet, Saudi Arabia, now demand sex segregation and lectures rescheduled for bowing towards the world's historically worst slave trafficking center!). Islam can't simply face homo floresiensis! Can you? Btw, in Sweden lamofascists now demand exception for muslim girls from sex education, mixed sport etc. OK, how abt removing Islam alltogether from the curricullum for non-muslims!
Rail Odinga, Obama's islamist sharia cousin and agitator for violence in Kenya is a close friend of Shiekh Abdullah Abdi, the Saudi supported chairman of the National Muslim Leaders Forum of Kenya
Michelle Obama gives us a new definition of racism: In her naive and stupid thesis (now withdrawn from public scrutiny - btw, was it originally passed as a form of affirmative action?!) writes that the path she chose by attending Princeton would likely lead to her "further integration and/or assimilation into a white cultural and social structure that will only allow me to remain on the periphery of society; never becoming a full participant." Klevius comment: Yee, you're right Michelle, see what happened to you! Running for first lady is just pure assimilation, isn't it! Spiced with a shade of sexism! However, by adding Michelle's notion that whatever the whites did good for her or no matter how nice they were towards her SHE FELT SEPARATE anyway! Could this have more to do with her own racist prejudices? Her fanatic separatism, however, is the very opposite to KLEVUX anti-separatist web - separatism means anti-pluralism!! Furthermore, the Obamas are members of an ignorant, (see Klevius Out of Africa with a chimp brain - No, it's probably not what you think!) fanatic (NOI) and tautological (what's African in Afro-Americans?) black supramist "church"!
WOULD YOU BELIEVE IT, PEOPLE SEEM NOT YET HAVE REALIZED THAT OBAMA (a born Muslim who thus isn't allowed to leave Islam and who, unlike ignorant "moderate" muslims and non-muslims, knows what Islamic racism is abt - and hails it!) IS AN ISLAMIST AND HIS & HIS WIFE'S NationOfIslam PALS ARE THE WORST OF RACIST FASCISTS! Intimidation against non-believers: Popular black author/talk-show host Tavis Smiley has disclosed death threats for blasphemy against their black prophet Barack Hussein Obama. According to Congressional Black Caucus member Stephanie Tubbs Jones many black elected officials not swearing allegiance to Obama have also been the target of violent threats. Klevius comment: Sounds Islamic doesn't it!
Feb 27, 2008 DAVE GIBSON: "I am also proud to live in a country where even a racist nut-case like Michelle Obama can publicly show her disdain for the nation which has allowed her to acquire great privilege." PHYLLIS CHESLER: Michelle Obama once wrote a thesis at Princeton abt the importance of black separatism. "The last time so many women cheered and swooned and orgasmically submitted themselves in large crowds to another thrilling orator took place in Germany and Austria in the 1930s and 1940s."
Feb 23, 2008:ISLAMOFASCIST SWEDISH STATE RADIO ("Konflikt") DOESN'T MENTION DARFUR/SUDAN GENOCIDE IN A PROGRAM ABT WORLD SEXUAL WARFARE! Amnesty report: Arab women sang in support while Janjaweed men raped black women. The Hakama, the women who cooperate with the Janjaweed, celebrated the rapes and insulted the women victims. "You are gorillas, you are black, and you are badly dressed," the Hakama yelled at the women. "The blood of the blacks runs like water, we take their goods and we chase them from our area and our cattle will be in their land. The power of [Sudanese President Omer Hassan] al-Bashir belongs to the Arabs and we will not rest until the end, you blacks, we have killed your god."
In addition to raping women in theirvillages, the Janjaweed abducts some for use as sex slaves and breaks their legs so they can't escape

Talking abt racism: WHY IS A GUY WITH A BLACK GENITOR AND A WHITE MOM CALLED BLACK?!THE BLACK HOLE IN AN ARCHBISHOP'S MIND: By proposing (on the grounds of what he thinks is religious pluralism, but, in fact, is secular negative human rights) the inclusion of totalitarianism (Islam/Sharia) in pluralism (democracy) Rowan Williams confuses secular negative human rights with (the right to) positive religious doctrines - in this case the worst of its kind (see Origin of Islam)!
This post will stay for a while but is continuously updated! Btw, it's now #2 on a Google search 'origin of mosque'!
IF THE PAKIS CHOOSE ISLAMOFASCISM THEN THE ELECTION WASN'T, BY DEFINITION, FREE, FAIR & DEMOCRATIC (compare Hamas)! Islamofascist media, e.g. in Sweden, repeatedly has accused Musharraf for electoral rigging even before the election started although it's probably a cover up for electoral rigging performed by Musharraf's Islamofascist enemies! E.g. are many women denied or controlled in the voting process quite the contrary to the very idea of democracy and the free voting individual (see Klevius definition of negative human rights)!
17 Feb 2008: KOSOVO - A DARK DAY FOR EUROPE & A VICTORY FOR RACIST ISLAMOFASCISM & SEXIST SHARIA! Saudi islamofascists who have built mosques there now pay women some €250/month if they wear a hijab (i.e. segregate themselves under Islamofascism). This pattern, however, just follows the blueprint of Origin of Islam! And the people are cheated into the Islamic dead end. Polit. Science prof. Miroljub Jevtic: Islamic faith pertains to establishment of its laws in the world. Islamic insurgency then used the Balkan Muslims as Trojan horses with whom they employed the Western rhetoric of human rights, free markets... to gain support. It is a paradox that the West was used for creation of basis against itself!
Steven Spielberg (abt Islamofascism in Darfur): "I find that my conscience will not allow me to continue business as usual"
MUSLIM OBAMA & OIL-FOR-FOOD SCANDAL MASTERMIND ANNAN HELP INTRODUCE SHARIA ISLAMOFASCISM IN KENYA! (see below)
WHEN SHOULD SWEDEN APOLOGIZE FOR ITS WORLD RECORD IN STOLEN CHILDREN? (btw, if the Australia case is called (skin color)racism, what should we call other similar (non-abusive cases of inherited poverty, different life styles etc) cases without the skin color factor?!US' MOST SEXIST/RACIST PRES. RACE EVER? Obama's Islamic "father-roots" now riot in Kenya and Indonesia/Timor on the eternal evil axis between jihadists and "moderate" Islamists (like Obama himself)! Also note that non-Islamic East-Timor, although rural and poor, is wealthier than most of rural Islamic Indonesia (approx. 18 per cent of Indonesians live on US$1/d or less, and >50% on US$ 2/d - despite oil etc wealth among a minority)! Without his white secular Western mother-roots Obama would have ended up in the same type of Islamic cultural monotonism! Is that why he keeps her downplayed?! Why white? In short because Islam haunted Europe for white slave girls to an extent (see Origin of Vikings) that caused rigid Catholicism that caused Protestantism that caused the 1688 English revolution that caused the industrial revolution - and made the US and its constitution possible (ref. KLEVUX)!
SHOULD THE SWEDISH OBAMA SUPPORTING PM BE INDICTED FOR SIDING WITH RACISTS & ISLAMOFASCISM? (Perhaps not too surprising in a country where an immigration officer is kicked because he thinks USA is OK, and where islamofascist state media fanatically defends every racist Islamic terrorist from bin Laden down!) Consider the UNDENIABLE FACT that Louis Farrakhan (leader of the US racist organization Nation of Islam), a white hating, America hating, and Christian hating extreme racist who has been promoted by Obama's Trinity United Church of Christ (which has a website about race, not religion): "White people are potential humans ... they haven't evolved yet"! He praised Hitler, though! For this and more Obama's pastor awarded Farrakhan (with whom he has been travelling in Islamofascist countries)! Klevius comment: Compare the racist teachings of Islam, i.e. that non-Muslims are no real humans!
Obama's fundraising channelled/cleaned through sophisticated Arab-American/Islamic networks!
Why di
d Obama vote for a wall against latinos?
Why did Obama place a member of the Nation of Islam, Cynthia K. Miller, as the treasurer of his 2004 U.S. Senate campaign? Why did Obama place a member of the Nation of Islam, Jennifer Mason, as the Director of Constituent Services in his U.S. Senate office? She is also in charge of selecting Obama's Senate interns! As a direct answer to a question by a former associate Obama said he saw nothing wrong with the Nation of Islam!
Obama's key to the senate in 2004 was the bless of the leaders of the Nation of Islam and due racist AA-voters in its heartland in Illinois!
Obama also attempted to get Federal Indictee Tony Rezko, a Syrian Arab who helped Obama to purchase his home for a "low" price and who is also in a partnership with Nation of Islam founder Elijah Muhammad's son, Jabir, a contract to build a nuclear power plant in Iraq! And why is most media picturing Obama nicely while Clinton badly?! And finally, Obama to his pastor when kicking off his presidential race: “You [Wright] can get kind of rough in the sermons, so what we’ve decided is that it’s best for you not to be out there in public. I would hate to admit that I was ashamed of being associated with my pastor"!AS A LAWYER OBAMA OUGHT TO KNOW THAT FROM A LEGAL POINT OF VIEW HIS PRESIDENTIAL BID ISN''T ONLY A TAUTOLOGY BUT A TRAGIC FARS!


Islam in Iraq 2008/02: The most devout Muslims seem to be women with Down's syndrome strapped with bombs (>70 dead & >160 injured) detonated from a distance by their imam's cell!
US poll: The most devout US-Muslim voters are those who believe that Islam and modernity are compatible Klevius comment: I.e. the so called "moderate" (read superficial & ignorant) Muslims who have no idea abt Islam's true origin & nature!
Why it really matters that Obama is a born Muslim: Because a born Muslim can't leave Islam, the most racist of ideologies! So when Obama, as a US pres. cand., isn't acting on it (but rather covering it up with huge funds) he desecrates & violates the US constitution! This fact is concealed by Obama and revealed by Ayaan Hirsi Ali (see below)! A born Muslim is according to Islam always a Muslim. Leaving Islam is an equal crime as it is for a US president to betray/conceal/not address the right to freedom of/from religion! So Obama ought to openly commit apostasy or resign as a pres. cand.! HOWEVER, A MUSLIM IS ALSO, ACCORDING TO KORAN, EXPECTED TO LIE IF IT BENEFITS ISLAM! And no, Obama hasn't sworn in on the Koran, that's just a silly misunderstanding that is now eagerly picked up by his supporters! And no, he's not a secret agent for al-qaeda! That would make him much less dangerous! However, in a deeper sense all "moderate Muslims" are secret agents for radical Islam!
*If to be a Muslim is ethnicity then the Koranic infidel/apostasy concepts make it the worst kind of racism!
SHARIA-JIHAD IN KENYA (homeland of Obama's father) is "ethnic cleansing" (of the "infidel") which is the trademark of Islam and its center, the mosque! We need to define the violence and its source - not to hide it!
POOR BLACK (& WHITE ETC) GIRLS FROM AYAAN TO DARFUR - ALL VICTIMS OF ISLAM!
IRAQ & OBAMA SHARE A PROBLEM - ISLAM (it was a huge mistake to let Islam into the constitution!)!
ISLAM, OF COURSE, ALSO BEHIND THE SPLIT IN KENYA ( incl. Muslims - see Odinga/Islamofascism connection - burning a church full of "non-Muslims", and many other similar atrocities)! Obinga and the opposition movement ODM has promised to implement strict Sharia law! Obama's father was btw a Kenyan born Muslim! And although Obama wanted to nuke-bomb Pakistan and Afganistan, he also voted against defining Iran's Revolutionary Guards as a terrorist group!?
Crypto(anti-white/pro-Farrakhan?)-racist Obama (who seems obsessed with race/lack of race in his book) is a born Muslim but doesn't dare/want to commit apostasy, i.e. quitting Islamofascism* like Ayaan Hirsi Ali did, the true representative of all the, mostly black (Obama isn't black), victims of Islamic rapetivism. He has a racist/separatist mentor, Jeremiah A. Wright Jr (rev. at Obama's "Christian" separatist "church"), who is a keen supporter of Farrakhan, leader of Nation of Islam, US most racist** organization according to which "whites are intrinsically evil"! When Malcolm X broke with NOI’s extreme racism Farrakhan stated: " Such a man as Malcolm is worthy of death…" Soon after Malcolm X was murdered by NOI hitmen. In 1998, as a reward to one of Malcolm's three assassins, Farrakhan appointed Norman 3X Butler, as the leader of Malcolm X’s former mosque!
* If you wonder abt the word 'Islamofascism' it's here (and should be everywhere) defined as Islam based on its basic tenets: infidel racism/dhimmitude, sex segregated rapetivism/sharia, and apostasy ban (when you are born or converted to Islam you are forbidden to leave)!
** Among many "blacks" there's a "white man complex" (also compare the "mongoloid complex") out there and the culprit is Islam and its 1400 years of slave robbing in Africa (see below and Origin of Islam). When Africa fell under Islam's apartheid it stalled while the British "protesters" (against fundamentalism and for freedom) after 1688 started the modern world in Lancashire - btw also the home of the world's first and best (relative to males of its time female soccer team, Dick, Kerr's Ladies 1917-1922 after WW1).

Dick Field:" The black student unfortunately, may to see his difficulties as a deliberate attempt to put him down because he is black. The black student’s parents are reported (by many teachers and principals) to be more prone to believing the student and attributing problems to racial or colour identity than their white or other minority counterparts." Klevius comment: Eagerly assisted by what Field calls "the professional black "anti-racist" (read racist) and ethnocultural agitators"!

Anti-white racism: In Penn. US, 26 year old lack student at Penn State, Langston Carraway, was stabbed 93 times and "Die Nigger" had been smeared with his blood. Eventually, police found this hate crime had been staged by blacks. Reportedly Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson are NOT expected to demonstrate!

Female mtDNA since the introduction of Islam reveals a massive one way stream of slave girls out of East-Africa. However, the stream of castrated boys was three times bigger! AND ALL SOLD BY BLACK AFRICANS TO ARABS! (see Origin of Islam - the worst crime ever). To really understand how fooled you are abt Islam on the net, consider that e.g. Wikipedia (20080111) - not to mention New York Times, BBC etc - hardly mentions Islam and then belittles the enormous Islamic eunuch institution: "It was only after the Muslim Arabs conquered parts of the Roman Empire (which wasn't even around after 610 - Klevius remark) that they acquired eunuchs from the Romans, and not knowing what else to do with them, made them into harem guards". "Not knowing what else to do with them" (sic) when it was Islam that was the by far worst consumer of eunuchs in the world history!
* and today even the most "moderate" mosque is still the meeting place for not only upholding rapetivism sex segregation and "infidel"-racism, but in particular the institution for the protection of the worst crime ever against humanity, Islam! And the smiling imams know well how to pretend peaceful while applauding every means that support Islamic rapetivism! Hypocrisy is only the first letter in what they share with islamofascist king Abdullah! Also see below horrifying examples of how modern imams/mosques work. Also note that bishop of Rochester, Rt Rev Dr Michael Nazir-Ali now (Jan/2008) warns that Islamists are turning areas in England into ghettos ruled by sexist/racist sharia law and considered no-go zones for non-Muslims!
ISLAM IS AN INSULT AGAINST NON-MUSLIMS (AND MANY "MUSLIMS")! The ugly origin of the racist/sexist mosque/masjid/madrassa institution will, little by little, be revealed here (+ KLEVUX + Origin of Islam). Stay tuned! I might even give you something abt Kaba (Islam's "holiest" place where non-Muslims aren't allowed. Why? Think for yourself! Almost all "info" abt Kaaba on the net is Islamic, and Abdullah & Co want to keep it that way! In the meantime learn abt religion and negative human rights! Yes, I know I'm up early but isn't that better than feminists (stuck in "women's experience") and islamists (stuck in medieval fascism) who are getting later for every moment?!
Yes, it's (so far) Klevius against Islam and that's very unfair because Islam's got only some 1 billion "followers", oil money, and support from the "West", whereas Klevius has got the easy, powerful, and inevitably winning answer from the problem and due analysis of sex segregation and negative human rights! I didn't even bother to look at such a lousy (slavery, infidels, apostasy ban - i.e. locking oneself up -, rapetivism etc) "faith" as Islam before my analysis of sex segregation made me interested! The modern Islamic bluff is a house of cards built on lies defended by every means. And what else would you expect from the world's worst crime against humanity? Just scratching its surface reveals an embarrassing and ugly truth. As an Indian researcher put it: "It is my deduction that at every historic site the construction is all Hindu, and destruction all Muslim. In Muslim history destroyers and disfigurers have been tomtommed as builders. Every historic mosque and mausoleum is a captured Hindu building and every Muslim is the descendant of a captured Hindu because before 622 A. D. there was no Muslim." And how come, for example, that a PhD defender at Pennsylvania Univ may reveal such ignorance abt Islam, by claiming that ALL MOSQUES ARE DIRECTED TOWARDS KAABA/MECCA!? Marvin Mills, expert on the Cordoba "mosque", rightly concluded that Islam's main contribution to the world architecture is that it didn't destroy everything - because it needed it and sponged on it in the same way as its basic idea, sponging on slaves! Making graffiti on old walls is much easier than creating something new. The only new creations were made by non-Islamic technology labeled Muslim through threats! Also take a look at the Islamic bluff abt Taj Mahal, as well as the Islamic scandal with the Indonesian remains of Flores WoMan, Homo floresiensis!
KLEVIUS OUTCRY: I CAN'T BELIEVE IT, AGAIN (like in 2000 when a SF woman answered NO to my stupid question if there are any female Catholic priests in SF)! A SERIOUS LOOKING US WOMAN: "I DON'T THINK A WOMAN CAN BE A PRESIDENT"! NO WONDER SEXIST MEDIEVAL ISLAM GETS SO MUCH SPACE, AND THAT TWO RELIGIOUS FUNDAMENTALIST* MALES TOP IOWA!
*Obama is to be considered fundamentalist because he hasn't made any effort to abandon his extremist Islamic past!

So US women, (who btw also seem blind for the real antifascist heroine, Ayaan Hirsi Ali) prefer an unexperienced, violent (advocated air strikes on Pakistan) male upper-class Harvard educated professor who is a crypto-Muslim* representative of sexist Islam (one who doesn't even have the guts to openly admit it or simply committing official apostasy, instead of saying he's a "member" of a church) in front of the only woman in the race, who also happens to be very experienced and who, furthermore, happens to have by her side one of the most brilliant and experienced poiliticians ever made (says Klevius who disliked his politics)!
* bin Laden & Co will certainly recognize him as a Muslim and, if elected, appreciate that Islam has taken over the US! Because, as you might know, Islam allows Muslims to be non-practising and even lying when needed (i.e. Taqiyya, the islamic rule of deception)! So it really doesn't even matter what's going on in Mr Hussein Obama's own head!

And although Obama speaks "unity" (under Islam?) and colorblindness (while playing the race card all the time) many of his (racist?) voters only vote for "a guy with a complexion like mine", i.e. also implying (or?!) that they would never consider voting the opposite sex - or are color shades more important than sex - stupids!?

FASCISM HAS ALWAYS BEEN TIED TO SEX SEGREGATION (compare Nazi women in Angels of Antichrist, the most important sociological paper from the last century)!

Kenya and Islamofascist violence and genocide attempt

Three years ago (posting Jan 5, 2005) I warned abt Islamist kids using fireworks etc as low scale street terror (incl. murders, injuries, and hundreds of destroyed buildings only in Sweden) against what they have been taught are "infidels". To deliberately send in big exploding firework rockets in buildings and crowds usually demands a special kind of religion - Islam! However, although this Islam inspired terror has escalated ever since an "expert" on the Swedish news said he "couldn't understand" this nor the fact that fireworkers, ambulance and police are threatened and attacked. The naive moron said "Maybe we don't behave well enough" (sic)! This same blindfolded reasoning applies to reports abt Kenya! Not a word abt Islamofascist sexism/racism!

Wikipedia's Islam hypocrisy (titled Pre-colonial history): "Kenya's proximity to the Arabian Peninsula invited (Arab) colonization, and Arab and Persian settlements sprouted along the coast by the 8th century. During the first millennium AD, Nilotic and Bantu peoples moved into the region, and the latter now comprise three-quarters of Kenya's population.
In the centuries preceding colonization, the Swahili coast of Kenya was part of the east African region which traded with the Arab world and India especially for
ivory and slaves (the Ameru tribe is said to have originated from slaves escaping from Arab lands"

Mohammad (acc. to Ibn Ishaq): "By him who holds my life in his hand, I bring you slaughter"!

Islam's Catch 22: Bhutto, who opposed Koran schools, and her murderer, who learnt to murder in a Koran school, both made martyrs by Islam!

"...for the sake of Islam itself, the truth of its teachings should not be so clearly expressed..."

Girls, before a "date", friendship etc. you might sometimes really benefit by simply asking abt his possible connection(s) to Islam (birth, membership, friends, gangs etc). Islam's apostasy ban (i.e. you're not allowed to divorce Islam) opposes the US constitution on individual and religious freedom in every bit!

WHY ISN'T OBAMA AS BRAVE AS AYAAN HIRSI ALI?!

Klevius comment: How can Hussein (Hussein = Muslim in the Islamofascist world) Barack Obama who, according to Islam, is a born Muslim* who hasn't openly proclaimed apostasy (i.e. becoming a murtad fitri - one of the worst crimes known to Islam) as yet, be a presidential candidate in US?! He enrolled as a Muslim in a school where one could choose among five different faiths. In fact, he was registered by his family as a Muslim at several schools. Furthermore he regularly bowed in the mosque towards the world's historical slave trade center Mecca. Moreover, he practised Islam in Indonesia, the world's most populous Muslim nation, which officially denounces secularism, pluralism and liberalism through the foremost state-sponsored Islamic body, Council of the Ulamas (MUI), notorious for its fundamentalist "fatwas" and neglect of human rights. If Hussein B. Obama wants to continue being a Muslim (i.e. not committing apostasy) while also continuing to warship other gods, such as, for example, Jesus and the Holy Ghost (like the naive (?!) Muslim/"Christian" rev. Ann Holmes Redding who "felt an inexplicable call to surrender to Abdullah's, sorry, God's patriarchy") he should honestly say so. And proclaiming that one is both a Muslim and a Christian is like treating AIDS and a flu as equals. However, the real point of this is that it really reveals the evil nature of Islam, namely that most Muslims, before they are even conscious human beings, are raped to their faith and have no right to leave! Am I stupid when I don't see how this fits the US constitution?! Sinclair Lewis predicted that when fascism comes to the US it will be wrapped in the flag carrying a cross!

* I.e. Islamic child abuse that is just opposite to the idea abt freedom in general and freedom of religion! I know you're ignorant abt Islam because of all the shit you get from Google etc. but truth is Obama's father could never be an "atheist" because he was born Muslim in the Islamic apostasy trap - he could only be a "non-practising" Muslim! There's no way out to freedom in Islam other than committing apostasy and hence disqualifying it in accordance to the US constitution! TAKE IT AND THINK IT! And for those who haven't got the depth of the issue as yet, this is where Obama faces only two possibilities: 1) Openly and clearly committing apostasy or, 2) Violating the US constitution - you can't, even passively, adhere to its opposite! So although some tricksters now try to make Obama "a possibility" this will only benefit Islamofascists, not the future of a free world! US is under an attack far worse than 9/11 - it's called "moderate Islam" but is, in fact, the covered fuel for real original Koranic slavery/rapetivism Islam!

The consequence of sex segregated Islamofascist rapetivism: Muhammad now the most popular boys name in the UK!

A senior terror leader, Muhammad Abdel-Al (a leader of the Popular Resistance Committees terror group - a coalition of Palestinian terror organizations, including Hamas and Islamic Jihad that has taken responsibility for thousands of shootings and deadly rocket attacks): "We see from this study of Muhammad's name that Islam is on the rise and cannot be stopped"! Klevius comment: Although I reject ALL sexist Mideast "monotheisms" I do recognize that Jesus isn't among the top scoring names in UK!

Islam was the means for the wealthy to sponge on the poor, weak or unorganized people. Just read the history of Islam and you'll see the repeated pattern of Islamic slave raiders/traders, their connections to the wealthy non-Muslim populase, and the never-ending stream of slaves as the basis for Islamic finance - from its very beginning!

The Jinn infidel/slave in Koran-Islam

A Jinn in Arabic is a non-human concealed through status and darkness. According to Koran the jinns are Satan's descendants (7:27, 18:50). Acccording to Islam "god"* (sic) wanted one jinn for every human from birth to death.However, the jinns were given the possibility to "re-educate" themselves by submitting to "god's" absolute authority. When a human (i.e. a "true Muslim") dies the jinn is "freed", i.e. forced (physically ot socially) to be a Muslim!

* read the human "master" - "God" is excluded and extinct in Islam via the "last messenger" and Koran-"interpretations"!

When a jinn being is born and assigned to a human being, the jinn remains a constant companion of the human until the human dies. The jinn is then freed, and lives on for a few centuries. Both humans and jinns are required to worship God alone (51:56).

The very root evilness of Islam became visible after Bush's surgery in Saddam's Islamofascist slaughter house - and the world shut its eyes from the horrible truth! And now, look at Islam's evil traces in Lebanon!

Why don't the US candidates talk religion at all? - Only Mideast sexist monotheisms (sic)! For a definition of real religion see KLEVUX!Klevius ultra short and extremely simplified lesson in Mideast "religion(s)":

Why are the silliest and most dangerous ideologies rooted in Mideast?

The Jewish idea abt the chosen people-tradition was originally just an extension of the only true religion, i.e. kinship groupings. In an almost dead desert territory, extremely dependent and limited by oasises and their connections, it created a widespread and powerful Diaspora trading network that influenced other surrounding cultures and, much later when the Romans left, inspired the evil elaborated ideology of racist/sexist sponging/expanding on slavery/rapetivism, that we now call Islam. This especially evil nomadic/agrarian curse of sexism (see Demand for Resources - on the right to be poor where the theory is originally outlined in 1992 and its modern consequences in Angels of Antichrist, 1996) emerged in an environment (outside the fertile valleys) which from most other parts of the world would be described as hell.

This is also the only significant explanation (to my knowledge so far trade-marked Klevius) to the remarkable lingvistic fact that sexist grammer seems to be mainly an indo-european and semitic feature! For me with one mother tongue inside and a second outside this linguistic area, the impact of sex segregation is quite obvious. Especially when I happened to experience my youth as poor in the world's back then richeast countries, Sweden and Finland, hence observing the confining feature of 'he/she' (Swe 'han/hon') segregation versus the Finnish non-gender 'hän' world. It's also noteworthy that whereas the original civilization in Mideast, the Sumerians, lack grammatical gender, Semitic has it as its basic principle!

The astonishing fact is that most of the world is free from both gender and "God-religions" - at least compared to Mideast monotheism(s)!
ISLAMIC* HONOR MURDERS IN US & CANADA
* honor murders are almost always Islamic because in the case of a non-Muslim honor-murderer rooted in Islamic land has been fostered and kept in this medieval "tradition"
When a Muslim named Abdul Said in Texas recently shot his two daughters Sarah 17 and Amin 18, because they were seeing "infidels" it was Islam and Koran that "aided" him, and it was probably a US (unconstitutional) mosque that offered him protection!
Aqsa Pervez, 16, of Mississauga Ontario (Canada) was strangled to death by her Pakistani Muslim father for refusing to wear hijab.

ORIGIN OF MOSQUE

According to historians it's difficult to explain what caused the Islamic conquest, i.e. that the Arabic ruling elite embraced an extremely expansionist policy? Well, here is the simple answer - but can you bear it!?

While reading this please keep in mind that the slavery/rapetivism strategy that we now call Koran/Islam was not fully elaborated and utilized until some decades after Mohammed's death. Koran in any form didn't exist while Mohammed lived, and even long afterwards there were many different versions around!

Islam is based on rapetivism, i.e. enforced sex segregation, represented by, e.g. burqas and eunuchs.

Islam expanded mainly via two different channels, military conquest (with inferior technology and skills but compensated by a cowardice gang tactics against the weaker) and slave commerce.

Why sword? Because the original parasitic idea of Islam was created as a strategy for replacing normal (and vanishing) trade with slave trade. Slaves were stolen, bought and sold along classic trade routes. This caused affluence that caused a growth of domestic slave population over the limits of what could be consumed no matter how wealthy you were. So the growth of slave population in an arid land had to be compensated by robbing neighbouring oasises on the classic trade routes. A chain reaction hence began under the Koranic apostasy harpoon threat: If you don't submit you will die or pay, and if you submit and then divorce you will die!

Why commerce? Outside the arid Arab land the evil slave ideology of Islam was effective in targeting the wealthiest for enslaving the poorest and weakest (see Origin of Islam).

A FASCIST CASTE "RELIGION" THAT CALLS TOTALITARIAN RACISM/SEXISM "EGALITARIANISM"!

The worst slave trader/raider in history, Islam, colonized foreign land by buying (or bribing as it would be called today) power with money earned on slavery. The typical setting included Arabic merchants building slave trade contacts in coastal areas, and local greedy chiefs who arranged slaves from the inland. These often (albeit not always, depending on the local situation) converted to Islam because that ideology gave them moral "peace" as it clearly stated that infidels were no real humans and, as a consequence, according to Koran, eligible for slavery. This system then, like cancer cells/metastases grew with its evil message while simultaneously spreading the Islamic "faith" through rapetivism and muslimifying people. Yes, when the targets were easy to catch Islam robbed them by the sword and submission, but sometimes (possibly most often) the target was already infiltrated before the miltary attacks as in India and elsewhere. In Africa Hutu/Tutsi and similar tensions are the grim remnants of the disastrous Islamic slave trade.

Ever thought abt, for example, the enourmous difference between Buddhism and Islam? Then bite this! Apart from the fact that whereas Mideast so called monbotheist "religions" (see Klevius definition of religion to understand the quotation mark) have been thoroughly busy confining girls/women from the very beginning, Buddhism didn't, you may also consider the Buddhist lack of an invisible "god"-ghost who allegedly wants something. However, the main difference is the lack of evil in Buddhism. No, I'm not talking abt branches but the original and basic ideology where Islam stands out precisely because of its racist/sexist emphasis of the infidel, a tenet that, until now, has made its very survival possible.

AN INTRODUCTORY NOTE ON US NAIVITY ON ISLAM

John Timmer : "The more that one looks into the dealings of the Bey empire and the activities of Oakland's Black Muslims, the more murky and seedy the picture becomes. And more questions emerge, such as how could members of the political elite in Oakland and Alameda County allow themselves to endorse a group that espoused racist and anti-Semitic views? A group that is now becoming revealed so obviously as a "front" for a long-running criminal enterprise..."


AN INTRODUCTORY NOTE ON BRITISH NAIVITY ON ISLAM

The so called "code of conduct" for Islamist mosques in England doesn't give an inch away from the preaching of (evil) Islam, according to a British Muslim leader. It only "main-streams" the way it's expressed! And everyone's happy - especially the true Islamists we used to call extremists and terrorists!

Mary Jackson: "This picture, taken shortly after the Birmingham terrorist arrests, shows women whose dress is alien, but whose boorish truculence would match that of any of our home-grown “lumpen sluts.” Is this what the suffragettes fought for? Don’t mess with us - British Muslims scream “Islamophobia” if they don’t get their right to special food or clothing in schools, the right to be spared any kind of real or imagined offense, the right to a job – on their terms, however unreasonable - and above all the right to welfare payments, which they receive in disproportionately high numbers. These demands, this sense of entitlement, should worry us far more than niqabs, gangsta rap, or even drugs. Welfare scrounging is not peculiar to Muslims, but Islam alone demands tribute from non-believers in the form of a special tax or jizya. This “right” is set out in the Koran, as part of the rules of jihad. Muslim scrounging is an act of jihad, and payment of benefits an act of dhimmitude."


AN INTRODUCTORY NOTE ON SWEDISH NAIVITY ON ISLAM

A group of Swedish women decided to take off their tops in public swimmingpools (as almost everyone did in the 80's!) as a means to de-sexualize women's breasts (also see Klevius analysis of heterosexual attraction and definition of feminism). However, when they did so in places with many Islamists they, of course, encountered deep sexism and racism hatefully pronounced, not the least from Muslim women (something like "Swedish whores" etc). However, what struck me was the complete and naive ignorance these Swedish women revealed when it comes to the understanding of the real nature and depth of Islamic racism/sexism. How very deeply they had been brainwashed and blinded by "political correctness".

An other example is Swedish "criminology" (read "hideology") which main task seems to be to shut its own as well as the Swede's eyes when it comes to the real nature of child/youth crimes. The last in an endless row is a thesis that argues, contrary to reality, that young criminlas are more harshly dealt with now than back in the 1970's. Without even reading it I may hit the bull's eye when I'm pointing to the fact that the only possible "harshness" encounters those who are already abducted because of the commercialization of foster care towards bigger/colder institutions (see Angels of Antichrist). However, what is not said is that the amount of child/youth criminals that are not even taken into the system has sky rocketed, mainly because the police are said to blink immigrant (read Muslim) perpetrators and the welfare system either don't dare to do anything if they get a report from the police, or the welfare officer is a Muslim her/himself who thinks the best care is at that very Islamist home that initially caused the (hate?) crime.For a better understanding of the really important criminological variables see "Pathological symbiosis" and attachment and Angels of Antichrist - kinship vs social state!

Today Sweden is a completely lawless land (except for tax crimes etc of course) with child/youth criminals roaming around and doing whatever they like while the police and adults in many places already are almost extinct from the streets - out of pure fear!

A possibly crime wave solving hint
Check out Islam's role in the sky rocketing stats of school- and other arsons!

ISLAM (under whatever "peaceful faith" disguise) IS A HATE CRIME - THE WORST EVER - AND FUELED BY




Why isn't he in Hague among other war criminals?! Instead he is shaking hand with Iranian islamofascist "president" Ahmadinejad. And they have a lot in common -not the least Islamic sex apartheid!


Which one came first, the mosque or the hate?


Today only the secondary effects of evil separatist racism (see KLEVUX) are brought to public, precisely because primary racism is often hidden behind "political correctness". However, whereas non-Islamic racism is based on pure stupidity/illogic, Islam induced hate crimes are based on "faith" and hence considered OK!



TheTrumpet.com (no author!?): "Radical Islam is so deeply embedded in British society, even the nation’s most famously controversial and edgy artists are afraid to confront it.
Grayson Perry, who prizes himself as a non-conformist, a creative, avant-garde revolutionary, unafraid to use art as a means of confronting tradition, religion and societal norms. But for as bold and progressive as Perry claims to be, there’s one subject that frightens him to the core.
“I’ve censored myself,” Perry
said at a discussion on art and politics organized by the Art Fund. “The reason I haven’t gone all out attacking Islamism in my art is because I feel real fear that someone will slit my throat.”


Klevius comment: Islam is peaceful - if you surrender and submit yourself under it! And no matter how you try to search Islam, women are, at best, only worth half of that of a man! And the bottomline of Islam always rests on some sort of "infidel" racism. And this evilness is preached and bred in the mosques/madrasas. And what abt Talibanistan where foreign soldiers now are approaching the same figures as US troops in Iraq without being able to protect girls/women from Islam! And what abt Sudanistan where the genocide runs on while UN and the Swedish pro-Islamofascist hypocrite Eliasson pave the way for it in cooperation with the Khartoum Islamofascists?!


ISLAM AND ITS MOSQUES/MADRASAS BEHIND THE RIOTS IN FRANCE! IT'S CALLED ISLAMIC TERROR!!

The mosque isn't a place for reformism/renewal - it's a tomb for medievil thought zombies based on "infidel" racism and rapetivism sex segregation! And although KLEVUX is the only web university so far dealing with this aspect, soon the net will be flooded by it! Although educate yourself on Origin of religion and Negative human rights!

The chain goes like: 1) Arabic Islam - 2) Oil fueled mosques/madrasas (remember that a Taliban-like islamist movement, The Union of Islamic Organisations in France, is the largest Muslim organization in France!) - 3) inducing "infidel" hatred/racism/sexism in mainly youth from Islamist families (or sometimes even Christian families contaminated by Islamist cultures) - 4) smiling, "peaceful" imams telling the world that they can handle it if only they are given even more resources! And also note the treacherous politically correct new language which lumps islamist immigrants together with non-Muslim immigrants from non-islamist areas who usually perform far better.

Klevius apology: Ive got criticism for not fully utilizing the historical facts and settings regarding the evil phenomenon we call Islam - a phenomenon now rapidly disintegrating in secular modernity*. Well, I admit that and have only two items on my defense agenda: 1) To be 100% sure I've cowardly cut off much more than necessary, and 2) I see the sinking of the worst enemy of the "developing world" as a process that includes both perpetrators and victims.


There's simply no logical "moderate" middle way when it comes to Islam precisely because the original soul of Islam is pure evilness, i.e. the sponging on slavery and rapetivism, not as some biproduct but as the main and only formula for its very existence. And because of this evil heritage a modernized Islam is a tautology - or self-destruction if you like! So those who push for modernization of Islam either use it as a disguise for real Islam or simply are too naive (or political) to get it.
* However, it doesn't disintegrate into "peaceful Islam" but into non-Islam, which fact liberates the blindfolded ones but not those who deliberately and with open eyes cause extention of Islam induced suffering!

In Origin of Islam I've been especially cautious. So, for example, have I rather leaned to Muslim scholars and exaggerated the unity of early Korans and Islamisms than following the most probable interpretation. Sadly, many of you readers seem to be too sensitive to take on the truth. In accordance with this strategy I will now start lending a meek gaze at the mosque.

Religion* is a disguise for evilness** (which fact doesn't outrule evilness outside religion as well) and as such an important matter. And whether we like it or not, even th most religious people cannot live with a religion but only without it. Religion per se isn't a provider but a divider!

* "religion" here refers only to the Mideast "god-religions"! For a definition of true religion see Origin of religion!


** what is usually interpreted as a social good doesn't belong to these "religions" but rather to original religion - see e.g. abt the Jews in Angels of Antichrist!


And remember, what unnecessarily prolonges the death of Islam is sex segregation and those who confuse Islam with nostalgia and racist/sexist attitudes of their own! And isn't it an irony that an evil ideology born out of trafficking in slaves and violent robbery is now presented as "a peaceful religion" whereas US, born out of human rights, is now presented as Satan!?


The mosque as a racist/sexist separatorBefore building too many mosques consider that we have too many churches in the wake of modernization. Also consider the evil purpose, origin and history of mosques.

A mosque was a guarded slave market place fueled by the racist Islamic "infidel" ideology that made it possible to buy millions of castrated boys to work among raped slave girls, and to transform innocent children into the same circle of Islamofascism.

Madrasa, the Koranic "teaching" of racist/sexist jihadism (incl. suicide murderings)

Because Islam is based on racist/sexist separatism this has to be carefully teached and practised. Contrary to what Wikipedia etc may propose the madrasa institution is inherently tied to the mosque and Islamic slavery, i.e. Islam's original financial base.

For a background to the problem take a look at the most important sociological paper from the last century, Angels of Antichrist!

You may also consider that most news organisations review their coverage of issues and events involving Islam, by drawing up codes of so called "professional conduct" and "style guides" about use of terminology, i.e. what we used to call "politicalcorrectness"! News organisations also take measures, within the framework of so called "positive action" in equalities legislation, to recruit more Islamist journalists. News organisations also give Islamist staff professional support! One may even conclude that those who propose and perform the above (ab)use Muslims as a cover up for not mentioning/disturbing the real beast, Islam! However, the uncomfortable truth is that there is no "good Islam" no matter where you dig - only a vanishing mirage that slowly gives place for a historical picture that makes Guernica pale!

And all of this for the sole purpose of protecting/preserving/boosting the, by most standards (see Origin of Islam), most evil and historically disastrous, anti-human rights ideology on the planet! Why?!

Skin color can never make a human evil (no matter what Nation of Islam says) - ideology does! And of all ideologies the most evil is the one that is based on the very idea of the dehumanization of humans in a strive towards a Utopian totalitarianism!



Lal Masjid

The Lal Masjid mosque in Pakistan and the girls madrasa attached to it with well-built quarters for two clerics, was built as recently as 1965.

K J M Varma :The girls' madrassa, which perhaps was thrown open to the media for the first time, was a revelation in many ways. Built like a prison to house the burqa clad girls, whom many regarded as Jihadi women specially nursed to be the wives of militants or suicide bombers, the three story complex begins with four 4/3 ft small rooms with small windows at the bottom from where the girls would converse with the visitors.
"Just like the visitors facility at any jail where the prisoners would meet their visitors," Pakistan Defence spokesman Maj. Gen. Waheed Arshad said.
The three floors together have medium sized rooms in which over 3000 girls were kept, perhaps like sardines. - The bullet marks and smell of the burnt flesh provide telltale evidence of room-to-room fighting to secure the place.

Klevius comment: This is true Islam in all its naked evilness, and the picture of Islam's jihadists hiding behind innocent girls is truly part of an answer to the question: What is rapetivism?! These girls were most likely born by Islamic "birth-machines", i.e. under the Sharfia threat. Then they were forced into the mosque to become sex slaves for the Islamic patriarchs. On top of this many of them finally had to sacrify their lives for that very same evil Islam that stands and falls with sex segregation!


Islamic evilness represented in European Kosovo Mosques/Madrasas


Europe got its first Islamofascist Taliban state, Kosovo, led by Hashim Thaci, allegedly linked to Osama bin Laden's al-Qa'eda and funded by Saudi Islamofascists, and making its living in a traditional Islamic manner based on violence, crimes, trafficking and drugs!


Hashim Thaci's is also connected to Albanian drug gangs who supply Western Europe with more than 75 per cent of its heroin.

Kosovos oldest Mosque was built with stones from the Monastery of the Archangels which had been destroyed by Islamists.


According to Dusan Batakovic the three centuries long domination of the Islamized ethnic Albanians in the Balkans, culminated at the beginning of the 20th century the Albanians discovering the plains of Kosovo and Metohia as space for further expansion. Islam, via the Islamic authorities, had granted the Albanians the right to persecute Christians (and non-Muslims - Klevius remark). Islam was the religion of the master race and Christianity that of slaves. In the interwar period the Kingdom of Yugoslavia tried not only to return the Serbian character to these areas, but also to establish modern European institutions, as it did in other provinces of the Yugoslav state. The Muslim Albanian population of Kosovo, however, found it very difficult to adjust to the new reality where, instead of a status of absolute privilege which they had enjoyed during the Islamic rule, they received only civil and political equality with the people they had only recently treated as serfs.


M. Bozinovich: "Wahabi mosques in Kosovo, built under the noses of NATO, is the sufficient prerequisite for the Islamic vision of the independent Kosova. - Kosovo Albanians, a Westerner and a Kosovo Christian Bishop who requires two armed UN bodyguards to protect him from Kosovo Albanian mob, deserves a discourse on resurrection of islamophobic fascism - Virus Fashizmus."

A Swedish school terror, mosque and imam


A Swedish school was closed after years of unbelievable terror by children/youth from Islamic countries. Instead of addressing the real culprit Islam (and its racist/sexist message of hateful xenophobia via the kids' families etc) a moron "expert" in a TV-show claimed that it all was caused by spanking immigrant parents whose kids had to transfer it as school terror. And then a smiling Islamofascist imam (i.e. the very source of the evilness) was presented as a hero with a solution named, guess what, yes Islam!


Klevius comment: 1) Of course, spanking is no good at all but there is certainly no hard core evidence that it causes school terror. However, 2) there is owerwhelming evidence that parental attachment is the best protection against kids going mad. 3) If kids are attached but still go mad there is usually an ideological logic behind it. 4) In Islamic countries where child abuse is still permitted this is also used as a means for the discipline of kids. However, Sweden not only bans spanking etc but also lacks any means for disciplinary actions (I will explain all of this in detail later). It is in this "black hole" Islamic scholl etc terror works. Finally, sometimes you may hear the stupid notion that also Christian kids from Islamic countries behave similarily. Well, da,
of course they have learned their West-xenophobia from the Islamic majority culture they used to live in.

Mohammed and democracy

Democracy is good for Islamofascists as long as it means more of Islamofascism! But democracy and teddy bears, there goes the line. Teacher Gillian Gibbons was arrested in Sudan - by the very same Islamofascists who commit genocide in Darfur - after she had allowed her 7-year-old pupils to choose a name for a stuffed teddy bear, and they chose the name Muhammad.

KLEVUX is (so far) the only source on the net that addresses the whole picture of evil* Islam. incl. sex segregation and friendship/marriage.
* measured against negative human rights



Blair's stupid sexist mideast faith neglects the majority rest of the world!

The Episcopal church(es) is now facing the threat from evil Islam in the form of conservative dioceses who feel strengthened by the presence of the very same Islam support that is called "moderate" among the majority Episcopals.

No comments: